Skip to content
1981

oa End Matter

image of End Matter
Preview this chapter:
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/9781835950821/9781835950852-bm01.html?itemId=/content/books/9781835950821.bm01&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. 189Abounaddara (2011–present), Vimeo channel, https://vimeo.com/user6924378. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  2. ACTUPNY (2012–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@ACTUPNY. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  3. Adair, Peter, Nancy Adair, Lucy Massie Phenix, Veronica Selver, Andrew Brown, and Rob Epstein (1977), Word Is Out: Stories of Some of Our Lives, directed by Mariposa Film Group, Nancy Adair, Andrew Brown, Lucy Massie Phenix, Veronica Selver, produced by Nancy Adair, Andrew Brown, Lucy Massie Phenix, Veronica Selver, USA.
  4. Airwars (2015–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@Airwarsorg. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  5. Al-Aloul, Ayman, and Yusef Maysam (2014), (Rubble Bucket Challenge), YouTube, August 23, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duSBig1-VUA. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  6. Al-Kateab, Waad, and Edward Watts (2020), For Sama, Syria, UK and USA: PBS Frontline, Channel 4 News, ITN Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Alk, Howard (1971), The Murder of Fred Hampton, USA: Chicago Film Group, MGA Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Allen, Taisha, and R. Sylon (2014), Unseen Video of Eric Garner Death—Over 7 Minutes Handcuffed Not Breathing NYPD Chokehold AFTERMATH, YouTube, July 19, http://tinyurl.com/2w2czwd4. Accessed January 5, 2024. Trigger warning: This video contains disturbing scenes.
  9. Álvarez, Santiago (1965), Now!, Cuba: Instituto Cubano del Arte e Industria Cinematográficos (ICAIC).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. American Masters PBS (2014), First Greenpeace Whale Rescue Mission | A Fierce Green Fire | American Masters, YouTube, April 2, https://tinyurl.com/2emdaa9b. Accessed August 26, 2023.
  11. Amnesty International (n.d.), Citizen Evidence Lab, Website, https://citizenevidence.org/. Accessed July 17, 2024.
  12. Amnesty International (2006–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/amnestyinternational. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  13. Amnesty International, and Max Hattler (2013), Amnesty International: Stop the Show, YouTube, April 6, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wre5VWHxSug. Accessed July 13, 2024.190
  14. Amnesty International UK (2008), The Stuff of Life / Exposing Waterboarding / International Law, YouTube, UK, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLL7O9hIloA. Accessed July 23, 2024. Trigger warning: This video contains disturbing scenes.
  15. Anders, Rayk (2013–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@RaykAnders. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  16. Antonio, Emile de (1968), In the Year of the Pig, USA: Monday Film Production, Turin Film Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Antonio, Emile de (1971), Millhouse: A White Comedy, USA: Whittier Film Corp./Turin Film Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. @aperegarom (Peregarom, Dana S.) (2022), Russian Pensioner Who Survived Siege of Leningrad Arrested for Protest Against Ukraine War, Russia, X/Twitter, March 2, https://twitter.com/aperegarom?lang=de. Accessed December 29, 2023.
  19. Antonio, Emile de, Mary Lampson, and Wexler Haskell (1976), Underground, USA: Action 27.
  20. Arrels fundació (2015), The Most Boring Viral Video, YouTube, May 3. Deleted, available at https://adsspot.me/media/tv-commercials/arrels-fundacio-the-most-boring-viral-video-3340e64c4084. Accessed July 20, 2016.
  21. bak.ma (n.d.), Website, https://bak.ma/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  22. @bait.faktencheck (n.d.), TikTok channel, https://www.tiktok.com/@bait.faktencheck. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  23. Bellingcat (2014–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@bellingcatofficial. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  24. Black Lives Matter (n.d.), Website, https://blacklivesmatter.com/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  25. Bliss, Rob (2014), 10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Woman, YouTube, October 28, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1XGPvbWn0A. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  26. Block, Hans, and Moritz Riesewieck (2018), The Cleaners, Germany: Gebrueder Beetz Filmproduktion. [See Website, https://www.bpb.de/mediathek/video/273199/the-cleaners/. Accessed July 17, 2024.]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Boe, Henrik and Nicolai Bjorke (2022), Worlds Apart, nrk, April 5, https://tinyurl.com/ d4nmcabe. Accessed November 3, 2023.
  28. Brave New Films (n.d.), Website, https://www.bravenewfilms.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  29. Brown, Matthew, Evan Cass-Kavanagh, Mary Ryder, and Jane Slater (2018), Anyone's Child: Mexico: A Living Documentary about Families Affected by Mexico's Drug War, Mexico, UK: Anyone's Child. [See Website: http://mexico.anyoneschild.org/. Accessed April 18, 2023.]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. B'Tselem (n.d.), Website, https://www.btselem.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  31. Calais Migrant Solidarity (2016), Calais Jungle Police Assaults (5th and 6th of January), YouTube, January 7, https://tinyurl.com/3aac6x2v. Accessed May 16, 2023.
  32. Campact (n.d.), Website, https://www.campact.de/. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  33. Cassetteboy (2006–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/cassetteboy. Accessed July 30, 2024.191
  34. Chai, Jing (2015), 穹顶之下 (Under the Dome), China. [See: Under the Dome (English subtitle, complete) by Chai Jing: Air pollution in China, YouTube, March 9, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/2kd9dthw. Accessed April 6, 2023.]
  35. Cinemata. Social Issue Films about the Asia-Pacific (n.d.), Website, https://cinemata.org/Cinemata.org. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  36. Critical Art Ensemble (n.d.), Website, http://critical-art.net/. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  37. Daopoulos, Rony (1971), L'Aggettivo donna (“The Adjective Woman”), Italy: Collettivo Femminista di Cinema.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Dellert, Louisa (2016–20), Instagram account, #louisadellert. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  39. Democracy at Work (2012–present), YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/@democracyatwrk. Accessed May 13, 2023.
  40. Democracy Now! Independent Global News (n.d.), Website, https://www.democracynow.org/. Accessed July, 30, 2024.
  41. Doc Society (n.d.), Website, https://docsociety.org/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  42. _docubase: The MIT Open Documentary Lab (2015), The Quipu Project, directed by Maria Court and Rosemarie Lerner, Chaka Studio, Website, https://docubase.mit.edu/project/quipu-project/. Accessed December 28, 2023.
  43. The Documentary Channel (TDC) (2015), Climate Change Explained Simply, YouTube, December 2, https://tinyurl.com/53p7est4. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  44. Ellis, Lindsay (2013–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@LindsayEllisVids. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  45. Emmerich, Roland (2004), The Day after Tomorrow, USA: Twentieth Century Fox.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ende Gelände (2019), Ende Gelände 19–24.6. 2019 Rheinland, YouTube, March 30, https://tinyurl.com/3rruyxwh. Accessed June 3, 2023.
  47. Engage Media (n.d.), Website, https://engagemedia.org/. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  48. European Alternatives (n.d.), Website, https://euroalter.com. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  49. European Community Organizing Network (ECON) (n.d.), Website, https://organizeeurope.org. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  50. Exodus: Our Journey to Europe (2016–present), TV documentary series, UK: KEO Films.
  51. Extinction Rebellion Deutschland (2019–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@ExtinctionRebellionDeutschland. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  52. Extinction Rebellion (XR) UK (2017–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@ExtinctionRebellionUK. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  53. Fegg, Nicola (2022), Following Valeria, Germany: Chromosom Film. [See: https://www.magnetfilm.de/short-film/films/details/following-valeria.html. Accessed July 17, 2024.]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. The Fifth Estate (2016), Whalers vs. Greenpeace: Standoff on the High Seas—The Fifth Estate, YouTube, July 5, https://tinyurl.com/4etnvsxa. Accessed April 19, 2023.
  55. The Film Group (1966), Cicero March, USA: The Film Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. FilmsForAction (n.d.), Website, https://www.filmsforaction.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.192
  57. Fincher, David (2010), The Social Network, USA: Columbia Pictures, Relativity Media, Scott Rudin Productions, Michael De Luca Productions, Trigger Street Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Forensic Architecture (n.d.), Website, https://forensic-architecture.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  59. Fox, Louis (2007), The Story of Stuff, USA: Free Range Studios, YouTube, April 22, 2009, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GorqroigqM. Accessed July 23, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Grant, Laurens (2016), Stay Woke: The Black Lives Matter Movement, USA: FarWord.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Greenpeace (1979), SYND 16 7 79 Ship Carrying Nuclear Waste Harried by Greenpeace Boats, YouTube (AP Archive), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bd8cOlIXjo. Accessed December 30, 2023.
  62. Greenpeace Deutschland (2007), Bei Vattenfall: Neulich in Krümmel …, YouTube, August 27, https://tinyurl.com/3avmevr5. Accessed August 16, 2023.
  63. Greenpeace International (2006–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@greenpeace. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  64. Greenpeace International (2010), Facebook: Unfriend Coal, YouTube, September 13, https://tinyurl.com/58y54e5y. Accessed April 6, 2023.
  65. Greenpeace International (2010), Give the Orangutan a Break: Nestle KitKat Spoof Video, Greenpeace media, March 17, 2010, https://tinyurl.com/mdjxtx22. Accessed August 10, 2023.
  66. Greenpeace International (2012), A Homeless Polar Bear in London—Ft. Jude Law and Radiohead, YouTube, July 3, https://tinyurl.com/yeyujea2. Accessed April 6, 2023.
  67. Greenpeace International (2015), A Song of Oil, Ice and Fire, YouTube, May 27, https://tinyurl.com/3evm3ap9. Accessed April 6, 2023.
  68. Greenpeace International (2018), There's a Rang Tan in My Bedroom, August 14, https://media.greenpeace.org/Detail/27MZIFJWY4WSN. Accessed August 16, 2023.
  69. Greenpeace Media (n.d.), Website, https://media.greenpeace.org/. Accessed July, 30, 2024.
  70. Guzmán, Patricio (1975–79), La Batalla de Chile (“The Battle of Chile”), Chile: Equipe Tercer Ano.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Hamed Rad (2009), Neda Agha Soltan Killing Scene, YouTube, June 20, https://tinyurl.com/mr2tyx3n. Accessed April 7, 2023. Trigger warning: This video contains scenes of graphic violence.
  72. Happen Films (n.d.), Website, https://happenfilms.com/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  73. Heinig, Marco, and Steffen Maurer (2018), Hamburger Gitter, Germany: Leftvision.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Heinig, Marco, Steffen Maurer, Luise Burchard, and Luca Vogel (2022), Rise Up, Germany: Freischwimmer Film and Leftvision.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. The Humane Society of the United Stetes, and Spencer Susser (2021), Save Ralph—A Short Film with Taika Waititi, YouTube, April 6, USA, Australia and UK: Arch Model Studio, Blue-Tongue Films, Humane Society International and Vespa Pictures, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G393z8s8nFY. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  76. Hurwitz, Leo (1932), Detroit Workers News Special 1932: Ford Massacre, YouTube, USA: Workers Film and Photo League. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFEskpjPbfE. Accessed July 23, 2024.193
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Indigenous Rising Media (2014–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/c/IndigenousRising/. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  78. Invisible Children, and Jason Russell (2012), KONY 2012, YouTube, March 5, https://tinyurl.com/46jxazkf. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  79. Ivens, Joris (1937), The Spanish Earth, USA: Contemporary Historians Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Jones, Owen (2015–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@owenjonestalks. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  81. Kitchell, Mark (2012), A Fierce Green Fire: The Battle for a Living Planet, USA: Zoetrope Aubry Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Kitidi, Katerina, and Aris Chatzistefanou (2011), Debtocracy, Greece: Creative Commons, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKpxPo-lInk. Accessed July 30, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lebow, Alisa (2018), Website, www.filmingrevolution.org. Accessed May 1, 2022.
  84. Leftvision (2017), Welcome to Hell—Polizei zerschlägt G20-Demo in Hamburg 2017 (“Police Smashes G20 Demonstration in Hamburg, Germany 2017”), YouTube, n.d., https://bit.ly/3S31OcN. Accessed January 5, 2024.
  85. Leftvision (2020), Gefangen auf Lesbos (Reportage), YouTube, March 14, https://tinyurl.com/yc688mhw. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  86. Leftvision (2020), Prozessauftakt gegen den Attentäter von Halle—Zeugin und Nebenklägerin blickt kritisch zurück (“Start of Trial Against the Halle Assassin: Witness and Joint Plaintiff Takes a Critical Look Back”), YouTube, July 21, https://tinyurl.com/4fjm7c8h. Accessed April 12, 2023.
  87. Letzte Generation (2021–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBeUnC1ky0b_Hwpjf9bA_qw. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  88. Linke Sau (2018–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@linkesau7595. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  89. LoveTapesCollective (2019), L020A Sylvia Rivera, “Y'All Better Quiet Down”, Original Authorized Video, 1973 Gay Pride Rally NYC, YouTube, May 23, https://tinyurl.com/xvm22u6w. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  90. Mesh Collective (2010–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/c/meshcollective. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  91. Minow, Hans-Rüdiger, and Thomas Giefer (1967), Berlin, 2. Juni ‘67, Germany: AStA der Freien Universität Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Navalny, Alexei (2021), Putin's Palace: The Story of the World's Biggest Bribe, YouTube, February 4, https://tinyurl.com/2vnvevke. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  93. New Tactics (n.d.), Website, https://tmt.newtactics.org/. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  94. Nexta TV (2015–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/nexta_tv. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  95. ¡Ni Una Menos! (n.d.), Website, https://niunamenos.org.ar/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  96. Office of the President of Ukraine (2013–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@PresidentGovUa. Accessed April 26, 2023.
  97. Olsson, Göran (2011), The Black Power Mixtape 1967–1975, Sweden: Louverture Films.194
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Orlowski, Jeff (2020), The Social Dilemma, USA: Agent Pictures.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Orta, Ramsey (2014), Eric Garner Fatal Arrest Video, New York Daily News Exclusive. [No longer retrievable online.]
  100. Papo Reto (2013–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@paporeto2279. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  101. Pataxó, Alice (2015–present), alice_pataxo. Instagram account. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  102. Pataxó, Tukumã (2013–present), tukuma_pataxo. Instagram account. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  103. Peng! Kollektiv (n.d.), Website, http://pen.gg/de/. Accessed July 30, 2022.
  104. Peng! Kollektiv (2018), Seebrücke des Bundes (“Federal Sea Bridge”), Berlin: Peng! [See: Seebrücke des Bundes Reup (2019), YouTube, February 26, http://tinyurl.com/mr3d33eh. Accessed January 5, 2024.]
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Perincioli, Cristina (1971), Für Frauen: 1. Kapitel (“For Women: Chapter 1”), Germany: Deutsche Film- und Fernsehakademie Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Perlman, Michael (2013), Occupy Wall Street: We Are the 99%, USA.
  107. PETA Deutschland (2006–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/petadeutschland. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  108. PhilosophyTube (2013–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@PhilosophyTube. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  109. Piker, Hasan (n.d.), HasanAbi, Twitch channel, www.twitch.tv/hasanabi. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  110. Politizane (2012), Wealth Inequality in America, YouTube, November 20, https://tinyurl.com/2p8a86dr. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  111. Praunheim, Rosa von (1971), Nicht der Homosexuelle ist pervers, sondern die Situation, in der er lebt (“It Is Not the Homosexual Who Is Perverse, but the Society in Which He Lives”), Germany: Bavaria.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Pro Asyl (2011–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@proasylEU. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  113. Radical Film Network (n.d.), Website, https://radicalfilmnetwork.com/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  114. ReelNews (2006–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@ReelNews. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  115. refugee.tv (2015–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@refugeetv. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  116. Reidemeister, Helga (1979), Von wegen “Schicksal” (“Is This Fate?”), Germany: Deutsche Film- und Fernsehakademie Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Renzo (2021a), Zerstörung Teil 1: Inkompetenz, YouTube, August 21, https://tinyurl.com/4f34am5c. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  118. Renzo (2021b), Zerstörung Teil 2: Klima-Katastrophe, YouTube, September 4, https://tinyurl.com/ycpzfjhw. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  119. Renzo (2021c), Zerstörung FINALE: Korruption, YouTube, September 18, https://tinyurl.com/b92wpxyp. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  120. Rezo (@rezomusik) (2019), Jo Leute, hab in den letzten Tagen sau viele Fragen bekommen und dachte, dass ich die aus meiner Sicht am häufigsten gestellten Themen hier mal kurz 195ansprechen und beantworten kann (Ein Thread) (“Guys, [...] (a thread)”), X/Twitter May 29, https://tinyurl.com/y8ajyr7x. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  121. Rezo ja lol ey (2019a), Die Zerstörung der CDU (“The Destruction of the CDU”), YouTube, May 18, https://tinyurl.com/y76tmz2u. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  122. Rezo ja lol eye (2019b), Ein Statement von 90+ YouTubern (“Statement of 90+ YouTubers”), YouTube, May 24, https://tinyurl.com/2s3zphmp. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  123. Rezo ja lol eye (2020), Die Zerstörung der Presse (“The Destruction of the Press”), YouTube, May 31, https://tinyurl.com/4pxvxupc. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  124. RobBubble (2006–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@RobBubble. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  125. Roca de Viñals, Jose Maria, Guillermo Santaisabel, Javier Urbaneja, Cristina Rodríguez, and Esteban Crespo (2015), Hologramas por la Libertad (“Holograms for Freedom”), No Somos Delito, YouTube channel, March 26, http://tinyurl.com/mpejcs6b. Accessed January 5, 2024.
  126. Sander, Helke (1968), Brecht die Macht der Manipulateure (“Break the Manipulators’ Power”), Germany: Deutsche Film- und Fernsehakademie Berlin (DFFB).
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Sander, Helke (1978), Die allseits reduzierte Persönlichkeit—Redupers (“The All-Round Reduced Personality—Redupers”), Germany: Basis Filmverleih and Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF).
    [Google Scholar]
  128. San Francisco Newsreel (1967), Black Panther a.k.a. Off the Pig (Newsreel #19), USA: Third World Newsreel.
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Sasse, Elke (2016), #My Escape/Meine Flucht, Germany: Westdeutscher Rundfunk.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Save the Children (2006–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@savethechildrenuk. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  131. Save the Children, and Martin Stirling (2014), Most Shocking Second a Day Video, YouTube, March 5, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBQ-IoHfimQ. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  132. Schneider, John B. (2018–present), X/Twitter account, JohnB_Schneider, https://twitter.com/JohnB_Schneider. Accessed July 17, 2024.
  133. Shashenok, Valeria (n.d.), TikTok account, @valerisssh. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  134. SITU Research (2011–present), Vimeo channel, https://vimeo.com/situnyc. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  135. Solanas, Fernando E., and Octavio Getino (1968), La Hora de las Hornos (“The Hour of the Furnaces”), Argentina: Grupo Cine Liberacion and Solanas Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Stokes, Edwin (2021), Conversations: The Black Radical Tradition, USA: self-produced.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Storck, Henri, and Ivens, Joris (1934), Misère au Borinage (Borinage), Belgium: self-produced.
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Syrian Archive (n.d.), https://syrianarchive.org/. Accessed April 7, 2023.
  139. Systemrelevant (2020-present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@systemrelevant8233. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  140. Tactical Tech (n.d.), Website, https://tacticaltech.org/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  141. Tagesschau (2019), Zerstörung der CDU: YouTuber Rezo polarisiert mit viralem Video (“Destruction of the CDU: YouTuber Rezo polarises with viral video”), YouTube, May 23, https://tinyurl.com/2exem7hj. Accessed April 5, 2023.196
  142. The Telegraph (2022), Deep Fake Video of Volodymyr Zelenskiy Surrendering Surfaces on Social Media, YouTube, March 17, https://tinyurl.com/2pf536xb. Accessed November 3, 2023.
  143. Testing the Limits Collective (1988), Testing the Limits: NYC, USA: Testing the Limits Collective.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Three Arrows (2016–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@ThreeArrows. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  145. TV Debout (2016), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@TVDeboutParis. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  146. TV Fórum (2010–present), Youtube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@forumrevista. Accessed August 2, 2024.
  147. Ulex Project (n.d.), Website, https://ulexproject.org. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  148. Ushahidi (n.d.), Website, https://www.ushahidi.com/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  149. Vframe (n.d.), Website, https://vframe.io/. Accesssed July 31, 2024.
  150. Video4Change (n.d.), Website, https://video4change.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  151. Videoccupy Türkiye (2013–14), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@videoccupyturkiye9204. Accesssed July 31, 2024.
  152. Volksverpetzer (n.d.), Website, https://www.volksverpetzer.de/. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  153. WikiLeaks (2010), Collateral Murder, 5 Apr 2010, 5 April, https://tinyurl.com/y2n56skv. Accessed April 6, 2023. Trigger warning: This video contains scenes with graphic violence.
  154. WITNESS (n.d.), Website, https://www.witness.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  155. WITNESS Media Lab (n.d.), Website, https://lab.witness.org/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  156. Wölken, Tiemo (2019), Reaktion auf Rezo/Tiemo Wölken, YouTube, May 22, https://tinyurl.com/394br9jh. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  157. Women's Film Group Munich (1975), Wir haben lange geschwiegen (“We Have Been Silent for a Long Time”), Germany: self-produced.
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Workers Film & Photo League International (2018–present), YouTube channel, https://tinyurl.com/92hd94u2. Accessed April 6, 2023.
  159. World Wildlife Fund Germany (2019), Die Glyphosat-Vergiftung! Aber was ist Glyphosat? | WWF Deutschland (“Intoxication by Glyphosate”), YouTube, December 5, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1AOlp1Q950. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  160. Wynn, Natalie (2011–present), ContraPoints, YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/contrapoints. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  161. The Yes Men (n.d.), Website, https://theyesmen.org/#. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  162. YouTube Advertisers (2017), The High Diver | YouTube Advertisers, YouTube, January 19, https://tinyurl.com/ystnv5s5. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  163. 197Abbamonte, Lucia. “The ‘Sustainable’ Video-Narratives of Greenpeace—An Ecolinguistic Investigation.” Forum for Modern Language Studies 57, no. 2 (2021): 14585.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. Adamson, Morgan. Enduring Images: A Future History of New Left Cinema. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  165. Adorno, Theodor W. Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. New York and London: Verso, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  166. Agde, Günter, and Alexander Schwarz, eds. Die rote Traumfabrik: Meschrabpom-Film und Prometheus 1921–1936. Berlin: Deutsche Kinemathek—Museum für Film und Fernsehen and Bertz + Fischer, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. Agency France Press. “War-Themed Video Game Fuels Wave of Misinformation.” France24, January 2, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/23bmepk2. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Aguayo, Angela J. Documentary Resistance: Social Change and Participatory Media. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Akser, Murat, and Victoria McCollum, eds. Alternative Media in Contemporary Turkey: Sustainability, Activism, and Resistance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colourblindness. London: Penguin, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  171. Alexander, William. Film on the Left: American Documentary Film from 1931 to 1942. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Alfter, Brigitte, Ralph Müller-Eiselt, and Matthias Spielkamp. “Introduction.” In Automating Society: Taking Stock of Automated Decision-Making in the EU, edited by Matthias Spielkamp, 612. Berlin: AlgorithmWatch, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. Allan, Stuart. Citizen Witnessing: Revisioning Journalism in Times of Crisis, Key Concepts in Journalism. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. Allgaier, Joachim. “Rezo and German Climate Change Policy: The Influence of Networked Expertise on YouTube and Beyond.” Media and Communication 8, no. 2 (2020): 37686.
    [Google Scholar]
  175. Amnesty International. Myanmar: The Social Atrocity: Meta and the Right to Remedy for the Rohingya. Website of Amnesty International, 2022, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ASA16/5933/2022/en/. Accessed November 3, 2023.198
  176. Andén-Papadopoulos, Kari. “Media Witnessing and the ‘Crowd Sourced Video Revolution’.” Visual Communication 12, no. 3 (2013): 34157.
    [Google Scholar]
  177. Andén-Papadopoulos, Kari. “Citizen Camera-Witnessing: Embodied Political Dissent in the Age of ‘Mediated Mass Self-Communication’.” New Media & Society 16, no. 5 (2014): 75369.
