Skip to content
1981

The Thorny Question of Art and Economy

image of The Thorny Question of Art and Economy
Preview this chapter:
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/books/9781789386523.c10
Loading

Data & Media loading...

References

  1. Andersen, Kristina, Devendorf, Laura, Pierce, James, Rosner, Daniela K., Wakkary, Ron and Fraser, Simon (2018), ‘Disruptive improvisations: Making use of non-deterministic art practices in HCI’, Extended Abstracts CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Engage with CHI, 18, https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170630.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ATF (2018), ‘Australia's tech future’, Australian Government: Department of Industry, Science and Technology, 19 December, https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australias-tech-future. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Australian Council of Learned Academies (2019), ‘Artificial Intelligence Report’, ACOLA, https://acola.org/media-release-july-2019-acola-ai-report-release/. Accessed 3 February 2021.210
  4. Barba, Eugine (1985), ‘The nature of dramaturgy: Describing actions at work’, New Theatre Quarterly, 1:1, pp. 758, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X00001421.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bardzell, Sharon (2018), ‘Utopias of participation: Feminism, design, and the futures’, ACM Trans. Computer Human Interaction, 25:1, Article 6 (February), pp. 124, https://doi.rg/10.1145/3127359.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Böhm, Kathrin and Szreder, Kuba (2020), ‘How to reclaim the economy using artistic means: The case of company drinks’, The Handbook of Diverse Economies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 52734, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119962.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brook, Donald (2012), ‘Experimental art’, in Studies of Material Thinking, Vol. 8 (May), Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, https://www.materialthinking.org/sites/default/files/papers/SMT_V8_P12_Brook_0.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Çalışkan, Koray and Callon, Michel (2010), ‘Economization, Part 2: A research programme for the study of markets’, Economy and Society, 39:1, pp. 132, https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903424519.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Callon, Michel (1998), ‘An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology’, The Sociological Review, 46:1, pp. 24469, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1998.tb03477.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ceballos, Gerado, Ehrlich, Paul and Dirzo, Rodolfo (2017), ‘Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signalled by vertebrate population losses and declines,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114:30, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Chen, Wan, Jiafu, Shu, Lei, Li, Peng, Mukherjee, Mithun and Yin, Boxing (2018), ‘Smart factory of industry 4.0: Key technologies, application case, and challenges’, IEEE Access, 6, pp. 650519, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Feral MBA (2020), ‘Feral MBA – Inception’, FoAm, 1 February–1 March, https://fo.am/events/feral-mba-inception/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Díaz, Eve (2014), The Experimenters: Chance and Design at Black Mountain College, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fisher, Mark (2005), Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?, London: Zero Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Flanagan, Richard (2013), ‘The Gambler’, The Monthly, February, https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/february/1366597433/richard-flanagan/gambler#mtr. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006), A Postcapitalist Politics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008), ‘Diverse economies: Performative practices for other worlds’, Progress in Human Geography, 32:5, pp. 61332, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2014), ‘Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory,’ Current Anthropology, 55:9, pp. 14753, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/676646.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kant, Immanuel ([1790] 1987), Critique of Judgement (trans. W. S. Plusher), Indianapolis: Hackett.211
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kennedy, Angus (2014), Being Cultured: In Defence of Discrimination. SOCIETAS Essays in Political & Cultural Criticism, Exeter: Imprint Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kleesattel, Ines (2021), ‘Situated aesthetics for relational critique: On messy entanglements from maintenance art to feminist server art’, in C. Sollfank, F. Stalder and S. Niederberger (eds), Aesthetics of the Commons, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 18197.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lind, Mara (2021), ‘Situating the curatorial’, e-flux Journal, 116, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/116/378689/situating-the-curatorial/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Maar, Bernard (2018), ‘What is industry 4.0? Here's a super easy explanation for anyone’, Forbes, 2 September, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/09/02/what-is-industry-4-0-heres-a-super-easy-explanation-for-anyone/?sh=4b8c67199788. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Manning, Erin (2015), ‘Against method’, in P. Vannini (ed.), Non-representational Methodologies: Re-envisioning Research, New York: Routledge, pp. 271.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mauro-Flude, Nancy (2015), ‘Feminist server stack’, Transmediale Festival for Art and Digital Culture Berlin, http://www.transmediale.de/content/feminist-server-stack. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mauro-Flude, Nancy (2017), ‘The divine trash strata,’ Unlikely Transdisciplinary Journal for Creative Arts, Issue 02: Field Work, Melbourne: University of Melbourne and Latrobe University, https://unlikely.net.au/issue-2/divine-trash-strata/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mauro-Flude, Nancy (2019), ‘Activating the textures of Post-Digital Aesthetics: A conversation with Nancy Mauro-Flude, Tom Penney and Alana Hunt’, Un Magazine, 28 February, Melbourne, https://unprojects.org.au/article/activating-the-textures-of-post-digital-aesthetics-pda/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller, Ethan (2019), Reimagining Livelihoods: Life Beyond Economy, Society, and Environment, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Morrison, Scott (2019), ‘Prime Minister E&OE, Press Conference Transcript – Parliament House’, ACT, 5 December, https://www.pm.gov.au/media/press-conference-parliament-house-act-2. