Thinking through making: What kinds of learning take place when HE students engage with creative arts technicians?

References

1. Backemeyer, S. (2000), Making Their Mark: Art, Craft and Design at the Central School 1896–1966, London: Herbert Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombs, J. and Daniels, L. (1999), ‘Conceptualising critical thinking’, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31:3, pp. 285–302.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Blythman, B., Parker, B. and Tiffin, S. (2008), ‘“Forget the academic staff!”: The contribution to creative learning in practice of technical staff and equipment’, Enhancing Curricula: Using Research and Enquiry to Inform Student Learning in the Disciplines Conference, Lycée Francais, New York, 3–4 April, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241824242_Forget_the_academic_staff_The_contribution_to_creative_learning_in_practice_of_technical_staff_and_equipment. Accessed 24 January 2014.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bolt, B. (2006), ‘Materializing pedagogies’, working papers in Art and Design 4, University of Melbourne, https://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/12381/WPIAAD_vol4_bolt.pdf. Accessed 23 January 2023.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Boud, D., Keogh, M. and Walker, D. (1985), Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, London: Kogan Page.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bourdieu, P. (1993), Sociology in Question, London: Sage Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Braddock, D. (1995), ‘What is a technician?’, Occupational Outlook Quarterly, 39:1, p. 38.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brannick, T. and Coghlan, D. (2007), ‘In defensive of being “native”: The case for insider academic research’, Organizational Research Methods, 10:1, pp. 59–74, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106289253.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brockbank, A. and McGill, I. (2007), Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brookfield, S. (1987), Developing Critical Thinking: Challenging Adults to Explore Alternative Ways of Thinking and Acting, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brookfield, S. (1992), ‘Uncovering assumptions: The key to reflective practice’, Adult Learning, 3:4, https://doi.org/10.1177/104515959200300405.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Buckley, B. and Conomos, J. (2009), Rethinking the Contemporary Art School: The Artist, the PhD, and the Academy, Halifax: The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bulley, J. and Özden, S. (2021), Practice Research, London: Practice Research Advisory Group UK, https://doi.org/10.23636/1347. Accessed 4 February 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bulman, C., Lathlean, J. and Gobbi, M. (2013), ‘The process of teaching and learning about reflection: Research insights from professional nurse education’, Studies in Higher Education, 39:7, pp. 1219–36, https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.777413.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chapman, L. (1978), Approaches to Art in Education, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Clarke, A. and Bautisca, D. (2017), ‘Critical reflection and arts-based action research for the educator self’, Canadian Journal of Action Research, 18:1, pp. 52–70.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cole, A. L. and Knowles, J. G. (2008), Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452226545.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Dewey, J. (1934), Art as Experience, New York: Perigee.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Dobson, I. (2000), ‘Them and us: General and non-general staff in higher education’, Journal of Higher Education Policy Management, 22:2, pp. 203–10.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Duley, J. (1981), ‘Field experience education’, in A. W. Chickering (ed.), The Modern American College, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Ellis, C., Adams, T. and Bochner, E. (2011), ‘Autoethnography: An overview’, Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12:1, https://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3096. Accessed 17 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Facione, P. and Giancarlo, C. (2001), ‘A look across four years at the disposition toward critical thinking among undergraduate students’, The Journal of General Education, 50:1, pp. 29–55, https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2001.0004.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Fitzgerald, K. (1990), ‘Encouraging risk taking, sanctioning failures are helping spur creativity’, IEEE Spectrum, 27:10, pp. 67–69, https://doi.org/10.1109/6.58480.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Foucault, M. (1985), The Problematization of Parrhesia, Evanston, IL: Nothwestern University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gibbs, G. (2012), ‘Implications of “dimensions of quality” in a market environment’, Higher Education Academy, 1 November, https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/implications-dimensions-quality-market-environment. Accessed 4 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gibson, G. (2019), ‘Material matters with Grant Gibson’, 22 January, https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/material-matters-with-grant-gibson/id1450375359. Accessed 15 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Gordon, R. (2013), ‘Material significance in contemporary art’, International Journal for Technical Art History, Art Matters, 5, pp. 1–10, https://www.academia.edu/45094133/Material_significance_in_contemporary_art. Accessed 11 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Gray, C. and Burnett, G. (2009), ‘Making sense: An exploration of ways of knowing generated through practice and reflection in craft’, in L. K. Kaukinen (ed.), Proceedings of the Crafticulation and Education Conference, Helsinki, Finland, 23–27 September 2008, Helsinki: NordFo, pp. 44–51.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Grix, J. (2002), ‘Introducing students to the generic terminology of social research’, Politics, 22:3, pp. 175–86.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Hamilton, M. L., Smith, L. and Worthington, K. (2008), ‘Fitting the methodology with the research: An exploration of narrative, self-study and auto-ethnography’, Studying Teacher Education, 4:1, pp. 17–28.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Heidegger, M. (1962), Being and Time, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Hellawell, D. (2006), ‘Inside-out: Analysis of the insider-outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research’, Teaching in Higher Education, 11:4, pp. 483–94, https://doi.org/10.108013562510600874292.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2016), Report on Research and Data Analysis on Academic Teaching Qualifications, London: Higher Education Funding Council for England, http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/year/2016/tquals/. Accessed 4 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Hockey, J. (1993), ‘Research methods: Researching peers and familiar settings, Research Papers in Education, 8:2, pp. 199–225, https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152930080205.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Honderich, T. (1995), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
36. hooks, b. (2010), Teaching Critical Thinking: Practical Wisdom, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hope, S. (2016), ‘Bursting paradigms: A colour wheel of practice-research’, Cultural Trends, 25:2, pp. 74–86, https://doi.org/10/1080/09548963.2016.1171511.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Ingold, T. (2013), Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kehoe, D. (2007), Practice Makes Perfect: The Importance of Practical Learning, London: The Social Market Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Koster, B. and Van den Berg, B. (2014), ‘Increasing professional understanding: Self study research by teachers with the help of biography, core reflection and dialogue’, Studying Teacher Education, 10:1, pp. 86–100, https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2013.866083.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lampert, N. (2006), ‘Critical thinking dispositions as an outcome of art education’, Studies in Art Education, 47:3, pp. 215–28, https://www.jstor.org/stable/25475782. Accessed 4 March 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
42. LeCompte, M. D. and Schensul, J. J. (eds) (2010), Designing and Conducting Ethnographic Research: An Introduction, Ethnographer’s Toolkit, 2nd ed., Plymouth: AltaMira Press, p. 6.
