Skip to content
1981

oa End Matter

image of End Matter
file format pdf download PDF
file format text download EPUB
  • Source: On the Communicative Turn in Philosophy , pp 145-162
  • Publication Date: October 2025
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/9781835951637_12
  • Language: English
  • Accessibility Summary:  EPUB 3 and pdf file included; compatible with devices and software which can read these formats. Adjustable font size, spacing, contrast, text justification, number of columns (ePUB only). Alternative text for images. Tagged with a logical reading order to assist screen readers. Navigation between in-text citations and reference list, and endnotes and endnote markers.
Preview this chapter:
Preview Magnify
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/9781835951637/9781835951668-bm01.html?itemId=/content/books/9781835951637.bm01&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1993), The Coming Community (trans. M. Hardt), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Akhutina, T. (2003), ‘The theory of verbal communication in the works of M.M Bakhtin and L.S Vygostky’, Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 41:3–4, pp. 96–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnett, R. (1986), Communication and Community: Implications of Martin Buber's Dialogue, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnett, R. C. (2012), ‘Beyond dialogue: Levinas and otherwise than the I–Thou’, Language and Dialogue, 2:1, pp. 140–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayer, A. J. (1953), ‘One's knowledge of other minds’, Theoria, 10:1–2, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakhtin, M. (1981), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin (trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist), Austin and London: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakhtin, M. (1984), Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (ed. and trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakhtin, M. (1986), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (ed. C. Emerson and M. Holquist), Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakhtin, M. (1990), Art and Answerability (ed. V. Liapunov and M. Holquist), Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bakhtin, M. (1993), Toward a Philosophy of the Act (ed. V. Liapunov and M. Holquist), Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bakhtin, M. (1995), ‘Discourse in art and discourse in life’, in Landmark Essays on Voice and Writing (ed. P. Elbow), London: Routledge, pp. 3–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bataille, G. (1985a), Literature and Evil (trans. B. Boone), London and New York: Marion Boyars.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bataille, G. (1985b), Visions of Excess: Selected Writings 1927-1939 (trans. A. Stoekl), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bataille, G. (1988a), Guilty (trans. B. Boone), Vencie: The Lapis Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bataille, G. (1988b), Inner Experience (trans. L. A. Boldt), Albany: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bataille, G. (2001), ‘Socratic college’, in The Unfinished System of NonKnowledge (trans. M. Kendall and S. Kendall), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 5–17.148
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Baxter, L. (2006), ‘Communication as dialogue’, in Communication as…: Perspectives on Theory (eds G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John and T. Striphas), Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. 101–09.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Belman, S. L. (1977), ‘John Dewey's concept of communication’, Journal of Communication, 27:1, pp. 29–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Benjamin, W. (2002), Selected Writings, Volume 1: 1913-1926, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Binding, L. L. and Tapp, M. D. (2008), ‘Human understanding in dialogue: Gadamer's recovery of the genuine’, Nursing Philosophy, 9:2, pp. 121–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Blanchot, M. (1988), The Unavowable Community, New York: Station Hill Pres.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Brandist, C. (n.d.), The Bakhtin Circle, https://iep.utm.edu/bakhtin-circle/. Accessed 20 July 2023.
  23. Buber, M. (1965), The Knowledge of Man (trans. M. Friedman), London: George Allen and Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Buber, M. (1970), I And Thou (trans. W. Kaufmann), New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Buber, M. (2002), Between Man and Man (trans. R. Gregor-Smith), London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Buceniece, E. (2005), ‘How can we be together: Intersubjectivity and communication’, Anelecta Husserliana, LXXXIV, pp. 119–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Burleson, B. R. and Kline, S. L. (1979), ‘Habermas’ theory of communication: A critical explication’, The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 26:4, pp. 412–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Butchart, G. C. (2017), ‘Communication and the thesis of intentionality in Husserl, Sartre, and Levinas’, Review of Communication, 17:1, pp. 56–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Butchart, G. C. (2019), Embodiment, Relation, Community: A Continental Philosophy of Communication, University Park: Penn State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Carey, J. (1977), ‘Mass communication research and cultural studies: An American view’, in J. Curran, M. Gurevich, and J. Woolacott (eds), Mass Communication and Society, London: Edward Arnold, pp. 409–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Carey, J. (1997), ‘Afterword: The culture in question’, in E. Stryker and W. A. Catherine (eds), James Carey: A Critical Reader, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 308–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Carey, J. (1998), ‘Political ritual on television’, in T. Curran and T. Liebes (eds), Media, Ritual and Identity, London: Routledge, pp. 42–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Carey, J. (2008), Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society, Boston, MA: Unwin and Hyman.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Chang, B. (1996), Deconstructing Communication, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Cmiel, K. (1992), ‘A review of James Carey's “Communication as Culture”’, Theory and Society, 21:2, pp. 285–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Cohen, R. (1986), Face-to-Face with Levinas, New York: Suny Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Crossley, N. (1996), Intersubjectivity, the Fabric of Social Becoming, London: Sage Publicatons Ltd.149
