Skip to content
1981

oa Zombie Canon: Art Datasets, Generative AI, and the Reanimation of the Western Canon of Art

image of Zombie Canon: Art Datasets, Generative AI, and the Reanimation of the Western Canon of Art

Art images are regularly used in computer vision research and generative AI applications. Each art dataset presents a particular point of view that both defines and delimits what art is, and this point of view often happens to closely align with the traditional western canon of art. In this chapter, I define art data in the context of machine learning and then analyze the history and make-up of one popular online art image collection-turned-dataset, WikiArt. I then turn to a discussion of an implied dataset of the popular text-to-image generator DALL-E 2. I argue that art datasets reanimate the western concept of style by instrumentalizing it in such a manner. This zombie canon of art is then deployed in the world in ways that may go unnoticed, infecting not only how we see art but how it is defined and reproduced.

Keywords: AI-generated images ; art collections ; artificial intelligence ; canon ; DALL-E ; dataset ; decolonizing ; digital resources ; digital tools ; generative AI ; western art ; WikiArt

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/9781789389760/9781789389746-c07.html?itemId=/content/books/9781789389760.c07&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah
/content/books/9781789389760.c07
Loading

Data & Media loading...

References

  1. Alpers, S. (1977), ‘Is art history?’ Daedalus, 106:3, pp. 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alpers, S., Apter, E., Armstrong, C., Buck-Morss, S., Conley, T., Crary, J., Crow, T., Gunning, T., Holly, M.A., Jay, M. and Kaufmann, T.D. (1996), ‘Visual culture questionnaire’, October, 77, pp. 2570.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Artworks by style – WikiArt.org (n.d.), www.wikiart.org. https://www.wikiart.org/en/paintings-by-style. Accessed 18 November 2022 .
  4. Barredo Arrieta, A. , Díaz-Rodríguez, N. , Del Ser, J. , Bennetot, A. , Tabik, S. , Barbado, A. , Garcia, S. , Gil-Lopez, S. , Molina, D. , Benjamins, R. , Chatila, R. and Herrera, F. (2020), ‘Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI’, Information Fusion, 58, pp. 82115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Belting, H. (1987), The End of the History of Art? (trans. C.S. Wood), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryson, N. (ed.) (1988), Calligram: Essays in New Art History from France, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cetinic, E. , Lipic, T. and Grgic, S. (2019), ‘A deep learning perspective on beauty, sentiment, and remembrance of art’, IEEE Access, 7, pp. 73694710, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921101.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crawford, K. and Paglen, T. (2019), ‘Excavating AI: The politics of images in machine learning training sets’, https://www.excavating.ai/. Accessed 16 January 2024 .
  9. Elgammal, A. , Mazzone, M. , Liu, B. , Kim, D. and Elhoseiny, M. (2018), ‘The shape of art history in the eyes of the machine’, http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07729v2. Accessed 21 July 2020 .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fanon, F. (2021), Black Skin, White Masks (trans. R. Philcox), London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Forsythe, C. (1994), ‘Bill's bounty: A digital art gallery’, Wired, 1 April, https://www.wired.com/1994/04/bills-bounty-a-digital-art-gallery/. Accessed 21 December 2022 .
  12. Giedion, S. (1948), Mechanization Takes Command, a Contribution to Anonymous History, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Google (n.d.), About Google Cultural Institute, https://about.artsandculture.google.com/. Accessed 29 April 2021 .
  14. Grant, C. and Price, D. (2020), ‘Decolonizing art history’, Art History, 43:1, pp. 866.144
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang, S. , Huang, Q. , Ye, Q. and Gao, W. (2006), ‘An effective method to detect and categorize digitized traditional Chinese paintings’, Pattern Recognition Letters, 27:7, pp. 73446.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson, K. (n.d.), ‘DALL-E 2 creates incredible images – and biased ones you don't see’, Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/dall-e-2-ai-text-image-bias-social-media/. Accessed 17 January 2023 .