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. NAVA (2018–2020), ‘Artistic Courage: Strategic Plan 2018–2020’, NAVA, https://visualarts.net.au/media/uploads/files/NAVAStrategicPlan2018-20.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. NAVA (2021) ‘About NAVA’, NAVA , https://visualarts.net.au/about/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. NMI – New Materialist Informatics (2021), New Materialist Informatics, https://www.uni-kassel.de/forschung/en/iteg/veranstaltungen/nmi-2021. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Oz Co (2020), ‘Australian Council for the arts: Arts and culture governance spotlight report’, Australian Council for the Arts, 24 January, https://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/research/arts-and-culture-governance-report. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Oz Co (2021), ‘The Board’, Australian Council for the Arts, https://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/news/media-centre/biographies/?categories=3549. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Piccini, Angela and Rich, Kate (2020), ‘Organising through a RADMIN Lens’, in RADMIN Reader 2020, https://fo.am/publications/radmin-reader-2020/. Accessed 3 February 2021.212
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rich, Kate (2020), ‘Radical Business’, Art Guide Australia, https://artguide.com.au/radical-business Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Snelting, Femke (2014), ‘Histories of the feminist servers’, New Criticals, http://www.newcriticals.com/exquisite-corpse/page-8. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Strathern, Marilyn (2000), ‘The tyranny of transparency’, British Educational Research Journal, 26:3, pp. 30921, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1501878.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomas, Julian (2017), ‘Digital inclusion: Understanding Australia's digital divide’, Telstra Exchange, 1 August, https://exchange.telstra.com.au/digital-inclusion-understanding-australias-digital-divide/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson, Nato (2015), Seeing Power: Art and Activism in the 21st Century, Brooklyn, London: Melville House.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Thornton, Cassie (2020), The Hologram: Feminist, Peer-to-Peer Health for a Post-Pandemic Future, London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tzara, Tristan (1918), ‘Dadaism’, Dada Manifesto (trans. R. Motherwell), New York: Wittenborn Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wright, Stephen (2013), Toward a Lexicon of Usership, Eindhoven: Van Abbemuseum.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Andersen, Kristina, Devendorf, Laura, Pierce, James, Rosner, Daniela K., Wakkary, Ron and Fraser, Simon (2018), ‘Disruptive improvisations: Making use of non-deterministic art practices in HCI’, Extended Abstracts CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Engage with CHI, 18, https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170630.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. ATF (2018), ‘Australia's tech future’, Australian Government: Department of Industry, Science and Technology, 19 December, https://www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australias-tech-future. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Australian Council of Learned Academies (2019), ‘Artificial Intelligence Report’, ACOLA, https://acola.org/media-release-july-2019-acola-ai-report-release/. Accessed 3 February 2021.210
  4. Barba, Eugine (1985), ‘The nature of dramaturgy: Describing actions at work’, New Theatre Quarterly, 1:1, pp. 758, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X00001421.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bardzell, Sharon (2018), ‘Utopias of participation: Feminism, design, and the futures’, ACM Trans. Computer Human Interaction, 25:1, Article 6 (February), pp. 124, https://doi.rg/10.1145/3127359.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Böhm, Kathrin and Szreder, Kuba (2020), ‘How to reclaim the economy using artistic means: The case of company drinks’, The Handbook of Diverse Economies, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 52734, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788119962.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Brook, Donald (2012), ‘Experimental art’, in Studies of Material Thinking, Vol. 8 (May), Auckland: Auckland University of Technology, https://www.materialthinking.org/sites/default/files/papers/SMT_V8_P12_Brook_0.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Çalışkan, Koray and Callon, Michel (2010), ‘Economization, Part 2: A research programme for the study of markets’, Economy and Society, 39:1, pp. 132, https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140903424519.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Callon, Michel (1998), ‘An essay on framing and overflowing: Economic externalities revisited by sociology’, The Sociological Review, 46:1, pp. 24469, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954x.1998.tb03477.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ceballos, Gerado, Ehrlich, Paul and Dirzo, Rodolfo (2017), ‘Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signalled by vertebrate population losses and declines,’ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114:30, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704949114.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Chen, Wan, Jiafu, Shu, Lei, Li, Peng, Mukherjee, Mithun and Yin, Boxing (2018), ‘Smart factory of industry 4.0: Key technologies, application case, and challenges’, IEEE Access, 6, pp. 650519, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2783682.