Skip to content
1981

oa Architecture After Affect

image of Architecture After Affect

Affective architecture is everywhere. Practically every emerging design trajectory grounds itself in some conception of affect. Like other cultural spheres including film, fashion and food, architecture is increasingly expected to elicit emotional and sensorial, affective responses. Unfortunately, architectural discourse on affect remains trapped between two ontological traditions: the essentializing phenomenology of Martin Heidegger, and the post-humanist metaphysics of Gilles Deleuze. This essay identifies postphenomenology—with its projective embrace of vision and technology and rejection of essentialism—as one inviting alternative to these polarizing ideological traditions. The hedonistically ocular-centric work of Los Angeles architect John Lautner (1911-1994) offers an ideal postphenomenological case study. His affective spaces reproduce the effects of widescreen cinema by exploiting the immersive opportunities of panoramic vision. This essay takes Lautner's houses, along with the writings of Maurice Merleau-Ponty and his cinematic interpreters, as lenses through which to focus on issues of postcinematic immersion in architecture and film.

Keywords: apparatus ; architectural theory ; architecture and film ; cineramic ; design research ; digital fabrication ; immersive media ; John Lautner ; Los Angeles architecture ; Modern architecture ; ocular ; post-phenomenology ; vision and visuality ; visual media ; widescreen architecture

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/9781789387377/9781789387384-c02.html?itemId=/content/books/9781789387377.c02&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/books/9781789387377.c02
Loading

Data & Media loading...

