Skip to content
1981

oa Process Epistemologies for the Careful Interplay of Art and Biology: An Afterword

image of Process Epistemologies for the Careful Interplay of Art and Biology: An Afterword
Preview this chapter:
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/9781789387094/9781789387100-c11.html?itemId=/content/books/9781789387094.c11&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/books/9781789387094.c11
Loading

Data & Media loading...

References

  1. Agassiz, Louis (1857), ‘Contributions to the natural history of the United States. Part III’, Embryology of the Turtle, Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Gemma (2019), Drawing as a Way of Knowing in Art and Science, Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ankel-Simons, Friderun and Cummins, Jim M. (1996), ‘Misconceptions about mitochondria and mammalian fertilization: Implications for theories on human evolution’, Proceeding National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, pp. 1385963.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barresi, Michael J. F. and Gilbert, Scott F. (2019), Developmental Biology, 12th ed., New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benler, Sean , Hung, Shr- Hau , Vander Griend, Jacob A. , Peters, Gregory A. , Rohwer, Forest and Segall, Anca M. (2020), ‘Gp4 is a nuclease required for morphogenesis of T4-like bacteriophages’, Virology, 543, pp. 712.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blum, Ann S. (1993), Picturing Nature: American Nineteenth Century Zoological Illustration, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonner, John T. (1965), Size and Cycle: An Essay on the Structure of Biology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Borish, Steven and Gilbert, Scott F. (2016), ‘Waddington's epigenetic landscape’, in R. M. Klinman (ed.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 4, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 34957.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brakefield, Paul M. and Frankino, W. Anthony (2009), ‘Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: Multidisciplinary approaches to studies of evolution’, in D. W. Whitman and T. N. Ananthakrishnan (eds), Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences, Plymouth: Science, pp. 281312.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brakefield, Paul M. , Gates , Julie , Keys , Dave , Kesbeke, Fanja , Wijngaarden, Pieter J. , Monteiro, Antónia , French, Vernon and Carrol, Sean B. (1996), ‘Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns’, Nature, 384, pp. 23642.315
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Burke, Ann C. (1989), ‘Development of the turtle carapace: Implications for the evolution of a novel bauplan’, Journal of Morphology, 199, pp. 36378, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051990310. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carroll, David M. (1996), The Year of the Turtle: A Natural History, New York: St. Martin's Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2009), ‘The climate of history: Four theses’, Critical Inquiry, 35, pp. 197222.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Churchill, Frederick B. (1991), ‘The rise of classical descriptive embryology’, in S. F. Gilbert (ed.), A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 129.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Darwin, Charles (1859), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 1st ed., London: John Murray.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2010), Objectivity, Cambridge: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Deacon, Terrence W. (2012), Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. de la Fuente, Alejandro (2021), ‘Agassiz's other photographs tell a global tale of scientific racism’, The Harvard Gazette, Cited in Aggarwal-Schifellite, Manisha (2021), https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/03/reflecting-on-louis-agassizs-lesser-known-images-from-brazil/. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Deleuze, Gilles (1968/1994), Difference and Repetition (trans. Paul Patton), New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. DiFrisco, James and Jaeger, Johannes (2021), ‘Homology of process: Developmental dynamics in comparative biology’, Interface Focus, 11:3, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2021.0007. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fusco, Giuseppe (2019), Perspectives on Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Padova: Padova University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gilbert, Sarah R. (2018), ‘A widening chromaticism: Learning perception in the collective craftwork of encounter’, in K. A. Bull and A. Gali (eds), Material Perceptions, Documents of Contemporary Craft No. 5, Stuttgart: Arnoldsche Art Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilbert, Scott F. (2000), ‘Diachronic biology meets evo-devo: C. H. Waddington's approach to evolutionary developmental biology’, American Zoologist, 40, pp. 72937.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilbert, Scott F. (2003), ‘Opening Darwin's Black Box: Teaching evolution through developmental genetics’, Nature Reviews: Genetics, 4, pp. 73541.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gilbert, Scott F. (2017), ‘Biological individuality: A relational reading’, in S. Ludgard and L. K. Nyhart (eds), Biological Individuality: Integrating Scientific, Philosophical and Historical Perspectives, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 297317.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gilbert, Scott F. (2019a), ‘Evolutionary transitions revisited: Holobiont evo-devo’, Journal of Experimental Zoology Molecular and Developmental Biology, 332, pp. 30714, https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22903. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gilbert, Scott F. (2019b), ‘Shucking nature: How oysters used their material properties to save Chesapeake Bay’, in Animal Materialities Symposium, Berlin, December. Submitted to Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences.316
