Skip to content
1981
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2001-0818
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between news coverage of immigrants and refugees and identifiability of stories’ authors. Quantitative content analysis was used in comparative approach across regions that constitute borderlands between first world and developing countries: the state of Arizona in the United States of America and Italy in the European Union. The content of 800 news stories and 1470 online comments published by four major newspapers in Arizona and Italy in 2013 was examined. The data suggest that in the Italian news outlets, which produced equal shares of ‘anonymous’ and ‘signed’ stories, articles that carried no byline – i.e., whose author was identifiable neither as a journalist nor as a wire service – tended to portray immigrants and refugees more negatively than stories carrying a byline did. No statistically significant relationship was found between representations of immigrants and byline in the sample of stories published by the pair of Arizona dailies. The degree of antipathy for migrants expressed in online comments varied in relation to story byline only in the subsample of online comments posted by readers of the US newspapers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajms.7.1.153_1
2018-03-01
2024-09-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajms.7.1.153_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Arizona; content analysis; immigration; Italy; newspapers; online comments; refugees
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error