43. McKenna, S. E. (1999), ‘Theory and practice: Revisiting critical pedagogy in studio art education’, Art Journal, 58:1, pp. 74–79.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Mercer, J. (2007), ‘The challenges of insider research in educational instituations: Wielding a double-edged sword and resolving delicate dilemmas’, Oxford Review of Education, 33:1, pp. 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980601094651.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962), Phenomenology of Perception, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Mezirow, J. and Associates (1990), Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Base Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Miller, J. (2011), ‘RSA Design & Society: What’s wrong with DT?’, RSA Projects, pp. 1–21, https://www.thersa.org/globalassets/pdfs/blogs/rsa_whats-wrong-with-dt.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mittler, G. A. (1986), ‘Toward a more complete introduction to art in the high school’, Art Education, 39:6, pp. 10–13.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Mohamed, M., Rashid, R. A. and Alqaryouti, M. H. (2022), ‘Conceptualizing the complexity of reflective practice in education’, Frontiers in Psychology, 13, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1008234.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Nimkulrat, N. (2009), ‘Paperness: Expressive material in textile art from an artist’s viewpoint’, Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Nimkulrat, N. (2010), ‘Material inspiration: From practice-led research to craft art education’, Craft Research, 1:1, pp. 63–84, https://dx.doi.org/10.1386/crre.1.63_1.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Olalere, F. E. (2018), ‘Integrating theory and practice: A critical pedagogy in art education’, International Journal of Humanities Education, 16:3, pp. 1–8, http://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0063/CGP/v16i03/1-8.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Orr, S. and Shreeve, A. (2018), Art and Design Pedagogy in Higher Education: Knowledge, Values and Ambiguity in the Creative Curriculum, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Panofsky, E. (1968), Idea: A Concept in Art Theory (trans. J. J. S. Peake), Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Pratt, J. (1997), The Polytechnic Experiment 1965–1992, Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Savage, T. (2018), ‘Creative arts technicians in academia: To transition or not to transition?’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 17:2, pp. 237–53, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.17.2.237_1.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Savage, T. (2019), ‘Challenging HEA Fellowship: Why should technicians in creative arts HE be drawn into teaching?’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 18:2, pp. 201–18, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00007_1.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Schön, D. A. (1983), The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Schön, D. (1984), ‘The Architectural Studio as an exemplar of education for reflection-in-action’, Journal of Architectural Education, 38:1, pp. 2–9.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Schön, D. (1987), Educating the Reflective Practitioner, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Sennett, R. (2008), The Craftsman, London: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Shockley, K. G., Bond, H. and Rollins, J. (2008), ‘Singing in my own voice: Teachers’ journey toward self-knowledge’, Journal of Transformative Education, 6:3, pp. 182–200, https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344608324017.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Smyth, W. J. (1992), ‘Teachers’ work and the politics of reflection’, American Educational Research Journal, 29:2, pp. 267–300.
    [Google Scholar]
65. TALENT (2022), The Role of Technicians in Knowledge Exchange: An Explorative Study, MI Talent, https://www.mitalent.ac.uk/write/MediaUploads/PDF/TALENTTechniciansandKnowledgeExchange_web.pdf. Accessed 23 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Tollifson, J. (1988), ‘A balanced comprehensive art curriculum makes sense’, Educational Leadership, 45:40, pp. 18–22.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Tomhave, R. D. (1999), ‘Portfolio assessment in the visual arts: A comparison of advanced secondary art education strategies’, Ph.D. thesis, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, https://www.proquest.com/openview/6cd21589bfbe0e42f42bfa9221559fb4/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y. Accessed 17 June 2024.
68. Trowler, P. (2011), ‘Researching your own institution: Higher education’, April, British Educational Research Association, http://www.bera.ac.uk/resources/researching-your-own-institution-higher-education. Accessed 13 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Whitchurch, C. (2008), ‘Shifting identities and blurring boundaries: The emergence of third space professionals in UK higher education’, Higher Education Quarterly, 62:4, pp. 377–96.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Wragg, F. P. H., Harris, C., Noyes, A. and Vere, K. (2023), ‘Technicians as teachers: The emerging role of technical staff within higher education teaching and learning environments’, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47:9, pp. 1196–210, https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2023.2231380.
    [Google Scholar]