  28. Gilbert, Scott F. and Bard, Jonathan (2014), ‘Formalizing theories of development: A fugue on the orderliness of nature’, in A. Minelli and T. Pradeu (eds), Towards a Theory of Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 12943.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gilbert, Scott F. and Bolker, Jessica A. (2001), ‘Homologies of process: Modular elements of embryonic construction’, in G. Wagner (ed.), The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 43554.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gilbert, Scott F. and Braukman, Sabine (2011), ‘Fertilization narratives in the art of Gustav Klimt, Diego Rivera, and Frida Kahlo: Repression, domination, and eros among cells’, Leonardo, 44, pp. 22127.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gilbert, Scott F. and Faber, Marion (1996), ‘Looking at embryos: The visual and conceptual aesthetics of emerging form’, in A. I. Tauber (ed.), The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 12551.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gilbert, Scott F. , Sapp, Jan, and Tauber, Alfred I. (2012), ‘A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 87, pp. 32541.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gilbert, Scott F. and Greenberg, Jason P. (1984), ‘Intellectual traditions in the life sciences. II. Stereospecificity’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 28, pp. 1834.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang (1829), ‘Goethe. Die Schriften zur Naturwissenschaft. Vollständige mit Erläuterungen versehene Ausgabe im Auftrage der Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina’, in D. Kuhn, W. von Engelhart and I. Müller (eds), Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, vol. 1, Weimar: Böhlaus Nachfolger, pp. 99112, Cited in Klausmeyer, Bryan (n.d.) ‘Spirale (Spiral)’, Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-7337. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Haraway, Donna J. (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14, pp. 57599.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Haraway, Donna J. (2003), The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Haraway, Donna J. (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hill, Amelia (2018), ‘Children struggle to hold pencils due to too much tech, doctors say’, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/25/children-struggle-to-hold-pencils-due-to-too-much-tech-doctors-say. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hirata, Shugi , Hoshi, Kazuhiko , Shoda, Tomoko and Mabuchi, Tadashi (2002), ‘Spermatozoon and mitochondrial DNA’, Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 1:2, pp. 4147, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-5781.2002.00007.x. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang, Sui (2009), ‘Reprogramming cell fates: Reconciling rarity with robustness’, Bioessays, 31:5, pp. 54660.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ingram, Neil (2019), ‘Waddington, Holmyard, and Alchemy: Perspectives on the epigenetic landscape’, Endeavor, 43:3, p. 100690, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2019.08.001. Accessed 25 June 2022 .317
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Israel, J. V. , Anderson-Tempini, Thomas F. and Levine, Myron (1967), ‘In vitro morphogenesis of phage P22 from heads and base-plate parts’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 57:2, pp. 28491.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Jardine, Nicholas , Secord, James A. and Spary, E. C. (eds.) (1996), Cultures of Natural History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Jonas, Hans (1966), The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Klausmeyer, Bryan (2021), ‘Spirale (Spiral)’, Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, 1, pp. 99112, https://doi.org/10.5195/glpc.2021.22. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Klinenberg, E. (2021), ‘The seas are rising. Could oysters help?’, New Yorker, 9 August, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/08/09/the-seas-are-rising-could-oysters-protect-us. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  47. Koshland, Jr., Daniel (1995), ‘The key-lock theory and the induced fit theory’, Angewandte Chemie, 33, pp. 237578.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Latour, Bruno (2004), ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30, pp. 22548.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Le Guin, Ursula K. (1985), Always Coming Home, New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lurie, Edward (1988), Louis Agassiz: A Life in Science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mainberger, Sabine (2010), ‘In the vortex of the spiral tendency – Questions of aesthetics, literature, and natural sciences in the works of Goethe’, Estudios Avancados, 24, pp. 20318.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Matsushita, Yuuki and Kaneko, Kunihiko (2020), ‘Homeorhesis in Waddington's landscape by epigenetic feedback regulation’, Physical Review Research, 2, p. 023083, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023083. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. McFall-Ngai, Margaret et al. (2013), ‘Animals in a bacterial world: A new imperative for the life sciences’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110, pp. 3229–36.
