Innovation in a volatile field: An analysis of judges’ comments from journalism awards

References

1. Arenberg, T., and Lowrey, W.. ( 2019;), ‘ The impact of web metrics on community news decisions – A resource dependence perspective. ’, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 96:1, pp. 131–49.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Atkinson, P., and Coffey, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Analysing documentary realities. ’, in D. Silverman. (ed.), Qualitative Research, , 3rd ed.., London:: Sage;, pp. 77–92.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Benton, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Clay Christensen on the news industry: “We didn’t quite understand…how quickly things fall off the cliff”. ’, Nieman Lab, 18 October, https://www.niemanlab.org/2012/10/clay-christensen-on-the-news-industry-we-didnt-quite-understand-how-quickly-things-fall-off-the-cliff/. Accessed 3 April 2022.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Chew, M., and Tandoc, E. C.. ( 2022;), ‘ Media startups are behaving more like tech startups – Iterative, multi-skilled and journalists that “hustle”. ’, Digital Journalism, online first, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2040374.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Christensen, C. M.. ( [1997] 2016), The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA:: Harvard Business School Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Cooper, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ The future of journalism: Addressing pervasive market failure with public policy. ’, in R. W. McChesney, and V. Pickard. (eds), Will the Last Reporter Please Turn Out the Lights, New York:: Free Press;, pp. 320–39.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Creech, B., and Nadler, A. M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Post-industrial fog: Reconsidering innovation in visions of journalism’s future. ’, Journalism, 19:2, pp. 182–99.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Crossan, M. M., and Apaydin, M.. ( 2010;), ‘ A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. ’, Journal of Management Studies, 47:6, pp. 1154–91.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Damanpour, F.. ( 1991;), ‘ Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. ’, Academy of Management Journal, 34:3, pp. 555–90.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Edelman ( 2022;), ‘ Edelman Trust Barometer 2022. ’, Edelman Trust Barometer Global Report, https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2022-01/Trust%2022_Top10.pdf. Accessed 11 August 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Evans, S. K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Making sense of innovation: Process, product, and storytelling innovation in public service broadcasting organizations. ’, Journalism Studies, 19:1, pp. 4–24.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ferrucci, P., and Perreault, G.. ( 2021;), ‘ The liability of newness: Journalism, innovation and the issue of core competencies. ’, Journalism Studies, 22:11, pp. 1436–49.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Høyer, S.. ( 2005;), ‘ The idea of the book. ’, in S. Høyer, and H. Pöttker. (eds), Diffusion of the News Paradigm 1850–2000, Goteborg:: Nordicom;, pp. 9–16.
    [Google Scholar]
14. JEERA ( n.d.a;), ‘ 2020 Ossie Award winners. ’, https://jeraa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2020-Ossie-Award-winners.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2022.
15. JEERA ( n.d.b;), ‘ 2021 Ossie Awards winners. ’, https://jeraa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/2021-Ossie-Awards-winners.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2022.
16. Jenkins, J., and Volz, Y.. ( 2018;), ‘ Players and contestation mechanisms in the journalism field: A historical analysis of journalism awards, 1960s to 2000s. ’, Journalism Studies, 19:7, pp. 921–41.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Jones, J., and Salter, L.. ( 2012), Digital Journalism, London:: Sage;.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kunert, J.,, Frech, J.,, Brüggemann, M.,, Lilienthal, V., and Loosen, W.. ( 2022;), ‘ How investigative journalists around the world adopt innovative digital practices. ’, Journalism Studies, 23:7, pp. 761–80.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Küng, L.. ( 2015), Innovators in Digital News, London:: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and IB Tauris;.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Lewis, S. C.. ( 2012;), ‘ From journalism to information: The transformation of the Knight Foundation and news information. ’, Mass Communication and Society, 15:3, pp. 309–34.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Luengo, M., and García-Marín, D.. ( 2020;), ‘ The performance of truth: Politicians, fact-checking journalism, and the struggle to tackle COVID-19 misinformation. ’, American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 8:3, pp. 405–27.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Meier, K.,, Schützeneder, J.,, García Avilés, J. A.,, Valero-Pastor, J. M.,, Kaltenbrunner, A.,, Lugschitz, R.,, Porlezza, C.,, Ferri, G.,, Wyss, V., and Saner, M.. ( 2022;), ‘ Examining the most relevant journalism innovations: A comparative analysis of five European countries from 2010 to 2020. ’, Journalism and Media, 3:4, pp. 698–714.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Min, S. J., and Fink, K.. ( 2021;), ‘ Keeping up with the technologies: Distressed journalistic labor in the pursuit of “shiny” technologies. ’, Journalism Studies, 22:14, pp. 1987–2004.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Neveu, E.. ( 2007;), ‘ Pierre Bourdieu: Sociologist of media, or sociologist for media scholars?. ’, Journalism Studies, 8:2, pp. 335–47.
