Skip to content
1981

End Matter

image of End Matter
  • Source: Photo Obscura , pp 187-198
  • Publication Date: October 2025
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/9781835951507_11
  • Language: English
  • Accessibility Summary:  EPUB 3 and pdf file included; compatible with devices and software which can read these formats. Adjustable font size, spacing, contrast, text justification, number of columns (ePUB only). Alternative text for images. Tagged with a logical reading order to assist screen readers. Navigation between in-text citations and reference list, and endnotes and endnote markers.
Preview this chapter:
Preview Magnify
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. 187Anders, Peter. Envisioning Cyberspace: Designing 3D Electronic Spaces. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ascott, Roy. “Is There Love in the Telematic Embrace?” In The Sublime. Edited by Simon Morley. London: Whitechapel Gallery, 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barthes, Roland. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Translated by Richard Howard. London: Vintage Books, 2000.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Batchen, Geoffrey. Each Wild Idea: Writing Photography, History. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baudelaire, Charles. The Mirror of Art. Translated by Jonathan Mayne. London: Phaidon Press Limited, 1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Benjamin, Ruha. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Edited by Hannah Arendt. Translated by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. New York: Penguin, 1977.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Berger, John, and Jean Mohr. Another Way of Telling: A Possible Theory of Photography. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bishop, Claire. “Digital Divide: Contemporary Art and New Media.” Artforum 51, no. 1 (2012). https://www.artforum.com/features/digital-divide-contemporary-art-and-new-media-200814/.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bogost, Ian, Simon Ferrari, and Bobby Schweizer. Newsgames: Journalism at Play. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bolter, Jay, and Richard Grusin. Remediations: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Broeckmann, Andreas. “The Machine as Artist as Myth.” Arts 8, no. 1 (2019): 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010025.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Broussard, Meredith. Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chiang, Ted. “ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web.” New Yorker, February 9, 2023. https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chuk, Natasha. “Reimagining Archives: Radically Rethinking Design, Identity, and Multiplicity.” Public 34, no. 68 (2024): 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1386/public_00161_1.188
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen, Paul. “Harold Cohen and AARON.” AI Magazine 37, no. 4 (2016): 63–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Crawford, Kate. Atlas of AI. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cresswell, Tim. Place: An Introduction. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Davis, Heather. “Art in the Anthropocene.” In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 63–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Delacroix, Eugene. The Journal of Eugène Delacroix. Translated by Walter Pach. New York: Hacker Art Books, 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. del Campo, Mattias. Neural Architecture. Los Angeles: Applied Research and Design Publishing, 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Delistraty, Cody. “How Picasso Bled the Women in His Life for Art.” The Paris Review, November 9, 2017. https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2017/11/09/how-picasso-bled-the-women-in-his-life-for-art/.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Derrida, Jacques. “Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression.” Translated by Eric Prenowitz. Diacritics 25, no. 2 (Summer, 1995): 9–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Derrida, Jacques. Copy, Archive, Signature: A Conversation on Photography. Edited by Gerhard Richter. Translated by Jeff Fort. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dinkins, Stephanie. “Afro-now-ism.” Noema, June 16, 2020. https://www.noemamag.com/afro-now-ism/.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dinkins, Stephanie. Interview with the author, February 26, 2023.
  28. Doyle, Denise. “Travel, Space and Transformation.” Metaverse Creativity 6, no. 1–2 (2016): 25–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fan, Shelly. Will AI Replace Us?: A Primer for the 21st Century. London: Thames & Hudson, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Farocki, Harun. Phantom Images. Translated by Brian Poole. ZKM, Karlsruhe, 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Flanagan, Mary. “Play, Participation, and Art: Blurring the Edges.” In Context Providers: Conditions of Meaning in Media Arts. Edited by Margot Lovejoy, Christiane Paul, and Victoria Vesna. Bristol: Intellect, 2011, pp. 89–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Flusser, Vilém. Into the Universe of Technical Images. Translated by Nancy Ann Roth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Fontcuberta, Joan. The Post-Photographic Condition. Edited by Joan Fontcuberta. Montréal: Le Mois de la Photo à Montréal, 2015, pp. 10–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Galloway, Alexander R. “Social Realism in Gaming.” Game Studies 4, no. 1 (2004). https://gamestudies.org/0401/galloway/.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gannis, Carla. Interview with the author, June 8, 2021.