  54. Merian, Maria S. (1705), Metamorphosis Insectorum Surinamensium, Amsterdam: G. Vack.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Morange, Michel (2011), ‘What history tells us XXV. Construction of the ribbon model of proteins (1981). The contribution of Jane Richardson’, Journal of Biosciences, 36, pp. 57174.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Müller, Stefan C. and Tsuji, Kinko (2017), ‘Appearance in nature’, in Tsuji, Kinko and Stefan C. Müller (eds), Spirals and Vortices, The Frontiers Collection, Switzerland: Springer Nature, p. 47, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05798-5_2. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Nakagaki, Toshiyuki, Iima, Makoto, Ueda, Tetsuo, Nishiura, Yasumasa, Saigusa, Tetsu, Tero, Atsushi, Kobayashi, Ryo and Showalter, Kenneth (2007), ‘Minimum-risk path finding by an adaptive amoebal network’, Physiological Reviews Letters, 99, pp. 68–104.
  58. Needham, Joseph (1936), Order and Life, New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Nicholson, Daniel and Dupré, John (2018), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.318
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Nicoglou, Antonine (2018), ‘Waddington's epigenetics or the pictorial meetings of development and genetics’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40:4, p. 61, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0228-8. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Noble, Denis (2016), Dance to the Tune of Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Oostra, Vincencio, Mateus Ana Rita A., van der Burg, Karin R. L., Piessens, Thomas, van Eijk, Marleen, Brakefield, Paul M., Beldade, Patricia and Zwaan, Bas J. (2014), ‘Ecdysteroid hormones link the juvenile environment to alternative adult life histories in a seasonal insect’, American Naturalist, 184, pp. 79–92.
  63. Panfilov, Alexander V. (2017), ‘Spiral waves in the heart’, in K. Tsuji and S. Müller (eds), Spirals and Vortices, The Frontiers Collection, New York: Springer, pp. 20915, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05798-5_11. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Pirsig, Robert M. (1974), Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values, New York: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Prudic, Kathleen L. , Stoehr, Andrew M. , Wasik, Bethany R. and Monteiro, Antónia (2015), ‘Eyespots deflect predator attack increasing fitness and promoting the evolution of phenotypic plasticity’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282:1798, p. 20141531, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1531. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Reid, Chris R. and Beekman, Madeleine (2013), ‘Solving the Towers of Hanoi – How an amoeboid organism efficiently constructs transport networks’, Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, pp. 154651.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Rancière, Jacques and Djordjevic, Radmila (2004). ‘Is there a Deleuzian aesthetics?', Qui Parle,14, pp.114.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Reitsma, Ella (2008), Maria Sibylla Merian and Daughters: Women of Art and Science, Amsterdam: Waanders Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Richards, Robert J. (2002), The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ricou, Joana and Pollock, John A. (2012), ‘The tree, the spiral and the web of life: A visual exploration of biological evolution for public murals’, Leonardo, 45, pp. 1825, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00321. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Root-Bernstein, Robert and Root-Bernstein, Michèle (1999), Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World's Most Creative People, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Root-Bernstein, Robert and Root-Bernstein, Michèle (2013), The art and craft of science, Educational Leadership, https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-art-and-craft-of-science. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  73. Root-Bernstein, Robert, Siler, Todd , Brown, Adam and Snelson, Kenneth (2011), ‘ArtScience: Integrative collaboration to create a sustainable future’, Leonardo, 44, p. 192.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Roseberry, Jessica (2007), interview with Jane Richardson, Women in Duke Medicine, 9 November, http://digitaldukemed.mc.duke.edu/med_women/women/richardson_interview.html. Accessed 25 June 2022 .319
  75. Rupik, Gregory (2021), ‘Ateleological propagation in Goethe's Metamorphosis of plants ’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43, p. 32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00387-6. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Sagan, Dorion (2004), ‘The postman always already rings twice’, Summer, https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/14/sagan.php. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  77. Schjeldahl, Peter (2021), ‘Drawing conclusions: Cézanne at MOMA’, New Yorker, 28 June, p. 73.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Schleicher, August (1853), Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. Allgemeine Zeitung für Wissenschaft und Literatur.
