Skip to content
1981
Exploring Situatedness in Partnership with ELIA, Part 2
  • ISSN: 1474-273X
  • E-ISSN: 2040-0896

Abstract

Artists have always related to what happens around them, both on local and global levels. The professorship ‘Artistic Connective Practices’ at Fontys Academy of the Arts in Tilburg, the Netherlands, addresses the notion of ‘artistic connectivity’ as a lens towards artistic research in relation to society. One of the central approaches of the professorship is the form of artistic research residencies: artist-researchers engage in the context at hand, from a socially engaged perspective and work with what the people and contexts have to offer. We choose for a situated approach and consciously leave space for the residencies, their forms and purposes to emerge from the ground up. In this article, I share the notion of artistic connectivity and the approach of socially engaged artistic research residencies and explore how such approaches can contribute to situatedness as a conceptual framework for socially engaged artistic practice and research.

This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The CC BY licence permits commercial and noncommercial reuse. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00121_1
2025-10-21
2026-04-18

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/adche/24/2/adche.24.2.211_Hubner.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00121_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. artsACT (n.d.), ‘Artist-in-residence toolkit’, https://www.oskaloosaiowa.org/DocumentCenter/View/3259/Appendix-E-Artist-in-Residence-Toolkit-artsACT. Accessed 30 September 2024.
  2. Arts Fund (n.d.), ‘Social impact study’, https://www.artsfund.org/social-impact-study-2018/. Accessed 4 September 2024.
  3. Cilliers, Paul (2006), ‘On the importance of a certain slowness’, Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8:3, pp. 10512, https://doi.org/10.emerg/10.17357.bd3be2ec507c9e039579778f0452f0a1.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Flick, Uwe (2018), Designing Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Haigh, Martin (2017), ‘Connective practices in sustainability education’, Journal of Applied Technical and Educational Sciences, 7:4, pp. 630, http://doi.org/10.24368/jates.v7i4.16.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Haraway, Donna (1988), ‘Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14:3, p. 575, https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hübner, Falk (2022), In Good Company: Think We Must, Tilburg: Fontys Fine and Performing Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hübner, Falk and Hoon, Heleen de (2024), ‘Running as connective practice: A first step towards next steps?’, Research Catalogue, 2 November, https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/1387258/1387259. Accessed 13 September 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Madden, Raymond (2017), Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Massumi, Brian (2011), Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McKittrick, Katherine (2023), Dear Science and Other Stories, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Oosterling, Henk (2013), ‘Henk Oosterling speech’, YouTube, 27 November, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsTSasp8noE. Accessed 1 July 2025.
  14. Solnit, Rebecca (2016), Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities, Edinburgh: Canongate.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Stengers, Isabelle (2018), Another Science is Possible: A Manifesto for Slow Science, Cambridge: Polity.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tuin, Iris van der and Verhoeff, Nanna (2022), Critical Concepts for the Creative Humanities, London: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. van Dartel, Michel (2017), ‘Unravelling human situatedness through art’, Challenging Organisations and Society, 6:2, pp. 112136, https://www.maria-spindler.at/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/COS2017_V6I2_Unravelling_Human_Situatedness_Through_Art.pdf. Accessed 11 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hinton, Peta (2014), ‘Situated knowledges’ and new materialism(s): Rethinking a politics of location’, Women: A Cultural Review, 25:1, pp. 99113, https://doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2014.901104.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Noë, Alva (2015), Strange Tools: Art and Human Nature, New York: Hill and Wang.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rogowska-Stangret, Monika (2018), ‘Situated knowledges’, New Materialism, 22 March, https://newmaterialism.eu/almanac/s/situated-knowledges.html. Accessed 8 June 2024.
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00121_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/adch_00121_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test