Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education
  4. Volume 22, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1474-273X
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0896
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This article discusses research from the Design Experimentation and Exploration (DEE) course in the higher education context. The DEE course was designed to support MA design students’ understanding of their creativity in an explorative course. The data were drawn from the students’ weekly and final reflections, as well as from the notes by one of the researchers. We were interested in how material-led processes developed through repeated material explorations and experimentation during the DEE course. We found that, in this context, the material process was related to identity building, overcoming challenges in idea development, and conceptual inquiry. The results highlight how materials and making can intertwine with personal goals. They thus provide an example for educators in other contexts to support students in bravely following uncertain processes, letting go, and experimenting freely.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Academy of Finland (Award 331778, 331763 and 266125)
© The Author(s). Published by Intellect Ltd
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC-BY), which allows users to copy, distribute and transmit an article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00061_1
2023-07-06
2025-03-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/adche/22/1/adche.22.1.33_Laamanen.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00061_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Adams, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Art and design as agent for change. ’, iJADE, 37:4, pp. 558–59, https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12215.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aktaş, B., and Mäkelä, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Negotiating between the maker and material: Observations on material interaction in felting studio. ’, International Journal of Design, 13:2, pp. 55–67, http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/3267/857. Accessed 14 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Beltzer, A.. ( 2004;), ‘ “It’s not like normal school”: The role of prior learning contexts in adult learning. ’, Adult Education Quarterly, 55:1, pp. 41–59, https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713604268893.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bolt, B.. ( 2007;), ‘ Material thinking and the agency of matter. ’, Studies in Material Thinking, 1:1, pp. 1–4.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolt, B.. ( 2013;), ‘ Introduction. ’, in E. Barrett, and B. Bolt. (eds), Carnal Knowledge: Towards a ‘New Materialism’ through the Arts, London:: I. B. Tauris;, pp. 1–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Carabine, J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Creativity, art and learning: A psycho-social exploration of uncertainty. ’, iJADE, 32:1, pp. 33–43, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2013.01745.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Ceschin, F., and Gaziulusoy, I.. ( 2016;), ‘ Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. ’, Design Studies, 47, pp. 118–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Cross, N.. ( 2006), Designerly Ways of Knowing, London:: Birkhäuser;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Danvers, J.. ( 2003;), ‘ Towards a radical pedagogy: Provisional notes on learning and teaching in art & design. ’, International Journal of Art and Design Education, 22:1, pp. 47–57, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00338.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Darke, J.. ( 1979;), ‘ The primary generator and the design process. ’, Design Studies, 1:1, pp. 36–44, https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90027-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Dorst, K., and Cross, N.. ( 2001;), ‘ Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. ’, Design Studies, 22:5, pp. 425–37, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fenwick, T.,, Nerland, M., and Jensen, K.. ( 2012;), ‘ Sociomaterial approaches learning and practice. ’, Journal of Education and Work, 25:1, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2012.644901.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Garner, S., and Evans, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ Fostering motivation in undergraduate design education. ’, in M. Tovey. (ed.), Design Pedagogy: Developments in Art and Design Education, London:: Routledge;, pp. 69–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Goldschmidt, G., and Sever, A. L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Inspiring design ideas with texts. ’, Design Studies, 32:2, pp. 139–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.006.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Groth, C.. ( 2017;), ‘ Making sense through hands: Design and craft practice analysed as embodied cognition. ’, Ph.D. dissertation, Espoo:: Aalto University, https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/24839. Accessed 14 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Heylighen, A., and Neuckermans, H.. ( 2002;), ‘ Are architects natural case-based designers? Experts speaking. ’, Design Journal, 5:2, pp. 8–22, https://doi.org/10.2752/146069202790718521.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hsieh, H. F., and Shannon, S. E.. ( 2005;), ‘ Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. ’, Qualitative Health Research, 15, pp. 1277–88, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ingold, T.. ( 2013), Making, Anthropology, Archeology, Art & Architecture, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Jacucci, G., and Wagner, I.. ( 2007;), ‘ Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity. ’, in Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, New York:, 13–25 June, New York:: ACM;, pp. 73–82, https://doi.org/10.1145/1254960.1254971.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Jonson, B.. ( 2005;), ‘ Design ideation: The conceptual sketch in the digital age. ’, Design Studies, 26:6, pp. 613–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.03.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Joy, F.. ( 2018;), ‘ Sámi shamanism, cosmology and art as systems of embedded knowledge. ’, Ph.D. dissertation, Rovaniemi:: University of Lapland.