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Daley, L. (2007), ‘Communication as limit experience’, Contemporary Issues in Education, 26:2, pp. 75–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Debord, G. (1990), Comments on the Society of the Spectacle (trans. M. Imrie), London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Debord, G. (2002), The Society of the Spectacle (trans. K. Knabb), London: Rebel Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. De Ia Durantaye, L. (2009), Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Dentith, S. (1995), Bakhtinian Thought: An Introductory Reader, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. De Oliviera, P. P. (2017), ‘From Schutz to Dewey: Communication and everday life’, Estudos em Comunicação, 1:25, pp. 163–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Derrida, J. (1976), Of Grammatology (trans. G. C. Spivak), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Derrida, J. (1978), ‘Violence and metaphysics’, in Writing and Difference (trans. A. Bass), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 79–153.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Derrida, J. (1981), Dissemination (trans. B. Johnson), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Derrida, J. (1994), Spectres of Marx (trans. P. Kamuf), Oxfordshire: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. De Saussure, F. (1983), Course in General Linguistics (trans. R. Harris), London: Duckworth.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Devadas, V. and Mummery, J. (2007), ‘Community without community’, Borderlands, 6:1, https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Community without community.-a0169458010. Accessed 12 July 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Devisch, I. (2012), Jean-Luc Nancy and the Queston of Community, London: Bloomsbury Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Dewey, J. (1929), Experience and Nature, London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Dewey, J. (1938), Logic: Theory of Inquiry, New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Dewey, J. (1957), Reconstruction in Philosophy, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Dewey, J. (2004), Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, Delhi: Aakar Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Dreher, J. (2003), ‘The symbol and the theory of the life-world: “The transcendences of the life-world and their overcoming by signs and symbols”’, Human Studies, 26, pp.141–163, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024014620368.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Edgar, A. (2005), The Philosophy of Habermas, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Elliott, B. (2009), ‘Theories of community in Habermas, Nancy and Agamben: A critical introduction’, Philosophy Compass, 4:6, p. 8930903.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Frechette, G. (2016), ‘Two phenomenological accounts of intuition’, in D. Fisette and G. Frechette (eds), Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Proceedings of the 37th International Wittgentsein Sumposium, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 129–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Gadamer, H.-G. (1992), ‘Interview: Writing and the living voice’, in D. Misgeld and G. Nicholson (eds), in Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied (trans. L. Schmidt and M. Reuss), New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 63–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Gadamer, H.-G. (1996), The Enigma of Health: The Art of Healing in a Scientiifc Age (trans. J. Gaiger and N. Walker), Stanford: Stanford University Press.150
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Gadamer, H.-G. (1997), ‘Reflections on my philosophical journey’, in L. E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Library of Living Philosophers, v. 24 (trans. R. Palmer), Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company, pp. 3–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Gadamer, H.-G. (1998), ‘Culture and word’, in Praise of Theory: Speech and Essays (trans. C. Dawson), New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Gadamer, H.-G. (2000), ‘Subjectivity and intersubjectivity, subject and person’, Continental Philosophy Review, 33, pp. 275–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004), Truth and Method (trans. J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall), New York: The Continuum Publishing House.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Gadamer, H.-G. (2006), ‘The Incapacity for Conversation’, Continental Philosophy Review, 39, pp. 351–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Gadamer, H.-G. (2007), ‘Hermeneutics and the ontologcial difference’, in The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings (translated and edited R. Palmer), Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 356–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Gadamer, H.-G. (2008), Philosophical Hermeneutics (trans. D. E. Linge), Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Gilicka, M. (2017), ‘Husserl's phenomenological-communicative project’, Lingua Posnaniensis, LIX:1, pp. 53–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Giordin, J. (1999), ‘Understanding as dialogue: Gadamer’, in S. Glendenning (ed.), The Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 222–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Grinnell, F. (1983), ‘The problem of intersubjectivity: A comparison of Martin Buber and Alfred Schutz’, Human Studies, 6:1, pp. 185–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Grondin, J. (2012), Introduction to Metaphysics: From Parmenides to Levinas, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Habermas, J. (1972), Knowledge and Human Interests (trans. J. J. Shapiro), Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Habermas, J. (1979), Communication and the Evolution of Society (trans. T. MacCarthy), Boston, MA: Beacon press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Habermas, J. (1982), ‘A reply to my critics’, in Habermas Critical Debates (eds J. B. Thompson and D. Held), London: The Macmillan Press Limited, pp. 219–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1 (trans. T. McCarthy), Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2 (trans. T. McCarthy), Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Habermas, J. (1990a), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (trans. F. G. Lawrence), Amherst: Massachusetts University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Habermas, J. (1990b), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (trans. C. Lenhardt and S.W. Nicholson), Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Habermas, J. (2001), On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction (trans. B. Fultner), Cambridge: Polity Press.151
