Skip to content
1981

Museums as Intersectional Spaces for Artivist Solidarity

image of Museums as Intersectional Spaces for Artivist Solidarity

This chapter responds to the themes of pedagogical sensibilities and anticolonial museum work by exploring two separate, but intertwined art education projects (cases) carried out in collaboration between the Art Education Programme at Aalto University, the Finnish National Gallery's Ateneum Art Museum, the Amos Rex art museum, and individuals associated with local NGOs.

The chapter concludes with an emphasis on solidarity; to sensibly and ethically combat systemic discrimination supported and maintained by museums and countless educators despite of their personal and collective aims and ideals. The chapter challenges the prevailing binary divisions within museum knowledges and their inscribed hegemonic, hierarchical structures between people, objects and knowledges. As a critical stance, the authors present the need for anticolonial and co-constructed knowledges where authority is shared, and where critical knowledge as a discourse strives to move past normative ways to perceive, experience, articulate and contextualise museum objects. The notions of sensible, anticolonial museum also brings forth non-verbal, embodied knowledge and sensuous epistemic orientation: artivist solidarity.

Keywords: accountability ; allyship ; anticolonial museum work ; artivist solidarity ; audience engagement ; embodied knowledge ; grief ; intersectionality ; museum knowledge ; museum objects ; museum pedagogy ; process of un-doing ; queer pedagogy ; solidarity

