Skip to content
1981

oa Spatial Practices, Craftsmanship, and Empowerment. On the Collaborative Project on Roma Building Culture in Dortmund

image of Spatial Practices, Craftsmanship, and Empowerment. On the Collaborative Project Faţadă/Façade on Roma Building Culture in Dortmund
file format pdf download PDF

Kerstin Meincke's contribution to this volume focuses on the interplay between building practices, migration, and empowerment by analysing Christoph Wachter's and Mathias Jud's collaborative artistic project “Faţadă/Façade” on Roma building culture, realised in the city of Dortmund between 2018 and 2020 in the framework of Interkultur Ruhr. Besides analysing the project and its transfer from the workshop to the public space and into the museum, it also touches upon memorial culture around migration within urban planning strategies.

Keywords: Architectural Models ; Collective artwork ; Crafts ; Entanglement between countries of Origin and Arrival ; group stigmatization ; Mallinckrodt Street workshop ; Mathias Jud and Christoph Wachter ; Memory practices and Memory Culture around Migration ; Migration ; Monument ; Nordstadt district ; Roma Palaces ; Wall painting

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/9781789389616/9781789389630-c06.html?itemId=/content/books/9781789389616.c06&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
Spatial Practices, Craftsmanship, and Empowerment. On the Collaborative Project Faţadă/Façade on Roma Building Culture in Dortmund
Intellect , 104 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1386/9781789389616_8
/content/books/9781789389616.c06
/content/books/9781789389616.c06
Loading

Data & Media loading...

