Skip to content
1981

The Possible Worlds of VR Documentary

image of The Possible Worlds of VR Documentary

Producers have been drawn to virtual reality (VR) for its potential to render vivid experiences of nonfiction content. The politics of the platform's affective operation, particularly in relation to distant human others, has been analysed and critiqued. This chapter explores what is at play when that affective potential is deployed within mediated encounters with non-human species and speculative worlds. It considers case studies of VR projects that engage the temporal imagination and that reflect human entanglement with some of the other life forms that we share the planet with. In some of these projects, I argue, we can see the affective power of VR harnessed, not simply to provoke feeling, instead to trouble dominant ‘structures of feeling’ and support new formations of consciousness.

Keywords: Affect ; Climate Crisis ; Documentary ; Immersion ; Mixed Reality ; More-than-Human ; Temporal imagination ; Virtual Reality

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abram, David (2017), ‘On being human in a more-than-human world’, Centre for Humans and Nature, https://humansandnature.org/to-be-human-david-abram/. Accessed 10 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, Ben Joseph (2023), Talk at Sightlines Festival, Adelaide, Australia, recorded by the author.
  3. Andrews, Ben Joseph and Roberts, Emma (2021), Gondwana, Australia: Pernickety Split Pty Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Animal Equality (2016–2018), https://animalequality.org/. Accessed 6 August 2023.
  5. Arora, Gabo and Milk, Chris (2015), Waves of Grace, USA: Here be Dragons.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bevan, Chris, Green, Dave P., Rose, Mandy, Farmer, Harry, Cater, Kirsten and Fraser, Danaë Stanton (2019), VR Mediography – A History of Virtual Reality Non-fiction 2012–2018, http://vrdocumentaryencounters.co.uk/vrmediography. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Biidaaban Official Website (2018), https://www.nfb.ca/interactive/biidaaban_first_light. Accessed 10 July 2024.
  8. Bolter, Jay and Grusin, Richard (1998), Remediation: Understanding New Media, Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brewster, Joe, Elayat, Yasmin and Stephenson, Michèle (2021), The Changing Same VR – Episode 1 The Dilemma, USA: Rada Studio, Scatter.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brewster, Joe and Stephenson, Michèle (2019), The Changing Same, USA: CBS.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchanan, Brett (2008), Onto-Ethologies: The Animal Environments of Uexkull, Heigedder, Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze, Durham: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Christie, Ian (2024), ‘Afterword. Beyond the frame: “immersion”: New technologies and old ambitions’, in I. Christie (ed.), Spaces: Exploring Spatial Experiences of Representation and Reception in Screen Media, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 199–2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Davies, Char (2004), ‘Virtual space’, in G. Radick, R. Howell and F. Penz (eds), Space in Science, Art and Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. de la Bellacasa, Maria Puig (2017), Matters of Care – Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. de la Pena, Nonny (2012), Hunger in Los Angeles, USA: Nonny de la Pena, Virtual Pyedog, https://emblematicgroup.com/experiences/hunger-in-la/. Accessed 26 September 2023.117
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Emersion, Darren (2022), In Pursuit of Repetitive Beats, UK: East City Films.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fletcher, Mark (2016), In the Presence of Animals, USA: Brown, Casey and Condition One, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCtWo-yh3F4&t=2s. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Green, David, Rose, Mandy, Bevan, Chris R., Farmer, Harry, Cater, Kirsten and Fraser, Danaë Stanton (2021), ‘“You wouldn't get that from watching TV!”: Exploring audience responses to virtual reality non-fiction in the home’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27:3, pp. 805–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Godmillow, Jill (1999), ‘What's wrong with the liberal documentary?’ Peace Review, 11:1, pp. 91–98, https://www3.nd.edu/~jgodmilo/liberal.html. Accessed 19 December 2023