  17. Khan, F.S. , Beigpour, S. , Weijer, J. van de and Felsberg, M. (2014), ‘Painting-91: A large scale database for computational painting categorization’, Machine Vision and Applications, 25:6, pp. 138597.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Liong, S.-T. , Huang, Y.-C. , Li, S. , Huang, Z. , Ma, J. and Gan, Y.S. (2020), ‘Automatic traditional Chinese painting classification: A benchmarking analysis’, Computational Intelligence, 36: 3, pp. 118399, https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12328.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lorde, A. (1981), ‘The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house’, in G. Anzaldúa and C. Moraga (eds), This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, New York: Kitchen Table Press, pp. 98101.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Manovich, L. (2013), Software Takes Command, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mao, H. , Cheung, M. and She, J. (2017), ‘DeepArt: Learning joint representations of visual arts’, in Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 118391.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelson, R.S. (1997), ‘The map of art history’, The Art Bulletin, 79: 1, pp. 2840, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1997.10786721.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Orton, F. and Pollock, G. (1996), ‘Les Données Bretonnantes: La Prairie de Représentation’, in Avant-Gardes and Partisans Reviewed, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 5388.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Prakash, G. (1995), ‘Introduction: After colonialism’, in G. Prakash (ed.), After Colonialism, Princeton: Princeton University Press (Imperial Histories and Postcolonial Displacements), pp. 318, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t242.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rose, J. (2022), ‘The AI that draws what you type is very racist, shocking no one’, Vice, 13 April, https://www.vice.com/en/article/wxdawn/the-ai-that-draws-what-you-type-is-very-racist-shocking-no-one. Accessed 17 January 2023 .
  26. Saleh, B. and Elgammal, A. (2016), ‘Large-scale classification of fine-art paintings: Learning the right metric on the right feature’, International Journal for Digital Art History, pp. 7093.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sandoval, C. , Pirogova, E. and Lech, M. (2019), ‘Two-stage deep learning approach to the classification of fine-art paintings’, IEEE Access, 7, pp. 4177081, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907986.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schuhmann, C. (2021), LAION-400-MILLION OPEN DATASET, https://laion.ai/blog/laion-400-open-dataset. Accessed 9 October 2023 .
  29. Sheng, J. and Li, Y. (2019), ‘Classification of traditional Chinese paintings using a modified embedding algorithm’, Journal of Electronic Imaging, 28:2, p. 023013, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.28.2.023013.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Strezoski, G. and Worring, M. (2018), ‘OmniArt: A large-scale artistic benchmark’, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 14:4, pp. 88:188:21, https://doi.org/10.1145/3273022.145
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun, M. , Zhang, D. , Ren, J. , Wang, Z. and Jin, J.S. (2015), ‘Brushstroke based sparse hybrid convolutional neural networks for author classification of Chinese ink-wash paintings’, in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 62630, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2015.7350874.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tan, W.R. , Chan, C.S. , Aguirre, H.E. and Tanaka, K. (2016), ‘Ceci n'est pas une pipe: A deep convolutional network for fine-art paintings classification’, in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 370307, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533051.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Terras, M.M. (2011), ‘The rise of digitization: An overview’, in R. Rikowski (ed.), Digitisation Perspectives, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 320.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wasielewski, A. (2023), Computational Formalism: Art History and Machine Learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wayback Machine (n.d.), https://web.archive.org/. Accessed 16 November 2022 .
  36. WikiArt (n.d.), ‘About’, https://www.wikiart.org/en/about. Accessed 10 August 2022 .
  37. wikiart.org whois lookup – who.is (n.d.), https://who.is/whois/wikiart.org. Accessed 16 November 2022 .
  38. WikiPaintings blog (2012), https://web.archive.org/web/20120102225826/http://blog.wikipaintings.org:80/. Accessed 16 November 2022 .
  39. wikipaintings.com whois lookup – who.is (n.d.), https://who.is/whois/wikipaintings.com. Accessed 16 November 2022 .
