She belongs in the kitchen, not in Congress? Political engagement and sexism on Twitter

References

1. Althaus, S.. ( 2003), Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barak, A.. ( 2005;), ‘ Sexual harassment on the Internet. ’, Social Science Computer Review, 23:1, pp. 77–92.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bradley, A., and Wicks, R.. ( 2011;), ‘ A gendered blogosphere? Portrayal of Sarah Palin on political blogs during the 2008 presidential campaign. ’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88:4, pp. 807–20.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Burgess, J., and Bruns, A.. ( 2012;), ‘ (Not) the Twitter election. ’, Journalism Practice, 6:3, pp. 384–402.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bystrom, D.,, Robertson, T., and Banwart, M. C.. ( 2001;), ‘ Framing the fight: An analysis of media coverage of female and male candidates in primary races for governor and US Senate in 2000. ’, American Behavioral Scientist, 44:12, pp. 1999–2013.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Campbell, A.,, Converse, P.,, Miller, W., and Stokes, D.. ( 1960), The American Voter, New York:: Wiley;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Citron, D. K.. ( 2014), Hate Crimes in Cyberspace, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Coleman, S.. ( 2005;), ‘ New mediation and direct representation: Reconceptualizing representation in the digital age. ’, New Media & Society, 7:2, pp. 177–98.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Conroy, M.,, Oliver, S.,, Breckenridge-Jackson, I., and Heldman, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ From Ferraro to Palin: Sexism in coverage of vice presidential candidates in old and new media. ’, Politics, Groups, and Identities, 3:4, pp. 573–91.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Converse, P.. ( 1964;), ‘ The nature of belief systems in mass publics. ’, in D. Apter. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, New York:: Free Press;, pp. 206–61.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Delli Carpini, M., and Keeter, S.. ( 1996), What Americans Don't Know about Politics and Why It Matters, New Haven, CT:: Yale University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Fishkin, J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Beyond polling alone: The quest for an informed public. ’, Critical Review, 18:1&3, pp. 157–65.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Freelon, D., and Karpf, D.. ( 2015;), ‘ Of big birds and bayonets: Hybrid Twitter interactivity in the 2012 Presidential debates. ’, Information, Communication & Society, 18:4, pp. 390–406.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Friedman, J.. ( 1998;), ‘ Public ignorance and democratic theory. ’, Critical Review, 12:4, pp. 397–411.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gardiner, B.,, Mansfield, M.,, Anderson, I.,, Ulmanu, M.,, Louter, D., and Holder, J.. ( 2016;), ‘ The dark side of Guardian comments. ’, The Guardian, 12 April, https://www.theguardian.com. Accessed 1 June 2020.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Graber, D.. ( 2006;), ‘ Government by the people, for the people: Twenty-first century style. ’, Critical Review, 18:1&3, pp. 167–78.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Graham, T.,, Jackson, D., and Broersma, M.. ( 2016;), ‘ New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. ’, New Media & Society, 18:5, pp. 765–83.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Habermas, J.. ( 1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hayes, D., and Lawless, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ A non-gendered lens? Media, voters, and female candidates in contemporary congressional elections. ’, Perspectives on Politics, 13:1, pp. 95–118.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Heldman, C.,, Carroll, S., and Olson, S.. ( 2005;), ‘ She brought only a skirt: Print media coverage of Elizabeth Dole’s bid for the Republican presidential nomination. ’, Political Communication, 22:3, pp. 315–35.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Henry, N., and Powell, P.. ( 2015;), ‘ Embodied harms: Gender, shame, and technology-facilitated sexual violence. ’, Violence Against Women, 21:6, pp. 758–79.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hooghe, M.,, Jacobs, L., and Claes, E.. ( 2015;), ‘ Enduring gender bias in reporting on political elite positions. ’, International Journal of Press/Politics, 24:4, pp. 395–414.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Huang, F.. ( 2016;), ‘ Alternatives to multilevel modeling for the analysis of clustered data. ’, Journal of Experimental Education, 84:1, pp. 175–96.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Inter-Parliamentary Union ( 2013;), ‘ National women in parliaments: Situation as of 1st October 2013. ’, Inter-Parliamentary Union , 1 October, http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/arc/classif011013.htm. Accessed 1 March 2016.
