Skip to content
1981
Exploring Situatedness in Partnership with ELIA, Part 1
  • ISSN: 1474-273X
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0896

Abstract

This article highlights the importance of employing artistic and sensory methods in placemaking design and participatory land research to engage diverse voices and experiences. The study is organized into two main sections: first, it explores the interconnections between placemaking, place attachment and tacit (ecological) knowledge; then, it proposes sensory methodologies capable of engaging, capturing and conveying the tacit knowledge of place. Expanding the framework of placemaking to include participatory approaches to land decision-making, the article presents a case study conducted in a rural landscape, specifically the Hungarian floodplains, illustrating the application of artistic and sensory methods in understanding and communicating complex human–environment relationships. While the primary objective of placemaking is to collaboratively design and transform public spaces, creating environments that reflect the community’s identity and foster a sense of belonging, the study highlights how the prevailing consultation methods often exclude specific publics from both participation and knowledge creation. Utilizing a key case study that investigates the tacit ecological knowledge of floodplain farmers along the central stretch of Tisza River in Hungary, the article demonstrates how participatory sensory and artistic methods can reveal insights beyond verbal communication, contributing to a multidimensional and integrated understanding of human–environment relationships.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00111_1
2025-05-14
2026-04-22

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Brigstocke, J. and Noorani, T. (2018), More-than-Human Participatory Research, Bristol: University of Bristol and AHRC Connected Communities Programme.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Cianciolo, A. T. and Sternberg, R. J. (2018), ‘Practical intelligence and tacit knowledge: An ecological view of expertise’, in K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt and A. M. Williams (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 770–92, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748.039.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Demeter, L., Molnár, P., Bede-Fazekas, A., Öllerer, K., Varga, A., Szabados, K., Tucakov, M., Kiš, A., Biró, M., Marinkov, J. and Molnar, Z. (2021), ‘Controlling invasive alien shrub species, enhancing biodiversity and mitigating flood risk: A win–win–win situation in grazed floodplain plantations’, Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113053, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113053.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Dúll, A. (2009), A környezetpszichológia alapkérdései: Helyek, tárgyak, viselkedés, Budapest: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ebrahim, Z. (2019), ‘Let’s get together’, Some Thoughts, https://some-thoughts.org/ebrahim.html. Accessed 19 April 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Gibson, J. J. (1979), The Ecological Approach to Visual Perceptions, Boston, MA: Houston Mifflin.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Henry, S. (2006), ‘Recognizing tacit knowledge in medical epistemology’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 27, pp. 187–213, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-006-9005-x.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Illés, Z. S. (2020), ‘Towards a new framework to sensory approach for diversity in land engagement’, M.Des. thesis, Glasgow: The Glasgow School of Art, https://2020.gsapostgradshowcase.net/2020/07/14/zsofia-illes/. Accessed 10 August 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kelkar, N. P. and Spinelli, G. (2016), ‘Building social capital through creative placemaking’, Strategic Design Research Journal, 9:2, pp. 54–66, https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/14013/1/FullText.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Pink, S. (2011), ‘What is sensory ethnography?’, Sage Research Methods, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995566.
  11. Pink, S. (2015), Doing Sensory Ethnography, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Polanyi, M. (1966), The Tacit Dimension, New York: Doubleday.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Smith, J. A. and Osborn, M. (2003), ‘Interpretative phenomenological analysis’, in J. A. Smith (ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 51–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bartha, M. and Illés, Z. S. (2024), Wild Water Country, Hungary: MADOK Film Programme of the Hungarian Ethnography Museum.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Tan, H. and Libby, R. (1997), ‘Tacit managerial versus technical knowledge as determinants of audit expertise in the field’, Journal of Accounting Research, 35:1, pp. 97–113, https://doi.org/10.2307/2491469.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. The Town Paper (n.d.), ‘What is a Charrette?’, https://www.tndtownpaper.com/what_is_charrette.htm. Accessed 10 April 2020.
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00111_1
Loading
Tacit knowledge of place: Sensory and artistic approaches for capturing and communicating tacit ecological knowledge
Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 24, 105 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00111_1
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00111_1
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00111_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): experiential expertise; flood-meadow farming; land research; local ecological knowledge; sensory ethnography; sensory methods; traditional ecological knowledge

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test