  36. Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 1956.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Groys, Boris. “Art Workers: Between Utopia and the Archive.” e-flux 45 (May 2013). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/45/60134/art-workers-between-utopia-and-the-archive/.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gržinić, Marina. “Identity Operated in New Mode: Context and Body/Space/Time.” In Context Providers: Conditions of Meaning in Media Arts. Edited by Margot Lovejoy, Christiane Paul, and Victoria Vesna. Bristol: Intellect, 2011, pp. 151–74.189
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Gunning, Tom. “What's the Point of an Index?, or Faking Photographs.” In Still Moving: Between Cinema and Photography. Edited by Karen Beckman and Jean Ma. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008, pp. 23–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Haraway, Donna. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hart, Claudia. “The Digital Combine.” Outland. June 8, 2022. https://outland.art/digital-combine-claudia-hart/.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hayles, N. Katherine. “Print Is Flat, Code Is Deep: The Importance of Medium-Specific Analysis.” Poetics Today 25, no. 1 (2004): 67–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hayles, N. Katherine. Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Higgins, Dick. “Intermedia.” Leonardo 34, no. 1 (2001): 49–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hoelzl, Ingrid. “Postimage.” In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 361–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hoelzl, Ingrid, and Rémi Marie. Softimage: Towards a New Theory of the Digital Image. Bristol: Intellect, 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hui, Yuk. On the Existence of Digital Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hujar, Peter. Portraits in Life and Death. Boston: Da Capo Press, 1976.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Jurgenson, Nathan. The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media. New York: Verso, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Keenan, Hagi. Photography and Its Shadow. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Kittler, Friedrich. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated by Geoffrey Winthrup Young and Michael Wutz. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Kivy, Peter. The Performance of Reading: An Essay in the Philosophy of Literature. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kracauer, Siegfried. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Laurel, Brenda. Computers as Theatre. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Lee, Rosemary. Algorithm, Image, Art. New York: Atropos Press, 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Lichty, Patrick. “The Aesthetics of Liminality: Augmentation as Artform.” Leonardo 47, no. 4 (2014): 325–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Lotringer, Sylvère, and Paul Virilio. The Accident of Art. Translated by Michael Taormina. New York: Semiotext(e), 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Lovejoy, Margot. Digital Currents: Art in the Electronic Age. New York: Routledge, 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Marwick, Alice E. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002.190
     [Google Scholar]
  62. McCorduck, Pamela. Aaron's Code: Meta-Art, Artificial Intelligence and the World of Harold Cohen. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company, 1991.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Menkman, Rosa. Beyond Resolution (self-published, 2020). https://beyondresolution.info/PUBLICATIONS.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Milam, Emily. “A Brief History of Early Medical Photography.” Clinical Correlations, September 30, 2016. https://tinyurl.com/4tjchf7d.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Miller, Perry. The Life of the Mind in America: From the Revolution to the Civil War. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1965.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Mitchell, William J. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Moholy-Nagy, László. “A New Instrument of Vision (1936).” In The Photography Reader. Edited by Liz Wells. New York: Routledge, 2003, pp. 92–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Murray, Janet. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. New York: The Free Press, 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Murray, Soraya. On Video Games: The Visual Politics of Race, Gender and Space. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. O.nu.o.ha, Mimi, and Mother Cyborg (Diana Nucera). A People's Guide to AI. 2018. https://alliedmedia.org/resources/peoples-guide-to-ai.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Parikka, Jussi. Operational Images: From the Visual to the Invisual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Paul, Christiane. Digital Art. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Peirce, Charles S. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Edited by Justus Buchler. New York: Dover, 1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Peters, Benjamin. “Digital.” In Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society & Culture. Edited by Benjamin Peters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016, pp. 93–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Procter, Alice. The Whole Picture: The Colonial Story of the Art in Our Museums and Why We Need to Talk About It. London: Cassell, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Ritchin, Fred. After Photography. New York: WW Norton, 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Ritchin, Fred. “When Is a Photo Not a Photo?: The Looming Specter of Artificially Generated Photographs.” Vanity Fair, February 15, 2023. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/02/the-looming-specter-of-artificially-generated-photographs.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Russell, Legacy. “Digital Dualism and the Glitch Feminism Manifesto.” Cyborgology (blog), December 10, 2012. https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2012/12/10/digital-dualism-and-the-glitch-feminism-manifesto/.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Russell, Legacy. Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto. New York: Verso, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Salvaggio, Eryk. “How to Read an AI Image.” Cybernetic Forests, October 2, 2022. https://cyberneticforests.substack.com/p/how-to-read-an-ai-image.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Schofield, Michael. “Camera Phantasma: Reframing Virtual Photographies in the Age of AI.” Convergence 30, no. 2 (2024): 687–709.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Seaman, Bill. “Recombinant Poetics and Related Database Aesthetics.” In Database Aesthetics. Edited by Victoria Vesna. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007, pp. 121–41.191
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Serpell, Namwali. Stranger Faces. Oakland: Transit Books, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Shore, Robert. Post-Photography: The Artist with a Camera. London: Laurence King Publishing, 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Sigurdsson, Geir. “Towards the Work of Art in the Age of Digital Simulation: Walter Benjamin Revisited.” Literature & Aesthetics 11 (2001): 51–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Smith, Arianna. “The Secret Garden of Stephanie Dinkins, at DLECTRICITY.” Blac Detroit, September 24, 2021. https://www.blac.media/people-places/the-secret-garden-of-stephanie-dinkins-at-dlectricity/.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Solnit, Rebecca. River of Shadows: Eadweard Muybridge and the Technological Wild West. New York: Viking Press, 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Solomon-Godeau, Abigail. “Framing Landscape Photography.” In Photography After Photography: Gender, Genre, History. Edited by Sarah Parsons. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017, pp. 107–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Sontag, Susan. On Photography. New York: RosettaBooks, 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Steyerl, Hito. “In Defense of the Poor Image.” e-flux 10.com. e-flux, November 2009. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/10/61362/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Steyerl, Hito. “Mean Images.” New Left Review 140/141 (2023): 82–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Steyerl, Hito. “Proxy Politics: Signal and Noise.” e-flux 60 (December 2014). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/60/61045/proxy-politics-signal-and-noise/.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Valéry, Paul. “The Conquest of Ubiquity.” In The Collected Works of Paul Valéry: Aesthetics. Translated by Ralph Manheim. New York: Pantheon Books, Bollingen Series, 1964.