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Habermas, J. (2008), ‘Towards a theory of communicative competence’, Inquiry, 13:1–4, pp. 360–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Hammond, Mark (1991), Understanding Phenomenology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Haney, M. K. (1988), ‘The necessity of intersubjectivity’, in H. Silverman (ed.), The Horizons of Continental Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 32–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Haney, M. K. (2002), ‘The role of intersubjectivity and empathy in Husserl's Foundational Project’, in A. T. Tymieniecka (ed.), Phenomenology World-Wide, Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publishers, pp. 146–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Hegarty, P. (2000), Georges Bataille, London: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and Time (trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson), New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Hirshkop, K. (2001), ‘Bakhtin's linguistic turn’, Dialogism: An International Journal of Bakhtin Studies, 5–6, pp. 21–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Holquist, M. (1990), Dialogism, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Husserl, E. (1970a), Logical Investigations, Volume 1 (trans. J. N. Findlay), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Husserl, E. (1970b), Logical Investigations Volume 2 (trans. J. N. Findlay), London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Husserl, E. (1973a), Zur Phanomenologie der Intersubjektivitat. Texte aus dem Bachless. Zweiter Teil: 1921-1928, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Husserl, E. (1973b), Zur Phanomenologie der Intersubjektivitat. Texte aus dem Nachless, Dritter Teil: 1929-1935, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Husserl, E. (1990), Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy (trans. F. Kersten), Berlin: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Husserl, E. (1999), Cartesian Meditations (trans. D. Clairns), Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Husserl, E. (2008), Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und Ihrer Konstituin, Dordecht: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Hutchens, B. (2004), Levinas: A Guide for the Perplexed, London: Bloomsbury Academic Continuum International Pub. Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Irwin, C. A. (1993), ‘Ecstasy, sacrifice, communication: Bataille on religion and inner experience’, Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 76:1, pp. 105–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Jakobson, R. (1971), ‘The dominant’, in L. Matejka and K. L. Comp (eds), Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 105–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. James, I. (2005), The Fragmentary Demand: An Introdcution to J.L.Nancy, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Johnson, M. (2006), ‘Merleau-Ponty's embodied semantics: From immanent meaning, to gesture, to language’, EurAmerica, 36:1, pp. 1–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Keiichi, N. (1992), ‘“The hermeneutic turn” in Husserl's phenomenology of language’, Human Studies, 15:1, pp. 117–28.152
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Keller, P. (1999), Husserl and Heidegger on Human Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Lachowska, D. (1980), ‘Alfred Schutz's theory of intersubjectivity’, The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 3:51, pp. 41–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Lanigan, R. L. (1988), Phenomenology of Communication, Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Lawn, C. (2019), ‘Gadamer on poetic and everyday language’, Philosophy and Literature, 25, pp. 113–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Levinas, E. (1969), Ethics and Infinity (trans. A. Lingis), Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Levinas, E. (1978), Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence (trans. A. Lingis), Dordrecth: Martinus Nijhoff Press Philosophy Texts.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Levinas, E. (1979), Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (trans. A. Lingis), Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Levinas, E. (1987), Collected Philosophical Papers (trans. A. Lingis), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Levinas, E. (1996), Proper Names (trans. M. B. Smith), Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Levinas, E. (2001), Is it Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas (ed. J. Robbins), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Levinas, I. (2001), Is it Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas (ed. J. Robbins), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Llewelyn, J. (2004), ‘Levinas and language’, in S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Low, D. (1992), ‘Merleau-Ponty's intertwined notions of subjectivity and intersubjectivity’, International Studies in Philosophy, 24:3, pp. 45–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. MacIntyre, A. (2007), After Virtue, Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Malpas, J. (2022), Hans-Georg Gadamer, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gadamer/. Accessed 29 July 2023.
  116. Mead, G. H. (1922), ‘A behavioristic account of the significant symbol’, The Journal of Philosophy, 19:6, pp. 157–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Mead, H. G. (1934), Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Mead, H. G. (1936), Movement of Thought in the Nineteenth Century, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Meindl, P. and Zahavi, D. a. Z. D. (2023), ‘From communication to communalisation: A Husserlian account’, Continental Philosophy Review, pp. 361–77, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-023-09601-7.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a), Signs (trans. R. C. McCleary), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b). The Primacy of Perception (trans. J. M. Edie), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968), The Visible and the Invisible (trans. A. Lingis), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.153
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1970), In Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays (trans. W. Johyn and E. J. James), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973), The Prose of the World (trans. J. O'Neil), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002), The Phenomenology of Perception (trans. C. Smith), London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Moran, D. (2013), ‘“There is no brute world, only an elaborated world”: Merleau-Ponty on the interesubjecctive constitiuton of the world’, South African Journal of Philosophy, 32:4, pp. 355–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Mordechai, G. (2011), ‘Listening as embracing the other: Martin Buber's philosophy of dialogue’, Educational Theory, 61:2, pp. 207–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Murray, A. (2010), Agamben, Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Nancy, J.-L. (1991), The Inoperative Community (trans. P. Connor, L. Garbus, M. Holland, and S. Sawhney), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Nancy, J.-L. (1993), The Birth to Presence (trans. B. Holmes and others), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Nancy, J.