Skip to content
1981

Not-Knowing: Creating Spaces for Co-curation

image of Not-Knowing: Creating Spaces for Co-curation

This chapter explores how this epistemological position was fostered and explored through a curatorial project Ideas Depot. The research I undertook explored the impact of institutional epistemology within the wider context of curatorial and education practice and developed a framework for the co-creation of knowledge between the gallery and its audiences. Four models of co-creation were constructed: The jigsaw; the reflective pool; the clash and the creative catalyst. All of these models have potential to build collaboratively-generated knowledge about artworks, but the creative catalyst has the most potential for creating new knowledge together, between constituent groups. Associated with the creative catalyst is the development of a new institutional epistemology of not-knowing; one which embraces and cultivates uncertainty, is more equitable and fluid, and retains a speculative space.

Keywords: Children in galleries ; Co-creation ; co-curation ; Constituent groups ; curatorial transparency ; Democratic knowledge ; Dialogic ; Epistemology in the gallery ; Gallery education ; Not-knowing

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/books/9781789389135.c14
Loading

Data & Media loading...

References

  1. Adams, J. , & Owens, A. (2015). Creativity and democracy in education: Practices and politics of learning through the arts. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, D. (2008). Pedagogy against the state. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 27(3), 226240.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, D. (2012). Contemporary art and art in education: The new, emancipation and truth. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 31(1), 518.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett, T. (2013). The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157173.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Campolmi, I. (2016). Institutional engagement and the growing role of ethics in contemporary curatorial practice. Museum International, 68(3–4), 6883. https://doi.org/10.1111/muse.12137186
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cutler, A. (2010, Spring). What is to be done, Sandra? Learning in cultural institutions of the 21st century. Tate Papers. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/13/what-is-to-be-done-sandra-learning-in-cultural-institutions-of-the-twenty-first-century
  10. Dall, A. , Hyland, S. , Leung, M. , Riding, D. , Straine, S. , & Swan, M. (2016). We have your art gallery: Negotiations in co-creation. Engage, 37. https://engage.org/journals/engage-37/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dewdney, A. (2008). Making audiences visible. Tate [E]ncounters, 2, 123.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fortnum, R. (2013). Creative accounting: Not knowing in talking and making. In E. Fisher & R. Fortnum (Eds.), On not knowing: How artists think (pp. 7088). Black Dog Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Haraway, D. (1987). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(4), 142.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones, R. (2013). On the value of not knowing: Wonder, beginning again and letting be. In E. Fisher & R. Fortnum (Eds.), On not knowing: How artists think (pp. 1632). Black Dog Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kester, G. H. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lahav, S. (2000). A special place, a learning space: Museums in the twenty-first century. Art Book, 7(4), 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lord, B. (2006). Foucault's museum: Difference, representation, and genealogy. Museum and Society, 4(1), 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Obrist, H.-U. , & Bovier, L. (2008). A brief history of curating (vol. 3). Jrp Ringier Kunstverlag Ag.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. O'Neill, P. (2007). Curating subjects. Open Editions.
  20. O'Neill, P. (2012). Curatorial constellation and the paracuratorial paradox. The Exhibitionist, 6, 5560.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Neill, P. , & Wilson, M. (2010). Curating and the educational turn. Open Editions and de Appel.
  22. Pringle, E. , & DeWitt, J. (2014, Autumn). Perceptions, processes and practices around learning in an art gallery. Tate Papers.
  23. Riding, D. , Grimshaw, N. , Talbot-Landers, C. , & O'Keeffe, H. (2019). Developing place-based pedagogies to challenge institutional authority. International Journal for Art and Design Education, 38(4), 927942.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Riding, D. , Talbot Landers, C. , Grimshaw, N. , & O'Keefe, H. (2019). Developing a not knowing pedagogy in the public art museum. The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, 12(4), 1322.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rogoff, I. (2008). Turning. E-flux Journal, 00, 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sayers, E. (2011). Investigating the impact of contrasting paradigms of knowledge on the emancipatory aims of gallery programmes for young people. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(3), 409422.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheikh, S. (2006). Spaces for thinking. Texte zur Kunst, 62, 110121.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith, T. E. (2012). Thinking contemporary curating. Independent Curators International.