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gourdet, Frederic and Lefevre, Manuel (2018), 700 Sharks, France: Arte, Le Cinquieme Reve and Neotopy, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWFLe-vEbh4&t=2s. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Grierson, John (1979), Grierson on Documentary (ed. F. Hardy), London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Han Ersin, Ersin, Steel, Barnaby and McNicholas, Robin (2015), In the Eyes of the Animal, UK: Abandon Normal Devices, Marshmallow Laser Feast, http://intheeyesoftheanimal.com/. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Han Ersin, Ersin, Steel, Barnaby and McNicholas, Robin (2017), Treehugger: Wawona, UK: Marshmallow Laser Feast, https://vimeo.com/195539105. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Han Ersin, Ersin, Steel, Barnaby and McNicholas, Robin (2018), We Live in an Ocean of Air, UK: Marshmallow Laser Feast, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YmaB7qqu9c. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Haraway, Donna (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14:3 (Autumn), pp. 575–599.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hopkins, Marcelle, Moran, Benedict and Wexler, Evan (2016), On the Brink of Famine, USA: Brown Institute and PBS Frontline.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jackson, Lisa (2018), Biidaaban: First Light, Canada: National Film Board of Canada, https://lisajackson.ca/filter/VR/Biidaaban-First-Light-VR. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, Jihoon (2022), Documentary's Expanded Fields: New Media and the Twenty-First-Century Documentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. LaPensee, Elizabeth (2019), Along the River of Spacetime, Canada: Exquisite Ghost.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Leacock, Richard (2012), The Feeling of Being There – A Filmmaker's Memoir, France: Semeïon.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Marks, Laura (2000), The Skin of the Film – Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McNicholas, Robin (2015), ‘In the Eyes of the Animal: Behind the Scenes’, http://intheeyesoftheanimal.com/#behind-the-scenes. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Metzinger, Tomas (2018), ‘Why is virtual reality interesting for philosophers?’ Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00101.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Milk, Chris, (2015), ‘How virtual reality can create the ultimate empathy machine’, TED, https://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_how_virtual_reality_can_create_the_ultimate_empathy_machine?language=en. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mowarin, Tyson (2018), Thalu, Dreamtime is Now, Australia: Frame VR, https://store.steampowered.com/app/1005940/Thalu_Dreamtime_is_Now/. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakamura, Lisa (2020), ‘Feeling good about feeling bad: Virtuous virtual reality and the automation of racial empathy’, Journal of Visual Culture, 19:1, pp. 47–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nash, Kate (2017), ‘Virtual reality witness: Exploring the ethics of mediated presence’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:2, pp. 119–131.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Newland, Charlie and Rich, Owain (2016), Trafficked, UK, Mexico: Heredia, Lourdes.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Peters, Monica (2017), VR Future Farmscrapers, Monigarr, Canada, https://monigarr.com/future-farmscrapers-vr/. Accessed 10 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pietrobon, Agniese (2021), ‘To rewrite the narrative together’, interview with Michèle Stephenson, Joe Brewster, Yasmin Elayat, XR Must, 15 February, https://www.xrmust.com/xrmagazine/stephenson-brewster-elayat-the-changing-same/. Accessed 9 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Raby, Oscar (2013), Assent, RMITU, Australia, https://oscarraby.net/assent/. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Rose, Mandy (2018a), ‘Technologies of seeing and technologies of corporeality: Currents in nonfiction virtual reality’, World Records, 1:1, https://worldrecordsjournal.org/technologies-of-seeing-and-technologies-of-corporeality/. Accessed 9 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rose, Mandy (2018b), ‘The immersive turn: Hype and hope in the emergence of virtual reality as a nonfiction platform’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:2, pp. 132–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Scott-Stevenson, Julia (2020), ‘Finding shimmer: Immersive non-fiction media and entanglements in virtual nature’, Digital Culture & Education, 12:2, pp. 1–19, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cf15af7a259990001706378/t/5f03340a38bdf707c8f78a18/1594045454596/Scott-Stevenson-merge.pdf. Accessed 19 December 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Smaill, Belinda (2016), Regarding Life – Animals and the Documentary Moving Image, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sobchack, Vivian (1992), The Address of the Eye, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.118
