Studio pedagogies: Cultivating research through artistic practice

References

1. American Library Association (2011), ‘ACRL visual literacy competency standards for higher education’, 11 October, https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/visualliteracy. Accessed 15 February 2024.
2. Association of College and Research Libraries (2015), ‘Framework for information literacy for higher education’, American Library Association, 2 February, https://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework. Accessed 15 February 2024.
3. Beene, Stephanie and Robinson, Shannon M. (2017), ‘When research does not start with a question: Teaching with the framework and visual literacy standards within art and architecture librarianship’, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 36:2, pp. 254–80, https://doi.org/10.1086/694243.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Blackmore, Margaret G. (2014), ‘Informing research: Art and design practitioner researchers engaging with information’, Ph.D. thesis, Kensington: University of New South Wales.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bonanni, Mimmo and Vogus, Brad (2022), ‘Embedded librarians in academic libraries: Impact, assessment, and sustainability’, Public Services Quarterly, 18:1, pp. 46–53, https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2021.2015050.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Borgdorff, Henk (2010), ‘Production of knowledge in artistic research’, in M. Biggs and H. Karlsson (eds), Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, London: Routledge, pp. 44–63.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Braun, Virginia and Clarke, Victoria (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brinkman, Stacy and Young, Sara (2010), ‘Information literacy through site-specific installation: The library project’, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 29:1, pp. 61–66.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Carter, Sarah, Koopmans, Heather and Whiteside, Alice (2018), ‘Crossing the studio art threshold: Information literacy and creative populations’, Communications in Information Literacy, 12:1, pp. 36–55.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cobbledick, Susie (1996), ‘The information-seeking behavior of artists: Exploratory interviews’, The Library Quarterly, 66:4, pp. 343–72.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Conway, Janice (2016), ‘Academic librarians’ perceptions of creative arts students as learners: A discourse of difference and difficulty’, Ph.D. thesis, Lancaster: Lancaster University, http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/83295/. Accessed 31 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cowan, Sandra (2004), ‘Informing visual poetry: Information needs and sources of artists’, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 23:2, pp. 14–20.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Elkins, James (2009), On Beyond Research and New Knowledge, Washington, DC: New Academia Publishing, pp. 111–33.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Fitch, Sebastien (2016), ‘Critiques, credits and credibility: Assessment practices in higher education studio art courses’, Ph.D. thesis, Montréal: Concordia University.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Frayling, Christopher (1993), ‘Research in art and design’, Royal College of Art Research Papers, Special Issue: ‘Research in Art and Design’, 1:1, pp. 1–5, http://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/384/. Accessed 31 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Garcia, Larissa and Labatte, Jessica (2015), ‘Threshold concepts as metaphors for the creative process: Adapting the framework for information literacy to studio art classes’, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 34:2, pp. 235–48.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Garcia, Larissa and Peterson, Ashley (2017), ‘Who invited the librarian? Studio critiques as a site of information literacy education’, Art Libraries Journal, 42:2, pp. 73–79.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gray, Carole and Malins, Julian (2004), Visualizing Research: A Guide to the Research Process in Art and Design, Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hemmig, William S. (2008), ‘The information-seeking behavior of visual artists: A literature review’, Journal of Documentation, 64:3, pp. 343–62.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Ingelevic, Vid (2007), ‘Research as art (as curriculum): L’art de la recherche (au programme d’étude)’, Canadian Review of Art Education: Research & Issues, 34:1, pp. 8–31.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Keogh, Kristina M. and Patton, Stephen A. (2016), ‘Embedded art librarianship: Project partnerships from concept to production’, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America 35:1, pp. 144–63.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Loveless, Natalie (2019), How to Make Art at the End of the World: A Manifesto for Research-Creation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
23. National Architectural Accrediting Board (2020), Conditions for Accreditation: 2020 Edition, Washington, DC: National Architectural Accrediting Board.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Newbury, Darren (1996), ‘Knowledge and research in art and design’, Design Studies, 17:2, pp. 215–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(95)00025-M.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Petraits, Ellen (2017), ‘Assessing the impact of library instruction on studio-based research: Developing a qualitative model’, Art Libraries Journal, 42:2, pp. 80–85.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Read, Herbert (1943), Education Through Art, London: Faber and Faber.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Salazar, Stacey M. (2014), ‘Educating artists: Theory and practice in college studio art’, Art Education, 67:5, pp. 32–39.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Salisbury, Mackenzie (2018), ‘Out of the stacks and into the studios: A creative approach to information literacy’, Art Libraries Journal, 43:4, pp. 169–74.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Salisbury, Mackenzie and Ferreira, Nick (2017), ‘Drifting through research: How the bibliodérive inspired new approaches to information literacy at Flaxman Library’, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 36:1, pp. 108–21, https://doi.org/10.1086/691375.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Sawyer, R. Keith (2018), ‘Teaching and learning how to create in schools of art and design’, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27:1, pp. 137–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381963.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Vis, Dirk and Cramer, Florian (2022), Research For People Who Think They Would Rather Create, Eindhoven: Onomatopee Projects.
    [Google Scholar]