References

  1. Abrons, Ellie, and Adam Fure. “Postdigital Materiality.” In Lineament: Material, Representation and the Physical Figure in Architectural Production, edited by Gail Peter Borden and Michael Meredith, 18595. New York, NY: Routledge, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baudry, Jean-Louis. “Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus.” Translated by Alan Williams. Film Quarterly 28, no. 2 (Winter 1974–75) (1970): 3947.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Belton, John. Widescreen Cinema. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benedikt, Michael. Architecture Beyond Experience. San Francisco, Los Angeles, CA, New York, NY, Hong Kong: Applied Research + Design Publishing, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” (1936). In Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt. Translated by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, Jill. “Atmospheric Affects.” In Carnal Aesthetics: Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics, edited by Bettina Papenburg and Marta Zarzycka, 10218. London, New York, NY: I.B. Tauris, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blake, Peter. Frank Lloyd Wright: Architecture and Space (1960). New York, NY: Pelican Books Inc., 1965.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Comolli, Jean-Louis. “Machines of the Visible” (1971). In The Cinematic Apparatus, edited by Teresa de Lauretis and Stephen Heath, 12142. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crary, Jonathan. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Foster, Hal (in conversation with Marquard Smith). “Polemics, Postmodernism, Immersion, Militarized Space,” Journal of Visual Culture 3, no. 3 (December 2004): 32728.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harman, Graham. Is There an Object Oriented Architecture?, edited by Joseph Bedford. London, New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Harman, Graham. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Penguin, 2018.45
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heidegger, Martin. “Building Dwelling Thinking” (1954). In Basic Writings from Being and Time to The Task of Thinking, edited by David Farrell Krell, 32339. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art” (1935). In Poetry, Language, Thought, translated by Albert Hofstadter, 1787. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology” (1954). In The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays, translated by William Lovitt, 335. New York, NY: Garland Publishing, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hess, Alan. The Architecture of John Lautner. New York, NY: Rizzoli International Publications, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Holl, Steven. Parallax. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Holl, Steven, Juhani Pallasmaa, and Alberto Pérez-Gómez. Questions of Perception: Phenomenology of Architecture. Tokyo: A+U Publishing Co., Ltd., 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations (1900). Translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge and K. Paul; New York, NY: Humanities Press, 1970.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ihde, Don. Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ihde, Don. Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ihde, Don. Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ihde, Don. Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ihde, Don. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jay, Martin. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lacan, Jacques. “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience” (1949). In Écrits: A Selection. Translated by Bruce Fink. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lautner, John. Responsibility, Infinity, Nature Oral History Transcript (1982). Interview with Marlene L. Laskey. Los Angeles, CA: Oral History Program, UCLA, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lautner [Sr.], John E. “American Materialism.” In Normal College News 3, no. 9 (November 24, 1905).
  29. Marks, Laura U. Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McCoy, Esther. “West Coast Architects V/John Lautner.” In Arts & Architecture 82 (August 1965): 22–27.
  31. McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1964). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.46
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. “Eye and Mind.” In The Primacy of Perception. Edited by James M. Edie. Translated by Carleton Dallery, 15990. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception (1945). Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge & K. Paul; New York, NY: Humanities Press, 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Sense and Non-Sense. Translated by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible (1964). Edited by Claude Lefort. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Michalka, Matthias, ed. Dorit Margreiter: 10104 Angelo View Drive. Köln: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König; Vienna: Museum Moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig Wien, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Norwood, Bryan E. “Disorienting Phenomenology.” In Log 42 (Winter/Spring 2018): 10–22.
  38. Pallasmaa, Juhani. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chichester: Wiley-Academy, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Papenburg, Bettina and Marta Zarzycka, eds. Carnal Aesthetics: Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics. London, New York, NY: I.B. Tauris, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Plato. The Republic (Allegory of the Cave, circa 380 B.C.E.). Edited by G. R. F. Ferrari. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rancière, Jacques. The Emancipated Spectator. Translated by Gregory Elliott. London, New York, NY: Verso, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Reese, John. “Dream House or Nightmare?The Saturday Evening Post 30 (August 20, 1960): 6264.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Shaviro, Steven. Post-Cinematic Affect. Ropley: Zero Books, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Shaviro, Steven. The Universe of Things: On Speculative Realism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sobchack, Vivian. “The Scene of the Screen: Envisioning Cinematic and Electronic Presence.” In Materialities of Communication, edited by H. U. Gumbrecht and K. L. Pfeiffer, 83106. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sobchack, Vivian. “What My Fingers Knew: The Cinesthetic Subject, or Vision in the Flesh.” In Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture, 5384. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Stiegler, Christian. 360° Gaze: Immersions in Media, Society, and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Van Den Eede, Yoni, Stacey O'Neal Irwin and Galit Wellner, eds. Phenomenology and Media: Essays on Human-Media-World Relations. Forward by Don Ihde. London: Lexington Books, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Von Falkenhausen, Susanne. “The Trouble with ‘Affect Theory’ in our Age of Outrage.” Frieze, no. 204, June 6, 2019. https://www.frieze.com/article/trouble-affect-theory-our-age-outrage.47
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Yoder, Jon. “Design vs. History: Materializing Theory After the Post-Linguistic Turn.” Paper presented in Architectural Theory Now? Conference, University of Pennsylvania Weitzman School of Design, April 4–6, 2019.