  94. Wendt, Brooke. The Allure of the Selfie: Instagram and the New Self-Portrait. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Wiener, Norbert. “Men, Machines, and the World About.” In The New Media Reader. Edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Nick Montfort. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Wilkins, Inigo. “Noise.” In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 287–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Wolf, Mark J. P. Building Imaginary Worlds: The Theory and History of Subcreation. New York: Routledge, 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Wolfe, Cary. “Posthumanism.” In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 356–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Zylinska, Joanna. AI Art: Machine Visions and Warped Dreams. London: Open Humanities Press, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Zylinska, Joanna. Perception at the End of the World (or How Not to Play Video Games). Pittsburgh and New York: Flugschriften, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. 187Anders, Peter. Envisioning Cyberspace: Designing 3D Electronic Spaces. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ascott, Roy. “Is There Love in the Telematic Embrace?” In The Sublime. Edited by Simon Morley. London: Whitechapel Gallery, 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Barthes, Roland. Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography. Translated by Richard Howard. London: Vintage Books, 2000.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Batchen, Geoffrey. Each Wild Idea: Writing Photography, History. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Baudelaire, Charles. The Mirror of Art. Translated by Jonathan Mayne. London: Phaidon Press Limited, 1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Benjamin, Ruha. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Benjamin, Walter. Illuminations. Edited by Hannah Arendt. Translated by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books, 1969.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Berger, John. Ways of Seeing. New York: Penguin, 1977.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Berger, John, and Jean Mohr. Another Way of Telling: A Possible Theory of Photography. New York: Pantheon Books, 1982.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bishop, Claire. “Digital Divide: Contemporary Art and New Media.” Artforum 51, no. 1 (2012). https://www.artforum.com/features/digital-divide-contemporary-art-and-new-media-200814/.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bogost, Ian, Simon Ferrari, and Bobby Schweizer. Newsgames: Journalism at Play. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bolter, Jay, and Richard Grusin. Remediations: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Broeckmann, Andreas. “The Machine as Artist as Myth.” Arts 8, no. 1 (2019): 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010025.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Broussard, Meredith. Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chiang, Ted. “ChatGPT Is a Blurry JPEG of the Web.” New Yorker, February 9, 2023. https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/chatgpt-is-a-blurry-jpeg-of-the-web.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chuk, Natasha. “Reimagining Archives: Radically Rethinking Design, Identity, and Multiplicity.” Public 34, no. 68 (2024): 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1386/public_00161_1.188
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cohen, Paul. “Harold Cohen and AARON.” AI Magazine 37, no. 4 (2016): 63–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Crawford, Kate. Atlas of AI. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Cresswell, Tim. Place: An Introduction. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Davis, Heather. “Art in the Anthropocene.” In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 63–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Delacroix, Eugene. The Journal of Eugène Delacroix. Translated by Walter Pach. New York: Hacker Art Books, 1980.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. del Campo, Mattias. Neural Architecture. Los Angeles: Applied Research and Design Publishing, 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Delistraty, Cody. “How Picasso Bled the Women in His Life for Art.” The Paris Review, November 9, 2017. https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2017/11/09/how-picasso-bled-the-women-in-his-life-for-art/.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Derrida, Jacques. “Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression.” Translated by Eric Prenowitz. Diacritics 25, no. 2 (Summer, 1995): 9–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Derrida, Jacques. Copy, Archive, Signature: A Conversation on Photography. Edited by Gerhard Richter. Translated by Jeff Fort. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2010.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dinkins, Stephanie. “Afro-now-ism.” Noema, June 16, 2020. https://www.noemamag.com/afro-now-ism/.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dinkins, Stephanie. Interview with the author, February 26, 2023.
  28. Doyle, Denise. “Travel, Space and Transformation.” Metaverse Creativity 6, no. 1–2 (2016): 25–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Fan, Shelly. Will AI Replace Us?: A Primer for the 21st Century. London: Thames & Hudson, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Farocki, Harun. Phantom Images. Translated by Brian Poole. ZKM, Karlsruhe, 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Flanagan, Mary. “Play, Participation, and Art: Blurring the Edges.” In Context Providers: Conditions of Meaning in Media Arts. Edited by Margot Lovejoy, Christiane Paul, and Victoria Vesna. Bristol: Intellect, 2011, pp. 89–100.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Flusser, Vilém. Into the Universe of Technical Images. Translated by Nancy Ann Roth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Fontcuberta, Joan. The Post-Photographic Condition. Edited by Joan Fontcuberta. Montréal: Le Mois de la Photo à Montréal, 2015, pp. 10–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Galloway, Alexander R. “Social Realism in Gaming.” Game Studies 4, no. 1 (2004). https://gamestudies.org/0401/galloway/.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gannis, Carla. Interview with the author, June 8, 2021.