  79. Schmitt, Stéphane (2005), ‘From eggs to fossils: Epigenesis and transformation of species in Pander's biology’, International Journal of Developmental Biology, 49, pp. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Simard, Suzanne (2021), Finding the Mother Tree, New York: Knoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Snow, Charles P. (1959), The Two Cultures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Song, Hao , Hewitt, Olivia, and Degnan, Sandie M. (2021), ‘Arginine biosynthesis by a bacterial symbiont enables nitric oxide production and facilitates larval settlement in the marine-sponge host’, Current Biology, 31:2, pp. 43337.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Squier, Susan M. (2017), Epigenetic Landscapes: Drawing as Metaphor, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Stamatoyannopoulos, John A. (2012), ‘What does our genome encode?’, Genome Research, 22, pp. 160211.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Stengers, Isabelle (2017), ‘Matters of concern all the way down’, Ctrl-Z, 7, https://www.ctrl-z.net.au/articles/issue-7/stengers-matters-of-concern-all-the-way-down/. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  86. Stengers, Isabelle (2018), Another Science Is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science (trans. S. Muecke), New York: Wiley.
  87. Stengers, Isabelle (2020), ‘The Earth won't let itself be watched’, in B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds), Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 22835.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Stotz, Karola C. , Bostanci, Adam and Griffiths, Paul E. (2006), ‘Tracking the shift to “postgenomics”’, Community Genetics, 9, pp. 19096.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Tauber, Alfred I. (2001), Henry David Thoreau and the Moral Agency of Knowing, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Todd, Kim (2007), Chrysalis: Maria Sibylla Merian and the Secrets of Metamorphosis, New York: Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Waddington, Conrad H. (1968), Behind Appearance: A Study of the Relations between Painting and the Natural Sciences in this Century, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Waddington, Conrad H. (1975), The Evolution of an Evolutionist, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Waddington, Conrad H. (1977), Tools for Thought, Boulder: Paladin.320
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Wakefield, Stephanie and Braun, Bruce (2019), ‘Oystertecture: Infrastructure, profanation, and the sacred figure of the human’, in Infrastructure, Environment, and Life in the Anthropocene, Durham: Duke University Press, https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002567-012. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Walls, Laura D. (1997), ‘Textbooks and texts from the Brooks: Inventing scientific authority in America’, American Quarterly, 1, pp. 125.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Watts, Alan (1970), Does it Matter? Essays on Man's Relation to Materiality, New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Wellman, Janina (2017), The Form of Becoming: Embryology and Epistemology of Rhythm, 1760–1830, New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Wessel, Gary M. (2010), ‘Christian Heinrich Pander (1794–1865) and the concept of the three germ layers’, Molecular Reproduction and Development, 77, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.21236. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Wilson, Edmund B. and Leaming, Edward (1895), An Atlas of Fertilization and Karyokinesis of the Ovum, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Winner, Ellen and Casey, M. Beth (1992), ‘Cognitive profiles of artists’, in G. C. Cupchik and J. László (eds.), Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process: In Psychology, Semiology, and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 15470.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Winsor, Mary (1979), ‘Louis Agassiz and the species question’, Studies in the History of Biology, 3, pp. 89117.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Yeats, William B. (1929), ‘Among school children’, Finneran, R. J. (ed.) The Poems of W. B. Yeats: A New Edition, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, http://poetry.about.com/od/poems/l/blyeatsamongchildren.htm. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  103. Zabeo, Davide, Heumann, John M., Schwartz, Cindi L., Suzuki-Shinjo, Azusa, Morgan, Garry, Widlund, Per O. and Höög, Johanna L. (2018), ‘A lumenal interrupted helix in human sperm tail microtubules’, Science Reports, 8, p. 2727, https://doi.org/doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21165-8. Accessed 25 June 2022.