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801831.34
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barad, K. (2015). On touching – The inhuman that therefore I am (v1.1). In S. Witzgall & K. Stakemeier (Eds.), Power of material/politics of materiality (pp. 153164). Diaphanes.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism, and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne, J. , Morgan, E. , Paynter, N. , Sánches de Serdio, A. , & Ẑeleznik, A. (Eds.). (2018). The constituent museum. Constellations of knowledge, politics and mediation. A generator of social change. Valiz & L'Internationale.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, F. (2018). Posthuman museum practices. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 349352). Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, B. , Krauss, A. , & van der Heide, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Unlearning exercises: Art organizations as sites for unlearning. Casco Art Institute: Working for the Commons & Valiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dai, Y. (2016). Bridging the divide in feminism with transcultural feminist solidarity. In E. Chowdhury & L. Philipose (Eds.), Dissident friendships: Feminism, imperialism, and transnational solidarity (pp. 65118). University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ekholm, K. , & Orenius, M. (2021). A fish, a goddess, and a friend: How three ancient artefacts created a possibility for anticolonial understanding in the Amos Rex art museum [Master's thesis, Aalto University]. https://aaltodoc2.org.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/109808/master_Laukkanen_Roope_2021.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gershon, W. (Ed.). (2019). Sensuous curriculum: Politics and the senses in education. Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Haapalainen, R. (2021). Transsituational objects and things in participatory art. Tahiti, 10(4), 156171. https://doi.org/10.23995/tht.103186
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Janes, R. , & Sandell, R. (Eds.). (2019). Museum activism. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Järvinen, J. (2020). Queering/reconceiving the museum project and queer pedagogical practices in museums’ audience work [Unpublished Master's thesis, Aalto University].
  13. Kumashiro, K. (2002). Troubling education. Queer activism and antioppressive pedagogy. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lahusen, C. , & Grasso, M. (2018). Solidarity in Europe–European solidarity: An introduction. In C. Lahusen & M. Grasso (Eds.), Solidarity in Europe: Citizens’ responses in times of crisis (pp. 118). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Laitinen, A. , & Pessi, A. B. (2010). Vaatiiko solidaarisuus auttamaan? Solidaarisuus suomalaisten auttamisteoissa ja–asenteissa. Janus, 18(2), 355373.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mouffe, C. (2013). Institutions as sites for agonistic intervention. In P. Gielen (Ed.), Institutional attitudes: Instituting art in a flat world. Valiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ng, W. , Ware, S. M. , & Greenberg, A. (2017). Activating diversity and inclusion: A blueprint for museum educators as allies and change makers. Journal of Museum Education, 42, 142154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2017.1306664
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). Capabilities, entitlements, rights: Supplementation and critique. In T. Campbell (Ed.), Justice and the capabilities approach (pp. 173188). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Procter, A. (2020). The whole picture. The colonial story of the art in our museums and why we need to talk about it. Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care. Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.35
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rossi, L.-M. (2015). Muuttuva sukupuoli. Seksuaalisuuden, luokan ja värin politiikkaa. Gaudeamus.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rousell, D. , Hohti, R. , MacLure, M. , & Chalk, H. L. (2020). Blots on the Anthropocene: Micropolitical interventions with young people in a university museum. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 21(1), 2740. https://doi.org/10.1177/153270862095
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sen, A. (2012). Elements of a theory of human rights. In T. Campbell (Ed.), Justice and the capabilities approach (pp. 221263). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith, M. (Ed.). (2020). Decolonizing: The curriculum, the museum, and the mind. Vilnius Academy of Arts Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Spivak, G. C. (2011). An aesthetic education in the era of globalization. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Staniszewski, M. A. (1998). The power of display. A history of exhibition installations at the Museum of Modern Art. The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Suominen, A. , & Pusa, T. (Eds.). (2018). Feminism and queer in art education. Aalto ARTS Books.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801831.34
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barad, K. (2015). On touching – The inhuman that therefore I am (v1.1). In S. Witzgall & K. Stakemeier (Eds.), Power of material/politics of materiality (pp. 153164). Diaphanes.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism, and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Byrne, J. , Morgan, E. , Paynter, N. , Sánches de Serdio, A. , & Ẑeleznik, A. (Eds.). (2018). The constituent museum. Constellations of knowledge, politics and mediation. A generator of social change. Valiz & L'Internationale.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cameron, F. (2018). Posthuman museum practices. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 349352). Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Choi, B. , Krauss, A. , & van der Heide, Y. (Eds.). (2018). Unlearning exercises: Art organizations as sites for unlearning. Casco Art Institute: Working for the Commons & Valiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dai, Y. (2016). Bridging the divide in feminism with transcultural feminist solidarity. In E. Chowdhury & L. Philipose (Eds.), Dissident friendships: Feminism, imperialism, and transnational solidarity (pp. 65118). University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ekholm, K. , & Orenius, M. (2021). A fish, a goddess, and a friend: How three ancient artefacts created a possibility for anticolonial understanding in the Amos Rex art museum [Master's thesis, Aalto University]. https://aaltodoc2.org.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/109808/master_Laukkanen_Roope_2021.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gershon, W. (Ed.). (2019). Sensuous curriculum: Politics and the senses in education. Information Age Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Haapalainen, R. (2021). Transsituational objects and things in participatory art. Tahiti, 10(4), 156171. https://doi.org/10.23995/tht.103186
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Janes, R. , & Sandell, R. (Eds.). (2019). Museum activism. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Järvinen, J. (2020). Queering/reconceiving the museum project and queer pedagogical practices in museums’ audience work [Unpublished Master's thesis, Aalto University].
  13. Kumashiro, K. (2002). Troubling education. Queer activism and antioppressive pedagogy. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lahusen, C. , & Grasso, M. (2018). Solidarity in Europe–European solidarity: An introduction. In C. Lahusen & M. Grasso (Eds.), Solidarity in Europe: Citizens’ responses in times of crisis (pp. 118). Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Laitinen, A. , & Pessi, A. B. (2010). Vaatiiko solidaarisuus auttamaan? Solidaarisuus suomalaisten auttamisteoissa ja–asenteissa. Janus, 18(2), 355373.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mouffe, C. (2013). Institutions as sites for agonistic intervention. In P. Gielen (Ed.), Institutional attitudes: Instituting art in a flat world. Valiz.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ng, W. , Ware, S. M. , & Greenberg, A. (2017). Activating diversity and inclusion: A blueprint for museum educators as allies and change makers. Journal of Museum Education, 42, 142154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2017.1306664
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). Capabilities, entitlements, rights: Supplementation and critique. In T. Campbell (Ed.), Justice and the capabilities approach (pp. 173188). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Procter, A. (2020). The whole picture. The colonial story of the art in our museums and why we need to talk about it. Cassell.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care. Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.35
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rossi, L.-M. (2015). Muuttuva sukupuoli. Seksuaalisuuden, luokan ja värin politiikkaa. Gaudeamus.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rousell, D. , Hohti, R. , MacLure, M. , & Chalk, H. L. (2020). Blots on the Anthropocene: Micropolitical interventions with young people in a university museum. Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, 21(1), 2740. https://doi.org/10.1177/153270862095
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sen, A. (2012). Elements of a theory of human rights. In T. Campbell (Ed.), Justice and the capabilities approach (pp. 221263). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Smith, M. (Ed.). (2020). Decolonizing: The curriculum, the museum, and the mind. Vilnius Academy of Arts Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Spivak, G. C. (2011). An aesthetic education in the era of globalization. Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Staniszewski, M. A. (1998). The power of display. A history of exhibition installations at the Museum of Modern Art. The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Suominen, A. , & Pusa, T. (Eds.). (2018). Feminism and queer in art education. Aalto ARTS Books.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9781789389135.c02
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789389135
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test