Skip to content
1981
Volume 25, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1474-273X
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0896

Abstract

This article presents an extensive exploration of design education in Africa, with a focus on Ghana, employing storied-ethnography to critically contrast it with conventional western methodologies. It draws upon the narratives of prominent Ghanaian design educators – Sela, Isaac and Patrique – whose experiences and insights emphasize the need to integrate cultural, historical and social realities into the design curriculum. This study uncovers a significant divergence from western educational paradigms, which often prioritize technical proficiency and a universal design approach, potentially neglecting the rich cultural specificities integral to the African context. The research highlights the necessity for a design education system in Africa, particularly in Ghana, that balances technical skill with a deep-rooted connection to local culture and social nuances. It advocates for a model that honours and preserves African cultural heritage while preparing students to make impactful contributions in both local and global design spheres. The findings shed light on the complex nature of design education in Africa, calling for a decolonized, inclusive and culturally sensitive educational model, with profound implications for policy-makers and educators across the continent. Relevance to design practice: This research offers practical insights and strategies for integrating Indigenous knowledge and contemporary methodologies, shaping a more culturally nuanced and globally relevant design practice.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00097_1
2025-01-22
2026-04-10

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdulla, D., Ansari, A., Canli, E., Keshavarz, M., Kiem, M., Oliveira, P., Prado, L. and Schultz, T. (2019), ‘A manifesto for decolonising design’, Journal of Futures Studies, 23:3, pp. 12932, https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0012.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Acheampong, R. A. (2021), Accra: City Scoping Study, Manchester: African Cities Research Consortium.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Adjei, P. B. (2007), ‘Decolonising knowledge production: The pedagogic relevance of Gandhian Satyagraha to schooling and education in Ghana’, Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 30:4, pp. 104667, https://doi.org/10.2307/20466678.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alviar-Martin, T. and Baildon, M. C. (2022), ‘Global citizenship education in Asia: Moving towards decolonization’, in W. O. Lee, P. Brown, A. L. Goodwin and A. Green (eds), International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific, New York: Springer Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_144-1.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ashcroft, B., Griffiths, G. and Tiffin, H. (1995), The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402627.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bangay, C. and Blum, N. (2010), ‘Education responses to climate change and quality: Two parts of the same agenda?’, International Journal of Educational Development, 30:4, pp. 35968, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.11.011.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Benier, K., Wickes, R. and Moran, C. (2020), ‘“African gangs” in Australia: Perceptions of race and crime in urban neighbourhoods’, Journal of Criminology, 54:2, pp. 22038, https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820965647.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bennett, A., Cassim, F. and Van der Merwe, M. (2017), ‘How design education can use generative play to innovate for social change: A case study on the design of South African children’s health education toolkits’, International Journal of Design, 11, pp. 5772, https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12433.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhabha, H. K. (2012), The Location of Culture, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boateng, K. K. and Afranie, S. (2020), ‘Chieftaincy: An anachronistic institution within a democratic dispensation? The case of a traditional political system in Ghana’, Ghana Journal of Development Studies, 17:1, pp. 2547, http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/gjds.v17i1.2.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cavarero, A. (2014), Relating Narratives: Storytelling and Selfhood, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315824574.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chilisa, B. (2012), Indigenous Research Methodologies, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Costanza-Chock, S. (2020), Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Denzin, N. K. (2017), Qualitative Inquiry under Fire: Toward a New Paradigm Dialogue, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315421292.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. DeVault, M. L. and Gross, G. (2011), ‘Feminist qualitative interviewing: Experience, talk, and knowledge’, in S. N. Hesse-Biber (ed.), Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 20636, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384740.n11.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, C. and Bochner, A. (2000), ‘Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 73368.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Escobar, A. (2018), Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822371816.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fullan, M. (2007), Leading in a Culture of Change, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gyekye, K. (1997), Tradition and Modernity: Philosophical Reflections on the African Experience, Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112252.001.0001.