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Feral MBA (2020), ‘Feral MBA – Inception’, FoAm, 1 February–1 March, https://fo.am/events/feral-mba-inception/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Díaz, Eve (2014), The Experimenters: Chance and Design at Black Mountain College, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fisher, Mark (2005), Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative?, London: Zero Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Flanagan, Richard (2013), ‘The Gambler’, The Monthly, February, https://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/february/1366597433/richard-flanagan/gambler#mtr. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006), A Postcapitalist Politics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008), ‘Diverse economies: Performative practices for other worlds’, Progress in Human Geography, 32:5, pp. 61332, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2014), ‘Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory,’ Current Anthropology, 55:9, pp. 14753, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/676646.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kant, Immanuel ([1790] 1987), Critique of Judgement (trans. W. S. Plusher), Indianapolis: Hackett.211
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kennedy, Angus (2014), Being Cultured: In Defence of Discrimination. SOCIETAS Essays in Political & Cultural Criticism, Exeter: Imprint Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kleesattel, Ines (2021), ‘Situated aesthetics for relational critique: On messy entanglements from maintenance art to feminist server art’, in C. Sollfank, F. Stalder and S. Niederberger (eds), Aesthetics of the Commons, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 18197.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lind, Mara (2021), ‘Situating the curatorial’, e-flux Journal, 116, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/116/378689/situating-the-curatorial/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Maar, Bernard (2018), ‘What is industry 4.0? Here's a super easy explanation for anyone’, Forbes, 2 September, https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/09/02/what-is-industry-4-0-heres-a-super-easy-explanation-for-anyone/?sh=4b8c67199788. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Manning, Erin (2015), ‘Against method’, in P. Vannini (ed.), Non-representational Methodologies: Re-envisioning Research, New York: Routledge, pp. 271.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mauro-Flude, Nancy (2015), ‘Feminist server stack’, Transmediale Festival for Art and Digital Culture Berlin, http://www.transmediale.de/content/feminist-server-stack. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Mauro-Flude, Nancy (2017), ‘The divine trash strata,’ Unlikely Transdisciplinary Journal for Creative Arts, Issue 02: Field Work, Melbourne: University of Melbourne and Latrobe University, https://unlikely.net.au/issue-2/divine-trash-strata/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Mauro-Flude, Nancy (2019), ‘Activating the textures of Post-Digital Aesthetics: A conversation with Nancy Mauro-Flude, Tom Penney and Alana Hunt’, Un Magazine, 28 February, Melbourne, https://unprojects.org.au/article/activating-the-textures-of-post-digital-aesthetics-pda/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Miller, Ethan (2019), Reimagining Livelihoods: Life Beyond Economy, Society, and Environment, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Morrison, Scott (2019), ‘Prime Minister E&OE, Press Conference Transcript – Parliament House’, ACT, 5 December, https://www.pm.gov.au/media/press-conference-parliament-house-act-2. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. NAVA (2018–2020), ‘Artistic Courage: Strategic Plan 2018–2020’, NAVA, https://visualarts.net.au/media/uploads/files/NAVAStrategicPlan2018-20.pdf. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. NAVA (2021) ‘About NAVA’, NAVA , https://visualarts.net.au/about/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. NMI – New Materialist Informatics (2021), New Materialist Informatics, https://www.uni-kassel.de/forschung/en/iteg/veranstaltungen/nmi-2021. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Oz Co (2020), ‘Australian Council for the arts: Arts and culture governance spotlight report’, Australian Council for the Arts, 24 January, https://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/research/arts-and-culture-governance-report. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Oz Co (2021), ‘The Board’, Australian Council for the Arts, https://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/news/media-centre/biographies/?categories=3549. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Piccini, Angela and Rich, Kate (2020), ‘Organising through a RADMIN Lens’, in RADMIN Reader 2020, https://fo.am/publications/radmin-reader-2020/. Accessed 3 February 2021.212
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rich, Kate (2020), ‘Radical Business’, Art Guide Australia, https://artguide.com.au/radical-business Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Snelting, Femke (2014), ‘Histories of the feminist servers’, New Criticals, http://www.newcriticals.com/exquisite-corpse/page-8. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Strathern, Marilyn (2000), ‘The tyranny of transparency’, British Educational Research Journal, 26:3, pp. 30921, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1501878.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Thomas, Julian (2017), ‘Digital inclusion: Understanding Australia's digital divide’, Telstra Exchange, 1 August, https://exchange.telstra.com.au/digital-inclusion-understanding-australias-digital-divide/. Accessed 3 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thompson, Nato (2015), Seeing Power: Art and Activism in the 21st Century, Brooklyn, London: Melville House.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Thornton, Cassie (2020), The Hologram: Feminist, Peer-to-Peer Health for a Post-Pandemic Future, London: Pluto Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Tzara, Tristan (1918), ‘Dadaism’, Dada Manifesto (trans. R. Motherwell), New York: Wittenborn Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wright, Stephen (2013), Toward a Lexicon of Usership, Eindhoven: Van Abbemuseum.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9781789386523.c10
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789386523
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test