-L. (2000), Being Singular Plural (trans. R. D. Richardson and A. E. O'Byrne), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Nietzsche, F. (1989), ‘On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense’, in Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language (trans. S. L. Gilman, C. Blair and D. J. Parent), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 246–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Noys, B. (1997), ‘Communicative unreason: Bataille and Habermas’, Theory, Culture & Society, 14:1, pp. 59–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Noys, B. (2000), Bataille: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Olivier, B. (2009), Philosophy and Communication: Collected Essays, Lausanne: Peter Lang Group AG.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Peters, D. J. (2001), Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Pfuetze, P. (1961), Self, Society, Existence, Greenwood Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Pieper, J. (2010), Tradition: Concept and Claim, South Bend: St. Augustine's Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Pinchevski, A. (2005), By Way of Interruption: Levinas and the Ethics of Communication, Pittsburgh: Duquensne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Rasor, P. (2000), ‘Intersubjective communication and the self in Wieman and Habermas’, American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, 21:3, pp. 269–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Reinach, A. (2012), The Apriori Foundation of the Civil Law (ed. J. F. Cosby), Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Ricoeur, P. (1967), Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (trans. E. G. Ballard and L. E. Embree), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Risser, J. (2016), ‘Locating shared life in the “thou”’, in T. Szanto and D. Moran (eds), The Phenomenology of Sociality, London: Routledge, pp. 29–41.154
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Risser, J. (2019), ‘Hearing the other: Communication as shared life’, Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, Article 8, pp. 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Roffe, J. (2004), ‘Ethics’, in J. Reynolds and J. Roffe (eds), Understanding Derrida, London: Continuum, pp. 37–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Ross, M. (2013), An Alternative Path: The Intellectual Legacy of James Carey, Columbia: University of South Carolina.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Sanders, M. (2008), ‘Intersubjectivity and alterity’, in R. Diprose and J. Reynolds (eds), Merleau-Ponty Key Concepts, London: Routledge, pp. 142–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Scherto, G. (2015), ‘Holding oneself open in a conversation: Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics and the ethics of dialogue’, Journal of Dialogue Studies, 3:1, pp. 9–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Schutz, A. (1950), ‘Language, language disturbances, and the texture of consciousness’, Social Research, 17:3, pp. 365–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Schutz, A. (1962), Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Schutz, A. (1967), The Phenomenology of the Social World (trans. G. Walsh), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Schutz, A. (1970), Collected Papers III Studies in Phenomenolgical Philosophy, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Schutz, A. (1976), Collected Papers II Studies in Social Theory, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1974), The Structures of the Lifeworld Vol. 1 (trans. R. M. Zaner and H. T. Engelhardt, Jr), London: Heinemann.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1989), The Structures of the Lifeworld Vol. 11 (trans. R. M. Zaner and D.J. Parent), London: Heinemann.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Scruton, R. (2017), Conservatism: Ideas in Profile, London: Profile Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Sella, Z. K. (2007), ‘The journey of ritual communication’, Studies in Communication Sciences, pp. 103–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Smith, T. (1931), ‘The social philosophy of George Herbert Mead’, American Journal of Sociology, 37:3, pp. 368–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Sokolowski, R. (2002), ‘Semiotics in Husserl's logcal investigations’, in D. Zahavi and F. Stjernfelt (eds), One Hundred Years of Phenomenology, Amsterdam: Kleweeer Academic Publishers, pp. 171–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Stalmaszczyk, P. and Oleksy, W. (2014), ‘Philosophical and communicative turns in the study of language,’ in W. Szubko-Sitarek, L. Salski, and P. Stalmaszczyk (eds), Language Learning, Discourse and Communication, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 229–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Starwaska, B. (2009), Between You and I: Dialogical Phenomenology, Ohio University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. Subtil, F. (2014), ‘James W Carey's cultural approach of communication’, Intercom – Revista Brasileira de Ciencias da Comunicaçăo, 37:1, pp. 19–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. Taylor, C. (1991), The Ethics of Authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Tejera, V. (1988), Semiotics from Peirce to Barthes, Koln: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. ten Bos, R. (2005), ‘Giorgio Agamben and the community without identity’, Sociological Review, 53:1, p. 16–29155
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Tönnies, F. (2001), Community and Civil Society (trans. M. Hollis), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Tremblay, T. (2016), ‘Whatever singluarity, negative community and literature (perhaps)’, Countertext, 2:1, pp. 44–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Trujillo, J. (2018), ‘Intersubjectivity and the sociology of Alfred Schutz’, Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique, 14:7, pp. 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Vejera, V. (1986), ‘Community, communication, and meaning: Theories of Buchler and Habermas’, Symbolic Interaction, 9:1, pp. 83–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Vološinov, V. (1986), Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (trans. L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. Watkin, W. (2014), Agamben and Indifference, London: Rowman and Littlefield International Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Womack, P. (2011), Dialogue, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. Ying Kwok, L. (2004), ‘Intersubjectivity and phenomenology of the other: 135’, in Space Time and Culture (eds David Carr and Cheung Chan-Fai), Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 135–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. Young, I. M. (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Young, R. (1989), ‘Not revolutionary: But communicating’, Oxford Literary Review, pp. 213–25, https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/olr.1989.010?role=tab. Accessed 4 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Zahavi, D. (2001), ‘Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity’, in Between Ourselves: Second-Person Issues in the Study of Consciousness, pp. 151–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. Zaner, R. (1961), ‘Theory of intersubjectivity: Alfred Schutz’, Social Research, 28:1, pp. 71–93.157
