Skip to content
1981

The Cultural Imagination and Its Role in Researching Popular Music

image of The Cultural Imagination and Its Role in Researching Popular Music

The methodological approach for studying popular music proposed in this chapter is situated in the cultural studies tradition. I use the term “cultural imagination” to refer to the cultural competences possessed by researchers who participate in music fandoms/music cultures. The cultural imagination, I propose, can be a valuable methodological tool for conducting in-depth single case-study investigations. The cultural imagination allows researchers to deploy their own knowledge of music culture to devise qualitative interviewing methods for eliciting (musical) cultural experiences and writing about them, processes traditionally referred to as data collection and data analysis. By tapping into their own experiences, researchers can find unique ways to connect with their research participants, and encourage the opening of experiential territories that would be otherwise inaccessible, as well as accessing clandestine subcultural discourses to make sense of seemingly disparate pieces of information. Most importantly, the cultural imagination encourages a type of knowledge production where the researcher uses self-reflexivity, both to critically evaluate the type of knowledge they produce and to reflect on their own understandings of music culture. In that sense, the research process is dialectical, and the outcome is knowledge produced about the research participant and the researcher

Keywords: Cultural studies ; Methodology ; Music fandom ; Popular culture ; Qualitative interviews

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baker, S. L. (2004), ‘Pop in(to) the bedroom: Popular music in pre-teen girls’ bedroom culture’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7:1, pp. 7593.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bal, M. (2003), ‘From cultural studies to cultural analysis’, in P. Bowman (ed.), Interrogating Cultural Studies: Theory, Politics and Practice, London: Pluto Press, pp. 3040.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, A. (2002), ‘Researching youth culture and popular music: A methodological critique’, British Journal of Sociology, 53:3, pp. 45166.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergold, J. and Thomas, S. (2012), ‘Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion’, FQS, 13:1, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boden, D. (1990), ‘People are talking: Conversation analysis and symbolic interaction’, in H. S. Becker and M. M. McCall (eds), Symbolic Interaction and Cultural Studies, London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 24474.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1986), ‘The forms of capital’, in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York, Westport and London: Greenwood Press, pp. 24158.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Certeau, M. de. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Denshire, S. (2014), ‘On auto-ethnography’, Current Sociology, 62:6, pp. 83150.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Edley, N. and Litosseliti, L. (2018), ‘Critical perspectives on using interviews and focus groups’, in L. Litosseliti (ed.), Research Methods in Linguistics, 2nd ed., London: Bloomsbury, pp. 195227.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiske, J. (1989), Understanding Popular Culture, London: Unwin Hyman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, M. ([1969] 1974), The Archaeology of Knowledge, London: Tavistock Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Foucault, M. (1981), ‘The order of discourse’, in R. Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-structuralist Reader, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 4878.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gray, A. (2003), Research Practice for Cultural Studies, London: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1995), Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hills, M. (2002), Fan Cultures, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jenkins, H. (1992), Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Keightley, E. (2008), ‘Engaging with memory’, in M. Pickering (ed.), Research Methods for Cultural Studies, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 17592.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kellner, D. (1994), Cultural Studies, Multiculturalism, and Media Culture, Austin, TX: University of Texas, https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/60320_Chapter_1.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kristeva, J. (1980), Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewis, J. (1997), ‘What counts in cultural studies’, Media, Culture and Society, 19, pp. 8397.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mason, J. (2002), Qualitative Researching, 2nd ed., London: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McRobbie, A. and Garber, J. (1976), ‘Girls and subcultures’, in A. McRobbie (ed.), Feminism and Youth Culture: From Jackie to Just Seventeen, Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman, pp. 115 .
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meyer, A. (2008), ‘Investigating cultural consumers’, in M. Pickering (ed.), Research Methods for Cultural Studies, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 6886.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mills, C. W. ([1959] 2000), The Sociological Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Negri, A. and Hardt, M. (1999), ‘Value and affect’, Boundary 2, 26:2, pp. 7788.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Perry, I. (2005), ‘Cultural study, critical race theory and methods’, Villanova Law Review, 50, pp. 91524.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S. (2005), Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Silverstone, R. (1989), ‘Let us turn to the murmuring of everyday practices: A note on Michel de Certeau, television and everyday life’, Theory, Culture and Society, 6:1, pp. 7794.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Willis, P. (1990), Common Culture, Milton Keynes: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zenerian, E. (2018), ‘“Doing-Listening” with Deranged's Struck by a Murderous Siege: An auto-ethnography of death metal vinyl consumption’, Metal Music Studies, 4:1, pp. 11530.