25. Jackson, N., and Lilleker, D.. ( 2011;), ‘ Microblogging, constituency service and impression management: UK MPs and the use of Twitter. ’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 17:1, pp. 86–105.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jalalzai, F.. ( 2006;), ‘ Women candidates and the media: 1992–2000 elections. ’, Politics & Policy, 34:3, pp. 606–33.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jungherr, A.. ( 2016;), ‘ Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. ’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13:1, pp. 72–91.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kahn, K. F.. ( 1996), The Political Consequences of Being a Woman, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kennedy, T.. ( 2000;), ‘ An exploratory study of feminist experiences in cyberspace. ’, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3:5, pp. 707–19.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kittilson, M. C., and Fridkin, K.. ( 2008;), ‘ Gender, candidate portrayals and election campaigns. ’, Politics & Gender, 4:3, pp. 371–92.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Larsson, A. O., and Ihlen, Ø.. ( 2015;), ‘ Birds of a feather flock together? Party leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian elections. ’, European Journal of Communication, 30:6, pp. 666–81.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Larsson, A. O., and Moe, H.. ( 2013;), ‘ Representation or participation? Twitter use during the 2011 Danish election campaign. ’, Javnost-The Public, 20:1, pp. 71–88.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lawless, J.. ( 2009;), ‘ Sexism and gender bias in election 2008: A more complex path for women in politics. ’, Politics & Gender, 5:1, pp. 70–80.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Lippmann, W.. ( 1922), Public Opinion, New York:: Harcourt;.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Manifesto Project. Version ( 2014b), The Manifesto Data Collection, Berlin:: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung;.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Mocanu, D.,, Baronchelli, A.,, Perra, N.,, Gonçalves, B.,, Zhang, Q., and Vespignani, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ The Twitter of Babel: Mapping world languages through microblog platforms. ’, PloS One, 8:4, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061981.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Morahan-Martin, J.. ( 2000;), ‘ Women and the Internet: Promise and perils. ’, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3:5, pp. 683–91.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Neuman, W. R.. ( 1986), The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate, Cambridge:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Newman, N.. ( 2010), #UKelection2010, Mainstream Media and the Role of the Internet, Oxford:: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. O’Neill, D.,, Savigny, H., and Cann, V.. ( 2016;), ‘ Women politicians in the UK press: Not seen and not heard?. ’, Feminist Media Studies, 16:2, pp. 293–307.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Page, B., and Shapiro, R.. ( 1992), The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in American Policy Preferences, Chicago, IL:: University of Chicago Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Pontusson, J., and Rueda, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ Inequality as a source of political polarization. ’, in P. Beramendi, and C. Anderson. (eds), Democracy, Inequality, and Representation, New York:: Russell Sage;, pp. 312–53.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Prior, M.. ( 2013;), ‘ Media and political polarization. ’, Annual Review of Political Science, 16:1, pp. 101–27.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Ritchie, J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Creating a monster: Online media constructions of Hillary Clinton during the democratic primary campaign, 2007–8. ’, Feminist Media Studies, 13:1, pp. 102–19.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ross, K.,, Evans, E.,, Harrison, L.,, Shears, M., and Wadia, K.. ( 2013;), ‘ The gender of news and news of gender. ’, International Journal of Press/Politics, 18:1, pp. 3–20.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Salter, A., and Blodgett, B.. ( 2012;), ‘ Hypermasculinity & dickwolves: The contentious role of women in the new gaming public. ’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56:3, pp. 401–16.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schuman, H.,, Presser, S., and Ludwig, J.. ( 1981;), ‘ Context effects on survey responses to questions about abortion. ’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 45:2, pp. 216–23.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Siebler, F.,, Sabelus, S., and Bohner, G.. ( 2008;), ‘ A refined computer harassment paradigm. ’, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32:1, pp. 22–35.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Somin, I.. ( 1998;), ‘ Voter ignorance and the democratic ideal. ’, Critical Review, 12:4, pp. 413–58.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Stegmueller, D.. ( 2013;), ‘ How many countries for multilevel modeling?. ’, American Journal of Political Science, 57:3, pp. 748–61.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Suler, J.. ( 2004;), ‘ The online disinhibition effect. ’, CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7:3, pp. 321–26.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Tomkinson, S., and Harper, T.. ( 2015;), ‘ The position of women in video game culture: Perez and Day’s Twitter incident. ’, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 29:4, pp. 617–34.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Tromble, R.. ( 2018a;), ‘ The great leveler? Comparing citizen-politician Twitter engagement across three Western democracies. ’, European Political Science, 17:2, pp. 223–39.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Tromble, R.. ( 2018b;), ‘ Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians’ interactive practices on Twitter. ’, New Media & Society, 20:2, pp. 676–97.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Tuchman, G., and Kaplan Daniels, A.. (eds) ( 1978), Home and Hearth: Images of Women in the Mass Media, New York:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Vergeer, M., and Hermans, L.. ( 2013;), ‘ Campaigning on Twitter: Microblogging and online social networking as campaign tools in the 2010 general elections in the Netherlands. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18:4, pp. 399–419.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Zaller, J.. ( 1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, New York:: Cambridge University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Tromble, Rebekah, and Koole, Karin. ( 2020;), ‘ She belongs in the kitchen, not in Congress? Political engagement and sexism on Twitter. ’, Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 9:2, pp. 191–214, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00022_1
    [Google Scholar]