References

  1. Agassiz, Louis (1857), ‘Contributions to the natural history of the United States. Part III’, Embryology of the Turtle, Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson, Gemma (2019), Drawing as a Way of Knowing in Art and Science, Bristol: Intellect.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ankel-Simons, Friderun and Cummins, Jim M. (1996), ‘Misconceptions about mitochondria and mammalian fertilization: Implications for theories on human evolution’, Proceeding National Academy of Sciences USA, 93, pp. 1385963.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barresi, Michael J. F. and Gilbert, Scott F. (2019), Developmental Biology, 12th ed., New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benler, Sean , Hung, Shr- Hau , Vander Griend, Jacob A. , Peters, Gregory A. , Rohwer, Forest and Segall, Anca M. (2020), ‘Gp4 is a nuclease required for morphogenesis of T4-like bacteriophages’, Virology, 543, pp. 712.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Blum, Ann S. (1993), Picturing Nature: American Nineteenth Century Zoological Illustration, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonner, John T. (1965), Size and Cycle: An Essay on the Structure of Biology, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Borish, Steven and Gilbert, Scott F. (2016), ‘Waddington's epigenetic landscape’, in R. M. Klinman (ed.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 4, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 34957.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brakefield, Paul M. and Frankino, W. Anthony (2009), ‘Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: Multidisciplinary approaches to studies of evolution’, in D. W. Whitman and T. N. Ananthakrishnan (eds), Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences, Plymouth: Science, pp. 281312.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Brakefield, Paul M. , Gates , Julie , Keys , Dave , Kesbeke, Fanja , Wijngaarden, Pieter J. , Monteiro, Antónia , French, Vernon and Carrol, Sean B. (1996), ‘Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns’, Nature, 384, pp. 23642.315
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Burke, Ann C. (1989), ‘Development of the turtle carapace: Implications for the evolution of a novel bauplan’, Journal of Morphology, 199, pp. 36378, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051990310. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carroll, David M. (1996), The Year of the Turtle: A Natural History, New York: St. Martin's Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2009), ‘The climate of history: Four theses’, Critical Inquiry, 35, pp. 197222.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Churchill, Frederick B. (1991), ‘The rise of classical descriptive embryology’, in S. F. Gilbert (ed.), A Conceptual History of Modern Embryology, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 129.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Darwin, Charles (1859), On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, 1st ed., London: John Murray.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2010), Objectivity, Cambridge: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Deacon, Terrence W. (2012), Incomplete Nature: How Mind Emerged from Matter, New York: Norton.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. de la Fuente, Alejandro (2021), ‘Agassiz's other photographs tell a global tale of scientific racism’, The Harvard Gazette, Cited in Aggarwal-Schifellite, Manisha (2021), https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2021/03/reflecting-on-louis-agassizs-lesser-known-images-from-brazil/. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Deleuze, Gilles (1968/1994), Difference and Repetition (trans. Paul Patton), New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. DiFrisco, James and Jaeger, Johannes (2021), ‘Homology of process: Developmental dynamics in comparative biology’, Interface Focus, 11:3, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2021.0007. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fusco, Giuseppe (2019), Perspectives on Evolutionary and Developmental Biology, Padova: Padova University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gilbert, Sarah R. (2018), ‘A widening chromaticism: Learning perception in the collective craftwork of encounter’, in K. A. Bull and A. Gali (eds), Material Perceptions, Documents of Contemporary Craft No. 5, Stuttgart: Arnoldsche Art Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Gilbert, Scott F. (2000), ‘Diachronic biology meets evo-devo: C. H. Waddington's approach to evolutionary developmental biology’, American Zoologist, 40, pp. 72937.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gilbert, Scott F. (2003), ‘Opening Darwin's Black Box: Teaching evolution through developmental genetics’, Nature Reviews: Genetics, 4, pp. 73541.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gilbert, Scott F. (2017), ‘Biological individuality: A relational reading’, in S. Ludgard and L. K. Nyhart (eds), Biological Individuality: Integrating Scientific, Philosophical and Historical Perspectives, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 297317.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gilbert, Scott F. (2019a), ‘Evolutionary transitions revisited: Holobiont evo-devo’, Journal of Experimental Zoology Molecular and Developmental Biology, 332, pp. 30714, https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22903. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gilbert, Scott F. (2019b), ‘Shucking nature: How oysters used their material properties to save Chesapeake Bay’, in Animal Materialities Symposium, Berlin, December. Submitted to Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences.316