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Sobchack, Vivian (2004), Carnal Thoughts – Embodiment and Moving Image Culture, Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Solnit, Rebecca (2023), ‘“If you win the popular imagination, you change the game”: Why we need new stories on climate’, The Guardian, 12 January, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2023/jan/12/rebecca-solnit-climate-crisis-popular-imagination-why-we-need-new-stories. Accessed 10 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Steuer, Jonathan (1992), ‘Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence’, Journal of Communication, 42:4, pp. 73–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Sutu aka Campbell, Stuart (2018), Future Dreaming, Australia: Lucker, Alison, Visitor Vision.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Uexküll, Jacob von (1957), ‘A stroll through the worlds of animals and humans – A picture book of invisible worlds’, in C. H. Schiller (ed.), Instinctive Behaviour, the Development of a Modern Concept, New York: International Universities Press Inc., pp. 5–84, https://monoskop.org/images/1/1d/Uexkuell_Jakob_von_A_Stroll_Through_the_Worlds_of_Animals_and_Men_A_Picture_Book_of_Invisible_Worlds.pdf. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Uricchio, William (2016), ‘VR is not a film. So what is it?’ Immerse News, 8 November, https://immerse.news/vr-is-not-film-so-what-is-it-36d58e59c030. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Valle, Jose (2016a), iAnimal – Reactions, USA: Animal Equality.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Valle, Jose (2016b), Through the Eyes of a Pig, USA: Animal Equality, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-VMMotnujM. Accessed 26 September 2023
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Valle, Jose (2017a), 42 Days, USA: Animal Equality, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOFKxMnOw84. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Valle, Jose (2017b), The Dairy Industry in 360 Degrees, USA: Animal Equality, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II-J7Tw2Msc. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wallis, Keziah and Ross, Miriam (2020), Fourth VR, https://fourthvr.com. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wallis, Keziah and Ross, Miriam (2021), ‘Fourth VR: Indigenous virtual reality practice’, Convergence, 27:2, pp. 313–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Williams, Raymond (1977), Marxism and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Williams, Roger Ross (2019), Traveling While Black, Canada/USA: Felix and Paul Studios.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Winston, Brian (1988), ‘The tradition of the victim in Griersonian documentary’, in L. Gross, J. Katz and J. Ruby (eds), Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film and Television, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 34–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Winston, Brian (1996), Technologies of Seeing: Photography, Cinematography and Television, London: BFI.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Womack, Ytasha (2013), Afrofuturism: The World of Black Sci-Fi and Fantasy Culture, 1st ed., Chicago: Lawrence Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Yong, Ed (2022), An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us, London: UK: Penguin Random House.
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Abram, David (2017), ‘On being human in a more-than-human world’, Centre for Humans and Nature, https://humansandnature.org/to-be-human-david-abram/. Accessed 10 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews, Ben Joseph (2023), Talk at Sightlines Festival, Adelaide, Australia, recorded by the author.
  3. Andrews, Ben Joseph and Roberts, Emma (2021), Gondwana, Australia: Pernickety Split Pty Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Animal Equality (2016–2018), https://animalequality.org/. Accessed 6 August 2023.
  5. Arora, Gabo and Milk, Chris (2015), Waves of Grace, USA: Here be Dragons.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bevan, Chris, Green, Dave P., Rose, Mandy, Farmer, Harry, Cater, Kirsten and Fraser, Danaë Stanton (2019), VR Mediography – A History of Virtual Reality Non-fiction 2012–2018, http://vrdocumentaryencounters.co.uk/vrmediography. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Biidaaban Official Website (2018), https://www.nfb.ca/interactive/biidaaban_first_light. Accessed 10 July 2024.