  29. Tallant, S. (2009). Experiments in integrated programming. Tate Papers, 11. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/11
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Adams, J. , & Owens, A. (2015). Creativity and democracy in education: Practices and politics of learning through the arts. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson, D. (2008). Pedagogy against the state. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 27(3), 226240.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, D. (2012). Contemporary art and art in education: The new, emancipation and truth. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 31(1), 518.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bennett, T. (2013). The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernstein, B. (1999). Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157173.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. Verso Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Campolmi, I. (2016). Institutional engagement and the growing role of ethics in contemporary curatorial practice. Museum International, 68(3–4), 6883. https://doi.org/10.1111/muse.12137186
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cutler, A. (2010, Spring). What is to be done, Sandra? Learning in cultural institutions of the 21st century. Tate Papers. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/13/what-is-to-be-done-sandra-learning-in-cultural-institutions-of-the-twenty-first-century
  10. Dall, A. , Hyland, S. , Leung, M. , Riding, D. , Straine, S. , & Swan, M. (2016). We have your art gallery: Negotiations in co-creation. Engage, 37. https://engage.org/journals/engage-37/
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Dewdney, A. (2008). Making audiences visible. Tate [E]ncounters, 2, 123.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fortnum, R. (2013). Creative accounting: Not knowing in talking and making. In E. Fisher & R. Fortnum (Eds.), On not knowing: How artists think (pp. 7088). Black Dog Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Haraway, D. (1987). A manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology and socialist feminism. Australian Feminist Studies, 2(4), 142.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Jones, R. (2013). On the value of not knowing: Wonder, beginning again and letting be. In E. Fisher & R. Fortnum (Eds.), On not knowing: How artists think (pp. 1632). Black Dog Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kester, G. H. (2004). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lahav, S. (2000). A special place, a learning space: Museums in the twenty-first century. Art Book, 7(4), 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lord, B. (2006). Foucault's museum: Difference, representation, and genealogy. Museum and Society, 4(1), 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Obrist, H.-U. , & Bovier, L. (2008). A brief history of curating (vol. 3). Jrp Ringier Kunstverlag Ag.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. O'Neill, P. (2007). Curating subjects. Open Editions.
  20. O'Neill, P. (2012). Curatorial constellation and the paracuratorial paradox. The Exhibitionist, 6, 5560.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. O'Neill, P. , & Wilson, M. (2010). Curating and the educational turn. Open Editions and de Appel.
  22. Pringle, E. , & DeWitt, J. (2014, Autumn). Perceptions, processes and practices around learning in an art gallery. Tate Papers.
  23. Riding, D. , Grimshaw, N. , Talbot-Landers, C. , & O'Keeffe, H. (2019). Developing place-based pedagogies to challenge institutional authority. International Journal for Art and Design Education, 38(4), 927942.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Riding, D. , Talbot Landers, C. , Grimshaw, N. , & O'Keefe, H. (2019). Developing a not knowing pedagogy in the public art museum. The International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, 12(4), 1322.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rogoff, I. (2008). Turning. E-flux Journal, 00, 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sayers, E. (2011). Investigating the impact of contrasting paradigms of knowledge on the emancipatory aims of gallery programmes for young people. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(3), 409422.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sheikh, S. (2006). Spaces for thinking. Texte zur Kunst, 62, 110121.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith, T. E. (2012). Thinking contemporary curating. Independent Curators International.
  29. Tallant, S. (2009). Experiments in integrated programming. Tate Papers, 11. https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/11
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9781789389135.c14
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789389135
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test