    [Google Scholar]
  178. Anders, Rayk. Eure Dummheit kotzt mich an: Wie Bullshit unser Land vergiftet. München: dtv, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  179. Anders, Rayk. Der Barbar in uns muss Liebe finden: Warum das Land verroht und wie wir uns wehren können. München: dtv, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  180. Andreasen, Alan R.Marketing Social Marketing in the Social Change Marketplace.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 21, no. 1 (2002): 313.
    [Google Scholar]
  181. Animoto. “Easily Create Professional Videos” [online course], n.d. https://animoto.com/. Accessed April 12, 2023.
  182. anlen, shirin, and Raquel Vazquez Llorente. “Using Generative AI for Human Rights Advocacy.” WITNESS, June 28, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/27vmwh77. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  183. Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
    [Google Scholar]
  184. Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. London: Penguin Books, 1963.
    [Google Scholar]
  185. Arendt, Hannah. “Lying in Politics: Reflections on the Pentagon Papers.” In Crises of the Republic. San Diego, CA, New York and London: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1972: 147.
    [Google Scholar]
  186. Arkenbout, Chloë, Jack Wilson, and Daniel de Zeeuw, eds. Critical Meme Reader: Global Mutations of the Viral Image. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. Arroyo Almaraz, Isidoro, Miguel Baños Gonzaléz, and Cliff Van-Wyck. “Analysis of the Campaign Videos Posted by the Third Sector on YouTube.” Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 68 (2013): 32854, https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-980. Accessed September 11, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  188. Askanius, Tina. Radical Online Video: YouTube, Video Activism and Social Movement Media Practices. Lund: Lund University, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  189. Askanius, Tina. “Online Video Activism and Political Mash-Up Genres.” JOMEC Journal 4 (2013), 117, https://tinyurl.com/2hwtm7ye. Accessed April 25, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  190. Askanius, Tina. “Video as Text, Testimony, Technology—or Practices?” In Citizen Media and Practice: Currents, Connections, Critiques, edited by Hilde Stephansen and Emiliano Trerè, 13651. London: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  191. Aston, Judith, Sandra Gaudenzi, and Mandy Rose, eds. i-Docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary. London and New York: Wallflower Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  192. Atton, Chris, ed. The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media. London: Routledge, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  193. Auer, Stefan. “Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin: The Ukraine Crisis and the Return of Geopolitics.” International Affairs 91, no. 5 (2015): 95368.
    [Google Scholar]
  194. Bach, Jonathan, and David Stark. “Link, Search, Interact: The Co-Evolution of NGOs and Interactive Technology.” Theory, Culture & Society 21, no. 3 (2004): 10107.199
    [Google Scholar]
  195. Baker, Al, J. David Goodman, and Benjamin Mueller. “Beyond the Chokehold: The Path to Eric Garner's Death.” The New York Times, June 13, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/bdzx9z9b. Accessed October 2, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. Baker, Mona, Bolette Blaagaard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, eds. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media. London: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  197. Barassi, Veronica. Activism on the Web: Everyday Struggles against Digital Capitalism. London: Routledge, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  198. Barendregt, Bart, and Florian Schneider. “Digital Activism in Asia: Good, Bad, and Banal Politics Online.” Asiascape: Digital Asia 7, no. 1&2 (2020): 519.
    [Google Scholar]
  199. Barlow, John Perry. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” Electronic Frontier Foundation, February 8, 1996, https://tinyurl.com/y8syj43j. Accessed April 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  200. Barnouw, Erik. Documentary: A History of the Non-Fiction Film. 2nd rev. ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1974] 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  201. Bärtl, Mathias. “YouTube Channels, Uploads and Views: A Statistical Analysis of the Past 10 Years.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 24, no. 1 (2018): 1632.
    [Google Scholar]
  202. Baú, Valentina. “What Killed Indymedia? Lessons from the IMC Experience of Australia.” Journal of Alternative & Community Media 5, no. 2 (2020): 191210.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. Benjamin, Jack. “Misinformation Spreaders Surge on Twitter after Musk Takeover.” MediaLeader, November 14, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/2vyhupp6. Accessed April 15, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. Benkler, Yochai. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  205. Bennett, Bruce. “Becoming Refugees: Exodus and the Contemporary Meditations of the Refugee Crisis.” Transnational Cinemas 9, no. 1 (2018): 1330, https://doi.org/10.1080/20403526.2018.1471181. Accessed December 28, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  206. Bennett, W. Lance. Communicating the Future: Solutions for Environment, Economy and Democracy. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  207. Bennett, W. Lance. “Killing the Golden Goose? A Framework for Regulating Disruptive Technologies.” Information, Communication & Society 26, no. 1 (2021): 1636.
    [Google Scholar]
  208. Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication & Society 15, no. 5 (2012): 73968.
    [Google Scholar]
  209. Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  210. Bennett, W. Lance, Alexandra Segerberg, and Yunkang Yang. “The Strength of Peripheral Networks: Negotiating Attention and Meaning in Complex Media Ecologies.” Journal of Communication 68, no. 4 (2018): 65984.
    [Google Scholar]
  211. Bennett, W. Lance, and Barbara Pfetsch. “Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres.” Journal of Communication 68, no. 2 (2018): 24353.200
    [Google Scholar]
  212. Berger, Jonah. Contagious: Why Things Catch On. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  213. Beutelschmidt, Thomas. “Alternative Medienarbeit in Berlin—ein Überblick.” In Wer nicht produziert, lebt reduziert! Alternative Medienarbeit in Berlin West und Ost, edited by Thomas Beutelschmidt and Kay Hoffmann, 2130. Marburg: Schüren, 2018 (Augenblick: Konstanzer Hefte zur Medienwissenschaft, 72).
    [Google Scholar]
  214. Beyerle, Mo, and Christine N. Brinckmann, eds. Der amerikanische Dokumentarfilm der 60er Jahre: Direct Cinema und Radical Cinema. Frankfurt a. M. and New York: Campus, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  215. Biermann, Kai. “CSYou: CSU versucht eine Antwort auf Rezo.” Zeit Online, September 1, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/ycxukfj4. Accessed April 5, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  216. Boettger, Conny. “The Role of Photography in Greenpeace's Strategy. The Photograph as Witness.” In Greenpeace: Changing the World. The Photographic Record, edited by Conny Boettger and Fouad Hamndan, 1222. Steinfurt: Tecklenborg, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  217. Boettger, Conny, and Fouad Hamndan. Greenpeace: Changing the World. The Photographic Record. Steinfurt: Tecklenborg, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  218. Boichak, Olga. “Mapping the Russian Political Influence Ecosystem: The Night Wolves Biker Gang.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177920. Accessed April 13, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  219. Borenstein, Eliot. Meanwhile, in Russia … Russian Internet Memes and Viral Video. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  220. Borum Chattoo, Caty. Story Movements: How Documentaries Empower People and Inspire Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  221. Borum Chattoo, Caty, and Will Jenkins. “From Reel Life to Real Social Change: The Role of Contemporary Social-Issue Documentary in U.S. Public Policy.” Media, Culture & Society 41, no. 8 (2019): 110724.
    [Google Scholar]
  222. Bösch, Marcus. “WARTOK—TikTok und der Krieg in der Ukraine.” Televizion 35, no. 2 (2022): 47.
    [Google Scholar]
  223. Bösch, Marcus. “Russian Disinformation.” Understanding TikTok, July 3, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/2udjward. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  224. Bösch, Marcus, and Chris Köver. Schluss mit lustig? TikTok als Plattform für politische Kommunikation. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (Studien, 7), 2021, https://tinyurl.com/s4x7d78d(pdf). Accessed April 8, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  225. boyd, danah. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Zizi Papacharissi, 3958. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  226. boyd, danah. It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  227. Boyle, Deidre. “From Portapak to Camcorder: A Brief History of Guerilla Television.” Journal of Film and Video 44, no. 1&2 (1992): 6779.201
    [Google Scholar]
  228. Boyle, Deidre. Subject to Change: Guerrilla Television Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  229. Brecht, Bertolt. “The Radio as an Apparatus of Communication.” [German 1932]. In New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality, edited by Anna Everett and John T. Caldwell, 2932. New York and London: Routledge, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  230. Briese, Andreas, and Sabine Frank. “YouTube Rewind: Das sind die erfolgreichsten Videos des Jahres.” YouTube Official Blog, December 5, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/5x6u567x. Accessed April 5, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  231. Brown, Michael Harold, and John May. The Greenpeace Story. London: Dorling Kindersley, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  232. Browne, Malachy. “YouTube Removes Videos Showing Atrocities in Syria.” The New York Times, August 22, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/22/world/middleeast/syria-youtube-videos-isis.html. Accessed December 28, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  233. Bruns, Axel, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbo, Anders Larsson, and Christian Christensen. The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. London: Routledge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  234. Burgess, Jean, Anne Galloway, and Theresa Sauter. “Hashtag as Hybrid Forum: The Case of #agchatoz.” In Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks, edited by Nathan Rambukkana, 6176. Digital Formations, New York: Peter Lang, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  235. Butler, Judith. Precarious Life: The Politics of Mourning and Violence. New York and London: Verso, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  236. Butler, Judith. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  237. Casilli, Antonio A. “Never Mind the Algorithms: The Role of Click Farms and Exploited Digital Labor in Trump's Election.” November 20, 2016, https://www.casilli.fr/2016/11/20/never-mind-the-algorithms-the-role-of-exploited-digital-labor-and-global-click-farms-in-trumps-election/. Accessed April 10, 2023.
  238. Castells, Manuel. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  239. Castells, Manuel. Communication Power, 2nd ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  240. Celikates, Robin. “Digital Publics, Digital Contestation: A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere?” In Transformations of Democracy: Crisis, Protest and Legitimation, edited by Robin Celikates, Regina Kreide, and Tilo Wesche, 15976. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  241. De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by S. Rendall. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  242. Cervi, Laura, and Tom Divon. “Playful Activism: Memetic Performances of Palestinian Resistance in TikTok #challenges.” Social Media and Society 9, no. 1 (2023): 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  243. Chadwick, Andrew. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.202
    [Google Scholar]
  244. Chanan, Michael. The Politics of Documentary. London: British Film Institute, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  245. Chartier, Denis. “Greenpeace.” In Dictionnaire de la pensée écologique, edited by Dominique Bourg and Alain Papaux, 50104. Paris: PUF, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  246. Chayka, Kyle. “Watching the World's ‘First TikTok War’.” The New Yorker, March 3, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/248hfwjx. Accessed September 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  247. Chouliaraki, Lilie. “Ordinary Witnessing in Post-Television News: Towards a New Moral Imagination.” Critical Discourse Studies 7, no. 4 (2010): 30519, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29740/. Accessed December 28, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  248. Chouliaraki, Lilie. “Digital Witnessing in Conflict Zones: The Politics of Remediation.” Information, Communication & Society 18, no. 11 (2015): 136277.
    [Google Scholar]
  249. Citton, Yves. The Ecology of Attention. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  250. Clayton, James. “TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew's Congress Showdown: Five Takeaways.” BBC News, March 24, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/528pxkj8. Accessed May 11, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  251. Coleman, Gabriella. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. New York and London: Verso, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  252. Constine, Josh. “Facebook Hits 8 Billion Daily Video Views, Doubling from 4 Billion in April.” TechCrunch, November 4, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/56y3shep. Accessed April 6, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  253. Contreras, Brian, and Marisa Martinez. “Fed Up with TikTok, Black Creators Are Moving On.” Los Angeles Times, September 16, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/5cah8ahj. Accessed April 24, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  254. Cooney, Nick. Change of Heart: What Psychology Can Teach Us About Spreading Social Change. New York: Lantern Books, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  255. Couldry, Nick. Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  256. Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. The Costs of Connection. How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  257. Crawford, Kate. “Can an Algorithm Be Agnostic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41, no. 1 (2016): 7792.
    [Google Scholar]
  258. Curtis, Polly, and Tom McCarthy. “KONY 2012: What's the Real Story?The Guardian, March 8, 2012, https://tinyurl.com/2hu2emea. Accessed April 13, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  259. Dahlgren, Peter. “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation.” Political Communication 22, no. 2 (2005): 14762, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160.
    [Google Scholar]
  260. Daniels, Cheyanne M.Here's What Changed Since George Floyd's Murder Three Years Ago.” The Hill, May 25, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/3k5rpdc4. Accessed September 27, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  261. Dawson, Paul. “Hashtag Narrative: Emergent Storytelling and Affective Publics in the Digital Age.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 23, no. 6 (2020): 96883.
    [Google Scholar]
  262. Dawson, Paul, and Maria Mäkelä. “The Story Logic of Social Media: Co-construction and Emergent Narrative Authority.” Style 54, no. 1 (2020): 2135.203
    [Google Scholar]
  263. Dean, Jonathan. “From Solidarity to Self-promotion? Neoliberalism and Left Politics in the Age of the Social Media Influencer.” Capital & Class (2023): 123, https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231199907. Accessed December 2, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  264. Dee, Juliet, ed. From Tahrir Square to Ferguson: Social Networks as Facilitators of Social Movements. New York: Peter Lang, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  265. de Gregorio, Giovanni, and Catalina Goanta. “The Influencer Republic: Monetizing Political Speech on Social Media.” German Law Journal 23, no. 2 (2022): 20425.
    [Google Scholar]
  266. Della Porta, Donatella. “Repertoires of Contention.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Donatella Della Porta, Dough McAdam, and Bert Klandermans. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  267. Della Porta, Donatella, and Alice Mattoni, eds. Spreading Protest: Social Movements in Times of Crisis. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  268. Della Porta, Donatella, and Mario Diani, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  269. Dellar, Hugh. “Day 411 of the War.” VK.com, April 11, 2023, https://vk.com/wall438426825_9634. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  270. Della Ratta, Donatella. Shooting a Revolution: Visual Media and Warfare in Syria. London: Pluto Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  271. Dellert, Louisa. Mein Herz schlägt grün: Weltverbessern für Anfänger—Herzblut statt moralischer Zeigefinger. München: Komplett Media, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  272. Dellert, Louisa. WIR: Weil nicht egal sein darf, was morgen ist. München: Komplett Media, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  273. DeLuca, Kevin Michael. Image Politics: The New Rhetoric of Environmental Activism. New York and London: Routledge, [1999] 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  274. DeLuca, Kevin Michael. “Greenpeace International Media Analyst Reflects on Communicating Climate Change [Interview with Soenke Lorenzen, Greenpeace International].” Environmental Communication 3, no. 2 (2009): 2639.
    [Google Scholar]
  275. Denisova, Anastasia. Internet Memes and Society: Social, Cultural, and Political Contexts. London: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  276. Dennis, James. Beyond Slacktivism: Political Participation on Social Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  277. Derrida, Jacques. Spectres of Marx. New York and London: Routledge, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  278. Dietze, Gabriele. “Sich ein eigenes Bild machen: Selbstbestimmtheit in Filmen von Frauen in den 1960er- bis 1990er-Jahren.” In Selbstbestimmt: Perspektiven von Filmemacherinnen, edited by Karin Herbst-Meßlinger and Rainer Rother, 1745 Bonn: .Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  279. van Dijck, José. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  280. van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. “Understanding Social Media Logic.” Media and Communication 1, no. 1 (2013): 214.204
    [Google Scholar]
  281. van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  282. Dixson-Declève, Sandrine, Owen Gaffney, Jayati Ghosh, Jorgen Randers, Johan Rockström, and Per Espen Stoknes. Earth for All: A Survival Guide for Humanity. Gabriola, BC: New Society Publishers, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  283. Doc Society. The Impact Field Guide & Toolkit (Website), 2019, www.impactguide.org. Accessed April 25, 2023.
  284. Doll, Martin. Fälschung und Fake: Zur diskurskritischen Dimension des Täuschens, Berlin: Kadmos, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  285. Don't Panic. Save the Children: Most Shocking Second a Day (Website), (n.d.), https://tinyurl.com/bdz9u5xn. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  286. Dörr, Nicole, and Simon Teune. “The Imagery of Power Facing the Power of Imagery: Toward a Visual Analysis of Social Movements.” In The Establishment Responds: Power, Politics, and Protest since 1945, edited by Kathrin Fahlenbrach, Martin Klimke, Joachim Scharloth, and Laura Wong, 4355. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  287. Dorsch, Timo. “Die Seebrücke nach Deutschland.” Frankfurter Rundschau, January 4, 2019, https://www.fr.de/politik/seebruecke-nach-deutschland-10967122.html. Accessed September 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  288. Dovey, Jon, and Mandy Rose. “This Great Mapping of Ourselves: New Documentary Forms Online.” In The Documentary Film Book, edited by Brian Winston, 36675. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  289. Doyle, Julie. “Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication.” Science as Culture 16, no. 2 (2007): 12950.
    [Google Scholar]
  290. Doyle, Julie. Mediating Climate Change. Surrey: Ashgate, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  291. Duvan, Carrie. “18 Strategien für erfolgreiche Social Media Videos bei Facebook, Twitter, Instagram und LinkedIn.” filmpuls, March 21, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/46v54v8c. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  292. Dyer-Witheford, Nick, and Svitlana Matviyenko. Cyberwar and Revolution: Digital Subterfuge in Global Capitalism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  293. Earl, Jennifer, Thomas V. Maher, and Jennifer Pan. “The Digital Repression of Social Movements, Protest, and Activism: A Synthetic Review.” Science Advances 8, no. 10 (2022): 115, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abl8198. Accessed April 1, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  294. Edel, Anastasia. “A Day Inside Putin's Surreal Television Empire.” Foreign Policy, May 28, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/yvua7cdc. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  295. Eder, Jens. “Collateral Emotions: Political Web Videos and Divergent Audience Responses.” In Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film, edited by Catalin Brylla and Mette Kramer, 183203. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  296. Eder, Jens. “Rechte Videos und Affekte in Sozialen Medien.” In Zwischen Feindsetzung und Selbstviktimisierung: Gefühlspolitik und Ästhetik populistischer Kommunikation, edited by Lars Koch and Torsten König, 177202. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus, 2020.205
    [Google Scholar]
  297. Eder, Jens. “Political Impact—On the Societal Vibrancy of Film.” In What Film Is Good For: On the Values of Spectatorship, edited by Julian Hanich and Martin P. Rossouw, 10214. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  298. Eder, Jens, and Charlotte Klonk. “Introduction.” In Image Operations: Visual Media and Political Conflict, edited by Jens Eder and Charlotte Klonk, 122. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  299. Einspänner-Pflock, Jessica. Privatheit im Netz: Konstruktions- und Gestaltungsstrategien von Online-Privatheit bei Jugendlichen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  300. Elemia, Camille, and Gelo Gonzalez. “Stars, Influencers Get Paid to Boost Duterte Propaganda, Fake News.” Rappler, February 27, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/ynms3kc3. Accessed April 8, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  301. von Engelhardt, Johannes, and Jeroen Jansz. “Challenging Humanitarian Communication: An Empirical Exploration of KONY 2012.” International Communication Gazette 76, no. 6 (2014): 46484.
    [Google Scholar]
  302. Entman, Robert M.Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43, no. 4 (1993): 5158.
    [Google Scholar]
  303. Eskjær, Mikkel Fugl, Stig Hjarvard, and Mette Mortensen, eds. The Dynamics of Mediatized Conflicts. New York: Peter Lang, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  304. Evon, Dan. “With Gates Wide Open.” Snopes, November 17, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/2vzcbnjp. Accessed February 21, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  305. Fahlenbrach, Kathrin. “Video-Aktivismus: Formen und Strategien der audiovisuellen Mobilisierung im Netz.” Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 33, no. 2 (2020): 45773.
    [Google Scholar]
  306. Farocki, Harun. “Die Agitation verwissenschaftlichen und die Wissenschaft politisieren.” Film 3 (1969): 4952.
    [Google Scholar]
  307. Feng, Emily. “Zelenskiyy Has Consolidated Ukraine's TV Outlets and Dissolved Rival Political Parties.” npr, July 8, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/3c9yps63. Accessed September 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  308. Fenton, Natalie. Digital, Political, Radical. Cambridge: Polity, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  309. Feurich, Jörg Peter. “Gespräch mit Harun Farocki und Hartmut Bitomsky.” Filmkritik 8 (1970): 42025.
    [Google Scholar]
  310. Fielitz, Maik, and Laura Lotte Laloire, eds. Trouble on the Far-Right: Contemporary Right-Wing Strategies and Practices in Europe. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  311. Fielitz, Maik, and Nick Thurston, eds. Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right: Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  312. Fisher, Ian. “Kelly Bans Choke Holds by Officers.” The New York Times, November 24, 1993, https://tinyurl.com/yc6452s5. Accessed October 2, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  313. Ford, Sam, Joshua Green, and Henry Jenkins. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  314. Forestal, Jennifer. Designing for Democracy: How to Build Community in Digital Environments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  315. Frank, Lauren B., and Paul Falzone, eds. Entertainment-Education Behind the Scenes: Case Studies for Theory and Practice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.206
    [Google Scholar]
  316. Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25&26 (1990): 5680.
    [Google Scholar]
  317. Fraser, Nancy. “Neue Überlegungen zur Öffentlichkeit: Ein Beitrag zur Kritik der real existierenden Demokratie.” In Die halbierte Gerechtigkeit: Schlüsselbegriffe des postindustriellen Sozialismus, translated by Karin Wördemann, 10750. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  318. Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  319. Fuchs, Christian. OccupyMedia! The Occupy Movement and Social Media in Crisis Capitalism. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  320. Fuchs, Christian. Soziale Medien und Kritische Theorie. Eine Einführung. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: UTB, 2021a.
    [Google Scholar]
  321. Fuchs, Christian. “The Digital Commons and the Digital Public Sphere: How to Advance Digital Democracy Today.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 16, no. 1 (2021b): 926, https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.917. Accessed December 28, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  322. Fuchs, Christian, and Klaus Unterberger, eds. The Public Service Media and Public Service Internet Manifesto. London: University of Westminster Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  323. Fuller, Matthew, and Eyal Weizman. Investigative Aesthetics: Conflicts and Commons in the Politics of Truth. New York and London: Verso, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  324. Funk, Allie, Adrian Shahbaz, and Kian Vesteinsson. “Freedom on the Net 2023: The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence.” Freedom House, November 21, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/2ektra4y. Accessed November 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  325. Galloway, Alexander R., and Eugene Thacker. The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  326. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  327. Gerbaudo, Paolo. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  328. Gerhardt, Christina, and Sara Saljoughi, eds. 1968 and Global Cinema. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  329. Ghosh, Bishnupriya. Global Icons: Apertures to the Popular. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  330. Gilbert, David. “Russian TikTok Influencers Are Being Paid to Spread Kremlin Propaganda.” Vice, March 11, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/23m4zp2z. Accessed October 31, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  331. Gilbert, Nestor. “64 Facebook Video Statistics You Can't Ignore: 2023 Data Analysis & Market Share.” FinancesOnline, March 15, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/mpmnhn6p. Accessed April 6, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  332. Gillespie, Tarleton. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  333. Giraud, Eva. “Has Radical Participatory Online Media Really ‘Failed’? Indymedia and Its Legacies.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 20, no. 4 (2014): 41937.207
    [Google Scholar]
  334. Gladwell, Malcolm. “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” The New Yorker, October 4 (2010): 4229.
    [Google Scholar]
  335. Glazunova, Sofya. Digital Activism in Russia: The Communication Tactics of Political Outsiders. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  336. Götz, Norbert. “Reframing NGOs: The Identity of an International Relations Non-starter.” European Journal of International Relations 14, no. 2 (2008): 23158.
    [Google Scholar]
  337. Gould, Deborah. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP's Fight against AIDS. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  338. Grant, Paul Douglas. Cinéma Militant: Political Filmmaking and May 1968. London: Wallflower Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  339. Gray, Jonathan. “Data Witnessing: Attending to Injustice with Data in Amnesty International's Decoders Project.” Information, Communication & Society 22, no. 7 (2019): 97191.
    [Google Scholar]
  340. Greenpeace Deutschland. “Greenpeace-Jahresbericht 2020.” July 15, 2021, https://www.greenpeace.de/publikationen/greenpeace-jahresbericht-2020-1. Accessed September 9, 2023.
  341. Gregory, Sam. “Deepfakes, Misinformation and Disinformation and Authenticity Infrastructure Responses: Impacts on Frontline Witnessing, Distant Witnessing, and Civic Journalism.” Journalism 23, no. 3 (2022): 70829.
