Skip to content
1981

Propositions and Potentials: Ongoing Provocations of the A/r/tographic Oblique

image of Propositions and Potentials: Ongoing Provocations of the A/r/tographic Oblique
Preview this chapter:
Preview Magnify
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

Propositions and Potentials: Ongoing Provocations of the A/r/tographic Oblique
Intellect , 460 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/9781789388688_32
/content/books/9781789388688.c26
/content/books/9781789388688.c26
Loading

Data & Media loading...

References

  1. Deleuze, G., &Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Irwin, R. L. (2004). A metonymic métissage. In R. L. Irwin &A. de Cosson (Eds.), A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 27–38). Pacific Educational Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Leggo, C. (2012). 29 Ways of looking at the oblique in a/r/tography. Visual Arts Research, 38(2), 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Leggo, C., &Irwin, R. L. (2013). Becoming pedagogical: Sustaining hearts with living credos. In Education, 19(1), 2–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Llinás, R. (2001). I of the vortex: From neurons to self. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Manning, E. (2020). For a pragmatics of the useless. Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Massumi, B. (2002). Shock to thought. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Prendergast, M. (2006). Found poetry as literature review: Research poems on audience and performance. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 369–388.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Rousell, D., Lasczik, A., Irwin, R. L., Ellis, D., Hotko, K., &Peisker, J. (2019). Site/sight/insight: Becoming a socioecological learner through collaborative artmaking practices. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie, A. Lasczik, J. Wilks, M. Logan, A. Turner, &W. Boyd. (Eds.), Touchstones for deterritorialising socioecological learning: The Anthropocene, posthumanism, and commonworlds (pp. 163–187). Palgrave.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Triggs, V., &Irwin, R. L. (2019). Pedagogy and the a/r/tographic invitation. In R. Hickman, J. Baldacchino, K. Freedman, E. Hall, &N. Meager (Eds.), The International encyclopedia of art and design education Vol III, (pp. 1557–1572). John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Triggs, V., Irwin, R. L., &O'Donoghue, D. (2014). Following a/r/tography in practice: From possibility to potential. In K. Miglan &C. Smilan (Eds) Inquiry in action: Paradigms, methodologies and perspectives in art education research (pp. 253–264). National Art Education Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. The Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Deleuze, G., &Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Irwin, R. L. (2004). A metonymic métissage. In R. L. Irwin &A. de Cosson (Eds.), A/r/tography: Rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 27–38). Pacific Educational Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Leggo, C. (2012). 29 Ways of looking at the oblique in a/r/tography. Visual Arts Research, 38(2), 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Leggo, C., &Irwin, R. L. (2013). Becoming pedagogical: Sustaining hearts with living credos. In Education, 19(1), 2–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Llinás, R. (2001). I of the vortex: From neurons to self. MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Manning, E. (2020). For a pragmatics of the useless. Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Massumi, B. (2002). Shock to thought. Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Prendergast, M. (2006). Found poetry as literature review: Research poems on audience and performance. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 369–388.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Rousell, D., Lasczik, A., Irwin, R. L., Ellis, D., Hotko, K., &Peisker, J. (2019). Site/sight/insight: Becoming a socioecological learner through collaborative artmaking practices. In A. Cutter-Mackenzie, A. Lasczik, J. Wilks, M. Logan, A. Turner, &W. Boyd. (Eds.), Touchstones for deterritorialising socioecological learning: The Anthropocene, posthumanism, and commonworlds (pp. 163–187). Palgrave.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Triggs, V., &Irwin, R. L. (2019). Pedagogy and the a/r/tographic invitation. In R. Hickman, J. Baldacchino, K. Freedman, E. Hall, &N. Meager (Eds.), The International encyclopedia of art and design education Vol III, (pp. 1557–1572). John Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Triggs, V., Irwin, R. L., &O'Donoghue, D. (2014). Following a/r/tography in practice: From possibility to potential. In K. Miglan &C. Smilan (Eds) Inquiry in action: Paradigms, methodologies and perspectives in art education research (pp. 253–264). National Art Education Association.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. The Free Press.
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9781789388688.c26
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
/content/books/9781789388688.c26
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789388688
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test