  51. Yoder, Jon. “Vision and Crime: The Cineramic Architecture of John Lautner.” In Archi.Pop: Mediating Architecture in Popular Culture, edited by D. Medina Lasansky, 4558. London, New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Abrons, Ellie, and Adam Fure. “Postdigital Materiality.” In Lineament: Material, Representation and the Physical Figure in Architectural Production, edited by Gail Peter Borden and Michael Meredith, 18595. New York, NY: Routledge, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baudry, Jean-Louis. “Ideological Effects of the Basic Cinematographic Apparatus.” Translated by Alan Williams. Film Quarterly 28, no. 2 (Winter 1974–75) (1970): 3947.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Belton, John. Widescreen Cinema. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benedikt, Michael. Architecture Beyond Experience. San Francisco, Los Angeles, CA, New York, NY, Hong Kong: Applied Research + Design Publishing, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” (1936). In Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt. Translated by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bennett, Jill. “Atmospheric Affects.” In Carnal Aesthetics: Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics, edited by Bettina Papenburg and Marta Zarzycka, 10218. London, New York, NY: I.B. Tauris, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Blake, Peter. Frank Lloyd Wright: Architecture and Space (1960). New York, NY: Pelican Books Inc., 1965.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Comolli, Jean-Louis. “Machines of the Visible” (1971). In The Cinematic Apparatus, edited by Teresa de Lauretis and Stephen Heath, 12142. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Crary, Jonathan. Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Foster, Hal (in conversation with Marquard Smith). “Polemics, Postmodernism, Immersion, Militarized Space,” Journal of Visual Culture 3, no. 3 (December 2004): 32728.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Harman, Graham. Is There an Object Oriented Architecture?, edited by Joseph Bedford. London, New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Harman, Graham. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Penguin, 2018.45
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Heidegger, Martin. “Building Dwelling Thinking” (1954). In Basic Writings from Being and Time to The Task of Thinking, edited by David Farrell Krell, 32339. New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Heidegger, Martin. “The Origin of the Work of Art” (1935). In Poetry, Language, Thought, translated by Albert Hofstadter, 1787. New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1971.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Heidegger, Martin. “The Question Concerning Technology” (1954). In The Question Concerning Technology, and Other Essays, translated by William Lovitt, 335. New York, NY: Garland Publishing, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hess, Alan. The Architecture of John Lautner. New York, NY: Rizzoli International Publications, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Holl, Steven. Parallax. New York, NY: Princeton Architectural Press, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Holl, Steven, Juhani Pallasmaa, and Alberto Pérez-Gómez. Questions of Perception: Phenomenology of Architecture. Tokyo: A+U Publishing Co., Ltd., 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations (1900). Translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge and K. Paul; New York, NY: Humanities Press, 1970.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ihde, Don. Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ihde, Don. Expanding Hermeneutics: Visualism in Science. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1998.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ihde, Don. Heidegger's Technologies: Postphenomenological Perspectives. New York, NY: Fordham University Press, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ihde, Don. Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ihde, Don. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jay, Martin. Downcast Eyes: The Denigration of Vision in Twentieth-Century French Thought. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lacan, Jacques. “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience” (1949). In Écrits: A Selection. Translated by Bruce Fink. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lautner, John. Responsibility, Infinity, Nature Oral History Transcript (1982). Interview with Marlene L. Laskey. Los Angeles, CA: Oral History Program, UCLA, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lautner [Sr.], John E. “American Materialism.” In Normal College News 3, no. 9 (November 24, 1905).
  29. Marks, Laura U. Touch: Sensuous Theory and Multisensory Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. McCoy, Esther. “West Coast Architects V/John Lautner.” In Arts & Architecture 82 (August 1965): 22–27.
  31. McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (1964). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.46
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. “Eye and Mind.” In The Primacy of Perception. Edited by James M. Edie. Translated by Carleton Dallery, 15990. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception (1945). Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge & K. Paul; New York, NY: Humanities Press, 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Sense and Non-Sense. Translated by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Patricia Allen Dreyfus. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1964.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible (1964). Edited by Claude Lefort. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Michalka, Matthias, ed. Dorit Margreiter: 10104 Angelo View Drive. Köln: Verlag der Buchhandlung Walther König; Vienna: Museum Moderner Kunst Stiftung Ludwig Wien, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Norwood, Bryan E. “Disorienting Phenomenology.” In Log 42 (Winter/Spring 2018): 10–22.
  38. Pallasmaa, Juhani. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chichester: Wiley-Academy, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Papenburg, Bettina and Marta Zarzycka, eds. Carnal Aesthetics: Transgressive Imagery and Feminist Politics. London, New York, NY: I.B. Tauris, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Plato. The Republic (Allegory of the Cave, circa 380 B.C.E.). Edited by G. R. F. Ferrari. Translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Rancière, Jacques. The Emancipated Spectator. Translated by Gregory Elliott. London, New York, NY: Verso, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Reese, John. “Dream House or Nightmare?The Saturday Evening Post 30 (August 20, 1960): 6264.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Shaviro, Steven. Post-Cinematic Affect. Ropley: Zero Books, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Shaviro, Steven. The Universe of Things: On Speculative Realism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Sobchack, Vivian. “The Scene of the Screen: Envisioning Cinematic and Electronic Presence.” In Materialities of Communication, edited by H. U. Gumbrecht and K. L. Pfeiffer, 83106. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sobchack, Vivian. “What My Fingers Knew: The Cinesthetic Subject, or Vision in the Flesh.” In Carnal Thoughts: Embodiment and Moving Image Culture, 5384. Berkeley, Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Stiegler, Christian. 360° Gaze: Immersions in Media, Society, and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Van Den Eede, Yoni, Stacey O'Neal Irwin and Galit Wellner, eds. Phenomenology and Media: Essays on Human-Media-World Relations. Forward by Don Ihde. London: Lexington Books, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Von Falkenhausen, Susanne. “The Trouble with ‘Affect Theory’ in our Age of Outrage.” Frieze, no. 204, June 6, 2019. https://www.frieze.com/article/trouble-affect-theory-our-age-outrage.47
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Yoder, Jon. “Design vs. History: Materializing Theory After the Post-Linguistic Turn.” Paper presented in Architectural Theory Now? Conference, University of Pennsylvania Weitzman School of Design, April 4–6, 2019.
  51. Yoder, Jon. “Vision and Crime: The Cineramic Architecture of John Lautner.” In Archi.Pop: Mediating Architecture in Popular Culture, edited by D. Medina Lasansky, 4558. London, New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9781789387377.c02
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789387377
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test