     [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1993), The Coming Community (trans. M. Hardt), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Akhutina, T. (2003), ‘The theory of verbal communication in the works of M.M Bakhtin and L.S Vygostky’, Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 41:3–4, pp. 96–114.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arnett, R. (1986), Communication and Community: Implications of Martin Buber's Dialogue, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnett, R. C. (2012), ‘Beyond dialogue: Levinas and otherwise than the I–Thou’, Language and Dialogue, 2:1, pp. 140–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayer, A. J. (1953), ‘One's knowledge of other minds’, Theoria, 10:1–2, pp. 1–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bakhtin, M. (1981), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin (trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist), Austin and London: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bakhtin, M. (1984), Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics (ed. and trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bakhtin, M. (1986), Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (ed. C. Emerson and M. Holquist), Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bakhtin, M. (1990), Art and Answerability (ed. V. Liapunov and M. Holquist), Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bakhtin, M. (1993), Toward a Philosophy of the Act (ed. V. Liapunov and M. Holquist), Austin: University of Texas Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bakhtin, M. (1995), ‘Discourse in art and discourse in life’, in Landmark Essays on Voice and Writing (ed. P. Elbow), London: Routledge, pp. 3–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bataille, G. (1985a), Literature and Evil (trans. B. Boone), London and New York: Marion Boyars.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Bataille, G. (1985b), Visions of Excess: Selected Writings 1927-1939 (trans. A. Stoekl), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bataille, G. (1988a), Guilty (trans. B. Boone), Vencie: The Lapis Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bataille, G. (1988b), Inner Experience (trans. L. A. Boldt), Albany: State University of New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bataille, G. (2001), ‘Socratic college’, in The Unfinished System of NonKnowledge (trans. M. Kendall and S. Kendall), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 5–17.148
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Baxter, L. (2006), ‘Communication as dialogue’, in Communication as…: Perspectives on Theory (eds G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John and T. Striphas), Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., pp. 101–09.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Belman, S. L. (1977), ‘John Dewey's concept of communication’, Journal of Communication, 27:1, pp. 29–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Benjamin, W. (2002), Selected Writings, Volume 1: 1913-1926, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Binding, L. L. and Tapp, M. D. (2008), ‘Human understanding in dialogue: Gadamer's recovery of the genuine’, Nursing Philosophy, 9:2, pp. 121–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Blanchot, M. (1988), The Unavowable Community, New York: Station Hill Pres.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Brandist, C. (n.d.), The Bakhtin Circle, https://iep.utm.edu/bakhtin-circle/. Accessed 20 July 2023.
  23. Buber, M. (1965), The Knowledge of Man (trans. M. Friedman), London: George Allen and Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Buber, M. (1970), I And Thou (trans. W. Kaufmann), New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Buber, M. (2002), Between Man and Man (trans. R. Gregor-Smith), London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Buceniece, E. (2005), ‘How can we be together: Intersubjectivity and communication’, Anelecta Husserliana, LXXXIV, pp. 119–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Burleson, B. R. and Kline, S. L. (1979), ‘Habermas’ theory of communication: A critical explication’, The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 26:4, pp. 412–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Butchart, G. C. (2017), ‘Communication and the thesis of intentionality in Husserl, Sartre, and Levinas’, Review of Communication, 17:1, pp. 56–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Butchart, G. C. (2019), Embodiment, Relation, Community: A Continental Philosophy of Communication, University Park: Penn State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Carey, J. (1977), ‘Mass communication research and cultural studies: An American view’, in J. Curran, M. Gurevich, and J. Woolacott (eds), Mass Communication and Society, London: Edward Arnold, pp. 409–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Carey, J. (1997), ‘Afterword: The culture in question’, in E. Stryker and W. A. Catherine (eds), James Carey: A Critical Reader, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 308–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Carey, J. (1998), ‘Political ritual on television’, in T. Curran and T. Liebes (eds), Media, Ritual and Identity, London: Routledge, pp. 42–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Carey, J. (2008), Communication as Culture: Essays on Media and Society, Boston, MA: Unwin and Hyman.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Chang, B. (1996), Deconstructing Communication, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Cmiel, K. (1992), ‘A review of James Carey's “Communication as Culture”’, Theory and Society, 21:2, pp. 285–90.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Cohen, R. (1986), Face-to-Face with Levinas, New York: Suny Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Crossley, N. (1996), Intersubjectivity, the Fabric of Social Becoming, London: Sage Publicatons Ltd.149
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Daley, L. (2007), ‘Communication as limit experience’, Contemporary Issues in Education, 26:2, pp. 75–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Debord, G. (1990), Comments on the Society of the Spectacle (trans. M. Imrie), London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Debord, G. (2002), The Society of the Spectacle (trans. K. Knabb), London: Rebel Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. De Ia Durantaye, L. (2009), Giorgio Agamben: A Critical Introduction, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Dentith, S. (1995), Bakhtinian Thought: An Introductory Reader, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. De Oliviera, P. P. (2017), ‘From Schutz to Dewey: Communication and everday life’, Estudos em Comunicação, 1:25, pp. 163–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Derrida, J. (1976), Of Grammatology (trans. G. C. Spivak), Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Derrida, J. (1978), ‘Violence and metaphysics’, in Writing and Difference (trans. A. Bass), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 79–153.