    [Google Scholar]
  342. Gregory, Sam. “Testimony of Sam Gregory, Executive Director, WITNESS before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Data Security. Date of Hearing: September 12, 2023. The Need for Transparency in Artificial Intelligence” (pdf), 2023, https://tinyurl.com/yckx7fd5. Accessed November 29, 2023.
  343. Gritsenko, Daria, Mariëlle Wijermars, and Mikhail Kopotev, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  344. Habermas, Jürgen. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  345. Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, [German 1962] 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  346. Habermas, Jürgen. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  347. Habermas, Jürgen. “Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere.” Theory, Culture & Society 39, no. 4 (2022): 14571.
    [Google Scholar]
  348. Habermas, Jürgen. A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  349. Habermas, Jürgen, Sigmar Gabriel, and Emmanuel Macron. “Europa neu denken.” Blätter 17, no. 4 (2017): 4154.
    [Google Scholar]
  350. Hamblin, Sarah, and Ryan Watson. “Introduction: Radical Documentary Today.” Studies in Documentary Film 13, no. 3 (2019): 18795.208
    [Google Scholar]
  351. Hankey, Stephanie. “The Influence Industry: The Global Business of Using Your Data in Elections.” TacticalTech (Website), April 20, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/526tx99w. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  352. Happen Films. “About Happen Films.” (n.d.), https://happenfilms.com/about. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  353. Harcup, Tony, and Deirdre O'Neill.What Is News? News Values Revisited (Again).” Journalism Studies 18, no. 12 (2017): 147088.
    [Google Scholar]
  354. Harding, Thomas. The Video Activist Handbook, 2nd ed. London: Pluto Press, [1997] 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  355. Harrild, Lucie. “Lessons from the Palm Oil Showdown.” The Guardian, October 27, 2010, http://tinyurl.com/2przsm3u. Accessed August 4, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  356. Harris, Brandon C., Maxwell Foxman, and William C. Partin. “‘Don't Make Me Ratio You Again’: How Political Influencers Encourage Platformed Political Participation.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177944. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  357. Hartley, John. “Silly Citizenship.” Critical Discourse Studies 7, no. 4 (2010): 23348.
    [Google Scholar]
  358. Harwell, Drew. “The Gory Online Campaign Ukraine Hopes Will Sow Anti-Putin Dissent Probably Violates the Geneva Conventions.” The Washington Post, March 3, 2022, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/03/telegram-russian-war-dead-ukraine-pows/. Accessed April 26, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  359. Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Random House, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  360. Hern, Alex. “Revealed: How TikTok Censors Videos That Do Not Please Beijing.” The Guardian, September 25, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/3vnptakv. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  361. Herrmann, Boris. “WhatsApp im Wahlkampf: Brasilien, Land der bestellten Lügen.” Süddeutsche Zeitung, October 23, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/f72m2kny. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  362. Hesling, Willem. “Documentary Film and Rhetorical Analysis.” In Image—Reality—Spectator: Essays on Documentary Film and Television, edited by Willem de Greef and Willem Hesling, 10131. Leuven: Acco, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  363. Highfield, Tim. Social Media and Everyday Politics. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  364. Highfield, Tim, and Tama Leaver. “Instagrammatics and Digital Methods: Studying Visual Social Media, from Selfies and GIFS to Memes and Emoji.” Communication Research and Practice 2, no. 1 (2016): 4762.
    [Google Scholar]
  365. Himelboim, Itai, Marc A. Smith, Lee Rainie, Ben Shneiderman, and Camila Espina Young. “Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis.” Social Media + Society 3, no. 1 (2017): 113, https://tinyurl.com/yn82yrse. Accessed June 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  366. Hoffmann, Kay. “Die Technik verändert den Dokumentarfilm: Neue Formen durch synchrone 16 mm und Video-Kameras.” In Protest—Film—Bewegung: Neue Wege im Dokumentarischen, edited by Kay Hoffmann, Erika Wottrich, Ursula von Keitz, and Thomas Weber, 3851, München: Edition Text + Kritik, 2015.209
    [Google Scholar]
  367. Hoffmann, Kay. “Die Aufnahmetechnik prägt das Dokumentarische.” In Wer nicht produziert, lebt reduziert! Alternative Medienarbeit in Berlin West und Ost, edited by Thomas Beutelschmidt and Kay Hoffmann, 920. Marburg: Schüren, 2018 (=Augenblick. Konstanzer Hefte zur Medienwissenschaft, 72).
    [Google Scholar]
  368. Hofmann, Martin Ludwig. Mindbombs. Was Werbung und PR von Greenpeace & Co. lernen können. München: Fink, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  369. Hogenkamp, Bert. “The Radical Tradition in Documentary Film-Making, 1920s–50s.” In The Documentary Film Book, edited by Brian Winston, 17379. London: British Film Institute, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  370. Holmlund, Chris, and Cynthia Fuchs, eds. Between the Sheets, in the Streets: Queer, Lesbian, and Gay Documentary. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  371. Hund, Emily. The Influencer Industry: The Quest for Authenticity on Social Media. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  372. Hunter, Bobbi, ed. Mr. Mind Bomb: Eco-hero and Greenpeace Co-founder Bob Hunter—A Life in Stories. Surrey, British Columbia: Rocky Mountain Books, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  373. InfluenceMap. Big Oil's Real Agenda on Climate Change: An InfluenceMap Report, 2019, www.bit.ly/3exO7Nc. Accessed April 24, 2023.
  374. The Influence Industry Project. The Influence Industry Explorer (Website), (n.d.), https://influenceindustry.org/en/explorer/. Accessed April 15, 2023.
  375. Jackson, Sarah J., Moya Bailey, and Brooke Foucault Welles. #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  376. Jasper, James. The Emotions of Protest. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  377. Jendrzejewski, Sophia, and Celine Strufe. Don't Shoot the Messenger! Telegram als Instrument für linken Aktivismus. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (=Studien, 3), 2022, https://tinyurl.com/tdxz92ve. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  378. Jenkins, Henry. “If It Doesn't Spread, It's Dead (Part One): Media Viruses and Memes.” Pop Junctions (Website), February 11, 2009, www.bit.ly/2RV2MZc. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  379. Jenkins, Henry, Sangita Shresthova, Liana Gamber-Thompson, Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, and Arely M. Zimmerman, eds. By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism, Connected Youth and Digital Futures. New York: NYU Press, 2016a.
    [Google Scholar]
  380. Jenkins, Henry, Sangita Shrestova, Liana Gamber-Thompson, and Neta Kligler-Vilenchik. “Superpowers to the People! How Young Activists are Tapping the Civic Imagination.” In Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice, edited by Eric Gordon and Paul Milhailidis, 295320. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016b.
    [Google Scholar]
  381. Johnson, Lauren. “Save the Children Spot Gets Another Run on YouTube Thanks to Ashton Kutcher.” Adweek, November 12, 2014, https://tinyurl.com/5n6smc6j. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  382. Johnston, Hank, and John A. Noakes, eds. Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  383. de Jong, Wilma, Martin Shaw, and Neil Stammer, eds. Global Activism, Global Media, London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  384. Juhasz, Alexandra. AIDS TV: Identity, Community, and Alternative Video. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.210
    [Google Scholar]
  385. Juhola, Sirkku, Tatiana Filatova, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Reinhard Mechler, Jürgen Scheffran, and Pia-Johanna Schweizer. “Social Tipping Points and Adaptation Limits in the Context of Systemic Risk: Concepts, Models and Governance.” Frontiers in Climate 4, September 21 (2022): 1009234, https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.1009234. Accessed December 30, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  386. Kaap, Henry. “‘I Can't Breathe!’—Polizeigewalt und anti-rassistischer Protest in den USA.” Kritische Berichte 44, no. 1 (2016): 8695.
    [Google Scholar]
  387. Kácha, Ondřej, Jáchym Vintr, and Cameron Brick. “Four Europes: Climate Change Beliefs and Attitudes Predict Behavior and Policy Preferences Using a Latent Class Analysis on 23 countries.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 81 (2022): 110, https://tinyurl.com/49sw3bp9. Accessed April 25, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  388. Kahne, Joseph, and Benjamin Bowyer. “The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks.” Political Communication 35, no. 3 (2018): 47093.
    [Google Scholar]
  389. Kaiser, Jonas, and Adrian Rauchfleisch. “How the Right Takes Advantage of YouTube.” Encore: Magazine on Internet and Society (2018): 3445, https://www.hiig.de/encore/[pdf]. Accessed April 1, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  390. Kaltseis, Magdalena. “Russisches YouTube.” Dekoder [Russland und Belarus entschlüsseln], April 6, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/mpt7vr7v. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  391. Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” In Practical Philosophy. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, edited by Mary J. Gregor, 1122. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  392. Kantar TNS / Die Medienanstalten. Gewichtungsstudie zur Relevanz der Medien für die Meinungsbildung in Deutschland: MedienGewichtungsStudie 2018 I Juli 2018, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/32vn6a43. Accessed April 19, 2023.
  393. Kara, Selmin. “Rebels Without Regret: Documentary Artivism in the Digital Age.” Studies in Documentary Film 9, no. 1 (2015): 4254.
    [Google Scholar]
  394. Kara, Selmin, and Camilla Møhring Reestorff. “Introduction: Unruly Documentary Artivism.” Studies in Documentary Film 9, no. 1 (2015): 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  395. Katz-Kimchi, Merav, and Idit Manosevitch. “Mobilizing Facebook Users Against Facebook's Energy Policy: The Case of Greenpeace Unfriend Coal Campaign.” Environmental Communication 9, no. 2 (2015): 24867.
    [Google Scholar]
  396. Kavada, Anastasia. “Engagement, Bonding, and Identity across Multiple Platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace.” MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 52 (2012): 2848, https://tidsskrift.dk/index.php/mediekultur/article/view/5486. Accessed August 8, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  397. Kavada, Anastasia, Tina Askanius, Anne Kaun, Alice Mattoni, and Julie Udam. Tying up Goliath: Activist Strategies for Confronting and Harnessing Digital Power. Transnational Institute (TNI), February 14, 2023, https://www.tni.org/en/article/tying-up-goliath. Accessed December 29, 2023.
  398. Kaye, D. Bondy Valdovinos, Jing Zeng, and Patrik Wikstrom. TikTok: Creativity and Culture in Short Video. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022.211
    [Google Scholar]
  399. Kaye, D. Bondy Valdovinos, Xu Chen, and Jing Zeng. “The Co-evolution of Two Chinese Mobile Short Video Apps: Parallel Platformization of Douyin and TikTok.” Mobile Media & Communication 9, no. 2 (2020): 22953, https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  400. Keenan, Thomas. “Counter-forensics and Photography.” Grey Room 55 (2014): 5877.
    [Google Scholar]
  401. Kempkes, Sebastian. “Plastikmüll: Der Schrott und sein zweites Leben.” Die Zeit, November 22 (2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  402. Khan-Cullors, Patrisse, and asha bandele. When They Call You a Terrorist: A Black Lives Matter Memoir. Edinburgh: Canongate Books, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  403. Kidd, Dorothy. “Indymedia.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, edited by Mona Baker, Bolette B. Blaagaard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, 21520. London and New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  404. Kirchgaessner, Stephanie, Manisha Ganguly, David Pegg, Carole Cadwalladr, and Jason Burke. “Revealed: The Hacking and Disinformation Team Meddling in Elections.” The Guardian, February 15, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/yc326xxp. Accessed April 13, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  405. Kleinfeld, Philip. “Calling Bullshit on the Anti-refugee Video Taking the Internet by Storm.” Vice, November 27, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/k2cwand3. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  406. Koch, Svenja. “Greenpeace: Medienpräsent und spektakulär—ist das nachhaltig?” In Handbuch Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation: Grundlagen und Praxis, edited by Gerd Michelsen and Jasmin Godemann, 2nd ed., 90207. München: Oekom, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  407. Koch, Svenja. “Umweltkampagnen mit Herz und Verstand: Strategien der Greenpeace-Kommunikation.” In PR-Kampagnen: Über die Inszenierung von Öffentlichkeit, edited by Ulrike Röttger, 10915. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  408. Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Ulrike Klinger, Lance Bennett, and Andrea Römmele. “(Digital) Campaigning in Dissonant Public Spheres.” Political Communication 40, no. 3 (2023): 25562.
    [Google Scholar]
  409. Koetsier, John. “Here are the 10 Most Downloaded Apps of 2020.” Forbes, January 7, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/ymb2ex7j. Accessed April 15, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  410. Köhler, Andreas. “Die Einflussnahme von NGOs auf den politischen Prozess: Lobbying als Kommunikationsinstrument.” In Handbuch NGO Kommunikation, edited by Nadine Remus and Lars Rademacher, 14762. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  411. Köhler, Margret, ed. Alternative Medienarbeit: Videogruppen in der Bundesrepublik. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  412. Kozinets, Robert. Netnography. London: Sage, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  413. Kozinets, Robert V., Kristine de Valck, Andrea C. Wojnicki, and Sarah J. S. Wilner. “Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing 74, no. 2 (2010): 7189.
    [Google Scholar]
  414. Krebber, Felix, Christian Biederstadt, and Ansgar Zerfaß. “Digitaler Lobbyismus? Die politische Kommunikation von Greenpeace Deutschland im Internet.” In Strategische Onlinekommunikation: Theoretische Konzepte und empirische Befunde, edited by Olaf Hoffjann and Thomas Pleil, 291310. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2015.212
    [Google Scholar]
  415. Kuo, Lily. “TikTok ‘Makeup Tutorial’ Goes Viral with Call to Action on China's Treatment of Uighurs.” The Guardian, November 27, 2019, https://bit.ly/3NIImQ5. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  416. Kurz, Bettina, and Doreen Kubek [on behalf of PHINEO]. Social Impact Navigator. The Practical Guide for Organizations Targeting Better Results, 2021, www.social-impact-navigator.org/. Accessed April 24, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  417. Lancaster, Kurt. Video Journalism for the Web: A Practical Introduction to Documentary Storytelling. New York and London: Routledge, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  418. Lang, Sabine. NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  419. Lang, Sabine. “Nongovernmental Organizations.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (Volume 2. Int-Pol), edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni, 87782. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  420. Lasn, Kalle. Culture Jam. New York: Quill, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  421. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  422. Laville, Sandra. “Top Oil Firms Spending Millions Lobbying to Block Climate Change Policies, Says Report.” The Guardian, March 22, 2019, www.bit.ly/2VKbIlj; https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/mar/22/top-oil-firms-spending-millions-lobbying-to-block-climate-change-policies-says-repor. Accessed April 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  423. Learning for Action. Deepening Engagement for Lasting Impact: A Framework for Measuring Media Performance & Results, 2013, www.bit.ly/2yutAbS. Accessed April 21, 2023.
  424. Lebow, Alisa. Filming Revolution (Website), 2018, www.filmingrevolution.org. Accessed April 26, 2023.
  425. Lefebvre, Henri, ed. “The Right to the City.” In Writings on Cities, edited and translated by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas, 14759. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, [French 1968] 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  426. Lessenich, Stephan. Grenzen der Demokratie: Teilhabe als Verteilungsproblem. Stuttgart: Reclam, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  427. Levin, Sam. “Did Russia Fake Black Activism on Facebook to Sow Division in the US?The Guardian, September 30, 2017, https://tinyurl.com/43kjdj2j. Accessed October 2, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  428. Lewis, Rebecca. “Alternative Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube.” Analysis & Policy Observatory (APO), September 18, 2018, https://apo.org.au/node/193281. Accessed October 20, 2024.
  429. Libin, Xie, and Haig Patapan. “Schmitt Fever: The Use and Abuse of Carl Schmitt in Contemporary China.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 1 (2020): 13046.
    [Google Scholar]
  430. Liedtke, Marius, and Daniel Marwecki. Von Influencer*innen lernen: YouTube & Co. als Spielfelder linker Politik und Bildungsarbeit. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (=Studien, 7), 2019, https://tinyurl.com/23hbumj9[pdf]. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  431. Lindquist, Johan. “Illicit Economies of the Internet: Click Farming in Indonesia and Beyond.” Made in China Journal, January 12, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/2p993fyj. Accessed April 10, 2023.213
    [Google Scholar]
  432. Lippert, Leopold. “Performance Labor, Im/Mobility, and Exhaustion in Nature Theater of Oklahoma's Life and Times.” Journal of Contemporary Drama in English 5, no. 1 (2017): 14055.
    [Google Scholar]
  433. Literat, Ioana, and Neta Kligler-Vilenchik. “TikTok as a Key Platform for Youth Political Expression: Reflecting on the Opportunities and Stakes Involved.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 1 (2023), https://tinyurl.com/25synu47. Accessed April 25, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  434. Lovink, Geert. Dark Fiber: Tracking Critical Internet Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  435. Maier, Tanja. Visueller Aktivismus mit Instagram: Politische Kommunikation in sozialen Medien. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (=Studien, 10), 2021, https://tinyurl.com/42a7w9hk. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  436. Makhortykh, Mykola, and Mariella Bastian. “Personalizing the War: Perspectives for the Adoption of News Recommendation Algorithms in the Media Coverage of the Conflict in Eastern Ukraine.” Media, War & Conflict 15, no. 1 (2022): 2545.
    [Google Scholar]
  437. Malkowski, Jennifer. Dying in Full Detail: Mortality and Digital Documentary. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  438. Mateos, Concha, and Carmen Gaona. “Video Activism: A Descriptive Typology.” Global Media Journal, Special Issue: “Use of Social media and Mediacoverage” (2015): 115, https://tinyurl.com/ynh9t9j6. Accessed April 18, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  439. Matsa, Katerina Eva, Laura Silver, Elisa Shearer, and Mason Walker. “Western Europeans under 30 View News Media Less Positively, Rely More on Digital Platforms than Older Adults.” Pew Research Center, October 30, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/me79t6bd. Accessed April 7, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  440. McGarry, Aidan, Itir Erhart, Hande Eslen-Ziya, Olu Jenzen, and Umut Korkut. The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication, Protest and Social Movements. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  441. McLagan, Meg, and Yates McKee, eds. Sensible Politics: The Visual Culture of Nongovernmental Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  442. McLuhan, Marshall. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
  443. McQuater, Katie. “Anatomy of an Ad: Behind the Scenes of Save the Children's Second a Day Syria Ad.” The Drum, April 7, 2014, https://tinyurl.com/4kdd2cwc. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  444. Meeker, Mary (on behalf of BOND). Internet Trends 2019 (Website), 2019, https://www.bondcap.com/report/it19/. Accessed December 14, 2023.
  445. Mehrabov, Ilkin. Video Activism in Turkey: Empowerment of Oppressed or Another Kind of Surveillance? The Curious Case of Karahaber. Saarbrücken: VDM, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  446. Mehrabov, Ilkin. “When States Strike Back: Failures of Mediatized Activism in Azerbaijan and Turkey.” tripleC 14, no. 2 (2016): 496515.
    [Google Scholar]
  447. Melchior, Moritz, and Manuel Rivera. Klimagerechtigkeit erzählen: Narrative, Wertbezüge und Frames bei Extinction Rebellion, Ende Gelände und Fridays for Future. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), 2021, https://tinyurl.com/bdcm3ekx. Accessed May 22, 2023.214
    [Google Scholar]
  448. Metag, Julia, Tobias Füchslin, and Mike S. Schäfer. “Global Warming's Five Germanys: A Typology of Germans’ Views on Climate Change and Patterns of Media Use and Information.” Public Understanding of Science 26, no. 4 (2017): 43451.
    [Google Scholar]
  449. Meyer, David S.Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (2004): 12545.
    [Google Scholar]
  450. Milmo, Dan. “TikTok Users in Russia Can See Only Old Russian-made Content.” The Guardian, March 10, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/5n839rd9. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  451. Milmo, Dan, and Pjotr Sauer. “Deepfakes v Pre-bunking: Is Russia Losing the Infowar?The Guardian, March 19, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/4c2vktaf. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  452. Milne, Elizabeth-Jane, Claudia Mitchell, and Naydene de Lange, eds. Handbook of Participatory Video. Lanham and Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  453. Mitchell, Mary. “Where Voice and Listening Meet: Participation in and Through Interactive Documentary in Peru.” Glocal Times 22&23 (September 2015): 113, https://ojs.mau.se/index.php/glocaltimes/article/view/248. Accessed December 29, 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  454. Mobile Marketing Association (MMA). “From a Blink to a Heartbeat.” 2019, https://www.mmaglobal.com/documents/blink-heartbeat. Accessed April 12, 2023.
  455. Moody-Ramirez, Mia, and Hazel Cole. “Victim Blaming in Twitter Users’ Framing of Eric Garner and Michael Brown.” Journal of Black Studies 49, no. 4 (2018): 383407.
    [Google Scholar]
  456. Morgan, Michael, James Shanahan, and Nancy Signorielli. “Cultivation Theory in the Twenty-First Century.” In The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication Theory, edited by Robert S. Fortner and P. Mark Fackler, 48097. Chichester: John Wiley, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  457. Morozov, Evgeny. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York and Philadelphia, PA: Public Affairs, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  458. Mortensen, Mette. “Connective Witnessing: Reconfiguring the Relationship Between the Individual and the Collective.” Information, Communication & Society 18, no. 11 (2015): 1393406.
    [Google Scholar]
  459. Moser, Susanne C.Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1, no. 1 (2010): 3153.
    [Google Scholar]
  460. Mouffe, Chantal. Über das Politische: Wider die kosmopolitische Illusion. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  461. Nagel, Laura. Tales of Doom, Tales of Opportunity: How Climate Communication Can Help to Overcome Psychological Barriers to Sustainable Action. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), 2021, https://tinyurl.com/bdkfb934. Accessed May 22, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  462. Napoli, Philip M. Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. New York: Columbia University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  463. Nash, Kate. Interactive Documentary: Theory and Debate. London and New York: Routledge, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  464. Nash, Kate, and John Corner. “Strategic Impact Documentary: Contexts of Production and Social Intervention.” European Journal of Communication 31, no. 3 (2016): 22742.215
    [Google Scholar]
  465. Negt, Oskar, and Alexander Kluge. Public Sphere and Experience: Towards an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  466. Neumayer, Christina. “Activism.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, edited by Mona Baker, Bolette B. Blaagaard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, 16. London and New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  467. Neumayer, Christina, and Jakob Svensson. “Activism and Radical Politics in the Digital Age: Towards a Typology.” Convergence 22, no. 2 (2016): 13114, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514553395. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  468. Nichols, Bill. Newsreel: Documentary Filmmaking on the American Left, 1969–1974. New York: Ayer Co. Pub, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  469. Nichols, Bill. “The Voice of Documentary.” Film Quarterly 36, no. 3 (1983): 1730.
    [Google Scholar]
  470. Nichols, Bill. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  471. Nichols, Bill. Engaging Cinema: An Introduction to Film Studies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  472. Nigg, Heinz, ed. Rebel Video: Die Videobewegung der 1970er- und 1980er-Jahre. London, Bern, Lausanne, Basel and Zürich: Scheidegger & Spiess, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  473. Nix, Naomi. “Meta to Begin Fresh Layoffs, Cutting Heavily Among Business Staff.” The Washington Post, May 23, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/mwusbj5v. Accessed November 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  474. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion, Our Social Skin. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, [German 1984] 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  475. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. Die Schweigespirale: Öffentliche Meinung—unsere soziale Haut. München: Langen Müller, [German 1980] 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  476. Notley, Tanya, Sam Gregory, and Andrew Lowenthal. “Video for Change: Creating and Measuring Ethical Impact.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 9, no. 2 (2017): 22346.
    [Google Scholar]
  477. Nunes, Rodrigo. The Organisation of the Organisationless: Collective Action After Networks. London: Mute, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  478. Nussbaum, Martha. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  479. Nymoen, Ole, and Wolfgang M. Schmitt. Influencer: Die Ideologie der Werbekörper. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  480. Ollis, Tracey. “The ‘Accidental Activist’: Learning, Embodiment and Action.” Australian Journal of Adult Learning 48, no. 2 (2008): 31635.