  8. Bolter, Jay and Grusin, Richard (1998), Remediation: Understanding New Media, Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brewster, Joe, Elayat, Yasmin and Stephenson, Michèle (2021), The Changing Same VR – Episode 1 The Dilemma, USA: Rada Studio, Scatter.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brewster, Joe and Stephenson, Michèle (2019), The Changing Same, USA: CBS.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchanan, Brett (2008), Onto-Ethologies: The Animal Environments of Uexkull, Heigedder, Merleau-Ponty and Deleuze, Durham: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Christie, Ian (2024), ‘Afterword. Beyond the frame: “immersion”: New technologies and old ambitions’, in I. Christie (ed.), Spaces: Exploring Spatial Experiences of Representation and Reception in Screen Media, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 199–2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Davies, Char (2004), ‘Virtual space’, in G. Radick, R. Howell and F. Penz (eds), Space in Science, Art and Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. de la Bellacasa, Maria Puig (2017), Matters of Care – Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. de la Pena, Nonny (2012), Hunger in Los Angeles, USA: Nonny de la Pena, Virtual Pyedog, https://emblematicgroup.com/experiences/hunger-in-la/. Accessed 26 September 2023.117
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Emersion, Darren (2022), In Pursuit of Repetitive Beats, UK: East City Films.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fletcher, Mark (2016), In the Presence of Animals, USA: Brown, Casey and Condition One, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCtWo-yh3F4&t=2s. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Green, David, Rose, Mandy, Bevan, Chris R., Farmer, Harry, Cater, Kirsten and Fraser, Danaë Stanton (2021), ‘“You wouldn't get that from watching TV!”: Exploring audience responses to virtual reality non-fiction in the home’, Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 27:3, pp. 805–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Godmillow, Jill (1999), ‘What's wrong with the liberal documentary?’ Peace Review, 11:1, pp. 91–98, https://www3.nd.edu/~jgodmilo/liberal.html. Accessed 19 December 2023
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gourdet, Frederic and Lefevre, Manuel (2018), 700 Sharks, France: Arte, Le Cinquieme Reve and Neotopy, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWFLe-vEbh4&t=2s. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Grierson, John (1979), Grierson on Documentary (ed. F. Hardy), London: Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Han Ersin, Ersin, Steel, Barnaby and McNicholas, Robin (2015), In the Eyes of the Animal, UK: Abandon Normal Devices, Marshmallow Laser Feast, http://intheeyesoftheanimal.com/. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Han Ersin, Ersin, Steel, Barnaby and McNicholas, Robin (2017), Treehugger: Wawona, UK: Marshmallow Laser Feast, https://vimeo.com/195539105. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Han Ersin, Ersin, Steel, Barnaby and McNicholas, Robin (2018), We Live in an Ocean of Air, UK: Marshmallow Laser Feast, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YmaB7qqu9c. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Haraway, Donna (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14:3 (Autumn), pp. 575–599.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hopkins, Marcelle, Moran, Benedict and Wexler, Evan (2016), On the Brink of Famine, USA: Brown Institute and PBS Frontline.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Jackson, Lisa (2018), Biidaaban: First Light, Canada: National Film Board of Canada, https://lisajackson.ca/filter/VR/Biidaaban-First-Light-VR. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, Jihoon (2022), Documentary's Expanded Fields: New Media and the Twenty-First-Century Documentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. LaPensee, Elizabeth (2019), Along the River of Spacetime, Canada: Exquisite Ghost.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Leacock, Richard (2012), The Feeling of Being There – A Filmmaker's Memoir, France: Semeïon.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Marks, Laura (2000), The Skin of the Film – Intercultural Cinema, Embodiment, and the Senses, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. McNicholas, Robin (2015), ‘In the Eyes of the Animal: Behind the Scenes’, http://intheeyesoftheanimal.com/#behind-the-scenes. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Metzinger, Tomas (2018), ‘Why is virtual reality interesting for philosophers?’ Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00101.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Milk, Chris, (2015), ‘How virtual reality can create the ultimate empathy machine’, TED, https://www.ted.com/talks/chris_milk_how_virtual_reality_can_create_the_ultimate_empathy_machine?language=en. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mowarin, Tyson (2018), Thalu, Dreamtime is Now, Australia: Frame VR, https://store.steampowered.com/app/1005940/Thalu_Dreamtime_is_Now/. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Nakamura, Lisa (2020), ‘Feeling good about feeling bad: Virtuous virtual reality and the automation of racial empathy’, Journal of Visual Culture, 19:1, pp. 47–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Nash, Kate (2017), ‘Virtual reality witness: Exploring the ethics of mediated presence’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:2, pp. 119–131.