  36. Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, 1956.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Groys, Boris. “Art Workers: Between Utopia and the Archive.” e-flux 45 (May 2013). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/45/60134/art-workers-between-utopia-and-the-archive/.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gržinić, Marina. “Identity Operated in New Mode: Context and Body/Space/Time.” In Context Providers: Conditions of Meaning in Media Arts. Edited by Margot Lovejoy, Christiane Paul, and Victoria Vesna. Bristol: Intellect, 2011, pp. 151–74.189
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Gunning, Tom. “What's the Point of an Index?, or Faking Photographs.” In Still Moving: Between Cinema and Photography. Edited by Karen Beckman and Jean Ma. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008, pp. 23–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Haraway, Donna. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hart, Claudia. “The Digital Combine.” Outland. June 8, 2022. https://outland.art/digital-combine-claudia-hart/.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hayles, N. Katherine. “Print Is Flat, Code Is Deep: The Importance of Medium-Specific Analysis.” Poetics Today 25, no. 1 (2004): 67–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hayles, N. Katherine. Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Higgins, Dick. “Intermedia.” Leonardo 34, no. 1 (2001): 49–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hoelzl, Ingrid. “Postimage.” In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 361–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hoelzl, Ingrid, and Rémi Marie. Softimage: Towards a New Theory of the Digital Image. Bristol: Intellect, 2015.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hui, Yuk. On the Existence of Digital Objects. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Hujar, Peter. Portraits in Life and Death. Boston: Da Capo Press, 1976.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Jurgenson, Nathan. The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media. New York: Verso, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Keenan, Hagi. Photography and Its Shadow. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Kittler, Friedrich. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated by Geoffrey Winthrup Young and Michael Wutz. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Kivy, Peter. The Performance of Reading: An Essay in the Philosophy of Literature. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kracauer, Siegfried. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Laurel, Brenda. Computers as Theatre. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1993.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Lee, Rosemary. Algorithm, Image, Art. New York: Atropos Press, 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Lichty, Patrick. “The Aesthetics of Liminality: Augmentation as Artform.” Leonardo 47, no. 4 (2014): 325–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Lotringer, Sylvère, and Paul Virilio. The Accident of Art. Translated by Michael Taormina. New York: Semiotext(e), 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Lovejoy, Margot. Digital Currents: Art in the Electronic Age. New York: Routledge, 2004.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Marwick, Alice E. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002.190
     [Google Scholar]
  62. McCorduck, Pamela. Aaron's Code: Meta-Art, Artificial Intelligence and the World of Harold Cohen. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company, 1991.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Menkman, Rosa. Beyond Resolution (self-published, 2020). https://beyondresolution.info/PUBLICATIONS.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Milam, Emily. “A Brief History of Early Medical Photography.” Clinical Correlations, September 30, 2016. https://tinyurl.com/4tjchf7d.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Miller, Perry. The Life of the Mind in America: From the Revolution to the Civil War. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1965.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Mitchell, William J. The Reconfigured Eye: Visual Truth in the Post-Photographic Era. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Moholy-Nagy, László. “A New Instrument of Vision (1936).” In The Photography Reader. Edited by Liz Wells. New York: Routledge, 2003, pp. 92–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Murray, Janet. Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. New York: The Free Press, 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Murray, Soraya. On Video Games: The Visual Politics of Race, Gender and Space. London: Bloomsbury, 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. O.nu.o.ha, Mimi, and Mother Cyborg (Diana Nucera). A People's Guide to AI. 2018. https://alliedmedia.org/resources/peoples-guide-to-ai.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Parikka, Jussi. Operational Images: From the Visual to the Invisual. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Paul, Christiane. Digital Art. London: Thames & Hudson, 2008.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Peirce, Charles S. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. Edited by Justus Buchler. New York: Dover, 1955.