    [Google Scholar]
  481. Ong, Jonathan Corpus, and Jason Vincent A. Cabañes. Architects of Network Disinformation: Behind the Scenes of Troll Accounts and Fake News Production in the Philippines. UMass Amherst: Communication Department Faculty Publication Series, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7275/2cq4-5396. Accessed April 24, 2023.216
    [Google Scholar]
  482. O'Reilly, Tim. “What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” O'Reilly (Website), September 30, 2005, https://tinyurl.com/3s93rk6m. Accessed May 22, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  483. Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  484. Otto, Isabell. TikTok. Ästhetik, Ökonomie und Mikropolitik überraschender Transformationen. Berlin: Wagenbach, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  485. Page, Ruth E. Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. London: Routledge, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  486. Papacharissi, Zizi. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  487. Papacharissi, Zizi. “Affective Publics and Structures of Storytelling: Sentiment, Events and Mediality.” Information, Communication & Society, 19, no. 3 (2015): 30724.
    [Google Scholar]
  488. Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. London: Viking, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  489. Park, Minsu, Naaman, Mor, and Jonah Berger. “A Data-Driven Study of View Duration on YouTube.” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Social Media 10, no. 1 (2016): 14, https://tinyurl.com/559jrsna. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  490. Pasquale, Frank. “The Automated Public Sphere.” In The Politics and Policies of Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother?, edited by Ann Rudinow Sætnan, Ingrid Schneider, and Nicola Green, 11028. London and New York: Routledge, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  491. Perez, Christian, and Anjana Nair. “Information Warfare in Russia's War in Ukraine.” Foreign Policy, March 1, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/3938zteb. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  492. Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  493. Piketty, Thomas. Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  494. da Ponte, Alexander Campos. “Ship Carrying Nuclear Waste Harried by Greenpeace Boats.” Video Activism (Website), March 14, 2018, https://videoactivism.net/en/greenpeace-nuclear-waste/. Accessed September 11, 2023.
  495. Pörksen, Bernhard. Die große Gereiztheit: Wege aus der kollektiven Erregung. Munich: Carl Hanser, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  496. Pörksen, Bernhard. Digital Fever: Taming the Big Businesses of Misinformation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  497. Presence, Steve. “Reel News in the Digital Age: Framing Britain's Radical Video-Activists.” In The Routledge Companion to Cinema and Politics, edited by Yannis Tzioumakis and Claire Mulloy, 10311. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  498. Presence, Steve, Mike Wayne, and Jack Newsinger. Contemporary Radical Film Culture: Networks, Organisations and Activists. London: Routledge, 2021.217
    [Google Scholar]
  499. Rabinowitz, Paula. They Must Be Represented: The Politics of Documentary. London and New York: Verso, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  500. Rainie, Lee. “Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters.” Pew Research Center, February 20, 2014, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/. Accessed June 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  501. Raley, Rita. Tactical Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  502. Rambukkana, Nathan, ed. Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. New York: Peter Lang, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  503. Raworth, Kate. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. New York: Random House, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  504. Reilly, Paul. “Sousveillance.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, edited by Mona Baker, Bolette B. Blaagaard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, 39004. London and New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  505. Reinsborough, Patrick, and Doyle Canning. Re:Imagining Change: How to Use Story-Based Strategy to Win Campaigns, Build Movements, and Change the World. Birmingham, NY: PM Press, [2010] 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  506. Reporters Without Borders. “2022 World Press Freedom Index.” 2022, https://rsf.org/en/index. Accessed April 26, 2023.
  507. Reporters Without Borders. “Press Freedom in Europe Overshadowed by the War in Ukraine.” 2023, https://rsf.org/en/classement/2023/europe-central-asia. Accessed November 3, 2023.
  508. Rettinger, Carl-Ludwig. Lieber Video in der Hand als Film im Kopf. Berlin: Chamisso, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  509. Reuter, Markus, and Chris Köver. “Cheerfulness and Censorship.” Netzpolitik, November 23, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/ya93bywm. Accessed April 8, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  510. Ribeiro, Manuel Horta, Raphael Ottoni, Robert West, Virgilio A. F. Almeida, and Wagner Meira Jr.Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTube.” In FAT* ‘20: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, edited by Mireille Hildebrandt, Carlos Castillo, Elisa Celis, Salvatore Ruggieri, Linnet Taylor, and Gabriela Zanfir-Fortuna, 13141. New York: ACM, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  511. Richardson, Alissa V. Bearing Witness While Black: African Americans, Smartphones, and the New Protest #Journalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  512. Riedl, Martin J., Josephine Lukito, and Samuel C. Woolley. “Political Influencers on Social Media: An Introduction.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305123117798. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  513. Ristovska, Sandra. “Strategic Witnessing in an Age of Video Activism.” Media, Culture & Society 38, no. 7 (2016): 103447.
    [Google Scholar]
  514. Ristovska, Sandra. Seeing Human Rights: Video Activism as a Proxy Profession. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  515. Robé, Chris. Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerillas, and Digital Ninjas. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 2017.218
    [Google Scholar]
  516. Robé, Chris. Abolishing Surveillance: Digital Media Activism and State Repression. Birmingham, NY: PM Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  517. Robé, Chris, and Stephen Charbonneau, eds. InsUrgent Media from the Front: A Media Activism Reader. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  518. Robertson, Alexa. Media and Politics in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  519. Rocha, Glauber. “The Aesthetics of Hunger.” In Twenty-Five Years of the New Latin American Cinema, edited by Michael Chanan, 1314. London: BFI, [Portuguese 1965] 1983.
    [Google Scholar]
  520. Roosvall, Anna, and Matthew Tegelberg. “Introduction to Climate Justice Communication.” In Research Handbook on Communicating Climate Change, edited by David C. Holmes and Lucy M. Richardson, 29192. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  521. Rotich, Juliane. “Ushahidi: Empowering Citizens Through Crowdsourcing and Digital Data Collection.” Field Actions Science Reports, Special Issue: “Smart Cities at the Crossroads” 16 (2017): 3638.
    [Google Scholar]
  522. Roudé, Catherine. Le cinéma militant à l'heure des collectifs: Slon et Iskra dans la France de l'après-1968. Rennes: Presses Universitaire de Rennes, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  523. Rucht, Dieter. “The Quadruple ‘A’: Media Strategies of Protest Movements Since the 1960s.” In Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements, edited by Wim van de Donk, Brian Loader, Paul G. Nixon, and Dieter Rucht, 2548. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  524. Ryan-Mosley, Tate. “This Huge Chinese Company Is Selling Video Surveillance Systems to Iran.” MIT Technology Review, December 15, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/mstuyehe. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  525. Sachs, Jonah. Winning the Story Wars: Why Those Who Tell (and Live) the Best Stories Will Rule the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  526. Sadler, Neil. Fragmented Narrative: Telling and Interpreting Stories in the Twitter Age. London and New York: Routledge, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  527. Sandvine. The Global Internet Phenomena Report January 2023, Reporters Without Borders, 2023, https://www.sandvine.com/global-internet-phenomena-report-2023. Accessed November 21, 2023.
  528. Sasse, Sylvia. “Der ‘forensische’ Blick.” Geschichte der Gegenwart, June 5, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/3vx89sxs. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  529. Sato, Mia. “Ukrainian Influencers Bring the Frontline to TikTok.” The Verge, March 16, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/3xtbrxss. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  530. Sauter, Molly. The Coming Swarm: DDOS Actions, Hacktivism, and Civil Disobedience on the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  531. Schäfer, Mike S.Digital Public Sphere.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni, 32228. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  532. Schankweiler, Kerstin. Bildproteste. Berlin: Wagenbach, 2019.219
    [Google Scholar]
  533. Schankweiler, Kerstin, Verena Straub, and Tobias Wendl, eds. Image Testimonies: Witnessing in Times of Social Media. London and New York: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  534. Schicha, Christian. “Kommunikationsstrategien von Greenpeace: Eventmanagement zwischen dramatisierender Symbolik und konstruktivem Engagement.” Zeitschrift für Kommunikationsökologie 1 (2001): 2226.
    [Google Scholar]
  535. Schmitt, Wolfgang M.Werden Influencer jetzt politisch?Der Freitag, August 28, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/ycxbbz6m. Accessed September 19, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  536. Schneider, Jonas. “Die 10 stärksten NGOs in Social Media.” PR Report 6 (2019): 3845.
    [Google Scholar]
  537. Schwenkenbecher, Anne. “How We Fail to Know: Group-Based Ignorance and Collective Epistemic Obligations.” Political Studies 70, no. 4 (2021): 90118, https://tinyurl.com/yk52nx8n. Accessed May 22, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  538. Scott, Martin, Kate Wright, and Mel Bunce. The State of Humanitarian Journalism. Norwich: University of East Anglia, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/yckt5wt5. Accessed April 16, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  539. Searls, Doc. “The Splinternet.” Doc Searls Weblog, December 16, 2008, https://tinyurl.com/yzyy3zp6. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  540. Sehl, Annika, and Jonas Schützeneder. “Political Knowledge to Go: An Analysis of Selected Political Influencers and Their Formats in the Context of the 2021 German Federal Election.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177916. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  541. Sennet, Richard. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  542. Sharon, Assaf. “Solidarity Without Sentimentality.” Raisons politiques 77, no. 2 (2018): 97116.
    [Google Scholar]
  543. Shestopalova, Alona, Anna Litvinenko, Magdalena Kaltseis, and Tatiana Golova. “FAQ #9: Propaganda in Russland—Wie und warum funktioniert sie?Dekoder, March 23, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/3djubz94. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  544. Shifman, Limor. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  545. The Shift Project. Climate Crisis: The Unsustainable Use of Online Video: Our New Report on the Environmental Impact of ICT, July 11, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/5n7u4ud8. Accessed June 30, 2023.
  546. The Shift Project. Did The Shift Project Really Overestimate the Carbon Footprint of Online Video? Our Analysis of the IEA and Carbonbrief Articles, June 15, 2020, https://theshiftproject.org/en/article/shift-project-really-overestimate-carbon-footprint-video-analysis/. Accessed June 29, 2023.
  547. Shirky, Clay. “The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change.” Foreign Affairs 90, no. 1 (2011): 2841.
    [Google Scholar]
  548. Shresthova, Sangita. “2. ‘Watch 30 Minute Video on Internet, Become Social Activist’? KONY 2012, Invisible Children, and the Paradoxes of Participatory Politics.” In By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism, edited by Henry Jenkins, Sangita Shresthova, Liana Gamber-Thompson, Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, and Arely M. Zimmerman, 61101. New York: New York University Press, 2016.220
    [Google Scholar]
  549. Singhal, Arvind, and M. Rogers Everett. “A Theoretical Agenda for Entertainment-Education.” Communication Theory 12, no. 2 (2002): 11735.
    [Google Scholar]
  550. Smith, Marc. “6 Kinds of Twitter Social Media Network Structures.” Social Media Research Foundation, March 2, 2014, https://tinyurl.com/2p8vpeax. Accessed April 5, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  551. SMK. “[STUDY] Facebook Video Watch Time: 4.57 seconds on Average.” SMK (Website), March 2, 2020, https://tinyurl.com/5h7y6j2p. Accessed April 12, 2023.
  552. Snow, David A., Rens Vliegenhart, and Pauline Ketelaars. “The Framing Perspective on Social Movements: It's Conceptual Roots and Architecture.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi, and H. J. McCammon, 392410. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  553. Socialbakers. Social Media Trends Report Q4 2019, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/2ps6tf3u.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2023.
  554. Social Media & Politics. “#140: Social Media and the War in Ukraine, with Prof. Joshua Tucker.” Lund University, April 7, 2022, https://socialmediaandpolitics.org/social-media-ukraine-war-russia-disinformation-putin-zelensky-politics-podcast/. Accessed November 3, 2023.
  555. Solanas, Fernando E., and Octavio Getino. “Towards a Third Cinema.” In Movies and Methods, edited by Bill Nichols, 4464. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, [Spanish 1969] 1976.
    [Google Scholar]
  556. Sorg, Christoph. Social Movements and the Politics of Debt: Transnational Resistance Against Debt on Three Continents. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  557. Spier, Shaked. Collective Action 2.0: The Impact of Social Media on Collective Action. Cambridge, MA and Kidlington: Chandos Publishing, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  558. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 271313, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  559. Squires, Catherine R.Rethinking the Black Public Sphere: An Alternative Vocabulary for Multiple Public Spheres.” Communication Theory 12, no. 4 (2002): 44668.
    [Google Scholar]
  560. Srnicek, Nick. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  561. Srnicek, Nick. “The Challenges of Platform Capitalism: Understanding the Logic of a New Business Model.” Progressive Review 23, no. 4 (2017): 2547.
    [Google Scholar]
  562. Stahl, Lesley. “How Does YouTube Handle the Site's Misinformation, Conspiracy Theories and Hate?CBS News, December 1, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/5ckmrkr4. Accessed April 5, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  563. Stalder, Felix. The Digital Condition. Translated by V. A. Pakis. Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  564. Stegemann, Patrick, and Sören Musyal. Die rechte Mobilmachung: Wie radikale Netzaktivisten die Demokratie angreifen. Berlin: Econ, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  565. Stephansen, Hilde C., and Emiliano Treré, eds. Citizen Media and Practice: Currents, Connections, Challenges. London: Routledge, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  566. Stewart, Nicole K., Ahmed Al-Rawi, Carmen Celestini, and Nathan Worku. “Hate Influencers’ Mediation of Hate on Telegram: ‘We Declare War Against the Anti-White System’.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177915. Accessed December 29, 2023.221
    [Google Scholar]
  567. Stoknes, Per Espen. What We Think about When We Try Not to Think about Global Warming: Toward a New Psychology of Climate Action. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  568. Stoldt, Ryan, Mariah Wellman, Brian Ekdale, and Melissa Tully. “Professionalizing and Profiting: The Rise of Intermediaries in the Social Media Influencer Industry.” Social Media + Society 5, no. 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119832587. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  569. Stratil, Jasper. “‘Ja es ist wieder Zeit für so ein Video.’ Zur audiovisuellen Adressierung und rhetorischen Situation des Rezo-YouTube-Videos Die Zerstörung der CDU.” Mediaesthetics—Journal of Poetics of Audiovisual Images 3, 2019, https://www.mediaesthetics.org/index.php/mae/article/view/83/207. Accessed December 31, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  570. Strick, Simon. “The Alternative Right, Masculinities, and Ordinary Affect.” In Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond, 20730, edited by Gabriele Dietze and Julia Roth. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  571. Strick, Simon. Rechte Gefühle: Affekte und Strategien des digitalen Faschismus, Bielefeld: Transcript, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  572. Strick, Simon. “Reflexive Facism in the Age of History Memes.” Journal of Modern European History, 20, no. 3 (2022): 33551.
    [Google Scholar]
  573. Suler, John. “The Online Disinhibition Effect.” Cyberpsychology & Behavior 7, no. 3 (2004): 3216.
    [Google Scholar]
  574. Sunstein, Cass R. Echo Chambers: Bush v. Gore, Impeachment, and Beyond. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  575. Sunstein, Cass R. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  576. Taylor, Diana. Performance. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  577. Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta. From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation. Foreword by Angela Davies. Expanded 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  578. Tedjasukmana, Chris. “Das Netzvideo als Flaschenpost: Sylvia Rivera und queere Filmgeschichte.” In Queer Cinema, 5667, edited by Simon Dickel and Dagmar Brunow. Mainz: Ventil, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  579. Terranova, Tiziana. Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto Press, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  580. Torchin, Leshu. “KONY 2012: Anatomy of a Campaign Video and a Video Campaign.” In The Routledge Handbook to Cinema and Politics, edited by Yannis Tzioumakis and Claire Molloy, 12333. New York: Routledge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  581. Tretyakov, Sergei. “Art in the Revolution and the Revolution in Art (Aesthetic Consumption and Production).” October 118 ([Russian 1923] 2014): 1118, https://doi.org/10.1162/octo.2006.118.1.11. Accessed April 11, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  582. Tseronis, Assimakis. “Documentary Film as Multimodal Argumentation: Arguing Audio-visually about the 2008 Financial Crisis.” In Building Bridges for Multimodal Research: 222International Perspectives on Theories and Practices of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Janina Wildfeuer, 32745. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  583. Tufekci, Zeynep. “‘Not This One’ Social Movements, the Attention Economy, and Microcelebrity Networked Activism.” American Behavioral Scientist 57, no. 7 (2013): 84870.
    [Google Scholar]
  584. Tufekci, Zeynep. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  585. Tufekci, Zeynep. “YouTube, the Great Radicalizer.” The New York Times, March 11 (2018): 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  586. Tuttle Ross, Sheryl. “Propaganda and the Moving Image.” In The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures, edited by Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa, and Shawn Loht, 75780. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  587. Urman, Aleksandra, and Mykola Makhortykh. My War Is Your Special Operation: Engagement with Pro-and Anti-regime Framing of the War in Ukraine on Russian Social Media. 2022, https://osf.io/67snk/download. Accessed December 29, 2023.
  588. Vaidhyanathan, Siva. Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  589. Valkenburg, Patti M., Jochen Peter, and Joseph B. Walther. “Media Effects: Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Psychology 67, no. 1 (2016): 31538.
    [Google Scholar]
  590. van Dijck, José. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  591. van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. “Understanding Social Media Logic.” Media and Communication 1, no. 1 (2013): 214.
    [Google Scholar]
  592. van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  593. Verma, Mimansa. “India Has Blocked 14 Mobile Messenger Apps on Security Fears.” Quartz, May 1, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/bdd9hyyk. Accessed May 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  594. Voß, Malte. “Videoaktivismus und Soziale Medien: Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Gegenöffentlichkeit durch Video im Internetzeitalter.” In Protest—Film—Bewegung: Neue Wege im Dokumentarischen, edited by Kay Hoffmann, Erika Wottrich, Ursula von Keitz, and Thomas Weber, 16173. München: Edition Text + Kritik, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  595. Waldman, Diane, and Janet Walker, eds. Feminism and Documentary. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  596. Walsh, Alistair. “TikTok Censoring LGBT, Nazi Terms in Germany: Report.” DW, March 23, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/yxuwuucs. Accessed April 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  597. Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  598. Waters, Richard D., and Paul M. Jones. “Using Video to Build an Organization's Identity and Brand: A Content Analysis of Nonprofit Organizations’ YouTube Videos.” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 23, no. 3 (2011): 24868.
    [Google Scholar]
  599. Waugh, Thomas. “Show Us Life”: Towards a History and Aesthetics of the Committed Documentary. Metuchen, NJ and London: Scarecrow Press, 1984.223
    [Google Scholar]
  600. Weibel, Peter, ed. global aCtIVISm: Art and Conflict in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  601. Weizman, Eyal. Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability. New York: Zone Books, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  602. Welles, Brooke. #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  603. Wessels, Josepha Ivanka. Documenting Syria: Film-Making, Video Activism and Revolution. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  604. Weyler, Rex. Greenpeace: How a Group of Ecologists, Journalists and Visionaries Changed the World. Vancouver: Raincoast Books, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  605. White, Katherine, Rishad Habib, and David J. Hardisty. “How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to Be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework.” Journal of Marketing 83, no. 3 (2019): 2249.
    [Google Scholar]
  606. Wiehl, Anna. The Digital Moment in Interactive Documentary: Polyphony and Collaborative Storytelling Between On-Line and On-Ground Action. Hamburg: Avinus, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  607. Wike, Richard, and Sneha Gubbala (on behalf of Pew Research Center). “Social Media Seen as Mostly Good for Democracy Across Many Nations, but U.S. Is a Major Outlier.” Pew Research Center, December 6, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/yrr3cdkh. Accessed April 19, 2023.
  608. Wike, Richard, and Sneha Gubbala (on behalf of Pew Research Center). “Social Media Seen as Mostly Good for Democracy Across Many Nations, but U.S. Is a Major Outlier.” Pew Research Center, December 6, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/yrr3cdkh. Accessed April 19, 2023.
  609. Wikipedia. “Comparison of Video Hosting Services.” (n.d.), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_hosting_services. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  610. Wimmer, Jeffrey. “Counterpublic.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni, 15. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  611. Winskell, Kate, and Daniel Enger. “Storytelling for Social Change.” In The Handbook of Development Communication and Social Change, edited by Karin Gwinn Wilkins, Thomas Tufte, and Rafael Obregon, 189206. Chichester: John Wiley, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  612. Winston, Brian. “The Tradition of the Victim in Griersonian Documentary.” In Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Films, and Television, edited by Larry Gross, John Stuart Katz, and Jay Ruby, 3457. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  613. Witness. “Deepfakes, Synthetic Media and Generative AI: Dossier.” WITNESS (2023), https://www.gen-ai.witness.org/. Accessed November 29, 2023.
  614. Woolley, Samuel, Martin Riedl, and Josephine Lukito. “TikTok has a Political Influencer Problem Targeted at Gen Z Voters.” The Hill, June 6, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/4wjdekh5. Accessed July 16, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  615. Yékú, James. Cultural Netizenship: Social Media, Popular Culture, and Performance in Nigeria. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2022.224
    [Google Scholar]
  616. Yuan, Elaine. “Publics (and Networked Publics).” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, edited by Moma Baker, Bolette B. Blaagard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, 17. London and New York: Routledge, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  617. Zimmermann, Patricia R., and Helen de Michiel. Open Space New Media Documentary: A Toolkit for Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  618. Zimmermann, Peter. “Camcorder Revolution—Videoaktivisten und internationale Öffentlichkeit.” In Referenzen: Zur Theorie und Geschichte des Realen in den Medien, edited by Harro Segeberg, 25661. Marburg: Schüren, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  619. Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  620. Zuckerman, Ethan. “The Cute Cat Theory Talk at ETech.” Ethan Zuckerman (blog), March 8, 2008, www.bit.ly/2VMZKHG. Accessed April 24, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  621. Zulli, Diana, and David James Zulli. “Extending the Internet Meme: Conceptualizing Technological Mimesis and Imitation Publics on the TikTok Platform.” New Media & Society 24, no. 8 (2022): 187290.
    [Google Scholar]
  622. Zutavern, Julia. Politik des Bewegungsfilms. Marburg: Schüren, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. 189Abounaddara (2011–present), Vimeo channel, https://vimeo.com/user6924378. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  2. ACTUPNY (2012–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@ACTUPNY. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  3. Adair, Peter, Nancy Adair, Lucy Massie Phenix, Veronica Selver, Andrew Brown, and Rob Epstein (1977), Word Is Out: Stories of Some of Our Lives, directed by Mariposa Film Group, Nancy Adair, Andrew Brown, Lucy Massie Phenix, Veronica Selver, produced by Nancy Adair, Andrew Brown, Lucy Massie Phenix, Veronica Selver, USA.
  4. Airwars (2015–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@Airwarsorg. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  5. Al-Aloul, Ayman, and Yusef Maysam (2014), (Rubble Bucket Challenge), YouTube, August 23, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=duSBig1-VUA. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  6. Al-Kateab, Waad, and Edward Watts (2020), For Sama, Syria, UK and USA: PBS Frontline, Channel 4 News, ITN Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Alk, Howard (1971), The Murder of Fred Hampton, USA: Chicago Film Group, MGA Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Allen, Taisha, and R. Sylon (2014), Unseen Video of Eric Garner Death—Over 7 Minutes Handcuffed Not Breathing NYPD Chokehold AFTERMATH, YouTube, July 19, http://tinyurl.com/2w2czwd4. Accessed January 5, 2024. Trigger warning: This video contains disturbing scenes.
  9. Álvarez, Santiago (1965), Now!, Cuba: Instituto Cubano del Arte e Industria Cinematográficos (ICAIC).
    [Google Scholar]
  10. American Masters PBS (2014), First Greenpeace Whale Rescue Mission | A Fierce Green Fire | American Masters, YouTube, April 2, https://tinyurl.com/2emdaa9b. Accessed August 26, 2023.
  11. Amnesty International (n.d.), Citizen Evidence Lab, Website, https://citizenevidence.org/. Accessed July 17, 2024.
  12. Amnesty International (2006–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/amnestyinternational. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  13. Amnesty International, and Max Hattler (2013), Amnesty International: Stop the Show, YouTube, April 6, 2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wre5VWHxSug. Accessed July 13, 2024.190
  14. Amnesty International UK (2008), The Stuff of Life / Exposing Waterboarding / International Law, YouTube, UK, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yLL7O9hIloA. Accessed July 23, 2024. Trigger warning: This video contains disturbing scenes.