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Harrison, A. and Hutton, L. (2013), Design for the Changing Educational Landscape: Space, Place and the Future of Learning, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hollins, E. R. (2015), Culture in School Learning: Revealing the Deep Meaning, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Irani, L., Vertesi, J., Dourish, P., Philip, K. and Grinter, R. E. (2010), ‘Postcolonial computing: A lens on design and development’, Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, 10–15 April, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 131120, https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753522.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kovach, M. (2010), ‘Conversation method in Indigenous research’, First Peoples Child & Family Review, 5:1, pp. 4048.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Labadi, S., Giliberto, F., Rosetti, I., Shetabi, L. and Yildirim, E. (2021), Heritage and the Sustainable Development Goals: Policy Guidance for Heritage and Development Actors, Paris: International Council on Monuments and Sites.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LaPin, D. A. (1977), Story, Medium and Masque: The Idea and Art of Yoruba Storytelling, Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Laurillard, D. (2013), Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lazem, S., Giglitto, D., Nkwo, M. S., Mthoko, H., Upani, J. and Peters, A. (2022), ‘Challenges and paradoxes in decolonising HCI: A critical discussion’, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 31:2, pp. 15996, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-021-09398-0.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Martin, J., Moore, C. M., Foley, A. D. and McDermid, K. T. (2021), ‘Culturally conscious assessment as pedagogy in study abroad: A case study of the higher education in the Ghanaian context program’, Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 33:1, pp. 16886, https://doi.org/10.36366/frontiers.v33i1.508.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A. and Moy, P. (1999), ‘Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation’, Political Communication, 16:3, pp. 31536, https://doi.org/10.1080/105846099198659.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Metcalfe, B. D. and Woodhams, C. (2012), ‘Introduction: New directions in gender, diversity and organization theorizing–re-imagining feminist post-colonialism, transnationalism and geographies of power’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 14:2, pp. 12340, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00336.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Metz, T. (2011), ‘Ubuntu as a moral theory and human rights in South Africa’, African Human Rights Law Journal, 11:2, pp. 53259.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mubangizi, J. and Kaya, H. (2015), ‘African Indigenous knowledge systems and human rights: Implications for higher education, based on the South African experience’, International Journal of African Renaissance Studies: Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity, 10:2, pp. 12542, https://doi.org/10.1080/18186874.2015.1107985.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E. and Moules, N. J. (2017), ‘Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16:1, pp. 113, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Ofosu-Asare, Y. (2023), ‘Sankofa: Stories of a postcolonial space, African philosophy, decolonisation and practice in design education in Ghana’, Ph.D. thesis, Lismore: Southern Cross University.
  35. Patel, L. (2015), Decolonizing Educational Research: From Ownership to Answerability, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315658551.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A. and Gulliksen, J. (2015), ‘Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: Different concepts – one goal? On the concept of accessibility – historical, methodological and philosophical aspects’, Universal Access in the Information Society, 14:4, pp. 50526, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Smith, L. T. (2021), Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Smith, T., Avraamidou, L. and Adams, J. (2022), ‘Culturally relevant/responsive and sustaining pedagogies in science education: Theoretical perspectives and curriculum implications’, Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17:3, pp. 63760, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10082-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor, S. V. and Sobel, D. M. (2011), Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: Teaching Like Our Students’ Lives Matter, vol. 4, Leiden: Brill.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Thambinathan, V. and Kinsella, E. A. (2021), ‘Decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Creating spaces for transformative praxis’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, pp. 19, https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tunstall, E. D. (2020), ‘Decolonizing design innovation: Design anthropology, critical anthropology, and Indigenous knowledge’, in W. Gunn, T. Otto and R. C. Smith (eds), Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, London: Routledge, pp. 23250.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Wilde, D. (2020), ‘Design research education and global concerns’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6:2, pp. 170212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.05.003.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wilson, S. (2020), Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods, Black Point: Fernwood Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Winter-Simat, N., Wright, N. and Choi, J. H.-j. (2017), ‘Creating 21st century global citizens: A design-led systems approach to transformative secondary education for sustainability’, The Design Journal, 20:sup1, pp. S165161, https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352688.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00097_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00097_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test