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Newland, Charlie and Rich, Owain (2016), Trafficked, UK, Mexico: Heredia, Lourdes.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Peters, Monica (2017), VR Future Farmscrapers, Monigarr, Canada, https://monigarr.com/future-farmscrapers-vr/. Accessed 10 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pietrobon, Agniese (2021), ‘To rewrite the narrative together’, interview with Michèle Stephenson, Joe Brewster, Yasmin Elayat, XR Must, 15 February, https://www.xrmust.com/xrmagazine/stephenson-brewster-elayat-the-changing-same/. Accessed 9 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Raby, Oscar (2013), Assent, RMITU, Australia, https://oscarraby.net/assent/. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Rose, Mandy (2018a), ‘Technologies of seeing and technologies of corporeality: Currents in nonfiction virtual reality’, World Records, 1:1, https://worldrecordsjournal.org/technologies-of-seeing-and-technologies-of-corporeality/. Accessed 9 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rose, Mandy (2018b), ‘The immersive turn: Hype and hope in the emergence of virtual reality as a nonfiction platform’, Studies in Documentary Film, 12:2, pp. 132–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Scott-Stevenson, Julia (2020), ‘Finding shimmer: Immersive non-fiction media and entanglements in virtual nature’, Digital Culture & Education, 12:2, pp. 1–19, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cf15af7a259990001706378/t/5f03340a38bdf707c8f78a18/1594045454596/Scott-Stevenson-merge.pdf. Accessed 19 December 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Smaill, Belinda (2016), Regarding Life – Animals and the Documentary Moving Image, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sobchack, Vivian (1992), The Address of the Eye, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.118
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Sobchack, Vivian (2004), Carnal Thoughts – Embodiment and Moving Image Culture, Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Solnit, Rebecca (2023), ‘“If you win the popular imagination, you change the game”: Why we need new stories on climate’, The Guardian, 12 January, https://www.theguardian.com/news/2023/jan/12/rebecca-solnit-climate-crisis-popular-imagination-why-we-need-new-stories. Accessed 10 July 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Steuer, Jonathan (1992), ‘Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence’, Journal of Communication, 42:4, pp. 73–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Sutu aka Campbell, Stuart (2018), Future Dreaming, Australia: Lucker, Alison, Visitor Vision.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Uexküll, Jacob von (1957), ‘A stroll through the worlds of animals and humans – A picture book of invisible worlds’, in C. H. Schiller (ed.), Instinctive Behaviour, the Development of a Modern Concept, New York: International Universities Press Inc., pp. 5–84, https://monoskop.org/images/1/1d/Uexkuell_Jakob_von_A_Stroll_Through_the_Worlds_of_Animals_and_Men_A_Picture_Book_of_Invisible_Worlds.pdf. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Uricchio, William (2016), ‘VR is not a film. So what is it?’ Immerse News, 8 November, https://immerse.news/vr-is-not-film-so-what-is-it-36d58e59c030. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Valle, Jose (2016a), iAnimal – Reactions, USA: Animal Equality.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Valle, Jose (2016b), Through the Eyes of a Pig, USA: Animal Equality, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-VMMotnujM. Accessed 26 September 2023
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Valle, Jose (2017a), 42 Days, USA: Animal Equality, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XOFKxMnOw84. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Valle, Jose (2017b), The Dairy Industry in 360 Degrees, USA: Animal Equality, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=II-J7Tw2Msc. Accessed 26 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Wallis, Keziah and Ross, Miriam (2020), Fourth VR, https://fourthvr.com. Accessed 6 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Wallis, Keziah and Ross, Miriam (2021), ‘Fourth VR: Indigenous virtual reality practice’, Convergence, 27:2, pp. 313–29.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Williams, Raymond (1977), Marxism and Literature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Williams, Roger Ross (2019), Traveling While Black, Canada/USA: Felix and Paul Studios.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Winston, Brian (1988), ‘The tradition of the victim in Griersonian documentary’, in L. Gross, J. Katz and J. Ruby (eds), Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film and Television, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 34–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Winston, Brian (1996), Technologies of Seeing: Photography, Cinematography and Television, London: BFI.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Womack, Ytasha (2013), Afrofuturism: The World of Black Sci-Fi and Fantasy Culture, 1st ed., Chicago: Lawrence Hill.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Yong, Ed (2022), An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us, London: UK: Penguin Random House.
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9781835950685.c07
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
/content/books/9781835950685.c07
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781835950685
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test