oa The Art of Running and Being (Or Just Running and Being?)

References

1. Atkinson, Dennis (2011), Art, Equality and Learning: Pedagogies against the State, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, Dennis (2018), Art, Disobedience, and Ethics: The Adventure of Pedagogy, London: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biesta, Gert (2006), Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future, Boulder: Paradigm.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biesta, Gert (2010), Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy, Boulder: Paradigm.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biesta, Gert (2017a), Letting Art Teach, Arnhem: ArtEZ Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Biesta, Gert (2017b), The Rediscovery of Teaching, New York: Routledge.55
   [Google Scholar]
7. Biesta, Gert (2018), ‘What if? Art education beyond expression and creativity’, in Christopher Naughton, Gert Biesta and David Cole (eds), Art, Artists and Pedagogy, New York: Routledge, pp. 11–20.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Biesta, Gert (2021), World-Centred Education: A View for the Present, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hannula, Mika, Suoranta, Juha and Vadén, Tere (2005), Artistic Research: Theories, Methods and Practices, Helsinki and Gothenburg: Academy of Fine Helsinki and ArtMonitor.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Illeris, Helene, Knudsen, Kristian Nødtvedt and Skregelid, Lisbet (2022), ‘A/r/tografi som tilgang til udvikling af en sanselig bæredygtighedsdidaktik i kunstfagene’, Nordic Journal of Art and Research (A & R), 11:1, https://doi.org/10.7577/information.5067.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Irwin, Rita (2012), ‘A/r/tography’, in Lisa Given (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Newbury Park: SAGE Publishing, pp. 27–28.
    [Google Scholar]
12. LeBlanc, Natalie and Irwin, Rita (2019), ‘A/r/tography’, in George Noblit (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. NRK (2021), ‘Kråkehviskeren fra Kristiansand’, 29 November, https://tv.nrk.no/serie/distriktsnyheter-soerlandet/202110/DKSL98102921/avspiller. Accessed 28 March 2022.
14. OECD (2015), Frascati Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en. Accessed 28 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Rancière, Jacques (2009), The Emancipated Spectator, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rancière, Jacques (2010), Dissensus on Politics and Aesthetics, London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ricoeur, Paul, Ballard, Edward G. and Embree, Lester (1967), Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ruben (2021), ‘Running’, Animosity, produced by Bjørn Helge Gammelesæter, Eirik Smaaland and Markus Vikstvedt, USA: Buddle Music Publishing GmbH, Warner Chappell Music, Inc, https://genius.com/Ruben-running-lyrics. Accessed 11 July 2023.
19. Skregelid, Lisbet (2016), ‘Tribuner for dissens: En studie av ungdomsskoleelevers møter med samtidskunst i en skole- og kunstmuseums kontekst’, Ph.D. thesis, Oslo: University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Skregelid, Lisbet (2020a), ‘A call for dissensus in art education!’ International Journal of Education Through Art, 16:2, pp. 161–76, https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00024_1. Accessed 28 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Skregelid, Lisbet (2020b), ‘Tensed possibilities: The cultural schoolbag as dissensus in teacher education’, in Hans Örtegren and Anna Widén (eds), Lärarutbildning & konstpedagogik: Några Nordiska Nedslag, Tilde rapport nr. 17 2020, Institutionen för estetiska ämnen, Umeå universitet, https://www.umu.se/contentassets/c87eeac40fcb43069f07c3fb5b980664/tilde_17.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2022.56
    [Google Scholar]
22. Skregelid, Lisbet (2021a), ‘Zoom in on dry joy—Dissensus, agonism and democracy in art education’, Education Sciences, 11:1, p. 28, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/1/28/htm Accessed 28 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Skregelid, Lisbet (2021b), ‘Encounters with the world through cultural schoolbag workshops for teacher students’, Nordic Journal of Art and Research, 10:2, https://doi.org/10.7577/information.4449. Accessed 28 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Skregelid, Lisbet (2021c), ‘Dissensuality and affect in education’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40:4, pp. 690–701.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Skregelid, Lisbet (forthcoming), ‘The art of teaching: A proposition for pedagogy of dissensus’, in A. Sinner and T. Osler (eds), Artful Xchanges: Propositions in Museum Education, Bristol: Intellect Books.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Springgay, Stephanie, Irwin, Rita L. and Kind, Sylvia W. (2005), ‘A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text’, Qualitative Inquiry, 11:6, pp. 897–912.
    [Google Scholar]