  40. Wölfflin, H. (1979), Renaissance and Baroque (trans. K. Simon), Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang, D. , Ye, X. and Guo, B. (2021), ‘Application of multitask joint sparse representation algorithm in Chinese painting image classification’, Complexity, 2021, p. e5546338, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5546338.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhong, S. , Huang, X. and Xiao, Z. (2020), ‘Fine-art painting classification via two-channel dual path networks’, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 11:1, pp. 13752, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-019-00963-0.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Zweig, B. (2015), ‘Forgotten genealogies: Brief reflections on the history of digital art history’, International Journal for Digital Art History, 1, pp. 3849.146
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Alpers, S. (1977), ‘Is art history?’ Daedalus, 106:3, pp. 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alpers, S., Apter, E., Armstrong, C., Buck-Morss, S., Conley, T., Crary, J., Crow, T., Gunning, T., Holly, M.A., Jay, M. and Kaufmann, T.D. (1996), ‘Visual culture questionnaire’, October, 77, pp. 2570.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Artworks by style – WikiArt.org (n.d.), www.wikiart.org. https://www.wikiart.org/en/paintings-by-style. Accessed 18 November 2022 .
  4. Barredo Arrieta, A. , Díaz-Rodríguez, N. , Del Ser, J. , Bennetot, A. , Tabik, S. , Barbado, A. , Garcia, S. , Gil-Lopez, S. , Molina, D. , Benjamins, R. , Chatila, R. and Herrera, F. (2020), ‘Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI’, Information Fusion, 58, pp. 82115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Belting, H. (1987), The End of the History of Art? (trans. C.S. Wood), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bryson, N. (ed.) (1988), Calligram: Essays in New Art History from France, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cetinic, E. , Lipic, T. and Grgic, S. (2019), ‘A deep learning perspective on beauty, sentiment, and remembrance of art’, IEEE Access, 7, pp. 73694710, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2921101.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Crawford, K. and Paglen, T. (2019), ‘Excavating AI: The politics of images in machine learning training sets’, https://www.excavating.ai/. Accessed 16 January 2024 .
  9. Elgammal, A. , Mazzone, M. , Liu, B. , Kim, D. and Elhoseiny, M. (2018), ‘The shape of art history in the eyes of the machine’, http://arxiv.org/abs/1801.07729v2. Accessed 21 July 2020 .
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fanon, F. (2021), Black Skin, White Masks (trans. R. Philcox), London: Penguin Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Forsythe, C. (1994), ‘Bill's bounty: A digital art gallery’, Wired, 1 April, https://www.wired.com/1994/04/bills-bounty-a-digital-art-gallery/. Accessed 21 December 2022 .
  12. Giedion, S. (1948), Mechanization Takes Command, a Contribution to Anonymous History, New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Google (n.d.), About Google Cultural Institute, https://about.artsandculture.google.com/. Accessed 29 April 2021 .
  14. Grant, C. and Price, D. (2020), ‘Decolonizing art history’, Art History, 43:1, pp. 866.144
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jiang, S. , Huang, Q. , Ye, Q. and Gao, W. (2006), ‘An effective method to detect and categorize digitized traditional Chinese paintings’, Pattern Recognition Letters, 27:7, pp. 73446.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Johnson, K. (n.d.), ‘DALL-E 2 creates incredible images – and biased ones you don't see’, Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/dall-e-2-ai-text-image-bias-social-media/. Accessed 17 January 2023 .
  17. Khan, F.S. , Beigpour, S. , Weijer, J. van de and Felsberg, M. (2014), ‘Painting-91: A large scale database for computational painting categorization’, Machine Vision and Applications, 25:6, pp. 138597.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Liong, S.-T. , Huang, Y.-C. , Li, S. , Huang, Z. , Ma, J. and Gan, Y.S. (2020), ‘Automatic traditional Chinese painting classification: A benchmarking analysis’, Computational Intelligence, 36: 3, pp. 118399, https://doi.org/10.1111/coin.12328.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lorde, A. (1981), ‘The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house’, in G. Anzaldúa and C. Moraga (eds), This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, New York: Kitchen Table Press, pp. 98101.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Manovich, L. (2013), Software Takes Command, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Mao, H. , Cheung, M. and She, J. (2017), ‘DeepArt: Learning joint representations of visual arts’, in Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 118391.