  28. Gilbert, Scott F. and Bard, Jonathan (2014), ‘Formalizing theories of development: A fugue on the orderliness of nature’, in A. Minelli and T. Pradeu (eds), Towards a Theory of Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 12943.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gilbert, Scott F. and Bolker, Jessica A. (2001), ‘Homologies of process: Modular elements of embryonic construction’, in G. Wagner (ed.), The Character Concept in Evolutionary Biology, New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 43554.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Gilbert, Scott F. and Braukman, Sabine (2011), ‘Fertilization narratives in the art of Gustav Klimt, Diego Rivera, and Frida Kahlo: Repression, domination, and eros among cells’, Leonardo, 44, pp. 22127.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Gilbert, Scott F. and Faber, Marion (1996), ‘Looking at embryos: The visual and conceptual aesthetics of emerging form’, in A. I. Tauber (ed.), The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 12551.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Gilbert, Scott F. , Sapp, Jan, and Tauber, Alfred I. (2012), ‘A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals’, Quarterly Review of Biology, 87, pp. 32541.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Gilbert, Scott F. and Greenberg, Jason P. (1984), ‘Intellectual traditions in the life sciences. II. Stereospecificity’, Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 28, pp. 1834.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Goethe, Johann Wolfgang (1829), ‘Goethe. Die Schriften zur Naturwissenschaft. Vollständige mit Erläuterungen versehene Ausgabe im Auftrage der Deutschen Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina’, in D. Kuhn, W. von Engelhart and I. Müller (eds), Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, vol. 1, Weimar: Böhlaus Nachfolger, pp. 99112, Cited in Klausmeyer, Bryan (n.d.) ‘Spirale (Spiral)’, Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-7337. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Haraway, Donna J. (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14, pp. 57599.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Haraway, Donna J. (2003), The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness, Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Haraway, Donna J. (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Hill, Amelia (2018), ‘Children struggle to hold pencils due to too much tech, doctors say’, https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/feb/25/children-struggle-to-hold-pencils-due-to-too-much-tech-doctors-say. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Hirata, Shugi , Hoshi, Kazuhiko , Shoda, Tomoko and Mabuchi, Tadashi (2002), ‘Spermatozoon and mitochondrial DNA’, Reproductive Medicine and Biology, 1:2, pp. 4147, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-5781.2002.00007.x. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Huang, Sui (2009), ‘Reprogramming cell fates: Reconciling rarity with robustness’, Bioessays, 31:5, pp. 54660.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Ingram, Neil (2019), ‘Waddington, Holmyard, and Alchemy: Perspectives on the epigenetic landscape’, Endeavor, 43:3, p. 100690, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2019.08.001. Accessed 25 June 2022 .317
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Israel, J. V. , Anderson-Tempini, Thomas F. and Levine, Myron (1967), ‘In vitro morphogenesis of phage P22 from heads and base-plate parts’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 57:2, pp. 28491.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Jardine, Nicholas , Secord, James A. and Spary, E. C. (eds.) (1996), Cultures of Natural History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Jonas, Hans (1966), The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Klausmeyer, Bryan (2021), ‘Spirale (Spiral)’, Goethe-Lexicon of Philosophical Concepts, 1, pp. 99112, https://doi.org/10.5195/glpc.2021.22. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Klinenberg, E. (2021), ‘The seas are rising. Could oysters help?’, New Yorker, 9 August, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2021/08/09/the-seas-are-rising-could-oysters-protect-us. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  47. Koshland, Jr., Daniel (1995), ‘The key-lock theory and the induced fit theory’, Angewandte Chemie, 33, pp. 237578.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Latour, Bruno (2004), ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30, pp. 22548.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Le Guin, Ursula K. (1985), Always Coming Home, New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lurie, Edward (1988), Louis Agassiz: A Life in Science, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Mainberger, Sabine (2010), ‘In the vortex of the spiral tendency – Questions of aesthetics, literature, and natural sciences in the works of Goethe’, Estudios Avancados, 24, pp. 20318.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Matsushita, Yuuki and Kaneko, Kunihiko (2020), ‘Homeorhesis in Waddington's landscape by epigenetic feedback regulation’, Physical Review Research, 2, p. 023083, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023083. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. McFall-Ngai, Margaret et al. (2013), ‘Animals in a bacterial world: A new imperative for the life sciences’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110, pp. 3229–36.
