Theory-based crafts: Students’ views about meaning-making strategies

References

1. Almevik, Gunnar, Groth, Camilla and Westerlund, Tina (2022), ‘Explorations in craft sciences’, in T. Westerlund, C. Groth and G. Almevik (eds), Craft Sciences, Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgensis, pp. 2–18.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Birau, Mia (2024), ‘Handmaking a better future: A scoping review on the role of handmade activities in advancing individual and societal well-being’, Psychology & Marketing, 42:1, pp. 44–63, https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.22112.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Borgdorff, Henk (2012), The Conflict of the Faculties: Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia, Leiden: Leiden University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bratland, Linn S. (2024), ‘Renovating traditional craft: Exploring the potential of craft as part of research’, Ethnologia Fennica, 51:1, pp. 60–80, https://doi.org/10.23991/ef.v51i1.138525.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Braun, Virginia and Clarke, Victoria (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77–101, https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Burns, Pippa and Van Der Meer, Rosemary (2021), ‘Happy hookers: Findings from an international study exploring the effects of crochet on wellbeing’, Perspectives in Public Health, 141:3, pp. 149–57, https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913920911961.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Candy, Linda and Edmonds, Ernest (2010), ‘The role of the artefact and frameworks for practice-based research’, in M. Biggs and H. Karlsson (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 120–37.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cervantes, Fabiola (2023), ‘Arctic wool: Perspectives on sustainable craft practices’, Research in Arts and Education, 2, pp. 85–98, https://doi.org/10.54916/rae.131750.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Holmquist, Anna, Magnusson, Mats and Livholts, Mona (2019), ‘Reinventing tradition: Exploring the creation of new meaning through innovations involving craft-based design’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 28:1, pp. 124–37, https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12297.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Jean-Berluche, Ducel (2024), ‘Creative expression and mental health’, Journal of Creativity, 34:2, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2024.100083.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kokko, Sirpa (2022), ‘Orientations on studying crafts in higher education’, Craft Research, 13:2, pp. 411–32, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00086_1.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kokko, Sirpa and Räisänen, Riikka (2019), ‘Craft education in sustaining and developing craft traditions: Reflections from Finnish craft teacher education’, Techne Series: Research in Sloyd Education and Craft Science A, 26:1, pp. 27–43, https://journals.oslomet.no/index.php/techneA/article/view/2911. Accessed 1 September 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Kokko, Sirpa, Almevik, Gunnar, Bentz Høgseth, Harald and Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Pirita (2020), ‘Mapping the methodologies of the craft sciences in Finland, Sweden and Norway’, Craft Research, 11:2, pp. 177–209, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00025_1.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Kouhia, Anna (2016), ‘Roots in tradition: Karelian tradition as a creative resource for Finnish craft designers’, The Design Journal, 19:5, pp. 725–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2016.1196090.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kouhia, Anna and Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Pirita (2017), ‘Towards design hybridity: Negotiating traditions through contemporary craft making in Finland’, Craft Research, 8:2, pp. 169–92, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre.8.2.169_1.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Lahti, Henna and Fernström, Päivi (2021), ‘Crafticulation as a method of knowledge creation’, Craft Research, 12:2, pp. 183–204, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00049_1.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Le Lagadec, Danielle, Kornhaber, Rachel, Johnston-Devin, Colleen and Cleary, Michelle (2024), ‘Healing stitches: A scoping review on the impact of needlecraft on mental health and well-being’, Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 45:10, pp. 1097–110, https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2024.2364228.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lundborg, Göran (2014), The Hand and the Brain: From Lucy’s Thumb to the Thought-Controlled Robotic Hand, Cham: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Mäkelä, Maarit and Nimkulrat, Nithikul (2018), ‘Documentation as a practice-led research tool for reflection on experiential knowledge’, FormAkademisk, 11:2, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1818.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Marchand, Trevor (2010), ‘Making knowledge: Explorations of the indissoluble relation between minds, bodies, and environment’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16:S1, pp. S1–S21, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01607.x.
    [Google Scholar]
21. McAuley, Mike and Roxburgh, Mark (2017), ‘Learning theory through doing: Applying design studio methods in the construction of an academic argument’, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 16:2, pp. 171–86, https://doi.org/10.1386/adch.16.2.171_1.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Molander, Bengt (2022), ‘Ways we are connected to the world: Craft and/or science?’, Craft Research, 13:2, pp. 221–36, https://doi.org/10.1386/crre_00077_1.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Mommo, Sanna, Kouhia, Anna and Rönkkö, Marja-Leena (2025), ‘Visions of the future of craft education’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 44:1, pp. 149–61, https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12548.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Nasseri, Mona and Wilson, Sandra (2017), ‘A reflection on learning crafts as a practice for self-development’, Reflective Practice, 18:2, pp. 194–205, https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2016.1265495.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Niedderer, Kristina and Townsend, Katherine (2014), ‘Designing craft research: Joining emotion and knowledge’, The Design Journal, 17:4, pp. 624–47, https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614x14056185480221.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Orr, Susan and Shreeve, Alison (2017), Art and Design Pedagogy in Higher Education: Knowledge, Values and Ambiguity in the Creative Curriculum, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Pöllänen, Sinikka (2009), ‘Contextualising craft: Pedagogical models for craft education’, International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28:3, pp. 249–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01619.x.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pöllänen, Sinikka and Weissmann-Hanski, Marja (2020), ‘Hand-made well-being: Textile crafts as a source of eudaimonic well-being’, Journal of Leisure Research, 51:3, pp. 348–65, https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2019.1688738.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Ryan, Gery W. and Bernard, Harvey R. (2003), ‘Techniques to identify themes’, Field Methods, 15:1, pp. 85–109, https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Saldaña, Johnny (2009), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Sawyer, Robert K. (2019), ‘The role of failure in learning how to create in art and design’, Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.002.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Stoll, Karin, Gårdvik, Mette and Sørmo, Wenche (2022), ‘The role of the arts and crafts subject in education for sustainable development’, Acta Didactica Norden, 16:1, pp. 1–30, https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.8429.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Väänänen, Niina and Pöllänen, Sinikka (2020), ‘Conceptualizing sustainable craft: Concept analysis of literature’, The Design Journal, 23:2, pp. 263–85, https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1718276.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Väänänen, Niina, Vartiainen, Leena, Kaipainen, Minna, Pitkäniemi, Harri and Pöllänen, Sinikka (2018), ‘Understanding Finnish student craft teachers’ conceptions of sustainability’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19:5, pp. 963–86, https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-11-2017-0200.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Valentine, Louise (2011), ‘Craft as a form of mindful inquiry’, The Design Journal, 14:3, pp. 283–306, https://doi.org/10.2752/175630611x13046972590806.
    [Google Scholar]