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Derrida, J. (1981), Dissemination (trans. B. Johnson), Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Derrida, J. (1994), Spectres of Marx (trans. P. Kamuf), Oxfordshire: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. De Saussure, F. (1983), Course in General Linguistics (trans. R. Harris), London: Duckworth.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Devadas, V. and Mummery, J. (2007), ‘Community without community’, Borderlands, 6:1, https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Community without community.-a0169458010. Accessed 12 July 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Devisch, I. (2012), Jean-Luc Nancy and the Queston of Community, London: Bloomsbury Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Dewey, J. (1929), Experience and Nature, London: George Allen and Unwin, Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Dewey, J. (1938), Logic: Theory of Inquiry, New York: Hold, Rinehart and Winston.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Dewey, J. (1957), Reconstruction in Philosophy, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Dewey, J. (2004), Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, Delhi: Aakar Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Dreher, J. (2003), ‘The symbol and the theory of the life-world: “The transcendences of the life-world and their overcoming by signs and symbols”’, Human Studies, 26, pp.141–163, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024014620368.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Edgar, A. (2005), The Philosophy of Habermas, Oxfordshire: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Elliott, B. (2009), ‘Theories of community in Habermas, Nancy and Agamben: A critical introduction’, Philosophy Compass, 4:6, p. 8930903.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Frechette, G. (2016), ‘Two phenomenological accounts of intuition’, in D. Fisette and G. Frechette (eds), Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Proceedings of the 37th International Wittgentsein Sumposium, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 129–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Gadamer, H.-G. (1992), ‘Interview: Writing and the living voice’, in D. Misgeld and G. Nicholson (eds), in Hans-Georg Gadamer on Education, Poetry, and History: Applied (trans. L. Schmidt and M. Reuss), New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 63–72.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Gadamer, H.-G. (1996), The Enigma of Health: The Art of Healing in a Scientiifc Age (trans. J. Gaiger and N. Walker), Stanford: Stanford University Press.150
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Gadamer, H.-G. (1997), ‘Reflections on my philosophical journey’, in L. E. Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer, Library of Living Philosophers, v. 24 (trans. R. Palmer), Chicago: Open Court Publishing Company, pp. 3–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Gadamer, H.-G. (1998), ‘Culture and word’, in Praise of Theory: Speech and Essays (trans. C. Dawson), New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Gadamer, H.-G. (2000), ‘Subjectivity and intersubjectivity, subject and person’, Continental Philosophy Review, 33, pp. 275–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Gadamer, H.-G. (2004), Truth and Method (trans. J. Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall), New York: The Continuum Publishing House.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Gadamer, H.-G. (2006), ‘The Incapacity for Conversation’, Continental Philosophy Review, 39, pp. 351–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Gadamer, H.-G. (2007), ‘Hermeneutics and the ontologcial difference’, in The Gadamer Reader: A Bouquet of the Later Writings (translated and edited R. Palmer), Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 356–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Gadamer, H.-G. (2008), Philosophical Hermeneutics (trans. D. E. Linge), Berkeley: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Gilicka, M. (2017), ‘Husserl's phenomenological-communicative project’, Lingua Posnaniensis, LIX:1, pp. 53–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Giordin, J. (1999), ‘Understanding as dialogue: Gadamer’, in S. Glendenning (ed.), The Edinburgh Encyclopedia of Continental Philosophy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 222–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Grinnell, F. (1983), ‘The problem of intersubjectivity: A comparison of Martin Buber and Alfred Schutz’, Human Studies, 6:1, pp. 185–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Grondin, J. (2012), Introduction to Metaphysics: From Parmenides to Levinas, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Habermas, J. (1972), Knowledge and Human Interests (trans. J. J. Shapiro), Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Habermas, J. (1979), Communication and the Evolution of Society (trans. T. MacCarthy), Boston, MA: Beacon press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Habermas, J. (1982), ‘A reply to my critics’, in Habermas Critical Debates (eds J. B. Thompson and D. Held), London: The Macmillan Press Limited, pp. 219–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1 (trans. T. McCarthy), Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Habermas, J. (1987), The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2 (trans. T. McCarthy), Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Habermas, J. (1990a), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (trans. F. G. Lawrence), Amherst: Massachusetts University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Habermas, J. (1990b), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (trans. C. Lenhardt and S.W. Nicholson), Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Habermas, J. (2001), On the Pragmatics of Social Interaction (trans. B. Fultner), Cambridge: Polity Press.151
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Habermas, J. (2008), ‘Towards a theory of communicative competence’, Inquiry, 13:1–4, pp. 360–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Hammond, Mark (1991), Understanding Phenomenology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Haney, M. K. (1988), ‘The necessity of intersubjectivity’, in H. Silverman (ed.), The Horizons of Continental Philosophy, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 32–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Haney, M. K. (2002), ‘The role of intersubjectivity and empathy in Husserl's Foundational Project’, in A. T. Tymieniecka (ed.), Phenomenology World-Wide, Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publishers, pp. 146–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Hegarty, P. (2000), Georges Bataille, London: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and Time (trans. J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson), New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Hirshkop, K. (2001), ‘Bakhtin's linguistic turn’, Dialogism: An International Journal of Bakhtin Studies, 5–6, pp. 21–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Holquist, M. (1990), Dialogism, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Husserl, E. (1970a), Logical Investigations, Volume 1 (trans. J. N. Findlay), London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Husserl, E. (1970b), Logical Investigations Volume 2 (trans. J. N. Findlay), London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Husserl, E. (1973a), Zur Phanomenologie der Intersubjektivitat. Texte aus dem Bachless. Zweiter Teil: 1921-1928, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Husserl, E. (1973b), Zur Phanomenologie der Intersubjektivitat. Texte aus dem Nachless, Dritter Teil: 1929-1935, Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Husserl, E. (1990), Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy (trans. F. Kersten), Berlin: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Husserl, E. (1999), Cartesian Meditations (trans. D. Clairns), Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Husserl, E. (2008), Die Lebenswelt: Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und Ihrer Konstituin, Dordecht: Springer.