The designer as mediator in higher education: Expanding roles in social design and project facilitation

References

1. Amatullo, Mariana, Boyer, Bryan, May, Jennifer and Shea, Andrew (eds) (2022), Design for Social Innovation: Case Studies from Around the World, Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Armstrong, Leah, Bailey, Jocelyn, Julier, Guy and Kimbell, Lucy (2014), Social Design Futures: HEI Research and the AHRC, Brighton: University of Brighton, https://mappingsocialdesign.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/social-design-report.pdf. Accessed 3 October 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Berger, Estelle (2014), ‘La démarche design, entre projet et expérience’, Communication et organisation, 46:46, pp. 33–42, https://doi.org/10.4000/communicationorganisation.4714.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bookchin, Murray (1982), The Ecology of Freedom, Palo Alto, CA: Cheshire Books.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Catoir-Brisson, Marie-Julie and Royer, Marine (2017), ‘L’innovation sociale par le design en santé’, Sciences du design, 6:2, pp. 65–79, https://doi.org/10.3917/sdd.006.0065.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Catoir-Brisson, Marie-Julie and Watkin, Thomas (2021), ‘Quand le design social renouvelle les méthodes de recherche en sciences humaines et sociales: Retour réflexif sur deux recherches-projets en santé et habitat’, in E. Agbessi (ed.), Art et innovation sociale: Définitions citoyennes et territoriales, Paris: L’Harmattan, pp. 149–64, https://hal.science/hal-03224337v2/document. Accessed 18 September 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cheng, Hui H. and Chou, Wen H. (2019), ‘A curricular case study: Constructing the essential factors in “social design” teaching’, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 9:9, pp. 639–44, https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2019.9.9.1281.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Deni, Michela (2014), ‘Le design de services: Projeter le bien-être’, Communication et organisation, 46:46, pp. 129–42, https://doi.org/10.4000/communicationorganisation.4760.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Devecchi, Alice and Guerrini, Luca (2017), ‘Empathy and design: A new perspective’, The Design Journal, 20, suppl. 1, pp. S4357–64, https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352932.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fry, Tony (2008), Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics and New Practice, Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Giney, Delphine (2019), ‘De l’(in) acceptabilité à l’appropriation sociale et pratique d’un nouveau transport collectif en milieu urbain: Le transport aérien par cable: Mise en perspective internationale: France–Italie–Etats Unis-Colombie’, doctoral thesis, Paris: Université Paris Panthéon Sorbonne, https://theses.hal.science/tel-02464031/. Accessed 14 September 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Horani, Lara (2023), ‘Sustainable design concepts and their definitions: An inductive content-analysis-based literature review’, Technological Sustainability, 2:3, pp. 225–43, https://doi.org/10.1108/techs-10-2022-0041.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Le Bœuf, Jocelyne (2015), ‘Design et innovation sociale’, Sciences du design, 2:2, pp. 88–90, https://doi.org/10.3917/sdd.002.0088.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Manzini, Ezio (2015), Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation, Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Marchildon, Allison (2017), ‘Le pouvoir de déployer la compétence éthique’, Éthique publique: Revue internationale d’éthique sociétale et gouvernementale, 19:1, https://doi.org/10.4000/ethiquepublique.2920.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Margolin, Victor and Margolin, Sylvia (2002), ‘A “social model” of design: Issues of practice and research’, Design Issues, 18:4, pp. 24–30, https://doi.org/10.1162/074793602320827406.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Nguyen, Mimi and Mougenot, Céline (2022), ‘A systematic review of empirical studies on multidisciplinary design collaboration: Findings, methods, and challenges’, Design Studies, 81, pp. 101–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2022.101120.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Norman, Donald (1988), The Design of Everyday Things, New York: Doubleday.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Papanek, Victor (1973), Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change, New York: Bantam.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Picard, C. (2002), ‘Common language, different meaning: What meidators mean when they talk about their work,’ Negotiation Journal, 18:3, pp. 251–68, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00743.x.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Reunkrilerk, Dorian (2022), ‘La force du signal faible: Rôle des médias pour l’intégration du design au sein des organisations: Une contribution sémio-pragmatique de la médiation au design’, doctoral thesis, Paris: Institut polytechnique de Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Roy, Émeline, Tortochot, Éric and Moineau, Christophe (2023), ‘Situation didactique, situation opérationnelle de conception: Construction, apports et emprunts théoriques d’une didactique du design’, Travail et Apprentissages, 25:1, pp. 65–89, https://doi.org/10.3917/ta.025.0065.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Senge, Peter M. and Sterman, John D. (1992), ‘Systems thinking and organizational learning: Acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future’, European Journal of Operational Research, 59:1, pp. 137–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90011-w.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Tromp, Nynke and Hekkert, Paul (2019), Designing for Society, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Walker, Brian and Salt, David (2012), Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, Washington, DC: Island Press.
    [Google Scholar]