References

  1. Andreşoiu, Bruno, editor. Kastello: palate ale rromilor din România / Palaces of the Roma in Romania. Igloo, 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arns, Inke. “Nordstadt.” Faţadă / Fassade. HMKV Ausstellungsmagazin, vol. 2, Kettler, 2020, pp. 108–111.120
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arns, Inke, and Fabian Saavedra-Lara, editors. Faţadă / Fassade. HMKV Ausstellungsmagazin, vol. 2, Kettler, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Daniel, and Maria Hlavajova, editors. We Roma. A Critical Reader in Contemporary Art, BAK, 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks, Ethel. “Reclaiming: The Camp and the Avant-Garde.” We Roma. A Critical Reader in Contemporary Art, edited by Daniel Baker and Maria Hlavajova, BAK, 2013, pp. 114–139.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR). Leitfaden zum Umgang mit Problemimmobilien. Herausforderungen und Lösungen im Quartierskontext, 2019, https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/veroeffentlichungen/sonderveroeffentlichungen/2020/leitfaden-problemimmobilien-dl.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3. Accessed 5 November 2021.
  7. Calzi, Renata, et al. Gypsy Architecture: Houses of the Roma in Eastern Europe. Menges, 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cioponea, Daniela. “Evolution of the Dămăroaia District at the Beginning of the Millenium. Involvement and Determination of the Rommany Population.” n.d., http://anale-arhitectura.spiruharet.ro/PDF/1_2012/6.final%20arhitectura%20minoritatii%20rrome%20bun_paginat[1]%20ENGLEZA.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2021.
  9. City of Dortmund, editor. Population by gender and migration background in the statistical districts on 31.12.2021, 2021, https://www.dortmund.de/media/p/statistik/pdf_statistik/bevoelkerung/02_02_Bevoelkerung_Geschlecht_Staatsangehoerigkeit_Statistische_Bezirke.pdf. Accessed 25 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. City of Dortmund, Amt für Stadterneuerung. Nordstadt, https://www.dortmund.de/themen/planen-und-bauen/quartierskonzepte/stadterneuerung-nordstadt/. Accessed 5 December 2023.
  11. Cojocaru, Andreea. “A Hierarchy of Separation: Emerging Territorialization Techniques in Romanian Gypsy Communities.” Perspecta. Urban Divides, vol. 50, 2017, pp. 229–240.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Creţan, Remus, and Ryan Powell. “The Power of Group Stigmatization: Wealthy Roma, Urban Space and Strategies of Defence in Post-socialist Romania.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 42, no. 3, 2018, pp. 423–441.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Crowe, David M. A History of the Gypsies of Eastern Europe and Russia. Second edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Finkenberger, Isabel Maria, et al., editors. Komplement und Verstärker/Amplifier and Complement, Jovis, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Genge, Gabriele, et al., editors. Aesthetic Temporalities Today: Present, Presentness, Re-Presentation. transcript, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gernot, Wolfram. Die Kunst, für sich selbst zu sprechen. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gräf, Rudolf R. [Z…]paläste: Die Architektur der Roma in Rumänien. Rumänische Akad., 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Grigore, Delia. “Rroma Self-Representation Reflected in Housing: From Internalised Stigma to the Quest for Dignity.” Faţadă / Fassade. HMKV Ausstellungsmagazin, vol. 2, Kettler, 2020, pp. 44–51.121
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. Diesseits der Hermeneutik. Über die Produktion von Präsenz. Suhrkamp, 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Harrod, Tanya, editor. Craft. Documents of Contemporary Art. Whitechapel, 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jud, Christoph, and Mathias Wachter. “Fassade. Mai 2016 – Dezember 2019. Rumänien / Ruhrgebiet. Von Repressionen und Repräsentationen im Stadtraum.” 2020. https://interkultur.ruhr/kalender/fassade. Accessed 11 December 2023.
  22. Jud, Christoph, and Mathias Wachter. “More Is More. On Architecture, Racism and Classism.” Podcast in the Context of the Series of Podcasts: How the Roma Community Reclaims Housing Space, edited by Olga Felker, 27 November 2020. https://www.hmkv.de/events/events-details/faţadă-how-the-roma-community-reclaims-housing-space-podcast-by-olga-felker.html. Accessed 30 March 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kastner, Jens. “Insurrektion und symbolische Arbeit. Graffiti in Oaxaca (Mexiko) 2006/2007 als Subversion und künstlerische Politik.” Kunst, Krise, Subversion. Zur Politik der Ästhetik, edited by Nina Bandi et al., transcript, 2012, pp. 37–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Keitz, Kay von. “Between Autonomous Avantgarde and Ornamental Repair. Art as an Element of Urban Design.” Komplement und Verstärker / Amplifier and Complement, edited by Isabel Maria Finkenberger et al., Jovis, 2019, pp. 148–151.