  54. Merian, Maria S. (1705), Metamorphosis Insectorum Surinamensium, Amsterdam: G. Vack.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Morange, Michel (2011), ‘What history tells us XXV. Construction of the ribbon model of proteins (1981). The contribution of Jane Richardson’, Journal of Biosciences, 36, pp. 57174.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Müller, Stefan C. and Tsuji, Kinko (2017), ‘Appearance in nature’, in Tsuji, Kinko and Stefan C. Müller (eds), Spirals and Vortices, The Frontiers Collection, Switzerland: Springer Nature, p. 47, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05798-5_2. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Nakagaki, Toshiyuki, Iima, Makoto, Ueda, Tetsuo, Nishiura, Yasumasa, Saigusa, Tetsu, Tero, Atsushi, Kobayashi, Ryo and Showalter, Kenneth (2007), ‘Minimum-risk path finding by an adaptive amoebal network’, Physiological Reviews Letters, 99, pp. 68–104.
  58. Needham, Joseph (1936), Order and Life, New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Nicholson, Daniel and Dupré, John (2018), Everything Flows: Towards a Processual Philosophy of Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.318
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Nicoglou, Antonine (2018), ‘Waddington's epigenetics or the pictorial meetings of development and genetics’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 40:4, p. 61, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-018-0228-8. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Noble, Denis (2016), Dance to the Tune of Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Oostra, Vincencio, Mateus Ana Rita A., van der Burg, Karin R. L., Piessens, Thomas, van Eijk, Marleen, Brakefield, Paul M., Beldade, Patricia and Zwaan, Bas J. (2014), ‘Ecdysteroid hormones link the juvenile environment to alternative adult life histories in a seasonal insect’, American Naturalist, 184, pp. 79–92.
  63. Panfilov, Alexander V. (2017), ‘Spiral waves in the heart’, in K. Tsuji and S. Müller (eds), Spirals and Vortices, The Frontiers Collection, New York: Springer, pp. 20915, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05798-5_11. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Pirsig, Robert M. (1974), Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values, New York: Harper.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Prudic, Kathleen L. , Stoehr, Andrew M. , Wasik, Bethany R. and Monteiro, Antónia (2015), ‘Eyespots deflect predator attack increasing fitness and promoting the evolution of phenotypic plasticity’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282:1798, p. 20141531, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1531. Accessed 9 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Reid, Chris R. and Beekman, Madeleine (2013), ‘Solving the Towers of Hanoi – How an amoeboid organism efficiently constructs transport networks’, Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, pp. 154651.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Rancière, Jacques and Djordjevic, Radmila (2004). ‘Is there a Deleuzian aesthetics?', Qui Parle,14, pp.114.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Reitsma, Ella (2008), Maria Sibylla Merian and Daughters: Women of Art and Science, Amsterdam: Waanders Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Richards, Robert J. (2002), The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ricou, Joana and Pollock, John A. (2012), ‘The tree, the spiral and the web of life: A visual exploration of biological evolution for public murals’, Leonardo, 45, pp. 1825, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/LEON_a_00321. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Root-Bernstein, Robert and Root-Bernstein, Michèle (1999), Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World's Most Creative People, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Root-Bernstein, Robert and Root-Bernstein, Michèle (2013), The art and craft of science, Educational Leadership, https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-art-and-craft-of-science. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  73. Root-Bernstein, Robert, Siler, Todd , Brown, Adam and Snelson, Kenneth (2011), ‘ArtScience: Integrative collaboration to create a sustainable future’, Leonardo, 44, p. 192.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Roseberry, Jessica (2007), interview with Jane Richardson, Women in Duke Medicine, 9 November, http://digitaldukemed.mc.duke.edu/med_women/women/richardson_interview.html. Accessed 25 June 2022 .319
  75. Rupik, Gregory (2021), ‘Ateleological propagation in Goethe's Metamorphosis of plants ’, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 43, p. 32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-021-00387-6. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Sagan, Dorion (2004), ‘The postman always already rings twice’, Summer, https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/14/sagan.php. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  77. Schjeldahl, Peter (2021), ‘Drawing conclusions: Cézanne at MOMA’, New Yorker, 28 June, p. 73.