  15. Anders, Rayk (2013–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@RaykAnders. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  16. Antonio, Emile de (1968), In the Year of the Pig, USA: Monday Film Production, Turin Film Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Antonio, Emile de (1971), Millhouse: A White Comedy, USA: Whittier Film Corp./Turin Film Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. @aperegarom (Peregarom, Dana S.) (2022), Russian Pensioner Who Survived Siege of Leningrad Arrested for Protest Against Ukraine War, Russia, X/Twitter, March 2, https://twitter.com/aperegarom?lang=de. Accessed December 29, 2023.
  19. Antonio, Emile de, Mary Lampson, and Wexler Haskell (1976), Underground, USA: Action 27.
  20. Arrels fundació (2015), The Most Boring Viral Video, YouTube, May 3. Deleted, available at https://adsspot.me/media/tv-commercials/arrels-fundacio-the-most-boring-viral-video-3340e64c4084. Accessed July 20, 2016.
  21. bak.ma (n.d.), Website, https://bak.ma/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  22. @bait.faktencheck (n.d.), TikTok channel, https://www.tiktok.com/@bait.faktencheck. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  23. Bellingcat (2014–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@bellingcatofficial. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  24. Black Lives Matter (n.d.), Website, https://blacklivesmatter.com/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  25. Bliss, Rob (2014), 10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Woman, YouTube, October 28, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1XGPvbWn0A. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  26. Block, Hans, and Moritz Riesewieck (2018), The Cleaners, Germany: Gebrueder Beetz Filmproduktion. [See Website, https://www.bpb.de/mediathek/video/273199/the-cleaners/. Accessed July 17, 2024.]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Boe, Henrik and Nicolai Bjorke (2022), Worlds Apart, nrk, April 5, https://tinyurl.com/ d4nmcabe. Accessed November 3, 2023.
  28. Brave New Films (n.d.), Website, https://www.bravenewfilms.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  29. Brown, Matthew, Evan Cass-Kavanagh, Mary Ryder, and Jane Slater (2018), Anyone's Child: Mexico: A Living Documentary about Families Affected by Mexico's Drug War, Mexico, UK: Anyone's Child. [See Website: http://mexico.anyoneschild.org/. Accessed April 18, 2023.]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. B'Tselem (n.d.), Website, https://www.btselem.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  31. Calais Migrant Solidarity (2016), Calais Jungle Police Assaults (5th and 6th of January), YouTube, January 7, https://tinyurl.com/3aac6x2v. Accessed May 16, 2023.
  32. Campact (n.d.), Website, https://www.campact.de/. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  33. Cassetteboy (2006–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/cassetteboy. Accessed July 30, 2024.191
  34. Chai, Jing (2015), 穹顶之下 (Under the Dome), China. [See: Under the Dome (English subtitle, complete) by Chai Jing: Air pollution in China, YouTube, March 9, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/2kd9dthw. Accessed April 6, 2023.]
  35. Cinemata. Social Issue Films about the Asia-Pacific (n.d.), Website, https://cinemata.org/Cinemata.org. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  36. Critical Art Ensemble (n.d.), Website, http://critical-art.net/. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  37. Daopoulos, Rony (1971), L'Aggettivo donna (“The Adjective Woman”), Italy: Collettivo Femminista di Cinema.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Dellert, Louisa (2016–20), Instagram account, #louisadellert. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  39. Democracy at Work (2012–present), YouTube channel, www.youtube.com/@democracyatwrk. Accessed May 13, 2023.
  40. Democracy Now! Independent Global News (n.d.), Website, https://www.democracynow.org/. Accessed July, 30, 2024.
  41. Doc Society (n.d.), Website, https://docsociety.org/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  42. _docubase: The MIT Open Documentary Lab (2015), The Quipu Project, directed by Maria Court and Rosemarie Lerner, Chaka Studio, Website, https://docubase.mit.edu/project/quipu-project/. Accessed December 28, 2023.
  43. The Documentary Channel (TDC) (2015), Climate Change Explained Simply, YouTube, December 2, https://tinyurl.com/53p7est4. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  44. Ellis, Lindsay (2013–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@LindsayEllisVids. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  45. Emmerich, Roland (2004), The Day after Tomorrow, USA: Twentieth Century Fox.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ende Gelände (2019), Ende Gelände 19–24.6. 2019 Rheinland, YouTube, March 30, https://tinyurl.com/3rruyxwh. Accessed June 3, 2023.
  47. Engage Media (n.d.), Website, https://engagemedia.org/. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  48. European Alternatives (n.d.), Website, https://euroalter.com. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  49. European Community Organizing Network (ECON) (n.d.), Website, https://organizeeurope.org. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  50. Exodus: Our Journey to Europe (2016–present), TV documentary series, UK: KEO Films.
  51. Extinction Rebellion Deutschland (2019–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@ExtinctionRebellionDeutschland. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  52. Extinction Rebellion (XR) UK (2017–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@ExtinctionRebellionUK. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  53. Fegg, Nicola (2022), Following Valeria, Germany: Chromosom Film. [See: https://www.magnetfilm.de/short-film/films/details/following-valeria.html. Accessed July 17, 2024.]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. The Fifth Estate (2016), Whalers vs. Greenpeace: Standoff on the High Seas—The Fifth Estate, YouTube, July 5, https://tinyurl.com/4etnvsxa. Accessed April 19, 2023.
  55. The Film Group (1966), Cicero March, USA: The Film Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. FilmsForAction (n.d.), Website, https://www.filmsforaction.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.192
  57. Fincher, David (2010), The Social Network, USA: Columbia Pictures, Relativity Media, Scott Rudin Productions, Michael De Luca Productions, Trigger Street Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Forensic Architecture (n.d.), Website, https://forensic-architecture.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  59. Fox, Louis (2007), The Story of Stuff, USA: Free Range Studios, YouTube, April 22, 2009, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GorqroigqM. Accessed July 23, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Grant, Laurens (2016), Stay Woke: The Black Lives Matter Movement, USA: FarWord.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Greenpeace (1979), SYND 16 7 79 Ship Carrying Nuclear Waste Harried by Greenpeace Boats, YouTube (AP Archive), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2bd8cOlIXjo. Accessed December 30, 2023.
  62. Greenpeace Deutschland (2007), Bei Vattenfall: Neulich in Krümmel …, YouTube, August 27, https://tinyurl.com/3avmevr5. Accessed August 16, 2023.
  63. Greenpeace International (2006–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@greenpeace. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  64. Greenpeace International (2010), Facebook: Unfriend Coal, YouTube, September 13, https://tinyurl.com/58y54e5y. Accessed April 6, 2023.
  65. Greenpeace International (2010), Give the Orangutan a Break: Nestle KitKat Spoof Video, Greenpeace media, March 17, 2010, https://tinyurl.com/mdjxtx22. Accessed August 10, 2023.
  66. Greenpeace International (2012), A Homeless Polar Bear in London—Ft. Jude Law and Radiohead, YouTube, July 3, https://tinyurl.com/yeyujea2. Accessed April 6, 2023.
  67. Greenpeace International (2015), A Song of Oil, Ice and Fire, YouTube, May 27, https://tinyurl.com/3evm3ap9. Accessed April 6, 2023.
  68. Greenpeace International (2018), There's a Rang Tan in My Bedroom, August 14, https://media.greenpeace.org/Detail/27MZIFJWY4WSN. Accessed August 16, 2023.
  69. Greenpeace Media (n.d.), Website, https://media.greenpeace.org/. Accessed July, 30, 2024.
  70. Guzmán, Patricio (1975–79), La Batalla de Chile (“The Battle of Chile”), Chile: Equipe Tercer Ano.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Hamed Rad (2009), Neda Agha Soltan Killing Scene, YouTube, June 20, https://tinyurl.com/mr2tyx3n. Accessed April 7, 2023. Trigger warning: This video contains scenes of graphic violence.
  72. Happen Films (n.d.), Website, https://happenfilms.com/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  73. Heinig, Marco, and Steffen Maurer (2018), Hamburger Gitter, Germany: Leftvision.
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Heinig, Marco, Steffen Maurer, Luise Burchard, and Luca Vogel (2022), Rise Up, Germany: Freischwimmer Film and Leftvision.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. The Humane Society of the United Stetes, and Spencer Susser (2021), Save Ralph—A Short Film with Taika Waititi, YouTube, April 6, USA, Australia and UK: Arch Model Studio, Blue-Tongue Films, Humane Society International and Vespa Pictures, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G393z8s8nFY. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  76. Hurwitz, Leo (1932), Detroit Workers News Special 1932: Ford Massacre, YouTube, USA: Workers Film and Photo League. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFEskpjPbfE. Accessed July 23, 2024.193
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Indigenous Rising Media (2014–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/c/IndigenousRising/. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  78. Invisible Children, and Jason Russell (2012), KONY 2012, YouTube, March 5, https://tinyurl.com/46jxazkf. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  79. Ivens, Joris (1937), The Spanish Earth, USA: Contemporary Historians Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Jones, Owen (2015–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@owenjonestalks. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  81. Kitchell, Mark (2012), A Fierce Green Fire: The Battle for a Living Planet, USA: Zoetrope Aubry Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Kitidi, Katerina, and Aris Chatzistefanou (2011), Debtocracy, Greece: Creative Commons, YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKpxPo-lInk. Accessed July 30, 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Lebow, Alisa (2018), Website, www.filmingrevolution.org. Accessed May 1, 2022.
  84. Leftvision (2017), Welcome to Hell—Polizei zerschlägt G20-Demo in Hamburg 2017 (“Police Smashes G20 Demonstration in Hamburg, Germany 2017”), YouTube, n.d., https://bit.ly/3S31OcN. Accessed January 5, 2024.
  85. Leftvision (2020), Gefangen auf Lesbos (Reportage), YouTube, March 14, https://tinyurl.com/yc688mhw. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  86. Leftvision (2020), Prozessauftakt gegen den Attentäter von Halle—Zeugin und Nebenklägerin blickt kritisch zurück (“Start of Trial Against the Halle Assassin: Witness and Joint Plaintiff Takes a Critical Look Back”), YouTube, July 21, https://tinyurl.com/4fjm7c8h. Accessed April 12, 2023.
  87. Letzte Generation (2021–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBeUnC1ky0b_Hwpjf9bA_qw. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  88. Linke Sau (2018–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@linkesau7595. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  89. LoveTapesCollective (2019), L020A Sylvia Rivera, “Y'All Better Quiet Down”, Original Authorized Video, 1973 Gay Pride Rally NYC, YouTube, May 23, https://tinyurl.com/xvm22u6w. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  90. Mesh Collective (2010–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/c/meshcollective. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  91. Minow, Hans-Rüdiger, and Thomas Giefer (1967), Berlin, 2. Juni ‘67, Germany: AStA der Freien Universität Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Navalny, Alexei (2021), Putin's Palace: The Story of the World's Biggest Bribe, YouTube, February 4, https://tinyurl.com/2vnvevke. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  93. New Tactics (n.d.), Website, https://tmt.newtactics.org/. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  94. Nexta TV (2015–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/nexta_tv. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  95. ¡Ni Una Menos! (n.d.), Website, https://niunamenos.org.ar/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  96. Office of the President of Ukraine (2013–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@PresidentGovUa. Accessed April 26, 2023.
  97. Olsson, Göran (2011), The Black Power Mixtape 1967–1975, Sweden: Louverture Films.194
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Orlowski, Jeff (2020), The Social Dilemma, USA: Agent Pictures.
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Orta, Ramsey (2014), Eric Garner Fatal Arrest Video, New York Daily News Exclusive. [No longer retrievable online.]
  100. Papo Reto (2013–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@paporeto2279. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  101. Pataxó, Alice (2015–present), alice_pataxo. Instagram account. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  102. Pataxó, Tukumã (2013–present), tukuma_pataxo. Instagram account. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  103. Peng! Kollektiv (n.d.), Website, http://pen.gg/de/. Accessed July 30, 2022.
  104. Peng! Kollektiv (2018), Seebrücke des Bundes (“Federal Sea Bridge”), Berlin: Peng! [See: Seebrücke des Bundes Reup (2019), YouTube, February 26, http://tinyurl.com/mr3d33eh. Accessed January 5, 2024.]
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Perincioli, Cristina (1971), Für Frauen: 1. Kapitel (“For Women: Chapter 1”), Germany: Deutsche Film- und Fernsehakademie Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Perlman, Michael (2013), Occupy Wall Street: We Are the 99%, USA.
  107. PETA Deutschland (2006–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/petadeutschland. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  108. PhilosophyTube (2013–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@PhilosophyTube. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  109. Piker, Hasan (n.d.), HasanAbi, Twitch channel, www.twitch.tv/hasanabi. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  110. Politizane (2012), Wealth Inequality in America, YouTube, November 20, https://tinyurl.com/2p8a86dr. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  111. Praunheim, Rosa von (1971), Nicht der Homosexuelle ist pervers, sondern die Situation, in der er lebt (“It Is Not the Homosexual Who Is Perverse, but the Society in Which He Lives”), Germany: Bavaria.
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Pro Asyl (2011–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@proasylEU. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  113. Radical Film Network (n.d.), Website, https://radicalfilmnetwork.com/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  114. ReelNews (2006–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@ReelNews. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  115. refugee.tv (2015–present), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@refugeetv. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  116. Reidemeister, Helga (1979), Von wegen “Schicksal” (“Is This Fate?”), Germany: Deutsche Film- und Fernsehakademie Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Renzo (2021a), Zerstörung Teil 1: Inkompetenz, YouTube, August 21, https://tinyurl.com/4f34am5c. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  118. Renzo (2021b), Zerstörung Teil 2: Klima-Katastrophe, YouTube, September 4, https://tinyurl.com/ycpzfjhw. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  119. Renzo (2021c), Zerstörung FINALE: Korruption, YouTube, September 18, https://tinyurl.com/b92wpxyp. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  120. Rezo (@rezomusik) (2019), Jo Leute, hab in den letzten Tagen sau viele Fragen bekommen und dachte, dass ich die aus meiner Sicht am häufigsten gestellten Themen hier mal kurz 195ansprechen und beantworten kann (Ein Thread) (“Guys, [...] (a thread)”), X/Twitter May 29, https://tinyurl.com/y8ajyr7x. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  121. Rezo ja lol ey (2019a), Die Zerstörung der CDU (“The Destruction of the CDU”), YouTube, May 18, https://tinyurl.com/y76tmz2u. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  122. Rezo ja lol eye (2019b), Ein Statement von 90+ YouTubern (“Statement of 90+ YouTubers”), YouTube, May 24, https://tinyurl.com/2s3zphmp. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  123. Rezo ja lol eye (2020), Die Zerstörung der Presse (“The Destruction of the Press”), YouTube, May 31, https://tinyurl.com/4pxvxupc. Accessed June 4, 2023.
  124. RobBubble (2006–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@RobBubble. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  125. Roca de Viñals, Jose Maria, Guillermo Santaisabel, Javier Urbaneja, Cristina Rodríguez, and Esteban Crespo (2015), Hologramas por la Libertad (“Holograms for Freedom”), No Somos Delito, YouTube channel, March 26, http://tinyurl.com/mpejcs6b. Accessed January 5, 2024.
  126. Sander, Helke (1968), Brecht die Macht der Manipulateure (“Break the Manipulators’ Power”), Germany: Deutsche Film- und Fernsehakademie Berlin (DFFB).
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Sander, Helke (1978), Die allseits reduzierte Persönlichkeit—Redupers (“The All-Round Reduced Personality—Redupers”), Germany: Basis Filmverleih and Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF).
    [Google Scholar]
  128. San Francisco Newsreel (1967), Black Panther a.k.a. Off the Pig (Newsreel #19), USA: Third World Newsreel.
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Sasse, Elke (2016), #My Escape/Meine Flucht, Germany: Westdeutscher Rundfunk.
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Save the Children (2006–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@savethechildrenuk. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  131. Save the Children, and Martin Stirling (2014), Most Shocking Second a Day Video, YouTube, March 5, 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBQ-IoHfimQ. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  132. Schneider, John B. (2018–present), X/Twitter account, JohnB_Schneider, https://twitter.com/JohnB_Schneider. Accessed July 17, 2024.
  133. Shashenok, Valeria (n.d.), TikTok account, @valerisssh. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  134. SITU Research (2011–present), Vimeo channel, https://vimeo.com/situnyc. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  135. Solanas, Fernando E., and Octavio Getino (1968), La Hora de las Hornos (“The Hour of the Furnaces”), Argentina: Grupo Cine Liberacion and Solanas Productions.
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Stokes, Edwin (2021), Conversations: The Black Radical Tradition, USA: self-produced.
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Storck, Henri, and Ivens, Joris (1934), Misère au Borinage (Borinage), Belgium: self-produced.
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Syrian Archive (n.d.), https://syrianarchive.org/. Accessed April 7, 2023.
  139. Systemrelevant (2020-present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@systemrelevant8233. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  140. Tactical Tech (n.d.), Website, https://tacticaltech.org/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  141. Tagesschau (2019), Zerstörung der CDU: YouTuber Rezo polarisiert mit viralem Video (“Destruction of the CDU: YouTuber Rezo polarises with viral video”), YouTube, May 23, https://tinyurl.com/2exem7hj. Accessed April 5, 2023.196
  142. The Telegraph (2022), Deep Fake Video of Volodymyr Zelenskiy Surrendering Surfaces on Social Media, YouTube, March 17, https://tinyurl.com/2pf536xb. Accessed November 3, 2023.
  143. Testing the Limits Collective (1988), Testing the Limits: NYC, USA: Testing the Limits Collective.
    [Google Scholar]
  144. Three Arrows (2016–present), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@ThreeArrows. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  145. TV Debout (2016), YouTube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@TVDeboutParis. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  146. TV Fórum (2010–present), Youtube channel, http://www.youtube.com/@forumrevista. Accessed August 2, 2024.
  147. Ulex Project (n.d.), Website, https://ulexproject.org. Accessed July 18, 2024.
  148. Ushahidi (n.d.), Website, https://www.ushahidi.com/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  149. Vframe (n.d.), Website, https://vframe.io/. Accesssed July 31, 2024.
  150. Video4Change (n.d.), Website, https://video4change.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  151. Videoccupy Türkiye (2013–14), YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/@videoccupyturkiye9204. Accesssed July 31, 2024.
  152. Volksverpetzer (n.d.), Website, https://www.volksverpetzer.de/. Accessed August 1, 2024.
  153. WikiLeaks (2010), Collateral Murder, 5 Apr 2010, 5 April, https://tinyurl.com/y2n56skv. Accessed April 6, 2023. Trigger warning: This video contains scenes with graphic violence.
  154. WITNESS (n.d.), Website, https://www.witness.org/. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  155. WITNESS Media Lab (n.d.), Website, https://lab.witness.org/. Accessed July 31, 2024.
  156. Wölken, Tiemo (2019), Reaktion auf Rezo/Tiemo Wölken, YouTube, May 22, https://tinyurl.com/394br9jh. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  157. Women's Film Group Munich (1975), Wir haben lange geschwiegen (“We Have Been Silent for a Long Time”), Germany: self-produced.
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Workers Film & Photo League International (2018–present), YouTube channel, https://tinyurl.com/92hd94u2. Accessed April 6, 2023.
  159. World Wildlife Fund Germany (2019), Die Glyphosat-Vergiftung! Aber was ist Glyphosat? | WWF Deutschland (“Intoxication by Glyphosate”), YouTube, December 5, 2017, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1AOlp1Q950. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  160. Wynn, Natalie (2011–present), ContraPoints, YouTube channel, https://www.youtube.com/user/contrapoints. Accessed July 23, 2024.
  161. The Yes Men (n.d.), Website, https://theyesmen.org/#. Accessed July 30, 2024.
  162. YouTube Advertisers (2017), The High Diver | YouTube Advertisers, YouTube, January 19, https://tinyurl.com/ystnv5s5. Accessed April 13, 2023.
  163. 197Abbamonte, Lucia. “The ‘Sustainable’ Video-Narratives of Greenpeace—An Ecolinguistic Investigation.” Forum for Modern Language Studies 57, no. 2 (2021): 14585.
    [Google Scholar]
  164. Adamson, Morgan. Enduring Images: A Future History of New Left Cinema. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  165. Adorno, Theodor W. Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. New York and London: Verso, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  166. Agde, Günter, and Alexander Schwarz, eds. Die rote Traumfabrik: Meschrabpom-Film und Prometheus 1921–1936. Berlin: Deutsche Kinemathek—Museum für Film und Fernsehen and Bertz + Fischer, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  167. Agency France Press. “War-Themed Video Game Fuels Wave of Misinformation.” France24, January 2, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/23bmepk2. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Aguayo, Angela J. Documentary Resistance: Social Change and Participatory Media. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  169. Akser, Murat, and Victoria McCollum, eds. Alternative Media in Contemporary Turkey: Sustainability, Activism, and Resistance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  170. Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colourblindness. London: Penguin, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  171. Alexander, William. Film on the Left: American Documentary Film from 1931 to 1942. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.
    [Google Scholar]
  172. Alfter, Brigitte, Ralph Müller-Eiselt, and Matthias Spielkamp. “Introduction.” In Automating Society: Taking Stock of Automated Decision-Making in the EU, edited by Matthias Spielkamp, 612. Berlin: AlgorithmWatch, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  173. Allan, Stuart. Citizen Witnessing: Revisioning Journalism in Times of Crisis, Key Concepts in Journalism. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  174. Allgaier, Joachim. “Rezo and German Climate Change Policy: The Influence of Networked Expertise on YouTube and Beyond.” Media and Communication 8, no. 2 (2020): 37686.
    [Google Scholar]
  175. Amnesty International. Myanmar: The Social Atrocity: Meta and the Right to Remedy for the Rohingya. Website of Amnesty International, 2022, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ASA16/5933/2022/en/. Accessed November 3, 2023.198
  176. Andén-Papadopoulos, Kari. “Media Witnessing and the ‘Crowd Sourced Video Revolution’.” Visual Communication 12, no. 3 (2013): 34157.
    [Google Scholar]
  177. Andén-Papadopoulos, Kari. “Citizen Camera-Witnessing: Embodied Political Dissent in the Age of ‘Mediated Mass Self-Communication’.” New Media & Society 16, no. 5 (2014): 75369.
    [Google Scholar]
  178. Anders, Rayk. Eure Dummheit kotzt mich an: Wie Bullshit unser Land vergiftet. München: dtv, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  179. Anders, Rayk. Der Barbar in uns muss Liebe finden: Warum das Land verroht und wie wir uns wehren können. München: dtv, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  180. Andreasen, Alan R.Marketing Social Marketing in the Social Change Marketplace.” Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 21, no. 1 (2002): 313.
    [Google Scholar]
  181. Animoto. “Easily Create Professional Videos” [online course], n.d. https://animoto.com/. Accessed April 12, 2023.
  182. anlen, shirin, and Raquel Vazquez Llorente. “Using Generative AI for Human Rights Advocacy.” WITNESS, June 28, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/27vmwh77. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  183. Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
    [Google Scholar]
  184. Arendt, Hannah. On Revolution. London: Penguin Books, 1963.
    [Google Scholar]
  185. Arendt, Hannah. “Lying in Politics: Reflections on the Pentagon Papers.” In Crises of the Republic. San Diego, CA, New York and London: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1972: 147.
    [Google Scholar]
  186. Arkenbout, Chloë, Jack Wilson, and Daniel de Zeeuw, eds. Critical Meme Reader: Global Mutations of the Viral Image. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  187. Arroyo Almaraz, Isidoro, Miguel Baños Gonzaléz, and Cliff Van-Wyck. “Analysis of the Campaign Videos Posted by the Third Sector on YouTube.” Revista Latina de Comunicación Social 68 (2013): 32854, https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2013-980. Accessed September 11, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  188. Askanius, Tina. Radical Online Video: YouTube, Video Activism and Social Movement Media Practices. Lund: Lund University, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  189. Askanius, Tina. “Online Video Activism and Political Mash-Up Genres.” JOMEC Journal 4 (2013), 117, https://tinyurl.com/2hwtm7ye. Accessed April 25, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  190. Askanius, Tina. “Video as Text, Testimony, Technology—or Practices?” In Citizen Media and Practice: Currents, Connections, Critiques, edited by Hilde Stephansen and Emiliano Trerè, 13651. London: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  191. Aston, Judith, Sandra Gaudenzi, and Mandy Rose, eds. i-Docs: The Evolving Practices of Interactive Documentary. London and New York: Wallflower Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  192. Atton, Chris, ed. The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media. London: Routledge, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  193. Auer, Stefan. “Carl Schmitt in the Kremlin: The Ukraine Crisis and the Return of Geopolitics.” International Affairs 91, no. 5 (2015): 95368.
