World building: Creating alternate worlds as meaningful making in undergraduate education | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education
  4. Volume 20, Issue 1
  5. Article
The Decolonization of Arts Education
  • ISSN: 1474-273X
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0896

Abstract

In this article, we offer a description of and reflection on our 2019 ‘creating alternate worlds’ course as a model for critical making in twenty-first-century higher education. Open to arts and humanities undergraduate students interested in creative research, our course used world building as a central approach to imagining alternatives. We found that explicitly centring Black and Indigenous perspectives helped support non-dominant students in their striving to realize possibilities beyond settler colonial visions of the future. We share our position in relation to decolonization and decolonizing pedagogies before describing the course at a high level and through an in-depth case study of an author’s research project. Our analysis of the course is presented via three axiological allegiances and three performative pragmatics. By discussing our political stance and a conceptual innovation that we term, ‘transcosmic potentials’, we conclude with insights for fellow educators. This pluriversal learning community opened a multiplicity of ‘portals’ to heterogeneous worlds, each with the power to fundamentally and forever alter all who pass through.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00028_1
2021-04-01
2023-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acuff, Joni Boyd. ( 2020;), ‘ Afrofuturism: Reimagining art curricula for Black existence. ’, Art Education, 73:3, pp. 13–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bang, Megan,, Warren, Beth,, Rosebery, Ann S., and Douglas, Medin. ( 2012;), ‘ Desettling expectations in science education. ’, Human Development, 55:5&6, pp. 302–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Forlano, Laura, and Smith, Stephanie. ( 2018;), ‘ Critique as collaboration in design anthropology. ’, Journal of Business Anthropology, 7:2, pp. 279–300.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Fregoso, Rosa-Linda. ( 2014;), ‘ For a pluriversal declaration of human rights. ’, American Quarterly, 66:3, pp. 583–608, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43823420. Accessed 12 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Giaccardi, Elisa,, Cila, Nazli,, Speed, Chris, and Caldwell, Melissa. ( 2016;), ‘ Thing ethnography: Doing design research with non-humans. ’, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Brisbane, Australia, 4 June, New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 377–87.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Kett, Robert. J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Respecting our relations: Dori Tunstall on decolonizing design. ’, Medium, 6 February, https://medium.com/@JacobsDesignCal/respecting-our-relations-dori-tunstall-on-decolonizing-design-d894df4c2ed2. Accessed 10 October 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. ( 2013), Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, London:: Zed Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Tuck, Eve,, and Yang, K. Wayne. ( 2012;), ‘ Decolonization is not a metaphor. ’, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1:1, pp. 1–40, https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/18630. Accessed 14 November 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Tunstall, Elizabeth Dori. ( 2013;), ‘ Decolonizing design innovation: Design anthropology, critical anthropology, and indigenous knowledge. ’, in W. Gunn,, T. Otto, and R. C. Smith. (eds), Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, London:: A & C Black;, pp. 232–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. VanderMeer, Jeff. ( 2013), Wonderbook: The Illustrated Guide to Creating Imaginative Fiction, New York:: Abrams Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Mengist, Nathanael Elias,, Sidibe, Mariama,, Biggs, Heidi,, Fox, Tyler,, Thurtle, Phillip, and Desjardins, Audrey. ( 2021;), ‘ World building: Creating alternate worlds as meaningful making in undergraduate education. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 20:1, pp. 29–47, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00028_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00028_1
Loading
World building: Creating alternate worlds as meaningful making in undergraduate education
Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 20, 29 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00028_1
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00028_1
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00028_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): critical making; futurisms; learning environments; settler colonialism; undergraduate research; world building

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error