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Schleicher, August (1853), Die ersten Spaltungen des indogermanischen Urvolkes. Allgemeine Zeitung für Wissenschaft und Literatur.
  79. Schmitt, Stéphane (2005), ‘From eggs to fossils: Epigenesis and transformation of species in Pander's biology’, International Journal of Developmental Biology, 49, pp. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Simard, Suzanne (2021), Finding the Mother Tree, New York: Knoff.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Snow, Charles P. (1959), The Two Cultures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Song, Hao , Hewitt, Olivia, and Degnan, Sandie M. (2021), ‘Arginine biosynthesis by a bacterial symbiont enables nitric oxide production and facilitates larval settlement in the marine-sponge host’, Current Biology, 31:2, pp. 43337.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Squier, Susan M. (2017), Epigenetic Landscapes: Drawing as Metaphor, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Stamatoyannopoulos, John A. (2012), ‘What does our genome encode?’, Genome Research, 22, pp. 160211.
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Stengers, Isabelle (2017), ‘Matters of concern all the way down’, Ctrl-Z, 7, https://www.ctrl-z.net.au/articles/issue-7/stengers-matters-of-concern-all-the-way-down/. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  86. Stengers, Isabelle (2018), Another Science Is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science (trans. S. Muecke), New York: Wiley.
  87. Stengers, Isabelle (2020), ‘The Earth won't let itself be watched’, in B. Latour and P. Weibel (eds), Critical Zones: The Science and Politics of Landing on Earth, Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 22835.
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Stotz, Karola C. , Bostanci, Adam and Griffiths, Paul E. (2006), ‘Tracking the shift to “postgenomics”’, Community Genetics, 9, pp. 19096.
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Tauber, Alfred I. (2001), Henry David Thoreau and the Moral Agency of Knowing, Berkeley: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Todd, Kim (2007), Chrysalis: Maria Sibylla Merian and the Secrets of Metamorphosis, New York: Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Waddington, Conrad H. (1968), Behind Appearance: A Study of the Relations between Painting and the Natural Sciences in this Century, Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Waddington, Conrad H. (1975), The Evolution of an Evolutionist, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Waddington, Conrad H. (1977), Tools for Thought, Boulder: Paladin.320
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Wakefield, Stephanie and Braun, Bruce (2019), ‘Oystertecture: Infrastructure, profanation, and the sacred figure of the human’, in Infrastructure, Environment, and Life in the Anthropocene, Durham: Duke University Press, https://doi.org/10.1215/9781478002567-012. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Walls, Laura D. (1997), ‘Textbooks and texts from the Brooks: Inventing scientific authority in America’, American Quarterly, 1, pp. 125.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Watts, Alan (1970), Does it Matter? Essays on Man's Relation to Materiality, New York: Pantheon Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Wellman, Janina (2017), The Form of Becoming: Embryology and Epistemology of Rhythm, 1760–1830, New York: Zone Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Wessel, Gary M. (2010), ‘Christian Heinrich Pander (1794–1865) and the concept of the three germ layers’, Molecular Reproduction and Development, 77, https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.21236. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Wilson, Edmund B. and Leaming, Edward (1895), An Atlas of Fertilization and Karyokinesis of the Ovum, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Winner, Ellen and Casey, M. Beth (1992), ‘Cognitive profiles of artists’, in G. C. Cupchik and J. László (eds.), Emerging Visions of the Aesthetic Process: In Psychology, Semiology, and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 15470.
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Winsor, Mary (1979), ‘Louis Agassiz and the species question’, Studies in the History of Biology, 3, pp. 89117.
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Yeats, William B. (1929), ‘Among school children’, Finneran, R. J. (ed.) The Poems of W. B. Yeats: A New Edition, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, http://poetry.about.com/od/poems/l/blyeatsamongchildren.htm. Accessed 25 June 2022 .
  103. Zabeo, Davide, Heumann, John M., Schwartz, Cindi L., Suzuki-Shinjo, Azusa, Morgan, Garry, Widlund, Per O. and Höög, Johanna L. (2018), ‘A lumenal interrupted helix in human sperm tail microtubules’, Science Reports, 8, p. 2727, https://doi.org/doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21165-8. Accessed 25 June 2022.
/content/books/9781789387094.c11
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789387094
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test