References

1. Atkinson, Dennis (2011), Art, Equality and Learning: Pedagogies against the State, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, Dennis (2018), Art, Disobedience, and Ethics: The Adventure of Pedagogy, London: Springer.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Biesta, Gert (2006), Beyond Learning: Democratic Education for a Human Future, Boulder: Paradigm.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biesta, Gert (2010), Good Education in an Age of Measurement: Ethics, Politics, Democracy, Boulder: Paradigm.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Biesta, Gert (2017a), Letting Art Teach, Arnhem: ArtEZ Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Biesta, Gert (2017b), The Rediscovery of Teaching, New York: Routledge.55
   [Google Scholar]
7. Biesta, Gert (2018), ‘What if? Art education beyond expression and creativity’, in Christopher Naughton, Gert Biesta and David Cole (eds), Art, Artists and Pedagogy, New York: Routledge, pp. 11–20.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Biesta, Gert (2021), World-Centred Education: A View for the Present, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hannula, Mika, Suoranta, Juha and Vadén, Tere (2005), Artistic Research: Theories, Methods and Practices, Helsinki and Gothenburg: Academy of Fine Helsinki and ArtMonitor.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Illeris, Helene, Knudsen, Kristian Nødtvedt and Skregelid, Lisbet (2022), ‘A/r/tografi som tilgang til udvikling af en sanselig bæredygtighedsdidaktik i kunstfagene’, Nordic Journal of Art and Research (A & R), 11:1, https://doi.org/10.7577/information.5067.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Irwin, Rita (2012), ‘A/r/tography’, in Lisa Given (ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Newbury Park: SAGE Publishing, pp. 27–28.
    [Google Scholar]
12. LeBlanc, Natalie and Irwin, Rita (2019), ‘A/r/tography’, in George Noblit (ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. NRK (2021), ‘Kråkehviskeren fra Kristiansand’, 29 November, https://tv.nrk.no/serie/distriktsnyheter-soerlandet/202110/DKSL98102921/avspiller. Accessed 28 March 2022.
14. OECD (2015), Frascati Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en. Accessed 28 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Rancière, Jacques (2009), The Emancipated Spectator, London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Rancière, Jacques (2010), Dissensus on Politics and Aesthetics, London and New York: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ricoeur, Paul, Ballard, Edward G. and Embree, Lester (1967), Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Ruben (2021), ‘Running’, Animosity, produced by Bjørn Helge Gammelesæter, Eirik Smaaland and Markus Vikstvedt, USA: Buddle Music Publishing GmbH, Warner Chappell Music, Inc, https://genius.com/Ruben-running-lyrics. Accessed 11 July 2023.
19. Skregelid, Lisbet (2016), ‘Tribuner for dissens: En studie av ungdomsskoleelevers møter med samtidskunst i en skole- og kunstmuseums kontekst’, Ph.D. thesis, Oslo: University of Oslo.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Skregelid, Lisbet (2020a), ‘A call for dissensus in art education!’ International Journal of Education Through Art, 16:2, pp. 161–76, https://doi.org/10.1386/eta_00024_1. Accessed 28 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Skregelid, Lisbet (2020b), ‘Tensed possibilities: The cultural schoolbag as dissensus in teacher education’, in Hans Örtegren and Anna Widén (eds), Lärarutbildning & konstpedagogik: Några Nordiska Nedslag, Tilde rapport nr. 17 2020, Institutionen för estetiska ämnen, Umeå universitet, https://www.umu.se/contentassets/c87eeac40fcb43069f07c3fb5b980664/tilde_17.pdf. Accessed 28 March 2022.56
    [Google Scholar]
22. Skregelid, Lisbet (2021a), ‘Zoom in on dry joy—Dissensus, agonism and democracy in art education’, Education Sciences, 11:1, p. 28, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/1/28/htm Accessed 28 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Skregelid, Lisbet (2021b), ‘Encounters with the world through cultural schoolbag workshops for teacher students’, Nordic Journal of Art and Research, 10:2, https://doi.org/10.7577/information.4449. Accessed 28 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Skregelid, Lisbet (2021c), ‘Dissensuality and affect in education’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 40:4, pp. 690–701.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Skregelid, Lisbet (forthcoming), ‘The art of teaching: A proposition for pedagogy of dissensus’, in A. Sinner and T. Osler (eds), Artful Xchanges: Propositions in Museum Education, Bristol: Intellect Books.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Springgay, Stephanie, Irwin, Rita L. and Kind, Sylvia W. (2005), ‘A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text’, Qualitative Inquiry, 11:6, pp. 897–912.
    [Google Scholar]