    [Google Scholar]
  194. Bach, Jonathan, and David Stark. “Link, Search, Interact: The Co-Evolution of NGOs and Interactive Technology.” Theory, Culture & Society 21, no. 3 (2004): 10107.199
    [Google Scholar]
  195. Baker, Al, J. David Goodman, and Benjamin Mueller. “Beyond the Chokehold: The Path to Eric Garner's Death.” The New York Times, June 13, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/bdzx9z9b. Accessed October 2, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  196. Baker, Mona, Bolette Blaagaard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, eds. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media. London: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  197. Barassi, Veronica. Activism on the Web: Everyday Struggles against Digital Capitalism. London: Routledge, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  198. Barendregt, Bart, and Florian Schneider. “Digital Activism in Asia: Good, Bad, and Banal Politics Online.” Asiascape: Digital Asia 7, no. 1&2 (2020): 519.
    [Google Scholar]
  199. Barlow, John Perry. “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace.” Electronic Frontier Foundation, February 8, 1996, https://tinyurl.com/y8syj43j. Accessed April 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  200. Barnouw, Erik. Documentary: A History of the Non-Fiction Film. 2nd rev. ed. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1974] 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  201. Bärtl, Mathias. “YouTube Channels, Uploads and Views: A Statistical Analysis of the Past 10 Years.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies 24, no. 1 (2018): 1632.
    [Google Scholar]
  202. Baú, Valentina. “What Killed Indymedia? Lessons from the IMC Experience of Australia.” Journal of Alternative & Community Media 5, no. 2 (2020): 191210.
    [Google Scholar]
  203. Benjamin, Jack. “Misinformation Spreaders Surge on Twitter after Musk Takeover.” MediaLeader, November 14, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/2vyhupp6. Accessed April 15, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  204. Benkler, Yochai. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2006.
    [Google Scholar]
  205. Bennett, Bruce. “Becoming Refugees: Exodus and the Contemporary Meditations of the Refugee Crisis.” Transnational Cinemas 9, no. 1 (2018): 1330, https://doi.org/10.1080/20403526.2018.1471181. Accessed December 28, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  206. Bennett, W. Lance. Communicating the Future: Solutions for Environment, Economy and Democracy. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  207. Bennett, W. Lance. “Killing the Golden Goose? A Framework for Regulating Disruptive Technologies.” Information, Communication & Society 26, no. 1 (2021): 1636.
    [Google Scholar]
  208. Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. “The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics.” Information, Communication & Society 15, no. 5 (2012): 73968.
    [Google Scholar]
  209. Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  210. Bennett, W. Lance, Alexandra Segerberg, and Yunkang Yang. “The Strength of Peripheral Networks: Negotiating Attention and Meaning in Complex Media Ecologies.” Journal of Communication 68, no. 4 (2018): 65984.
    [Google Scholar]
  211. Bennett, W. Lance, and Barbara Pfetsch. “Rethinking Political Communication in a Time of Disrupted Public Spheres.” Journal of Communication 68, no. 2 (2018): 24353.200
    [Google Scholar]
  212. Berger, Jonah. Contagious: Why Things Catch On. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  213. Beutelschmidt, Thomas. “Alternative Medienarbeit in Berlin—ein Überblick.” In Wer nicht produziert, lebt reduziert! Alternative Medienarbeit in Berlin West und Ost, edited by Thomas Beutelschmidt and Kay Hoffmann, 2130. Marburg: Schüren, 2018 (Augenblick: Konstanzer Hefte zur Medienwissenschaft, 72).
    [Google Scholar]
  214. Beyerle, Mo, and Christine N. Brinckmann, eds. Der amerikanische Dokumentarfilm der 60er Jahre: Direct Cinema und Radical Cinema. Frankfurt a. M. and New York: Campus, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  215. Biermann, Kai. “CSYou: CSU versucht eine Antwort auf Rezo.” Zeit Online, September 1, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/ycxukfj4. Accessed April 5, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  216. Boettger, Conny. “The Role of Photography in Greenpeace's Strategy. The Photograph as Witness.” In Greenpeace: Changing the World. The Photographic Record, edited by Conny Boettger and Fouad Hamndan, 1222. Steinfurt: Tecklenborg, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  217. Boettger, Conny, and Fouad Hamndan. Greenpeace: Changing the World. The Photographic Record. Steinfurt: Tecklenborg, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  218. Boichak, Olga. “Mapping the Russian Political Influence Ecosystem: The Night Wolves Biker Gang.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177920. Accessed April 13, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  219. Borenstein, Eliot. Meanwhile, in Russia … Russian Internet Memes and Viral Video. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  220. Borum Chattoo, Caty. Story Movements: How Documentaries Empower People and Inspire Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  221. Borum Chattoo, Caty, and Will Jenkins. “From Reel Life to Real Social Change: The Role of Contemporary Social-Issue Documentary in U.S. Public Policy.” Media, Culture & Society 41, no. 8 (2019): 110724.
    [Google Scholar]
  222. Bösch, Marcus. “WARTOK—TikTok und der Krieg in der Ukraine.” Televizion 35, no. 2 (2022): 47.
    [Google Scholar]
  223. Bösch, Marcus. “Russian Disinformation.” Understanding TikTok, July 3, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/2udjward. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  224. Bösch, Marcus, and Chris Köver. Schluss mit lustig? TikTok als Plattform für politische Kommunikation. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (Studien, 7), 2021, https://tinyurl.com/s4x7d78d(pdf). Accessed April 8, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  225. boyd, danah. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Zizi Papacharissi, 3958. London and New York: Routledge, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  226. boyd, danah. It's Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  227. Boyle, Deidre. “From Portapak to Camcorder: A Brief History of Guerilla Television.” Journal of Film and Video 44, no. 1&2 (1992): 6779.201
    [Google Scholar]
  228. Boyle, Deidre. Subject to Change: Guerrilla Television Revisited. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
    [Google Scholar]
  229. Brecht, Bertolt. “The Radio as an Apparatus of Communication.” [German 1932]. In New Media: Theories and Practices of Digitextuality, edited by Anna Everett and John T. Caldwell, 2932. New York and London: Routledge, 2003.
    [Google Scholar]
  230. Briese, Andreas, and Sabine Frank. “YouTube Rewind: Das sind die erfolgreichsten Videos des Jahres.” YouTube Official Blog, December 5, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/5x6u567x. Accessed April 5, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  231. Brown, Michael Harold, and John May. The Greenpeace Story. London: Dorling Kindersley, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  232. Browne, Malachy. “YouTube Removes Videos Showing Atrocities in Syria.” The New York Times, August 22, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/22/world/middleeast/syria-youtube-videos-isis.html. Accessed December 28, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  233. Bruns, Axel, Gunn Enli, Eli Skogerbo, Anders Larsson, and Christian Christensen. The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. London: Routledge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  234. Burgess, Jean, Anne Galloway, and Theresa Sauter. “Hashtag as Hybrid Forum: The Case of #agchatoz.” In Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks, edited by Nathan Rambukkana, 6176. Digital Formations, New York: Peter Lang, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  235. Butler, Judith. Precarious Life: The Politics of Mourning and Violence. New York and London: Verso, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  236. Butler, Judith. Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  237. Casilli, Antonio A. “Never Mind the Algorithms: The Role of Click Farms and Exploited Digital Labor in Trump's Election.” November 20, 2016, https://www.casilli.fr/2016/11/20/never-mind-the-algorithms-the-role-of-exploited-digital-labor-and-global-click-farms-in-trumps-election/. Accessed April 10, 2023.
  238. Castells, Manuel. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  239. Castells, Manuel. Communication Power, 2nd ed. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  240. Celikates, Robin. “Digital Publics, Digital Contestation: A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere?” In Transformations of Democracy: Crisis, Protest and Legitimation, edited by Robin Celikates, Regina Kreide, and Tilo Wesche, 15976. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  241. De Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by S. Rendall. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  242. Cervi, Laura, and Tom Divon. “Playful Activism: Memetic Performances of Palestinian Resistance in TikTok #challenges.” Social Media and Society 9, no. 1 (2023): 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  243. Chadwick, Andrew. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.202
    [Google Scholar]
  244. Chanan, Michael. The Politics of Documentary. London: British Film Institute, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  245. Chartier, Denis. “Greenpeace.” In Dictionnaire de la pensée écologique, edited by Dominique Bourg and Alain Papaux, 50104. Paris: PUF, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  246. Chayka, Kyle. “Watching the World's ‘First TikTok War’.” The New Yorker, March 3, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/248hfwjx. Accessed September 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  247. Chouliaraki, Lilie. “Ordinary Witnessing in Post-Television News: Towards a New Moral Imagination.” Critical Discourse Studies 7, no. 4 (2010): 30519, http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/29740/. Accessed December 28, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  248. Chouliaraki, Lilie. “Digital Witnessing in Conflict Zones: The Politics of Remediation.” Information, Communication & Society 18, no. 11 (2015): 136277.
    [Google Scholar]
  249. Citton, Yves. The Ecology of Attention. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  250. Clayton, James. “TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew's Congress Showdown: Five Takeaways.” BBC News, March 24, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/528pxkj8. Accessed May 11, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  251. Coleman, Gabriella. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. New York and London: Verso, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  252. Constine, Josh. “Facebook Hits 8 Billion Daily Video Views, Doubling from 4 Billion in April.” TechCrunch, November 4, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/56y3shep. Accessed April 6, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  253. Contreras, Brian, and Marisa Martinez. “Fed Up with TikTok, Black Creators Are Moving On.” Los Angeles Times, September 16, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/5cah8ahj. Accessed April 24, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  254. Cooney, Nick. Change of Heart: What Psychology Can Teach Us About Spreading Social Change. New York: Lantern Books, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  255. Couldry, Nick. Media, Society, World: Social Theory and Digital Media Practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  256. Couldry, Nick, and Ulises A. Mejias. The Costs of Connection. How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  257. Crawford, Kate. “Can an Algorithm Be Agnostic? Ten Scenes from Life in Calculated Publics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41, no. 1 (2016): 7792.
    [Google Scholar]
  258. Curtis, Polly, and Tom McCarthy. “KONY 2012: What's the Real Story?The Guardian, March 8, 2012, https://tinyurl.com/2hu2emea. Accessed April 13, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  259. Dahlgren, Peter. “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation.” Political Communication 22, no. 2 (2005): 14762, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160.
    [Google Scholar]
  260. Daniels, Cheyanne M.Here's What Changed Since George Floyd's Murder Three Years Ago.” The Hill, May 25, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/3k5rpdc4. Accessed September 27, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  261. Dawson, Paul. “Hashtag Narrative: Emergent Storytelling and Affective Publics in the Digital Age.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 23, no. 6 (2020): 96883.
    [Google Scholar]
  262. Dawson, Paul, and Maria Mäkelä. “The Story Logic of Social Media: Co-construction and Emergent Narrative Authority.” Style 54, no. 1 (2020): 2135.203
    [Google Scholar]
  263. Dean, Jonathan. “From Solidarity to Self-promotion? Neoliberalism and Left Politics in the Age of the Social Media Influencer.” Capital & Class (2023): 123, https://doi.org/10.1177/03098168231199907. Accessed December 2, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  264. Dee, Juliet, ed. From Tahrir Square to Ferguson: Social Networks as Facilitators of Social Movements. New York: Peter Lang, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  265. de Gregorio, Giovanni, and Catalina Goanta. “The Influencer Republic: Monetizing Political Speech on Social Media.” German Law Journal 23, no. 2 (2022): 20425.
    [Google Scholar]
  266. Della Porta, Donatella. “Repertoires of Contention.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Donatella Della Porta, Dough McAdam, and Bert Klandermans. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  267. Della Porta, Donatella, and Alice Mattoni, eds. Spreading Protest: Social Movements in Times of Crisis. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  268. Della Porta, Donatella, and Mario Diani, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  269. Dellar, Hugh. “Day 411 of the War.” VK.com, April 11, 2023, https://vk.com/wall438426825_9634. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  270. Della Ratta, Donatella. Shooting a Revolution: Visual Media and Warfare in Syria. London: Pluto Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  271. Dellert, Louisa. Mein Herz schlägt grün: Weltverbessern für Anfänger—Herzblut statt moralischer Zeigefinger. München: Komplett Media, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  272. Dellert, Louisa. WIR: Weil nicht egal sein darf, was morgen ist. München: Komplett Media, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  273. DeLuca, Kevin Michael. Image Politics: The New Rhetoric of Environmental Activism. New York and London: Routledge, [1999] 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  274. DeLuca, Kevin Michael. “Greenpeace International Media Analyst Reflects on Communicating Climate Change [Interview with Soenke Lorenzen, Greenpeace International].” Environmental Communication 3, no. 2 (2009): 2639.
    [Google Scholar]
  275. Denisova, Anastasia. Internet Memes and Society: Social, Cultural, and Political Contexts. London: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  276. Dennis, James. Beyond Slacktivism: Political Participation on Social Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  277. Derrida, Jacques. Spectres of Marx. New York and London: Routledge, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  278. Dietze, Gabriele. “Sich ein eigenes Bild machen: Selbstbestimmtheit in Filmen von Frauen in den 1960er- bis 1990er-Jahren.” In Selbstbestimmt: Perspektiven von Filmemacherinnen, edited by Karin Herbst-Meßlinger and Rainer Rother, 1745 Bonn: .Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  279. van Dijck, José. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  280. van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. “Understanding Social Media Logic.” Media and Communication 1, no. 1 (2013): 214.204
    [Google Scholar]
  281. van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  282. Dixson-Declève, Sandrine, Owen Gaffney, Jayati Ghosh, Jorgen Randers, Johan Rockström, and Per Espen Stoknes. Earth for All: A Survival Guide for Humanity. Gabriola, BC: New Society Publishers, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  283. Doc Society. The Impact Field Guide & Toolkit (Website), 2019, www.impactguide.org. Accessed April 25, 2023.
  284. Doll, Martin. Fälschung und Fake: Zur diskurskritischen Dimension des Täuschens, Berlin: Kadmos, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  285. Don't Panic. Save the Children: Most Shocking Second a Day (Website), (n.d.), https://tinyurl.com/bdz9u5xn. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  286. Dörr, Nicole, and Simon Teune. “The Imagery of Power Facing the Power of Imagery: Toward a Visual Analysis of Social Movements.” In The Establishment Responds: Power, Politics, and Protest since 1945, edited by Kathrin Fahlenbrach, Martin Klimke, Joachim Scharloth, and Laura Wong, 4355. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  287. Dorsch, Timo. “Die Seebrücke nach Deutschland.” Frankfurter Rundschau, January 4, 2019, https://www.fr.de/politik/seebruecke-nach-deutschland-10967122.html. Accessed September 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  288. Dovey, Jon, and Mandy Rose. “This Great Mapping of Ourselves: New Documentary Forms Online.” In The Documentary Film Book, edited by Brian Winston, 36675. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  289. Doyle, Julie. “Picturing the Clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the Representational Politics of Climate Change Communication.” Science as Culture 16, no. 2 (2007): 12950.
    [Google Scholar]
  290. Doyle, Julie. Mediating Climate Change. Surrey: Ashgate, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  291. Duvan, Carrie. “18 Strategien für erfolgreiche Social Media Videos bei Facebook, Twitter, Instagram und LinkedIn.” filmpuls, March 21, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/46v54v8c. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  292. Dyer-Witheford, Nick, and Svitlana Matviyenko. Cyberwar and Revolution: Digital Subterfuge in Global Capitalism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  293. Earl, Jennifer, Thomas V. Maher, and Jennifer Pan. “The Digital Repression of Social Movements, Protest, and Activism: A Synthetic Review.” Science Advances 8, no. 10 (2022): 115, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abl8198. Accessed April 1, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  294. Edel, Anastasia. “A Day Inside Putin's Surreal Television Empire.” Foreign Policy, May 28, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/yvua7cdc. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  295. Eder, Jens. “Collateral Emotions: Political Web Videos and Divergent Audience Responses.” In Cognitive Theory and Documentary Film, edited by Catalin Brylla and Mette Kramer, 183203. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  296. Eder, Jens. “Rechte Videos und Affekte in Sozialen Medien.” In Zwischen Feindsetzung und Selbstviktimisierung: Gefühlspolitik und Ästhetik populistischer Kommunikation, edited by Lars Koch and Torsten König, 177202. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus, 2020.205
    [Google Scholar]
  297. Eder, Jens. “Political Impact—On the Societal Vibrancy of Film.” In What Film Is Good For: On the Values of Spectatorship, edited by Julian Hanich and Martin P. Rossouw, 10214. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  298. Eder, Jens, and Charlotte Klonk. “Introduction.” In Image Operations: Visual Media and Political Conflict, edited by Jens Eder and Charlotte Klonk, 122. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  299. Einspänner-Pflock, Jessica. Privatheit im Netz: Konstruktions- und Gestaltungsstrategien von Online-Privatheit bei Jugendlichen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  300. Elemia, Camille, and Gelo Gonzalez. “Stars, Influencers Get Paid to Boost Duterte Propaganda, Fake News.” Rappler, February 27, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/ynms3kc3. Accessed April 8, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  301. von Engelhardt, Johannes, and Jeroen Jansz. “Challenging Humanitarian Communication: An Empirical Exploration of KONY 2012.” International Communication Gazette 76, no. 6 (2014): 46484.
    [Google Scholar]
  302. Entman, Robert M.Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43, no. 4 (1993): 5158.
    [Google Scholar]
  303. Eskjær, Mikkel Fugl, Stig Hjarvard, and Mette Mortensen, eds. The Dynamics of Mediatized Conflicts. New York: Peter Lang, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  304. Evon, Dan. “With Gates Wide Open.” Snopes, November 17, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/2vzcbnjp. Accessed February 21, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  305. Fahlenbrach, Kathrin. “Video-Aktivismus: Formen und Strategien der audiovisuellen Mobilisierung im Netz.” Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 33, no. 2 (2020): 45773.
    [Google Scholar]
  306. Farocki, Harun. “Die Agitation verwissenschaftlichen und die Wissenschaft politisieren.” Film 3 (1969): 4952.
    [Google Scholar]
  307. Feng, Emily. “Zelenskiyy Has Consolidated Ukraine's TV Outlets and Dissolved Rival Political Parties.” npr, July 8, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/3c9yps63. Accessed September 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  308. Fenton, Natalie. Digital, Political, Radical. Cambridge: Polity, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  309. Feurich, Jörg Peter. “Gespräch mit Harun Farocki und Hartmut Bitomsky.” Filmkritik 8 (1970): 42025.
    [Google Scholar]
  310. Fielitz, Maik, and Laura Lotte Laloire, eds. Trouble on the Far-Right: Contemporary Right-Wing Strategies and Practices in Europe. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  311. Fielitz, Maik, and Nick Thurston, eds. Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right: Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  312. Fisher, Ian. “Kelly Bans Choke Holds by Officers.” The New York Times, November 24, 1993, https://tinyurl.com/yc6452s5. Accessed October 2, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  313. Ford, Sam, Joshua Green, and Henry Jenkins. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  314. Forestal, Jennifer. Designing for Democracy: How to Build Community in Digital Environments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  315. Frank, Lauren B., and Paul Falzone, eds. Entertainment-Education Behind the Scenes: Case Studies for Theory and Practice. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.206
    [Google Scholar]
  316. Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25&26 (1990): 5680.
    [Google Scholar]
  317. Fraser, Nancy. “Neue Überlegungen zur Öffentlichkeit: Ein Beitrag zur Kritik der real existierenden Demokratie.” In Die halbierte Gerechtigkeit: Schlüsselbegriffe des postindustriellen Sozialismus, translated by Karin Wördemann, 10750. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  318. Fricker, Miranda. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  319. Fuchs, Christian. OccupyMedia! The Occupy Movement and Social Media in Crisis Capitalism. Winchester: John Hunt Publishing, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  320. Fuchs, Christian. Soziale Medien und Kritische Theorie. Eine Einführung. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: UTB, 2021a.
    [Google Scholar]
  321. Fuchs, Christian. “The Digital Commons and the Digital Public Sphere: How to Advance Digital Democracy Today.” Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 16, no. 1 (2021b): 926, https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.917. Accessed December 28, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  322. Fuchs, Christian, and Klaus Unterberger, eds. The Public Service Media and Public Service Internet Manifesto. London: University of Westminster Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  323. Fuller, Matthew, and Eyal Weizman. Investigative Aesthetics: Conflicts and Commons in the Politics of Truth. New York and London: Verso, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  324. Funk, Allie, Adrian Shahbaz, and Kian Vesteinsson. “Freedom on the Net 2023: The Repressive Power of Artificial Intelligence.” Freedom House, November 21, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/2ektra4y. Accessed November 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  325. Galloway, Alexander R., and Eugene Thacker. The Exploit: A Theory of Networks. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  326. Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  327. Gerbaudo, Paolo. Tweets and the Streets: Social Media and Contemporary Activism. London: Pluto Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  328. Gerhardt, Christina, and Sara Saljoughi, eds. 1968 and Global Cinema. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  329. Ghosh, Bishnupriya. Global Icons: Apertures to the Popular. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  330. Gilbert, David. “Russian TikTok Influencers Are Being Paid to Spread Kremlin Propaganda.” Vice, March 11, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/23m4zp2z. Accessed October 31, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  331. Gilbert, Nestor. “64 Facebook Video Statistics You Can't Ignore: 2023 Data Analysis & Market Share.” FinancesOnline, March 15, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/mpmnhn6p. Accessed April 6, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  332. Gillespie, Tarleton. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  333. Giraud, Eva. “Has Radical Participatory Online Media Really ‘Failed’? Indymedia and Its Legacies.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 20, no. 4 (2014): 41937.207
    [Google Scholar]
  334. Gladwell, Malcolm. “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” The New Yorker, October 4 (2010): 4229.
    [Google Scholar]
  335. Glazunova, Sofya. Digital Activism in Russia: The Communication Tactics of Political Outsiders. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  336. Götz, Norbert. “Reframing NGOs: The Identity of an International Relations Non-starter.” European Journal of International Relations 14, no. 2 (2008): 23158.
    [Google Scholar]
  337. Gould, Deborah. Moving Politics: Emotion and ACT UP's Fight against AIDS. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  338. Grant, Paul Douglas. Cinéma Militant: Political Filmmaking and May 1968. London: Wallflower Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  339. Gray, Jonathan. “Data Witnessing: Attending to Injustice with Data in Amnesty International's Decoders Project.” Information, Communication & Society 22, no. 7 (2019): 97191.
    [Google Scholar]
  340. Greenpeace Deutschland. “Greenpeace-Jahresbericht 2020.” July 15, 2021, https://www.greenpeace.de/publikationen/greenpeace-jahresbericht-2020-1. Accessed September 9, 2023.
  341. Gregory, Sam. “Deepfakes, Misinformation and Disinformation and Authenticity Infrastructure Responses: Impacts on Frontline Witnessing, Distant Witnessing, and Civic Journalism.” Journalism 23, no. 3 (2022): 70829.
    [Google Scholar]
  342. Gregory, Sam. “Testimony of Sam Gregory, Executive Director, WITNESS before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety and Data Security. Date of Hearing: September 12, 2023. The Need for Transparency in Artificial Intelligence” (pdf), 2023, https://tinyurl.com/yckx7fd5. Accessed November 29, 2023.
  343. Gritsenko, Daria, Mariëlle Wijermars, and Mikhail Kopotev, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Digital Russia Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  344. Habermas, Jürgen. Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 1984.
    [Google Scholar]
  345. Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, [German 1962] 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  346. Habermas, Jürgen. “Further Reflections on the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 1992.
    [Google Scholar]
  347. Habermas, Jürgen. “Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere.” Theory, Culture & Society 39, no. 4 (2022): 14571.
