Skip to content
1981

Rendering Our Relations

image of Rendering Our Relations

This introduction to the first section of the book focuses on two fundamental ideas to a/r/tography: relationality as it is understood within pedagogy, art-making and inquiry, and readerings, those conceptual ideas that allow the artist and pedagogue to inquire differently than through typical social science methods. The introduction provides a brief overview of the essential readings and conversations that comprise the first section.

Keywords: a/r/tography ; community of practice ; dissertations ; encounters ; fold ; forward slash ; identity ; immigrant families ; living inquiry ; metissage ; propositions ; relationality ; renderings ; research creation

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Rendering Our Relations
Intellect , 17 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/9781789388688_3
/content/books/9781789388688.c01a
/content/books/9781789388688.c01a
Loading

Data & Media loading...

References

  1. Bal, M. (2002). Traveling concepts in the humanities. University of Toronto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Beer, R., Irwin, R. L., Grauer, K., & Xiong, G. (2010). Research and creation: Socially-engaged art in The City of Richgate project. International Journal for Education Through Art, 6(2), 213–227.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickel, B., Springgay, S., Beer, R., Irwin, R. L., Grauer, K., & Xiong, G. (2010). A/r/tographic collaboration as radical relationality. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(1), 86–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke, G. (2013). (Re)connecting immersive art pedagogy [Doctoral exegesis, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology].
  5. Coleman, K. S. (2017). An a/r/tist in wonderland: Exploring identity, creativity and digital portfolios as a/r/tographer [Doctoral dissertation, Melbourne Graduate School of Education].
  6. Irwin, R. L. (2004). A/r/tography: A metonymic métissage. In R. L. Irwin & A. de Cosson (Eds.), A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 27–40). Pacific Educational Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, N. Y. S. (2021). Squares for breathing, becoming, and beholding: Cultivating a relationship with the unknown [Doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia].
  8. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith, B. E. (2020). Being against disappearance: A photographic inquiry through an a/r/tographic lens [Doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia].
  10. Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., & Wilson Kind, S. (2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897–912.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Truman, S., & Springgay, S. (2016). Propositions for walking research. In P. Burnard, E. Mackinlay, & K. Powell (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of intercultural arts research (pp. 259–267). Routledge.23
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Bal, M. (2002). Traveling concepts in the humanities. University of Toronto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Beer, R., Irwin, R. L., Grauer, K., & Xiong, G. (2010). Research and creation: Socially-engaged art in The City of Richgate project. International Journal for Education Through Art, 6(2), 213–227.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickel, B., Springgay, S., Beer, R., Irwin, R. L., Grauer, K., & Xiong, G. (2010). A/r/tographic collaboration as radical relationality. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 10(1), 86–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Burke, G. (2013). (Re)connecting immersive art pedagogy [Doctoral exegesis, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology].
  5. Coleman, K. S. (2017). An a/r/tist in wonderland: Exploring identity, creativity and digital portfolios as a/r/tographer [Doctoral dissertation, Melbourne Graduate School of Education].
  6. Irwin, R. L. (2004). A/r/tography: A metonymic métissage. In R. L. Irwin & A. de Cosson (Eds.), A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 27–40). Pacific Educational Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, N. Y. S. (2021). Squares for breathing, becoming, and beholding: Cultivating a relationship with the unknown [Doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia].
  8. Richardson, L. (1994). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 516–529). SAGE.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Smith, B. E. (2020). Being against disappearance: A photographic inquiry through an a/r/tographic lens [Doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia].
  10. Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., & Wilson Kind, S. (2005). A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(6), 897–912.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Truman, S., & Springgay, S. (2016). Propositions for walking research. In P. Burnard, E. Mackinlay, & K. Powell (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of intercultural arts research (pp. 259–267). Routledge.23
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9781789388688.c01a
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
/content/books/9781789388688.c01a
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789388688
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test