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Hutchens, B. (2004), Levinas: A Guide for the Perplexed, London: Bloomsbury Academic Continuum International Pub. Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Irwin, C. A. (1993), ‘Ecstasy, sacrifice, communication: Bataille on religion and inner experience’, Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 76:1, pp. 105–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Jakobson, R. (1971), ‘The dominant’, in L. Matejka and K. L. Comp (eds), Readings in Russian Poetics: Formalist and Structuralist Views, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 105–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. James, I. (2005), The Fragmentary Demand: An Introdcution to J.L.Nancy, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Johnson, M. (2006), ‘Merleau-Ponty's embodied semantics: From immanent meaning, to gesture, to language’, EurAmerica, 36:1, pp. 1–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Keiichi, N. (1992), ‘“The hermeneutic turn” in Husserl's phenomenology of language’, Human Studies, 15:1, pp. 117–28.152
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Keller, P. (1999), Husserl and Heidegger on Human Experience, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Lachowska, D. (1980), ‘Alfred Schutz's theory of intersubjectivity’, The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 3:51, pp. 41–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Lanigan, R. L. (1988), Phenomenology of Communication, Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Lawn, C. (2019), ‘Gadamer on poetic and everyday language’, Philosophy and Literature, 25, pp. 113–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Levinas, E. (1969), Ethics and Infinity (trans. A. Lingis), Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Levinas, E. (1978), Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence (trans. A. Lingis), Dordrecth: Martinus Nijhoff Press Philosophy Texts.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Levinas, E. (1979), Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority (trans. A. Lingis), Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Levinas, E. (1987), Collected Philosophical Papers (trans. A. Lingis), Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Levinas, E. (1996), Proper Names (trans. M. B. Smith), Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Levinas, E. (2001), Is it Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas (ed. J. Robbins), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Levinas, I. (2001), Is it Righteous to Be? Interviews with Emmanuel Levinas (ed. J. Robbins), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Llewelyn, J. (2004), ‘Levinas and language’, in S. Critchley and R. Bernasconi (eds), The Cambridge Companion to Levinas, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Low, D. (1992), ‘Merleau-Ponty's intertwined notions of subjectivity and intersubjectivity’, International Studies in Philosophy, 24:3, pp. 45–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  114. MacIntyre, A. (2007), After Virtue, Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Malpas, J. (2022), Hans-Georg Gadamer, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/gadamer/. Accessed 29 July 2023.
  116. Mead, G. H. (1922), ‘A behavioristic account of the significant symbol’, The Journal of Philosophy, 19:6, pp. 157–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Mead, H. G. (1934), Mind, Self and Society, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Mead, H. G. (1936), Movement of Thought in the Nineteenth Century, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Meindl, P. and Zahavi, D. a. Z. D. (2023), ‘From communication to communalisation: A Husserlian account’, Continental Philosophy Review, pp. 361–77, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-023-09601-7.
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964a), Signs (trans. R. C. McCleary), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964b). The Primacy of Perception (trans. J. M. Edie), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968), The Visible and the Invisible (trans. A. Lingis), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.153
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1970), In Praise of Philosophy and Other Essays (trans. W. Johyn and E. J. James), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973), The Prose of the World (trans. J. O'Neil), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2002), The Phenomenology of Perception (trans. C. Smith), London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Moran, D. (2013), ‘“There is no brute world, only an elaborated world”: Merleau-Ponty on the interesubjecctive constitiuton of the world’, South African Journal of Philosophy, 32:4, pp. 355–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Mordechai, G. (2011), ‘Listening as embracing the other: Martin Buber's philosophy of dialogue’, Educational Theory, 61:2, pp. 207–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Murray, A. (2010), Agamben, Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Nancy, J.-L. (1991), The Inoperative Community (trans. P. Connor, L. Garbus, M. Holland, and S. Sawhney), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Nancy, J.-L. (1993), The Birth to Presence (trans. B. Holmes and others), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Nancy, J.-L. (2000), Being Singular Plural (trans. R. D. Richardson and A. E. O'Byrne), Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Nietzsche, F. (1989), ‘On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense’, in Nietzsche on Rhetoric and Language (trans. S. L. Gilman, C. Blair and D. J. Parent), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 246–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Noys, B. (1997), ‘Communicative unreason: Bataille and Habermas’, Theory, Culture & Society, 14:1, pp. 59–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Noys, B. (2000), Bataille: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Olivier, B. (2009), Philosophy and Communication: Collected Essays, Lausanne: Peter Lang Group AG.