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Keller, A. I.,, Pasman, G. J., and Stappers, P. J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Collections designers keep: Collecting visual material for inspiration and reference. ’, Codesign, 2:1, pp. 17–33, https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880600571123.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kontturi, K.-K.. ( 2018), Ways of Following: Art, Materiality, Collaboration, London:: Open Humanities Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kosonen, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Finding one’s own way in design: Reflections on narrative professional identity. ’, Ph.D. dissertation, Espoo:: Aalto University, https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/31487. Accessed 11 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kosonen, K., and Mäkelä, M.. ( 2012;), ‘ Designing platform for exploring and reflecting on creative process. ’, Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, pp. 227–338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.559.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Krippendorff, K.. ( 2012), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Laamanen, T.-K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Generating and transforming representation in design ideation. ’, Ph.D. dissertation, Helsinki:: University of Helsinki, https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/fi/publications/generating-and-transforming-representations-in-design-ideation. Accessed 14 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Laamanen, T.-K., and Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P.. ( 2014;), ‘ Interview study of professional designers’ ideation approaches. ’, Design Journal, 17:2, pp. 194–217, https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X13915240575988.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Mace, M.-A., and Ward, T.. ( 2002;), ‘ Modelling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. ’, Creativity Research Journal, 14:2, pp. 179–92, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_5.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Mäkelä, M., and Aktaş, B.. ( 2022;), ‘ In dialogue with the environment: The environment, creativity, materials and making. ’, Craft Research, 13:1, pp. 9–34, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00064_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Mäkelä, M., and Löytönen, T.. ( 2017;), ‘ Rethinking materialities in higher education. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16:2, pp. 241–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Malafouris, L.. ( 2008;), ‘ At the potter’s wheel: An argument for material agency. ’, in C. Knappett, and L. Malafouris. (eds), Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, New York:: Springer;, pp. 19–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Malpass, M.. ( 2017), Critical Design in Context: History, Theory and Practices, London:: Bloomsbury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Pekrun, R.. ( 2014), Emotions and Learning, Educational Practices Series 24, Geneva:: International Bureau of Learning;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Petre, M.,, Sharp, H., and Johnson, J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Complexity through combination: An account of knitwear design. ’, Design Studies, 27:2, pp. 183–222, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.07.003.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Ramduny-Ellis, D.,, Dix, A.,, Evans, M.,, Hare, J., and Gill, S.. ( 2010;), ‘ Physicality in design: An exploration. ’, Design Journal, 13:1, pp. 48–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Schön, D.. ( 1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York:: Basic Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Schön, D., and Wiggins, G.. ( 1992;), ‘ Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. ’, Design Studies, 13:2, pp. 135–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-F.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. St. Pierre, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Design and nature: A history. ’, in K. Fletcher,, L. St. Pierre, and M. Tham. (eds), Design & Nature: A Partnership, London:: Routledge;, pp. 92–108.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Tangaart, L.. ( 2012;), ‘ The sociomateriality of creativity in everyday life. ’, Culture & Psychology, 19:1, pp. 20–32, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X12464987.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Toh, C. A.. ( 2014), Creativity in Engineering Design: Understanding the Factors That Influence Creative Idea Development, Philadelphia, PA:: Pennsylvania State University;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Watts, L. L.,, Medeiros, K. J.,, Steele, L. M., and Mumford, M. D.. ( 2019;), ‘ Minding the gap between generation and implementation: Effects of idea source, goals, and climate on selecting and refining creative ideas. ’, Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13:1, pp. 2–14, https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000157.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Welch, D., and Loy, J.. ( 2013;), ‘ A brave new creativity. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 12:1, pp. 91–102, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.12.1.91_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Yin, R.. ( 2014), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, , 5th ed.., London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Yin, R.. ( 2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, , 3rd ed.., London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Laamanen, Tarja-Kaarina,, Mäkelä, Maarit, and Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Pirita. ( 2023;), ‘ Material-led creative processes in the context of design education. ’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 22:1, pp. 33–54, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00061_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00061_1
Loading
Material-led creative processes in the context of design education
Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 22, 33 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00061_1
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00061_1
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00061_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): design exploration; design practices; experimenting; key idea; learning by doing; making

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test