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Peters, Benjamin. “Digital.” In Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society & Culture. Edited by Benjamin Peters. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016, pp. 93–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Procter, Alice. The Whole Picture: The Colonial Story of the Art in Our Museums and Why We Need to Talk About It. London: Cassell, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Ritchin, Fred. After Photography. New York: WW Norton, 2009.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Ritchin, Fred. “When Is a Photo Not a Photo?: The Looming Specter of Artificially Generated Photographs.” Vanity Fair, February 15, 2023. https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/02/the-looming-specter-of-artificially-generated-photographs.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Russell, Legacy. “Digital Dualism and the Glitch Feminism Manifesto.” Cyborgology (blog), December 10, 2012. https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2012/12/10/digital-dualism-and-the-glitch-feminism-manifesto/.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Russell, Legacy. Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto. New York: Verso, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Salvaggio, Eryk. “How to Read an AI Image.” Cybernetic Forests, October 2, 2022. https://cyberneticforests.substack.com/p/how-to-read-an-ai-image.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Schofield, Michael. “Camera Phantasma: Reframing Virtual Photographies in the Age of AI.” Convergence 30, no. 2 (2024): 687–709.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Seaman, Bill. “Recombinant Poetics and Related Database Aesthetics.” In Database Aesthetics. Edited by Victoria Vesna. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007, pp. 121–41.191
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Serpell, Namwali. Stranger Faces. Oakland: Transit Books, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Shore, Robert. Post-Photography: The Artist with a Camera. London: Laurence King Publishing, 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Sigurdsson, Geir. “Towards the Work of Art in the Age of Digital Simulation: Walter Benjamin Revisited.” Literature & Aesthetics 11 (2001): 51–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Smith, Arianna. “The Secret Garden of Stephanie Dinkins, at DLECTRICITY.” Blac Detroit, September 24, 2021. https://www.blac.media/people-places/the-secret-garden-of-stephanie-dinkins-at-dlectricity/.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Solnit, Rebecca. River of Shadows: Eadweard Muybridge and the Technological Wild West. New York: Viking Press, 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Solomon-Godeau, Abigail. “Framing Landscape Photography.” In Photography After Photography: Gender, Genre, History. Edited by Sarah Parsons. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017, pp. 107–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Sontag, Susan. On Photography. New York: RosettaBooks, 2005.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Steyerl, Hito. “In Defense of the Poor Image.” e-flux 10.com. e-flux, November 2009. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/10/61362/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Steyerl, Hito. “Mean Images.” New Left Review 140/141 (2023): 82–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Steyerl, Hito. “Proxy Politics: Signal and Noise.” e-flux 60 (December 2014). https://www.e-flux.com/journal/60/61045/proxy-politics-signal-and-noise/.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Valéry, Paul. “The Conquest of Ubiquity.” In The Collected Works of Paul Valéry: Aesthetics. Translated by Ralph Manheim. New York: Pantheon Books, Bollingen Series, 1964.
  94. Wendt, Brooke. The Allure of the Selfie: Instagram and the New Self-Portrait. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 2014.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Wiener, Norbert. “Men, Machines, and the World About.” In The New Media Reader. Edited by Noah Wardrip-Fruin and Nick Montfort. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2003.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Wilkins, Inigo. “Noise.” In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 287–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Wolf, Mark J. P. Building Imaginary Worlds: The Theory and History of Subcreation. New York: Routledge, 2012.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Wolfe, Cary. “Posthumanism.” In Posthuman Glossary. Edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019, pp. 356–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Zylinska, Joanna. AI Art: Machine Visions and Warped Dreams. London: Open Humanities Press, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Zylinska, Joanna. Perception at the End of the World (or How Not to Play Video Games). Pittsburgh and New York: Flugschriften, 2020.
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9781835951507.bm01
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
/content/books/9781835951507.bm01
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781835951507
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test