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kilper, Heiderose, editor. Migration und Baukultur: Transformation des Bauens durch individuelle und kollektive Einwanderung. Birkhäuser, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kluhs, Johanna-Yasirra, et al., editors. What we can relate to. Interkultur Ruhr 2016–2021. Strzelecki Books, 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lasser, Ethan W. “Scaling Up. Theaster Gates, Jr, and His Toolkit.” Journal of Modern Craft, vol. 6, no. 1, 2013, pp. 79–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehmann, Ulrich. “Making is Knowing.” Journal of Modern Craft, vol. 5, no. 2, 2012, pp. 149–164.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. McGarry, Aidan, et al. “Introduction: The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication.” The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication, edited by Aidan McGarry et al., Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ngo, Anh Linh, and Sascha Kellermann. “Editorial.” ARCH+, no. 245, Fassadenmanifest, November 2021, pp. 1–3.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Preda, Mihaela-Daniela, et al. “The Palace Architecture of the Roma Population in Romania.” Eastern European Countryside, vol. 24, no. 1, 2018, pp. 189–217, https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2018-0010.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Petryk, Nina. “Process Capability of the Houses.” Faţadă / Fassade. HMKV Ausstellungsmagazin, vol. 2, Kettler, 2020, pp. 86f.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Remmel, Franz. Die Roma Rumäniens – Volk ohne Hinterland. Picus, 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Saavedra-Lara, Fabian. Conversation with Kerstin Meincke, July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Paradigm, 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Scheppe, Wolfgang. “Die reine Fassade.” ARCH+, no. 245, Fassadenmanifest, November 2021, pp. 18–53.122
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Toma, Stefánia. “The Microcosm of Migration and Return: Identity, Space and Home in Romania.” HOMInG Working Paper, no. 9, 2020, pp. 1–24. https://erchoming.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/toma_wp_may-19_ba.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2022.https://erchoming.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/toma_wp_may-19_ba.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Tomlinson, Elena. “The ‘Palaces’ of the Romanian Roma: A Claim to Citizenship.” Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, vol. 19, no. 1, 2007, pp. 77–90.
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Andreşoiu, Bruno, editor. Kastello: palate ale rromilor din România / Palaces of the Roma in Romania. Igloo, 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Arns, Inke. “Nordstadt.” Faţadă / Fassade. HMKV Ausstellungsmagazin, vol. 2, Kettler, 2020, pp. 108–111.120
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arns, Inke, and Fabian Saavedra-Lara, editors. Faţadă / Fassade. HMKV Ausstellungsmagazin, vol. 2, Kettler, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Baker, Daniel, and Maria Hlavajova, editors. We Roma. A Critical Reader in Contemporary Art, BAK, 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks, Ethel. “Reclaiming: The Camp and the Avant-Garde.” We Roma. A Critical Reader in Contemporary Art, edited by Daniel Baker and Maria Hlavajova, BAK, 2013, pp. 114–139.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR). Leitfaden zum Umgang mit Problemimmobilien. Herausforderungen und Lösungen im Quartierskontext, 2019, https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/veroeffentlichungen/sonderveroeffentlichungen/2020/leitfaden-problemimmobilien-dl.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=3. Accessed 5 November 2021.
  7. Calzi, Renata, et al. Gypsy Architecture: Houses of the Roma in Eastern Europe. Menges, 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cioponea, Daniela. “Evolution of the Dămăroaia District at the Beginning of the Millenium. Involvement and Determination of the Rommany Population.” n.d., http://anale-arhitectura.spiruharet.ro/PDF/1_2012/6.final%20arhitectura%20minoritatii%20rrome%20bun_paginat[1]%20ENGLEZA.pdf. Accessed 20 November 2021.
  9. City of Dortmund, editor. Population by gender and migration background in the statistical districts on 31.12.2021, 2021, https://www.dortmund.de/media/p/statistik/pdf_statistik/bevoelkerung/02_02_Bevoelkerung_Geschlecht_Staatsangehoerigkeit_Statistische_Bezirke.pdf. Accessed 25 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. City of Dortmund, Amt für Stadterneuerung. Nordstadt, https://www.dortmund.de/themen/planen-und-bauen/quartierskonzepte/stadterneuerung-nordstadt/. Accessed 5 December 2023.