    [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Baker, S. L. (2004), ‘Pop in(to) the bedroom: Popular music in pre-teen girls’ bedroom culture’, European Journal of Cultural Studies, 7:1, pp. 7593.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bal, M. (2003), ‘From cultural studies to cultural analysis’, in P. Bowman (ed.), Interrogating Cultural Studies: Theory, Politics and Practice, London: Pluto Press, pp. 3040.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bennett, A. (2002), ‘Researching youth culture and popular music: A methodological critique’, British Journal of Sociology, 53:3, pp. 45166.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bergold, J. and Thomas, S. (2012), ‘Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion’, FQS, 13:1, https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-13.1.1801.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Boden, D. (1990), ‘People are talking: Conversation analysis and symbolic interaction’, in H. S. Becker and M. M. McCall (eds), Symbolic Interaction and Cultural Studies, London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 24474.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1977), Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1986), ‘The forms of capital’, in J. G. Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York, Westport and London: Greenwood Press, pp. 24158.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Certeau, M. de. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Denshire, S. (2014), ‘On auto-ethnography’, Current Sociology, 62:6, pp. 83150.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Edley, N. and Litosseliti, L. (2018), ‘Critical perspectives on using interviews and focus groups’, in L. Litosseliti (ed.), Research Methods in Linguistics, 2nd ed., London: Bloomsbury, pp. 195227.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Fiske, J. (1989), Understanding Popular Culture, London: Unwin Hyman.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, M. ([1969] 1974), The Archaeology of Knowledge, London: Tavistock Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Foucault, M. (1981), ‘The order of discourse’, in R. Young (ed.), Untying the Text: A Post-structuralist Reader, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 4878.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gray, A. (2003), Research Practice for Cultural Studies, London: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hammersley, M. and Atkinson, P. (1995), Ethnography: Principles in Practice, 2nd ed., London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hills, M. (2002), Fan Cultures, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jenkins, H. (1992), Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Keightley, E. (2008), ‘Engaging with memory’, in M. Pickering (ed.), Research Methods for Cultural Studies, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 17592.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kellner, D. (1994), Cultural Studies, Multiculturalism, and Media Culture, Austin, TX: University of Texas, https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/60320_Chapter_1.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2022 .
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kristeva, J. (1980), Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lewis, J. (1997), ‘What counts in cultural studies’, Media, Culture and Society, 19, pp. 8397.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Mason, J. (2002), Qualitative Researching, 2nd ed., London: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McRobbie, A. and Garber, J. (1976), ‘Girls and subcultures’, in A. McRobbie (ed.), Feminism and Youth Culture: From Jackie to Just Seventeen, Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman, pp. 115 .
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meyer, A. (2008), ‘Investigating cultural consumers’, in M. Pickering (ed.), Research Methods for Cultural Studies, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 6886.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mills, C. W. ([1959] 2000), The Sociological Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Negri, A. and Hardt, M. (1999), ‘Value and affect’, Boundary 2, 26:2, pp. 7788.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Perry, I. (2005), ‘Cultural study, critical race theory and methods’, Villanova Law Review, 50, pp. 91524.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rubin, H. J. and Rubin, I. S. (2005), Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Silverstone, R. (1989), ‘Let us turn to the murmuring of everyday practices: A note on Michel de Certeau, television and everyday life’, Theory, Culture and Society, 6:1, pp. 7794.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Willis, P. (1990), Common Culture, Milton Keynes: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Zenerian, E. (2018), ‘“Doing-Listening” with Deranged's Struck by a Murderous Siege: An auto-ethnography of death metal vinyl consumption’, Metal Music Studies, 4:1, pp. 11530.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/books/9781835951033.c06
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781835951033
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test