    [Google Scholar]
  348. Habermas, Jürgen. A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  349. Habermas, Jürgen, Sigmar Gabriel, and Emmanuel Macron. “Europa neu denken.” Blätter 17, no. 4 (2017): 4154.
    [Google Scholar]
  350. Hamblin, Sarah, and Ryan Watson. “Introduction: Radical Documentary Today.” Studies in Documentary Film 13, no. 3 (2019): 18795.208
    [Google Scholar]
  351. Hankey, Stephanie. “The Influence Industry: The Global Business of Using Your Data in Elections.” TacticalTech (Website), April 20, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/526tx99w. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  352. Happen Films. “About Happen Films.” (n.d.), https://happenfilms.com/about. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  353. Harcup, Tony, and Deirdre O'Neill.What Is News? News Values Revisited (Again).” Journalism Studies 18, no. 12 (2017): 147088.
    [Google Scholar]
  354. Harding, Thomas. The Video Activist Handbook, 2nd ed. London: Pluto Press, [1997] 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  355. Harrild, Lucie. “Lessons from the Palm Oil Showdown.” The Guardian, October 27, 2010, http://tinyurl.com/2przsm3u. Accessed August 4, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  356. Harris, Brandon C., Maxwell Foxman, and William C. Partin. “‘Don't Make Me Ratio You Again’: How Political Influencers Encourage Platformed Political Participation.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177944. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  357. Hartley, John. “Silly Citizenship.” Critical Discourse Studies 7, no. 4 (2010): 23348.
    [Google Scholar]
  358. Harwell, Drew. “The Gory Online Campaign Ukraine Hopes Will Sow Anti-Putin Dissent Probably Violates the Geneva Conventions.” The Washington Post, March 3, 2022, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/03/03/telegram-russian-war-dead-ukraine-pows/. Accessed April 26, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  359. Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Random House, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  360. Hern, Alex. “Revealed: How TikTok Censors Videos That Do Not Please Beijing.” The Guardian, September 25, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/3vnptakv. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  361. Herrmann, Boris. “WhatsApp im Wahlkampf: Brasilien, Land der bestellten Lügen.” Süddeutsche Zeitung, October 23, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/f72m2kny. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  362. Hesling, Willem. “Documentary Film and Rhetorical Analysis.” In Image—Reality—Spectator: Essays on Documentary Film and Television, edited by Willem de Greef and Willem Hesling, 10131. Leuven: Acco, 1989.
    [Google Scholar]
  363. Highfield, Tim. Social Media and Everyday Politics. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  364. Highfield, Tim, and Tama Leaver. “Instagrammatics and Digital Methods: Studying Visual Social Media, from Selfies and GIFS to Memes and Emoji.” Communication Research and Practice 2, no. 1 (2016): 4762.
    [Google Scholar]
  365. Himelboim, Itai, Marc A. Smith, Lee Rainie, Ben Shneiderman, and Camila Espina Young. “Classifying Twitter Topic-Networks Using Social Network Analysis.” Social Media + Society 3, no. 1 (2017): 113, https://tinyurl.com/yn82yrse. Accessed June 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  366. Hoffmann, Kay. “Die Technik verändert den Dokumentarfilm: Neue Formen durch synchrone 16 mm und Video-Kameras.” In Protest—Film—Bewegung: Neue Wege im Dokumentarischen, edited by Kay Hoffmann, Erika Wottrich, Ursula von Keitz, and Thomas Weber, 3851, München: Edition Text + Kritik, 2015.209
    [Google Scholar]
  367. Hoffmann, Kay. “Die Aufnahmetechnik prägt das Dokumentarische.” In Wer nicht produziert, lebt reduziert! Alternative Medienarbeit in Berlin West und Ost, edited by Thomas Beutelschmidt and Kay Hoffmann, 920. Marburg: Schüren, 2018 (=Augenblick. Konstanzer Hefte zur Medienwissenschaft, 72).
    [Google Scholar]
  368. Hofmann, Martin Ludwig. Mindbombs. Was Werbung und PR von Greenpeace & Co. lernen können. München: Fink, 2008.
    [Google Scholar]
  369. Hogenkamp, Bert. “The Radical Tradition in Documentary Film-Making, 1920s–50s.” In The Documentary Film Book, edited by Brian Winston, 17379. London: British Film Institute, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  370. Holmlund, Chris, and Cynthia Fuchs, eds. Between the Sheets, in the Streets: Queer, Lesbian, and Gay Documentary. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  371. Hund, Emily. The Influencer Industry: The Quest for Authenticity on Social Media. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  372. Hunter, Bobbi, ed. Mr. Mind Bomb: Eco-hero and Greenpeace Co-founder Bob Hunter—A Life in Stories. Surrey, British Columbia: Rocky Mountain Books, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  373. InfluenceMap. Big Oil's Real Agenda on Climate Change: An InfluenceMap Report, 2019, www.bit.ly/3exO7Nc. Accessed April 24, 2023.
  374. The Influence Industry Project. The Influence Industry Explorer (Website), (n.d.), https://influenceindustry.org/en/explorer/. Accessed April 15, 2023.
  375. Jackson, Sarah J., Moya Bailey, and Brooke Foucault Welles. #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  376. Jasper, James. The Emotions of Protest. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  377. Jendrzejewski, Sophia, and Celine Strufe. Don't Shoot the Messenger! Telegram als Instrument für linken Aktivismus. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (=Studien, 3), 2022, https://tinyurl.com/tdxz92ve. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  378. Jenkins, Henry. “If It Doesn't Spread, It's Dead (Part One): Media Viruses and Memes.” Pop Junctions (Website), February 11, 2009, www.bit.ly/2RV2MZc. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  379. Jenkins, Henry, Sangita Shresthova, Liana Gamber-Thompson, Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, and Arely M. Zimmerman, eds. By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism, Connected Youth and Digital Futures. New York: NYU Press, 2016a.
    [Google Scholar]
  380. Jenkins, Henry, Sangita Shrestova, Liana Gamber-Thompson, and Neta Kligler-Vilenchik. “Superpowers to the People! How Young Activists are Tapping the Civic Imagination.” In Civic Media: Technology, Design, Practice, edited by Eric Gordon and Paul Milhailidis, 295320. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016b.
    [Google Scholar]
  381. Johnson, Lauren. “Save the Children Spot Gets Another Run on YouTube Thanks to Ashton Kutcher.” Adweek, November 12, 2014, https://tinyurl.com/5n6smc6j. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  382. Johnston, Hank, and John A. Noakes, eds. Frames of Protest: Social Movements and the Framing Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  383. de Jong, Wilma, Martin Shaw, and Neil Stammer, eds. Global Activism, Global Media, London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press, 2005.
    [Google Scholar]
  384. Juhasz, Alexandra. AIDS TV: Identity, Community, and Alternative Video. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.210
    [Google Scholar]
  385. Juhola, Sirkku, Tatiana Filatova, Stefan Hochrainer-Stigler, Reinhard Mechler, Jürgen Scheffran, and Pia-Johanna Schweizer. “Social Tipping Points and Adaptation Limits in the Context of Systemic Risk: Concepts, Models and Governance.” Frontiers in Climate 4, September 21 (2022): 1009234, https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2022.1009234. Accessed December 30, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  386. Kaap, Henry. “‘I Can't Breathe!’—Polizeigewalt und anti-rassistischer Protest in den USA.” Kritische Berichte 44, no. 1 (2016): 8695.
    [Google Scholar]
  387. Kácha, Ondřej, Jáchym Vintr, and Cameron Brick. “Four Europes: Climate Change Beliefs and Attitudes Predict Behavior and Policy Preferences Using a Latent Class Analysis on 23 countries.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 81 (2022): 110, https://tinyurl.com/49sw3bp9. Accessed April 25, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  388. Kahne, Joseph, and Benjamin Bowyer. “The Political Significance of Social Media Activity and Social Networks.” Political Communication 35, no. 3 (2018): 47093.
    [Google Scholar]
  389. Kaiser, Jonas, and Adrian Rauchfleisch. “How the Right Takes Advantage of YouTube.” Encore: Magazine on Internet and Society (2018): 3445, https://www.hiig.de/encore/[pdf]. Accessed April 1, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  390. Kaltseis, Magdalena. “Russisches YouTube.” Dekoder [Russland und Belarus entschlüsseln], April 6, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/mpt7vr7v. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  391. Kant, Immanuel. “An Answer to the Question: What Is Enlightenment?” In Practical Philosophy. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant, edited by Mary J. Gregor, 1122. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  392. Kantar TNS / Die Medienanstalten. Gewichtungsstudie zur Relevanz der Medien für die Meinungsbildung in Deutschland: MedienGewichtungsStudie 2018 I Juli 2018, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/32vn6a43. Accessed April 19, 2023.
  393. Kara, Selmin. “Rebels Without Regret: Documentary Artivism in the Digital Age.” Studies in Documentary Film 9, no. 1 (2015): 4254.
    [Google Scholar]
  394. Kara, Selmin, and Camilla Møhring Reestorff. “Introduction: Unruly Documentary Artivism.” Studies in Documentary Film 9, no. 1 (2015): 19.
    [Google Scholar]
  395. Katz-Kimchi, Merav, and Idit Manosevitch. “Mobilizing Facebook Users Against Facebook's Energy Policy: The Case of Greenpeace Unfriend Coal Campaign.” Environmental Communication 9, no. 2 (2015): 24867.
    [Google Scholar]
  396. Kavada, Anastasia. “Engagement, Bonding, and Identity across Multiple Platforms: Avaaz on Facebook, YouTube, and MySpace.” MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research 52 (2012): 2848, https://tidsskrift.dk/index.php/mediekultur/article/view/5486. Accessed August 8, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  397. Kavada, Anastasia, Tina Askanius, Anne Kaun, Alice Mattoni, and Julie Udam. Tying up Goliath: Activist Strategies for Confronting and Harnessing Digital Power. Transnational Institute (TNI), February 14, 2023, https://www.tni.org/en/article/tying-up-goliath. Accessed December 29, 2023.
  398. Kaye, D. Bondy Valdovinos, Jing Zeng, and Patrik Wikstrom. TikTok: Creativity and Culture in Short Video. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2022.211
    [Google Scholar]
  399. Kaye, D. Bondy Valdovinos, Xu Chen, and Jing Zeng. “The Co-evolution of Two Chinese Mobile Short Video Apps: Parallel Platformization of Douyin and TikTok.” Mobile Media & Communication 9, no. 2 (2020): 22953, https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920952120. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  400. Keenan, Thomas. “Counter-forensics and Photography.” Grey Room 55 (2014): 5877.
    [Google Scholar]
  401. Kempkes, Sebastian. “Plastikmüll: Der Schrott und sein zweites Leben.” Die Zeit, November 22 (2019).
    [Google Scholar]
  402. Khan-Cullors, Patrisse, and asha bandele. When They Call You a Terrorist: A Black Lives Matter Memoir. Edinburgh: Canongate Books, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  403. Kidd, Dorothy. “Indymedia.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, edited by Mona Baker, Bolette B. Blaagaard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, 21520. London and New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  404. Kirchgaessner, Stephanie, Manisha Ganguly, David Pegg, Carole Cadwalladr, and Jason Burke. “Revealed: The Hacking and Disinformation Team Meddling in Elections.” The Guardian, February 15, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/yc326xxp. Accessed April 13, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  405. Kleinfeld, Philip. “Calling Bullshit on the Anti-refugee Video Taking the Internet by Storm.” Vice, November 27, 2015, https://tinyurl.com/k2cwand3. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  406. Koch, Svenja. “Greenpeace: Medienpräsent und spektakulär—ist das nachhaltig?” In Handbuch Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation: Grundlagen und Praxis, edited by Gerd Michelsen and Jasmin Godemann, 2nd ed., 90207. München: Oekom, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  407. Koch, Svenja. “Umweltkampagnen mit Herz und Verstand: Strategien der Greenpeace-Kommunikation.” In PR-Kampagnen: Über die Inszenierung von Öffentlichkeit, edited by Ulrike Röttger, 10915. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  408. Koc-Michalska, Karolina, Ulrike Klinger, Lance Bennett, and Andrea Römmele. “(Digital) Campaigning in Dissonant Public Spheres.” Political Communication 40, no. 3 (2023): 25562.
    [Google Scholar]
  409. Koetsier, John. “Here are the 10 Most Downloaded Apps of 2020.” Forbes, January 7, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/ymb2ex7j. Accessed April 15, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  410. Köhler, Andreas. “Die Einflussnahme von NGOs auf den politischen Prozess: Lobbying als Kommunikationsinstrument.” In Handbuch NGO Kommunikation, edited by Nadine Remus and Lars Rademacher, 14762. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  411. Köhler, Margret, ed. Alternative Medienarbeit: Videogruppen in der Bundesrepublik. Opladen: Leske & Budrich, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  412. Kozinets, Robert. Netnography. London: Sage, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  413. Kozinets, Robert V., Kristine de Valck, Andrea C. Wojnicki, and Sarah J. S. Wilner. “Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing 74, no. 2 (2010): 7189.
    [Google Scholar]
  414. Krebber, Felix, Christian Biederstadt, and Ansgar Zerfaß. “Digitaler Lobbyismus? Die politische Kommunikation von Greenpeace Deutschland im Internet.” In Strategische Onlinekommunikation: Theoretische Konzepte und empirische Befunde, edited by Olaf Hoffjann and Thomas Pleil, 291310. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2015.212
    [Google Scholar]
  415. Kuo, Lily. “TikTok ‘Makeup Tutorial’ Goes Viral with Call to Action on China's Treatment of Uighurs.” The Guardian, November 27, 2019, https://bit.ly/3NIImQ5. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  416. Kurz, Bettina, and Doreen Kubek [on behalf of PHINEO]. Social Impact Navigator. The Practical Guide for Organizations Targeting Better Results, 2021, www.social-impact-navigator.org/. Accessed April 24, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  417. Lancaster, Kurt. Video Journalism for the Web: A Practical Introduction to Documentary Storytelling. New York and London: Routledge, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  418. Lang, Sabine. NGOs, Civil Society, and the Public Sphere. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  419. Lang, Sabine. “Nongovernmental Organizations.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (Volume 2. Int-Pol), edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni, 87782. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  420. Lasn, Kalle. Culture Jam. New York: Quill, 2000.
    [Google Scholar]
  421. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  422. Laville, Sandra. “Top Oil Firms Spending Millions Lobbying to Block Climate Change Policies, Says Report.” The Guardian, March 22, 2019, www.bit.ly/2VKbIlj; https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/mar/22/top-oil-firms-spending-millions-lobbying-to-block-climate-change-policies-says-repor. Accessed April 21, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  423. Learning for Action. Deepening Engagement for Lasting Impact: A Framework for Measuring Media Performance & Results, 2013, www.bit.ly/2yutAbS. Accessed April 21, 2023.
  424. Lebow, Alisa. Filming Revolution (Website), 2018, www.filmingrevolution.org. Accessed April 26, 2023.
  425. Lefebvre, Henri, ed. “The Right to the City.” In Writings on Cities, edited and translated by Eleonore Kofman and Elizabeth Lebas, 14759. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, [French 1968] 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  426. Lessenich, Stephan. Grenzen der Demokratie: Teilhabe als Verteilungsproblem. Stuttgart: Reclam, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  427. Levin, Sam. “Did Russia Fake Black Activism on Facebook to Sow Division in the US?The Guardian, September 30, 2017, https://tinyurl.com/43kjdj2j. Accessed October 2, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  428. Lewis, Rebecca. “Alternative Influence: Broadcasting the Reactionary Right on YouTube.” Analysis & Policy Observatory (APO), September 18, 2018, https://apo.org.au/node/193281. Accessed October 20, 2024.
  429. Libin, Xie, and Haig Patapan. “Schmitt Fever: The Use and Abuse of Carl Schmitt in Contemporary China.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 18, no. 1 (2020): 13046.
    [Google Scholar]
  430. Liedtke, Marius, and Daniel Marwecki. Von Influencer*innen lernen: YouTube & Co. als Spielfelder linker Politik und Bildungsarbeit. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (=Studien, 7), 2019, https://tinyurl.com/23hbumj9[pdf]. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  431. Lindquist, Johan. “Illicit Economies of the Internet: Click Farming in Indonesia and Beyond.” Made in China Journal, January 12, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/2p993fyj. Accessed April 10, 2023.213
    [Google Scholar]
  432. Lippert, Leopold. “Performance Labor, Im/Mobility, and Exhaustion in Nature Theater of Oklahoma's Life and Times.” Journal of Contemporary Drama in English 5, no. 1 (2017): 14055.
    [Google Scholar]
  433. Literat, Ioana, and Neta Kligler-Vilenchik. “TikTok as a Key Platform for Youth Political Expression: Reflecting on the Opportunities and Stakes Involved.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 1 (2023), https://tinyurl.com/25synu47. Accessed April 25, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  434. Lovink, Geert. Dark Fiber: Tracking Critical Internet Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  435. Maier, Tanja. Visueller Aktivismus mit Instagram: Politische Kommunikation in sozialen Medien. Berlin: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (=Studien, 10), 2021, https://tinyurl.com/42a7w9hk. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  436. Makhortykh, Mykola, and Mariella Bastian. “Personalizing the War: Perspectives for the Adoption of News Recommendation Algorithms in the Media Coverage of the Conflict in Eastern Ukraine.” Media, War & Conflict 15, no. 1 (2022): 2545.
    [Google Scholar]
  437. Malkowski, Jennifer. Dying in Full Detail: Mortality and Digital Documentary. Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  438. Mateos, Concha, and Carmen Gaona. “Video Activism: A Descriptive Typology.” Global Media Journal, Special Issue: “Use of Social media and Mediacoverage” (2015): 115, https://tinyurl.com/ynh9t9j6. Accessed April 18, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  439. Matsa, Katerina Eva, Laura Silver, Elisa Shearer, and Mason Walker. “Western Europeans under 30 View News Media Less Positively, Rely More on Digital Platforms than Older Adults.” Pew Research Center, October 30, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/me79t6bd. Accessed April 7, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  440. McGarry, Aidan, Itir Erhart, Hande Eslen-Ziya, Olu Jenzen, and Umut Korkut. The Aesthetics of Global Protest: Visual Culture and Communication, Protest and Social Movements. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  441. McLagan, Meg, and Yates McKee, eds. Sensible Politics: The Visual Culture of Nongovernmental Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  442. McLuhan, Marshall. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1962.
    [Google Scholar]
  443. McQuater, Katie. “Anatomy of an Ad: Behind the Scenes of Save the Children's Second a Day Syria Ad.” The Drum, April 7, 2014, https://tinyurl.com/4kdd2cwc. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  444. Meeker, Mary (on behalf of BOND). Internet Trends 2019 (Website), 2019, https://www.bondcap.com/report/it19/. Accessed December 14, 2023.
  445. Mehrabov, Ilkin. Video Activism in Turkey: Empowerment of Oppressed or Another Kind of Surveillance? The Curious Case of Karahaber. Saarbrücken: VDM, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  446. Mehrabov, Ilkin. “When States Strike Back: Failures of Mediatized Activism in Azerbaijan and Turkey.” tripleC 14, no. 2 (2016): 496515.
    [Google Scholar]
  447. Melchior, Moritz, and Manuel Rivera. Klimagerechtigkeit erzählen: Narrative, Wertbezüge und Frames bei Extinction Rebellion, Ende Gelände und Fridays for Future. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), 2021, https://tinyurl.com/bdcm3ekx. Accessed May 22, 2023.214
    [Google Scholar]
  448. Metag, Julia, Tobias Füchslin, and Mike S. Schäfer. “Global Warming's Five Germanys: A Typology of Germans’ Views on Climate Change and Patterns of Media Use and Information.” Public Understanding of Science 26, no. 4 (2017): 43451.
    [Google Scholar]
  449. Meyer, David S.Protest and Political Opportunities.” Annual Review of Sociology 30 (2004): 12545.
    [Google Scholar]
  450. Milmo, Dan. “TikTok Users in Russia Can See Only Old Russian-made Content.” The Guardian, March 10, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/5n839rd9. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  451. Milmo, Dan, and Pjotr Sauer. “Deepfakes v Pre-bunking: Is Russia Losing the Infowar?The Guardian, March 19, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/4c2vktaf. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  452. Milne, Elizabeth-Jane, Claudia Mitchell, and Naydene de Lange, eds. Handbook of Participatory Video. Lanham and Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  453. Mitchell, Mary. “Where Voice and Listening Meet: Participation in and Through Interactive Documentary in Peru.” Glocal Times 22&23 (September 2015): 113, https://ojs.mau.se/index.php/glocaltimes/article/view/248. Accessed December 29, 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  454. Mobile Marketing Association (MMA). “From a Blink to a Heartbeat.” 2019, https://www.mmaglobal.com/documents/blink-heartbeat. Accessed April 12, 2023.
  455. Moody-Ramirez, Mia, and Hazel Cole. “Victim Blaming in Twitter Users’ Framing of Eric Garner and Michael Brown.” Journal of Black Studies 49, no. 4 (2018): 383407.
    [Google Scholar]
  456. Morgan, Michael, James Shanahan, and Nancy Signorielli. “Cultivation Theory in the Twenty-First Century.” In The Handbook of Media and Mass Communication Theory, edited by Robert S. Fortner and P. Mark Fackler, 48097. Chichester: John Wiley, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  457. Morozov, Evgeny. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York and Philadelphia, PA: Public Affairs, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  458. Mortensen, Mette. “Connective Witnessing: Reconfiguring the Relationship Between the Individual and the Collective.” Information, Communication & Society 18, no. 11 (2015): 1393406.
    [Google Scholar]
  459. Moser, Susanne C.Communicating Climate Change: History, Challenges, Process and Future Directions.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1, no. 1 (2010): 3153.
    [Google Scholar]
  460. Mouffe, Chantal. Über das Politische: Wider die kosmopolitische Illusion. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2007.
    [Google Scholar]
  461. Nagel, Laura. Tales of Doom, Tales of Opportunity: How Climate Communication Can Help to Overcome Psychological Barriers to Sustainable Action. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), 2021, https://tinyurl.com/bdkfb934. Accessed May 22, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  462. Napoli, Philip M. Social Media and the Public Interest: Media Regulation in the Disinformation Age. New York: Columbia University Press, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  463. Nash, Kate. Interactive Documentary: Theory and Debate. London and New York: Routledge, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  464. Nash, Kate, and John Corner. “Strategic Impact Documentary: Contexts of Production and Social Intervention.” European Journal of Communication 31, no. 3 (2016): 22742.215
    [Google Scholar]
  465. Negt, Oskar, and Alexander Kluge. Public Sphere and Experience: Towards an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press, 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  466. Neumayer, Christina. “Activism.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, edited by Mona Baker, Bolette B. Blaagaard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, 16. London and New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  467. Neumayer, Christina, and Jakob Svensson. “Activism and Radical Politics in the Digital Age: Towards a Typology.” Convergence 22, no. 2 (2016): 13114, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514553395. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  468. Nichols, Bill. Newsreel: Documentary Filmmaking on the American Left, 1969–1974. New York: Ayer Co. Pub, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  469. Nichols, Bill. “The Voice of Documentary.” Film Quarterly 36, no. 3 (1983): 1730.
    [Google Scholar]
  470. Nichols, Bill. Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1991.
    [Google Scholar]
  471. Nichols, Bill. Engaging Cinema: An Introduction to Film Studies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
  472. Nigg, Heinz, ed. Rebel Video: Die Videobewegung der 1970er- und 1980er-Jahre. London, Bern, Lausanne, Basel and Zürich: Scheidegger & Spiess, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  473. Nix, Naomi. “Meta to Begin Fresh Layoffs, Cutting Heavily Among Business Staff.” The Washington Post, May 23, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/mwusbj5v. Accessed November 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  474. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion, Our Social Skin. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press, [German 1984] 1993.
    [Google Scholar]
  475. Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. Die Schweigespirale: Öffentliche Meinung—unsere soziale Haut. München: Langen Müller, [German 1980] 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  476. Notley, Tanya, Sam Gregory, and Andrew Lowenthal. “Video for Change: Creating and Measuring Ethical Impact.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 9, no. 2 (2017): 22346.