  11. Cojocaru, Andreea. “A Hierarchy of Separation: Emerging Territorialization Techniques in Romanian Gypsy Communities.” Perspecta. Urban Divides, vol. 50, 2017, pp. 229–240.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Creţan, Remus, and Ryan Powell. “The Power of Group Stigmatization: Wealthy Roma, Urban Space and Strategies of Defence in Post-socialist Romania.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 42, no. 3, 2018, pp. 423–441.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Crowe, David M. A History of the Gypsies of Eastern Europe and Russia. Second edition, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Finkenberger, Isabel Maria, et al., editors. Komplement und Verstärker/Amplifier and Complement, Jovis, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Genge, Gabriele, et al., editors. Aesthetic Temporalities Today: Present, Presentness, Re-Presentation. transcript, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Gernot, Wolfram. Die Kunst, für sich selbst zu sprechen. Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gräf, Rudolf R. [Z…]paläste: Die Architektur der Roma in Rumänien. Rumänische Akad., 2007.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Grigore, Delia. “Rroma Self-Representation Reflected in Housing: From Internalised Stigma to the Quest for Dignity.” Faţadă / Fassade. HMKV Ausstellungsmagazin, vol. 2, Kettler, 2020, pp. 44–51.121
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. Diesseits der Hermeneutik. Über die Produktion von Präsenz. Suhrkamp, 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Harrod, Tanya, editor. Craft. Documents of Contemporary Art. Whitechapel, 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jud, Christoph, and Mathias Wachter. “Fassade. Mai 2016 – Dezember 2019. Rumänien / Ruhrgebiet. Von Repressionen und Repräsentationen im Stadtraum.” 2020. https://interkultur.ruhr/kalender/fassade. Accessed 11 December 2023.
  22. Jud, Christoph, and Mathias Wachter. “More Is More. On Architecture, Racism and Classism.” Podcast in the Context of the Series of Podcasts: How the Roma Community Reclaims Housing Space, edited by Olga Felker, 27 November 2020. https://www.hmkv.de/events/events-details/faţadă-how-the-roma-community-reclaims-housing-space-podcast-by-olga-felker.html. Accessed 30 March 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kastner, Jens. “Insurrektion und symbolische Arbeit. Graffiti in Oaxaca (Mexiko) 2006/2007 als Subversion und künstlerische Politik.” Kunst, Krise, Subversion. Zur Politik der Ästhetik, edited by Nina Bandi et al., transcript, 2012, pp. 37–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Keitz, Kay von. “Between Autonomous Avantgarde and Ornamental Repair. Art as an Element of Urban Design.” Komplement und Verstärker / Amplifier and Complement, edited by Isabel Maria Finkenberger et al., Jovis, 2019, pp. 148–151.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kilper, Heiderose, editor. Migration und Baukultur: Transformation des Bauens durch individuelle und kollektive Einwanderung. Birkhäuser, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kluhs, Johanna-Yasirra, et al., editors. What we can relate to. Interkultur Ruhr 2016–2021. Strzelecki Books, 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lasser, Ethan W. “Scaling Up. Theaster Gates, Jr, and His Toolkit.” Journal of Modern Craft, vol. 6, no. 1, 2013, pp. 79–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lehmann, Ulrich. “Making is Knowing.” Journal of Modern Craft, vol. 5, no. 2, 2012, pp. 149–164.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. McGarry, Aidan, et al. “Introduction: The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication.” The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication, edited by Aidan McGarry et al., Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Ngo, Anh Linh, and Sascha Kellermann. “Editorial.” ARCH+, no. 245, Fassadenmanifest, November 2021, pp. 1–3.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Preda, Mihaela-Daniela, et al. “The Palace Architecture of the Roma Population in Romania.” Eastern European Countryside, vol. 24, no. 1, 2018, pp. 189–217, https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2018-0010.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Petryk, Nina. “Process Capability of the Houses.” Faţadă / Fassade. HMKV Ausstellungsmagazin, vol. 2, Kettler, 2020, pp. 86f.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Remmel, Franz. Die Roma Rumäniens – Volk ohne Hinterland. Picus, 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Saavedra-Lara, Fabian. Conversation with Kerstin Meincke, July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. Paradigm, 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Scheppe, Wolfgang. “Die reine Fassade.” ARCH+, no. 245, Fassadenmanifest, November 2021, pp. 18–53.122
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Toma, Stefánia. “The Microcosm of Migration and Return: Identity, Space and Home in Romania.” HOMInG Working Paper, no. 9, 2020, pp. 1–24. https://erchoming.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/toma_wp_may-19_ba.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2022.https://erchoming.files.wordpress.com/2020/05/toma_wp_may-19_ba.pdf. Accessed 31 March 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Tomlinson, Elena. “The ‘Palaces’ of the Romanian Roma: A Claim to Citizenship.” Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, vol. 19, no. 1, 2007, pp. 77–90.
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9781789389616.c06
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
/content/books/9781789389616.c06
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789389616
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test