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Peters, D. J. (2001), Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Pfuetze, P. (1961), Self, Society, Existence, Greenwood Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Pieper, J. (2010), Tradition: Concept and Claim, South Bend: St. Augustine's Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Pinchevski, A. (2005), By Way of Interruption: Levinas and the Ethics of Communication, Pittsburgh: Duquensne University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Rasor, P. (2000), ‘Intersubjective communication and the self in Wieman and Habermas’, American Journal of Theology & Philosophy, 21:3, pp. 269–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Reinach, A. (2012), The Apriori Foundation of the Civil Law (ed. J. F. Cosby), Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Ricoeur, P. (1967), Husserl: An Analysis of His Phenomenology (trans. E. G. Ballard and L. E. Embree), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Risser, J. (2016), ‘Locating shared life in the “thou”’, in T. Szanto and D. Moran (eds), The Phenomenology of Sociality, London: Routledge, pp. 29–41.154
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Risser, J. (2019), ‘Hearing the other: Communication as shared life’, Journal of Applied Hermeneutics, Article 8, pp. 1–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  145. Roffe, J. (2004), ‘Ethics’, in J. Reynolds and J. Roffe (eds), Understanding Derrida, London: Continuum, pp. 37–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  146. Ross, M. (2013), An Alternative Path: The Intellectual Legacy of James Carey, Columbia: University of South Carolina.
     [Google Scholar]
  147. Sanders, M. (2008), ‘Intersubjectivity and alterity’, in R. Diprose and J. Reynolds (eds), Merleau-Ponty Key Concepts, London: Routledge, pp. 142–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  148. Scherto, G. (2015), ‘Holding oneself open in a conversation: Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics and the ethics of dialogue’, Journal of Dialogue Studies, 3:1, pp. 9–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Schutz, A. (1950), ‘Language, language disturbances, and the texture of consciousness’, Social Research, 17:3, pp. 365–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Schutz, A. (1962), Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Schutz, A. (1967), The Phenomenology of the Social World (trans. G. Walsh), Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Schutz, A. (1970), Collected Papers III Studies in Phenomenolgical Philosophy, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Schutz, A. (1976), Collected Papers II Studies in Social Theory, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1974), The Structures of the Lifeworld Vol. 1 (trans. R. M. Zaner and H. T. Engelhardt, Jr), London: Heinemann.
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Schutz, A. and Luckmann, T. (1989), The Structures of the Lifeworld Vol. 11 (trans. R. M. Zaner and D.J. Parent), London: Heinemann.
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Scruton, R. (2017), Conservatism: Ideas in Profile, London: Profile Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Sella, Z. K. (2007), ‘The journey of ritual communication’, Studies in Communication Sciences, pp. 103–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Smith, T. (1931), ‘The social philosophy of George Herbert Mead’, American Journal of Sociology, 37:3, pp. 368–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Sokolowski, R. (2002), ‘Semiotics in Husserl's logcal investigations’, in D. Zahavi and F. Stjernfelt (eds), One Hundred Years of Phenomenology, Amsterdam: Kleweeer Academic Publishers, pp. 171–83.
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Stalmaszczyk, P. and Oleksy, W. (2014), ‘Philosophical and communicative turns in the study of language,’ in W. Szubko-Sitarek, L. Salski, and P. Stalmaszczyk (eds), Language Learning, Discourse and Communication, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 229–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Starwaska, B. (2009), Between You and I: Dialogical Phenomenology, Ohio University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  162. Subtil, F. (2014), ‘James W Carey's cultural approach of communication’, Intercom – Revista Brasileira de Ciencias da Comunicaçăo, 37:1, pp. 19–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  163. Taylor, C. (1991), The Ethics of Authenticity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Tejera, V. (1988), Semiotics from Peirce to Barthes, Koln: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  165. ten Bos, R. (2005), ‘Giorgio Agamben and the community without identity’, Sociological Review, 53:1, p. 16–29155
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Tönnies, F. (2001), Community and Civil Society (trans. M. Hollis), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Tremblay, T. (2016), ‘Whatever singluarity, negative community and literature (perhaps)’, Countertext, 2:1, pp. 44–54.
     [Google Scholar]
  168. Trujillo, J. (2018), ‘Intersubjectivity and the sociology of Alfred Schutz’, Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique, 14:7, pp. 1–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Vejera, V. (1986), ‘Community, communication, and meaning: Theories of Buchler and Habermas’, Symbolic Interaction, 9:1, pp. 83–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  170. Vološinov, V. (1986), Marxism and the Philosophy of Language (trans. L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  171. Watkin, W. (2014), Agamben and Indifference, London: Rowman and Littlefield International Ltd.
     [Google Scholar]
  172. Womack, P. (2011), Dialogue, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  173. Ying Kwok, L. (2004), ‘Intersubjectivity and phenomenology of the other: 135’, in Space Time and Culture (eds David Carr and Cheung Chan-Fai), Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 135–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  174. Young, I. M. (1990), Justice and the Politics of Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  175. Young, R. (1989), ‘Not revolutionary: But communicating’, Oxford Literary Review, pp. 213–25, https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/abs/10.3366/olr.1989.010?role=tab. Accessed 4 February 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  176. Zahavi, D. (2001), ‘Beyond empathy: Phenomenological approaches to intersubjectivity’, in Between Ourselves: Second-Person Issues in the Study of Consciousness, pp. 151–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  177. Zaner, R. (1961), ‘Theory of intersubjectivity: Alfred Schutz’, Social Research, 28:1, pp. 71–93.157
     [Google Scholar]

  • From This Site

    /content/books/9781835951637.bm01
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
/content/books/9781835951637.bm01
dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
-contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
10
5
Chapter
content/books/9781835951637
Book
false
en
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test