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nelson, R.S. (1997), ‘The map of art history’, The Art Bulletin, 79: 1, pp. 2840, https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.1997.10786721.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Orton, F. and Pollock, G. (1996), ‘Les Données Bretonnantes: La Prairie de Représentation’, in Avant-Gardes and Partisans Reviewed, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 5388.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Prakash, G. (1995), ‘Introduction: After colonialism’, in G. Prakash (ed.), After Colonialism, Princeton: Princeton University Press (Imperial Histories and Postcolonial Displacements), pp. 318, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7t242.4.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rose, J. (2022), ‘The AI that draws what you type is very racist, shocking no one’, Vice, 13 April, https://www.vice.com/en/article/wxdawn/the-ai-that-draws-what-you-type-is-very-racist-shocking-no-one. Accessed 17 January 2023 .
  26. Saleh, B. and Elgammal, A. (2016), ‘Large-scale classification of fine-art paintings: Learning the right metric on the right feature’, International Journal for Digital Art History, pp. 7093.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sandoval, C. , Pirogova, E. and Lech, M. (2019), ‘Two-stage deep learning approach to the classification of fine-art paintings’, IEEE Access, 7, pp. 4177081, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2907986.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Schuhmann, C. (2021), LAION-400-MILLION OPEN DATASET, https://laion.ai/blog/laion-400-open-dataset. Accessed 9 October 2023 .
  29. Sheng, J. and Li, Y. (2019), ‘Classification of traditional Chinese paintings using a modified embedding algorithm’, Journal of Electronic Imaging, 28:2, p. 023013, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JEI.28.2.023013.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Strezoski, G. and Worring, M. (2018), ‘OmniArt: A large-scale artistic benchmark’, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 14:4, pp. 88:188:21, https://doi.org/10.1145/3273022.145
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sun, M. , Zhang, D. , Ren, J. , Wang, Z. and Jin, J.S. (2015), ‘Brushstroke based sparse hybrid convolutional neural networks for author classification of Chinese ink-wash paintings’, in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 62630, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2015.7350874.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Tan, W.R. , Chan, C.S. , Aguirre, H.E. and Tanaka, K. (2016), ‘Ceci n'est pas une pipe: A deep convolutional network for fine-art paintings classification’, in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 370307, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2016.7533051.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Terras, M.M. (2011), ‘The rise of digitization: An overview’, in R. Rikowski (ed.), Digitisation Perspectives, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 320.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wasielewski, A. (2023), Computational Formalism: Art History and Machine Learning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Wayback Machine (n.d.), https://web.archive.org/. Accessed 16 November 2022 .
  36. WikiArt (n.d.), ‘About’, https://www.wikiart.org/en/about. Accessed 10 August 2022 .
  37. wikiart.org whois lookup – who.is (n.d.), https://who.is/whois/wikiart.org. Accessed 16 November 2022 .
  38. WikiPaintings blog (2012), https://web.archive.org/web/20120102225826/http://blog.wikipaintings.org:80/. Accessed 16 November 2022 .
  39. wikipaintings.com whois lookup – who.is (n.d.), https://who.is/whois/wikipaintings.com. Accessed 16 November 2022 .
  40. Wölfflin, H. (1979), Renaissance and Baroque (trans. K. Simon), Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang, D. , Ye, X. and Guo, B. (2021), ‘Application of multitask joint sparse representation algorithm in Chinese painting image classification’, Complexity, 2021, p. e5546338, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5546338.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhong, S. , Huang, X. and Xiao, Z. (2020), ‘Fine-art painting classification via two-channel dual path networks’, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 11:1, pp. 13752, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-019-00963-0.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Zweig, B. (2015), ‘Forgotten genealogies: Brief reflections on the history of digital art history’, International Journal for Digital Art History, 1, pp. 3849.146
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9781789389760.c07
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781789389760
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test