    [Google Scholar]
  477. Nunes, Rodrigo. The Organisation of the Organisationless: Collective Action After Networks. London: Mute, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  478. Nussbaum, Martha. Political Emotions: Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  479. Nymoen, Ole, and Wolfgang M. Schmitt. Influencer: Die Ideologie der Werbekörper. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  480. Ollis, Tracey. “The ‘Accidental Activist’: Learning, Embodiment and Action.” Australian Journal of Adult Learning 48, no. 2 (2008): 31635.
    [Google Scholar]
  481. Ong, Jonathan Corpus, and Jason Vincent A. Cabañes. Architects of Network Disinformation: Behind the Scenes of Troll Accounts and Fake News Production in the Philippines. UMass Amherst: Communication Department Faculty Publication Series, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7275/2cq4-5396. Accessed April 24, 2023.216
    [Google Scholar]
  482. O'Reilly, Tim. “What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software.” O'Reilly (Website), September 30, 2005, https://tinyurl.com/3s93rk6m. Accessed May 22, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  483. Oreskes, Naomi, and Erik M. Conway. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  484. Otto, Isabell. TikTok. Ästhetik, Ökonomie und Mikropolitik überraschender Transformationen. Berlin: Wagenbach, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  485. Page, Ruth E. Stories and Social Media: Identities and Interaction. London: Routledge, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  486. Papacharissi, Zizi. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  487. Papacharissi, Zizi. “Affective Publics and Structures of Storytelling: Sentiment, Events and Mediality.” Information, Communication & Society, 19, no. 3 (2015): 30724.
    [Google Scholar]
  488. Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. London: Viking, 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  489. Park, Minsu, Naaman, Mor, and Jonah Berger. “A Data-Driven Study of View Duration on YouTube.” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web and Social Media 10, no. 1 (2016): 14, https://tinyurl.com/559jrsna. Accessed April 12, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  490. Pasquale, Frank. “The Automated Public Sphere.” In The Politics and Policies of Big Data: Big Data, Big Brother?, edited by Ann Rudinow Sætnan, Ingrid Schneider, and Nicola Green, 11028. London and New York: Routledge, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  491. Perez, Christian, and Anjana Nair. “Information Warfare in Russia's War in Ukraine.” Foreign Policy, March 1, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/3938zteb. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  492. Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  493. Piketty, Thomas. Capital and Ideology. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  494. da Ponte, Alexander Campos. “Ship Carrying Nuclear Waste Harried by Greenpeace Boats.” Video Activism (Website), March 14, 2018, https://videoactivism.net/en/greenpeace-nuclear-waste/. Accessed September 11, 2023.
  495. Pörksen, Bernhard. Die große Gereiztheit: Wege aus der kollektiven Erregung. Munich: Carl Hanser, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  496. Pörksen, Bernhard. Digital Fever: Taming the Big Businesses of Misinformation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  497. Presence, Steve. “Reel News in the Digital Age: Framing Britain's Radical Video-Activists.” In The Routledge Companion to Cinema and Politics, edited by Yannis Tzioumakis and Claire Mulloy, 10311. Abingdon: Routledge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  498. Presence, Steve, Mike Wayne, and Jack Newsinger. Contemporary Radical Film Culture: Networks, Organisations and Activists. London: Routledge, 2021.217
    [Google Scholar]
  499. Rabinowitz, Paula. They Must Be Represented: The Politics of Documentary. London and New York: Verso, 1994.
    [Google Scholar]
  500. Rainie, Lee. “Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters.” Pew Research Center, February 20, 2014, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/. Accessed June 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  501. Raley, Rita. Tactical Media. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  502. Rambukkana, Nathan, ed. Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. New York: Peter Lang, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  503. Raworth, Kate. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. New York: Random House, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  504. Reilly, Paul. “Sousveillance.” In The Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, edited by Mona Baker, Bolette B. Blaagaard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, 39004. London and New York: Routledge, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  505. Reinsborough, Patrick, and Doyle Canning. Re:Imagining Change: How to Use Story-Based Strategy to Win Campaigns, Build Movements, and Change the World. Birmingham, NY: PM Press, [2010] 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  506. Reporters Without Borders. “2022 World Press Freedom Index.” 2022, https://rsf.org/en/index. Accessed April 26, 2023.
  507. Reporters Without Borders. “Press Freedom in Europe Overshadowed by the War in Ukraine.” 2023, https://rsf.org/en/classement/2023/europe-central-asia. Accessed November 3, 2023.
  508. Rettinger, Carl-Ludwig. Lieber Video in der Hand als Film im Kopf. Berlin: Chamisso, 1980.
    [Google Scholar]
  509. Reuter, Markus, and Chris Köver. “Cheerfulness and Censorship.” Netzpolitik, November 23, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/ya93bywm. Accessed April 8, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  510. Ribeiro, Manuel Horta, Raphael Ottoni, Robert West, Virgilio A. F. Almeida, and Wagner Meira Jr.Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTube.” In FAT* ‘20: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, edited by Mireille Hildebrandt, Carlos Castillo, Elisa Celis, Salvatore Ruggieri, Linnet Taylor, and Gabriela Zanfir-Fortuna, 13141. New York: ACM, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  511. Richardson, Alissa V. Bearing Witness While Black: African Americans, Smartphones, and the New Protest #Journalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  512. Riedl, Martin J., Josephine Lukito, and Samuel C. Woolley. “Political Influencers on Social Media: An Introduction.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305123117798. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  513. Ristovska, Sandra. “Strategic Witnessing in an Age of Video Activism.” Media, Culture & Society 38, no. 7 (2016): 103447.
    [Google Scholar]
  514. Ristovska, Sandra. Seeing Human Rights: Video Activism as a Proxy Profession. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  515. Robé, Chris. Breaking the Spell: A History of Anarchist Filmmakers, Videotape Guerillas, and Digital Ninjas. Oakland, CA: PM Press, 2017.218
    [Google Scholar]
  516. Robé, Chris. Abolishing Surveillance: Digital Media Activism and State Repression. Birmingham, NY: PM Press, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  517. Robé, Chris, and Stephen Charbonneau, eds. InsUrgent Media from the Front: A Media Activism Reader. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  518. Robertson, Alexa. Media and Politics in a Globalizing World. Cambridge: Polity, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  519. Rocha, Glauber. “The Aesthetics of Hunger.” In Twenty-Five Years of the New Latin American Cinema, edited by Michael Chanan, 1314. London: BFI, [Portuguese 1965] 1983.
    [Google Scholar]
  520. Roosvall, Anna, and Matthew Tegelberg. “Introduction to Climate Justice Communication.” In Research Handbook on Communicating Climate Change, edited by David C. Holmes and Lucy M. Richardson, 29192. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  521. Rotich, Juliane. “Ushahidi: Empowering Citizens Through Crowdsourcing and Digital Data Collection.” Field Actions Science Reports, Special Issue: “Smart Cities at the Crossroads” 16 (2017): 3638.
    [Google Scholar]
  522. Roudé, Catherine. Le cinéma militant à l'heure des collectifs: Slon et Iskra dans la France de l'après-1968. Rennes: Presses Universitaire de Rennes, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  523. Rucht, Dieter. “The Quadruple ‘A’: Media Strategies of Protest Movements Since the 1960s.” In Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements, edited by Wim van de Donk, Brian Loader, Paul G. Nixon, and Dieter Rucht, 2548. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  524. Ryan-Mosley, Tate. “This Huge Chinese Company Is Selling Video Surveillance Systems to Iran.” MIT Technology Review, December 15, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/mstuyehe. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  525. Sachs, Jonah. Winning the Story Wars: Why Those Who Tell (and Live) the Best Stories Will Rule the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press, 2012.
    [Google Scholar]
  526. Sadler, Neil. Fragmented Narrative: Telling and Interpreting Stories in the Twitter Age. London and New York: Routledge, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  527. Sandvine. The Global Internet Phenomena Report January 2023, Reporters Without Borders, 2023, https://www.sandvine.com/global-internet-phenomena-report-2023. Accessed November 21, 2023.
  528. Sasse, Sylvia. “Der ‘forensische’ Blick.” Geschichte der Gegenwart, June 5, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/3vx89sxs. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  529. Sato, Mia. “Ukrainian Influencers Bring the Frontline to TikTok.” The Verge, March 16, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/3xtbrxss. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  530. Sauter, Molly. The Coming Swarm: DDOS Actions, Hacktivism, and Civil Disobedience on the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  531. Schäfer, Mike S.Digital Public Sphere.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni, 32228. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  532. Schankweiler, Kerstin. Bildproteste. Berlin: Wagenbach, 2019.219
    [Google Scholar]
  533. Schankweiler, Kerstin, Verena Straub, and Tobias Wendl, eds. Image Testimonies: Witnessing in Times of Social Media. London and New York: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  534. Schicha, Christian. “Kommunikationsstrategien von Greenpeace: Eventmanagement zwischen dramatisierender Symbolik und konstruktivem Engagement.” Zeitschrift für Kommunikationsökologie 1 (2001): 2226.
    [Google Scholar]
  535. Schmitt, Wolfgang M.Werden Influencer jetzt politisch?Der Freitag, August 28, 2021, https://tinyurl.com/ycxbbz6m. Accessed September 19, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  536. Schneider, Jonas. “Die 10 stärksten NGOs in Social Media.” PR Report 6 (2019): 3845.
    [Google Scholar]
  537. Schwenkenbecher, Anne. “How We Fail to Know: Group-Based Ignorance and Collective Epistemic Obligations.” Political Studies 70, no. 4 (2021): 90118, https://tinyurl.com/yk52nx8n. Accessed May 22, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  538. Scott, Martin, Kate Wright, and Mel Bunce. The State of Humanitarian Journalism. Norwich: University of East Anglia, 2018, https://tinyurl.com/yckt5wt5. Accessed April 16, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  539. Searls, Doc. “The Splinternet.” Doc Searls Weblog, December 16, 2008, https://tinyurl.com/yzyy3zp6. Accessed April 10, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  540. Sehl, Annika, and Jonas Schützeneder. “Political Knowledge to Go: An Analysis of Selected Political Influencers and Their Formats in the Context of the 2021 German Federal Election.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177916. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  541. Sennet, Richard. The Fall of Public Man. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  542. Sharon, Assaf. “Solidarity Without Sentimentality.” Raisons politiques 77, no. 2 (2018): 97116.
    [Google Scholar]
  543. Shestopalova, Alona, Anna Litvinenko, Magdalena Kaltseis, and Tatiana Golova. “FAQ #9: Propaganda in Russland—Wie und warum funktioniert sie?Dekoder, March 23, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/3djubz94. Accessed November 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  544. Shifman, Limor. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  545. The Shift Project. Climate Crisis: The Unsustainable Use of Online Video: Our New Report on the Environmental Impact of ICT, July 11, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/5n7u4ud8. Accessed June 30, 2023.
  546. The Shift Project. Did The Shift Project Really Overestimate the Carbon Footprint of Online Video? Our Analysis of the IEA and Carbonbrief Articles, June 15, 2020, https://theshiftproject.org/en/article/shift-project-really-overestimate-carbon-footprint-video-analysis/. Accessed June 29, 2023.
  547. Shirky, Clay. “The Political Power of Social Media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change.” Foreign Affairs 90, no. 1 (2011): 2841.
    [Google Scholar]
  548. Shresthova, Sangita. “2. ‘Watch 30 Minute Video on Internet, Become Social Activist’? KONY 2012, Invisible Children, and the Paradoxes of Participatory Politics.” In By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism, edited by Henry Jenkins, Sangita Shresthova, Liana Gamber-Thompson, Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, and Arely M. Zimmerman, 61101. New York: New York University Press, 2016.220
    [Google Scholar]
  549. Singhal, Arvind, and M. Rogers Everett. “A Theoretical Agenda for Entertainment-Education.” Communication Theory 12, no. 2 (2002): 11735.
    [Google Scholar]
  550. Smith, Marc. “6 Kinds of Twitter Social Media Network Structures.” Social Media Research Foundation, March 2, 2014, https://tinyurl.com/2p8vpeax. Accessed April 5, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  551. SMK. “[STUDY] Facebook Video Watch Time: 4.57 seconds on Average.” SMK (Website), March 2, 2020, https://tinyurl.com/5h7y6j2p. Accessed April 12, 2023.
  552. Snow, David A., Rens Vliegenhart, and Pauline Ketelaars. “The Framing Perspective on Social Movements: It's Conceptual Roots and Architecture.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, edited by David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi, and H. J. McCammon, 392410. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  553. Socialbakers. Social Media Trends Report Q4 2019, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/2ps6tf3u.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2023.
  554. Social Media & Politics. “#140: Social Media and the War in Ukraine, with Prof. Joshua Tucker.” Lund University, April 7, 2022, https://socialmediaandpolitics.org/social-media-ukraine-war-russia-disinformation-putin-zelensky-politics-podcast/. Accessed November 3, 2023.
  555. Solanas, Fernando E., and Octavio Getino. “Towards a Third Cinema.” In Movies and Methods, edited by Bill Nichols, 4464. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, [Spanish 1969] 1976.
    [Google Scholar]
  556. Sorg, Christoph. Social Movements and the Politics of Debt: Transnational Resistance Against Debt on Three Continents. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  557. Spier, Shaked. Collective Action 2.0: The Impact of Social Media on Collective Action. Cambridge, MA and Kidlington: Chandos Publishing, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  558. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 271313, edited by Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  559. Squires, Catherine R.Rethinking the Black Public Sphere: An Alternative Vocabulary for Multiple Public Spheres.” Communication Theory 12, no. 4 (2002): 44668.
    [Google Scholar]
  560. Srnicek, Nick. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  561. Srnicek, Nick. “The Challenges of Platform Capitalism: Understanding the Logic of a New Business Model.” Progressive Review 23, no. 4 (2017): 2547.
    [Google Scholar]
  562. Stahl, Lesley. “How Does YouTube Handle the Site's Misinformation, Conspiracy Theories and Hate?CBS News, December 1, 2019, https://tinyurl.com/5ckmrkr4. Accessed April 5, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  563. Stalder, Felix. The Digital Condition. Translated by V. A. Pakis. Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  564. Stegemann, Patrick, and Sören Musyal. Die rechte Mobilmachung: Wie radikale Netzaktivisten die Demokratie angreifen. Berlin: Econ, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  565. Stephansen, Hilde C., and Emiliano Treré, eds. Citizen Media and Practice: Currents, Connections, Challenges. London: Routledge, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  566. Stewart, Nicole K., Ahmed Al-Rawi, Carmen Celestini, and Nathan Worku. “Hate Influencers’ Mediation of Hate on Telegram: ‘We Declare War Against the Anti-White System’.” Social Media + Society 9, no. 2 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177915. Accessed December 29, 2023.221
    [Google Scholar]
  567. Stoknes, Per Espen. What We Think about When We Try Not to Think about Global Warming: Toward a New Psychology of Climate Action. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  568. Stoldt, Ryan, Mariah Wellman, Brian Ekdale, and Melissa Tully. “Professionalizing and Profiting: The Rise of Intermediaries in the Social Media Influencer Industry.” Social Media + Society 5, no. 1 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119832587. Accessed December 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  569. Stratil, Jasper. “‘Ja es ist wieder Zeit für so ein Video.’ Zur audiovisuellen Adressierung und rhetorischen Situation des Rezo-YouTube-Videos Die Zerstörung der CDU.” Mediaesthetics—Journal of Poetics of Audiovisual Images 3, 2019, https://www.mediaesthetics.org/index.php/mae/article/view/83/207. Accessed December 31, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  570. Strick, Simon. “The Alternative Right, Masculinities, and Ordinary Affect.” In Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond, 20730, edited by Gabriele Dietze and Julia Roth. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  571. Strick, Simon. Rechte Gefühle: Affekte und Strategien des digitalen Faschismus, Bielefeld: Transcript, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  572. Strick, Simon. “Reflexive Facism in the Age of History Memes.” Journal of Modern European History, 20, no. 3 (2022): 33551.
    [Google Scholar]
  573. Suler, John. “The Online Disinhibition Effect.” Cyberpsychology & Behavior 7, no. 3 (2004): 3216.
    [Google Scholar]
  574. Sunstein, Cass R. Echo Chambers: Bush v. Gore, Impeachment, and Beyond. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  575. Sunstein, Cass R. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  576. Taylor, Diana. Performance. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  577. Taylor, Keeanga-Yamahtta. From #BlackLivesMatter to Black Liberation. Foreword by Angela Davies. Expanded 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books, 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
  578. Tedjasukmana, Chris. “Das Netzvideo als Flaschenpost: Sylvia Rivera und queere Filmgeschichte.” In Queer Cinema, 5667, edited by Simon Dickel and Dagmar Brunow. Mainz: Ventil, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  579. Terranova, Tiziana. Network Culture: Politics for the Information Age. London: Pluto Press, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  580. Torchin, Leshu. “KONY 2012: Anatomy of a Campaign Video and a Video Campaign.” In The Routledge Handbook to Cinema and Politics, edited by Yannis Tzioumakis and Claire Molloy, 12333. New York: Routledge, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  581. Tretyakov, Sergei. “Art in the Revolution and the Revolution in Art (Aesthetic Consumption and Production).” October 118 ([Russian 1923] 2014): 1118, https://doi.org/10.1162/octo.2006.118.1.11. Accessed April 11, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  582. Tseronis, Assimakis. “Documentary Film as Multimodal Argumentation: Arguing Audio-visually about the 2008 Financial Crisis.” In Building Bridges for Multimodal Research: 222International Perspectives on Theories and Practices of Multimodal Analysis, edited by Janina Wildfeuer, 32745. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  583. Tufekci, Zeynep. “‘Not This One’ Social Movements, the Attention Economy, and Microcelebrity Networked Activism.” American Behavioral Scientist 57, no. 7 (2013): 84870.
    [Google Scholar]
  584. Tufekci, Zeynep. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  585. Tufekci, Zeynep. “YouTube, the Great Radicalizer.” The New York Times, March 11 (2018): 6.
    [Google Scholar]
  586. Tuttle Ross, Sheryl. “Propaganda and the Moving Image.” In The Palgrave Handbook of the Philosophy of Film and Motion Pictures, edited by Noël Carroll, Laura T. Di Summa, and Shawn Loht, 75780. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  587. Urman, Aleksandra, and Mykola Makhortykh. My War Is Your Special Operation: Engagement with Pro-and Anti-regime Framing of the War in Ukraine on Russian Social Media. 2022, https://osf.io/67snk/download. Accessed December 29, 2023.
  588. Vaidhyanathan, Siva. Antisocial Media: How Facebook Disconnects Us and Undermines Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  589. Valkenburg, Patti M., Jochen Peter, and Joseph B. Walther. “Media Effects: Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Psychology 67, no. 1 (2016): 31538.
    [Google Scholar]
  590. van Dijck, José. The Culture of Connectivity: A Critical History of Social Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
    [Google Scholar]
  591. van Dijck, José, and Thomas Poell. “Understanding Social Media Logic.” Media and Communication 1, no. 1 (2013): 214.
    [Google Scholar]
  592. van Dijck, José, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  593. Verma, Mimansa. “India Has Blocked 14 Mobile Messenger Apps on Security Fears.” Quartz, May 1, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/bdd9hyyk. Accessed May 3, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  594. Voß, Malte. “Videoaktivismus und Soziale Medien: Eine Bestandsaufnahme der Gegenöffentlichkeit durch Video im Internetzeitalter.” In Protest—Film—Bewegung: Neue Wege im Dokumentarischen, edited by Kay Hoffmann, Erika Wottrich, Ursula von Keitz, and Thomas Weber, 16173. München: Edition Text + Kritik, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  595. Waldman, Diane, and Janet Walker, eds. Feminism and Documentary. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
    [Google Scholar]
  596. Walsh, Alistair. “TikTok Censoring LGBT, Nazi Terms in Germany: Report.” DW, March 23, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/yxuwuucs. Accessed April 29, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  597. Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books, 2002.
    [Google Scholar]
  598. Waters, Richard D., and Paul M. Jones. “Using Video to Build an Organization's Identity and Brand: A Content Analysis of Nonprofit Organizations’ YouTube Videos.” Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing 23, no. 3 (2011): 24868.
    [Google Scholar]
  599. Waugh, Thomas. “Show Us Life”: Towards a History and Aesthetics of the Committed Documentary. Metuchen, NJ and London: Scarecrow Press, 1984.223
    [Google Scholar]
  600. Weibel, Peter, ed. global aCtIVISm: Art and Conflict in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  601. Weizman, Eyal. Forensic Architecture: Violence at the Threshold of Detectability. New York: Zone Books, 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  602. Welles, Brooke. #HashtagActivism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  603. Wessels, Josepha Ivanka. Documenting Syria: Film-Making, Video Activism and Revolution. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  604. Weyler, Rex. Greenpeace: How a Group of Ecologists, Journalists and Visionaries Changed the World. Vancouver: Raincoast Books, 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  605. White, Katherine, Rishad Habib, and David J. Hardisty. “How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to Be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework.” Journal of Marketing 83, no. 3 (2019): 2249.
    [Google Scholar]
  606. Wiehl, Anna. The Digital Moment in Interactive Documentary: Polyphony and Collaborative Storytelling Between On-Line and On-Ground Action. Hamburg: Avinus, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  607. Wike, Richard, and Sneha Gubbala (on behalf of Pew Research Center). “Social Media Seen as Mostly Good for Democracy Across Many Nations, but U.S. Is a Major Outlier.” Pew Research Center, December 6, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/yrr3cdkh. Accessed April 19, 2023.
  608. Wike, Richard, and Sneha Gubbala (on behalf of Pew Research Center). “Social Media Seen as Mostly Good for Democracy Across Many Nations, but U.S. Is a Major Outlier.” Pew Research Center, December 6, 2022, https://tinyurl.com/yrr3cdkh. Accessed April 19, 2023.
  609. Wikipedia. “Comparison of Video Hosting Services.” (n.d.), https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_hosting_services. Accessed April 5, 2023.
  610. Wimmer, Jeffrey. “Counterpublic.” In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni, 15. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
  611. Winskell, Kate, and Daniel Enger. “Storytelling for Social Change.” In The Handbook of Development Communication and Social Change, edited by Karin Gwinn Wilkins, Thomas Tufte, and Rafael Obregon, 189206. Chichester: John Wiley, 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
  612. Winston, Brian. “The Tradition of the Victim in Griersonian Documentary.” In Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Films, and Television, edited by Larry Gross, John Stuart Katz, and Jay Ruby, 3457. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.
    [Google Scholar]
  613. Witness. “Deepfakes, Synthetic Media and Generative AI: Dossier.” WITNESS (2023), https://www.gen-ai.witness.org/. Accessed November 29, 2023.
  614. Woolley, Samuel, Martin Riedl, and Josephine Lukito. “TikTok has a Political Influencer Problem Targeted at Gen Z Voters.” The Hill, June 6, 2023, https://tinyurl.com/4wjdekh5. Accessed July 16, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  615. Yékú, James. Cultural Netizenship: Social Media, Popular Culture, and Performance in Nigeria. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2022.224
    [Google Scholar]
  616. Yuan, Elaine. “Publics (and Networked Publics).” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Citizen Media, edited by Moma Baker, Bolette B. Blaagard, Henry Jones, and Luis Pérez-González, 17. London and New York: Routledge, 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
  617. Zimmermann, Patricia R., and Helen de Michiel. Open Space New Media Documentary: A Toolkit for Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  618. Zimmermann, Peter. “Camcorder Revolution—Videoaktivisten und internationale Öffentlichkeit.” In Referenzen: Zur Theorie und Geschichte des Realen in den Medien, edited by Harro Segeberg, 25661. Marburg: Schüren, 2009.
    [Google Scholar]
  619. Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: Public Affairs, 2019.
    [Google Scholar]
  620. Zuckerman, Ethan. “The Cute Cat Theory Talk at ETech.” Ethan Zuckerman (blog), March 8, 2008, www.bit.ly/2VMZKHG. Accessed April 24, 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  621. Zulli, Diana, and David James Zulli. “Extending the Internet Meme: Conceptualizing Technological Mimesis and Imitation Publics on the TikTok Platform.” New Media & Society 24, no. 8 (2022): 187290.
    [Google Scholar]
  622. Zutavern, Julia. Politik des Bewegungsfilms. Marburg: Schüren, 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9781835950821.bm01
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781835950821
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test