    [Google Scholar]
25. National Headliner Awards ( n.d.;), ‘ 2020: Print/photo. ’, https://www.headlinerawards.org/2020-print-photo/. Accessed 2 July 2022.
26. News Publishers’ Association ( n.d.a;), ‘ 2020 winners. ’, https://npa.co.nz/voyager-media-awards/2020-winners. Accessed 23 June 2022.
27. News Publishers’ Association ( n.d.b;), ‘ 2021 winners. ’, https://npa.co.nz/voyager-media-awards/2021-winners. Accessed 10 July 2022.
28. News Publishers’ Association ( n.d.c;), ‘ 2022 winners & finalists. ’, https://npa.co.nz/voyager-media-awards/2022-winners/. Accessed 28 June 2022.
29. Nieminen, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Incremental innovation – the what, why, and how. ’, Viima.com, 2 December, https://www.viima.com/blog/incremental-innovation. Accessed 5 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Nölleke, D.,, Hanusch, F., and Maares, P.. ( 2022;), ‘ The ambivalence of recognition: How awarded journalists assess the value of journalism prizes. ’, Journalism, online first, https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849221109657.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Online Journalism Awards ( n.d.a;), ‘ At risk, in the dark. ’, https://awards.journalists.org/entries/at-risk-in-the-dark/. Accessed 13 July 2022.
32. Online Journalism Awards ( n.d.b;), ‘ Case cleared: How rape goes unpunished in America. ’, https://awards.journalists.org/entries/case-cleared-how-rape-goes-unpunished-in-america/. Accessed 16 July 2022.
33. Online News Association ( n.d.;), ‘ Frequently asked questions. ’, Online Journalism Awards, https://awards.journalists.org/faq/. Accessed 2 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Pavlik, J. V.. ( 2013;), ‘ Innovation and the future of journalism. ’, Digital Journalism, 1:2, pp. 181–93.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Peters, C., and Broersma, M.. ( 2018;), ‘ Fusion cuisine: A functional approach to interdisciplinary cooking in journalism studies. ’, Journalism, 20:5, pp. 660–69.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Peters, C., and Carlson, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ Conceptualizing change in journalism studies: Why change at all?. ’, Journalism, 20:5, pp. 637–41.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Posetti, J.. ( 2018), Time to Step Away from the ‘Bright, Shiny Things’? Towards a Sustainable Model of Journalism Innovation in an Era of Perpetual Change, Oxford:: Reuters Institute and University of Oxford;, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-11/Posetti_Towards_a_Sustainable_model_of_Journalism_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 22 February 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Prenger, M., and Deuze, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ A history of innovation and entrepreneurialism in journalism. ’, in P. J. Boczkowski, and C. W. Anderson. (eds), Remaking the News: Essays on the Future of Journalism Scholarship in the Digital Age, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;, pp. 235–50.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Preston, P.. ( 2009), Making the News: Journalism and News Cultures in Europe, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Rupar, V.. ( 2021;), ‘ Revisiting the public interest: Journalism and the global immigration crisis. ’, in S. J. A. Ward. (ed.), Handbook of Global Media Ethics, New York:: Springer;, pp. 695–710.
    [Google Scholar]
41. SABEW ( n.d.;), ‘ 2021 best in business honorees – judging comments. ’, https://sabew.org/2021-best-in-business-honorees-judging-comments/. Accessed 23 July 2022.
42. Scharp, K. M., and Sanders, M. L.. ( 2019;), ‘ What is a theme? Teaching thematic analysis in qualitative communication research methods. ’, Communication Teacher, 33:2, pp. 117–21.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Shepard, A. C.. ( 2000;), ‘ Journalism’s prize culture. ’, American Journalism Review, 22:3, pp. 22–31.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Storsul, T., and Krumsvik, A. H.. ( 2013;), ‘ What is media innovation?. ’, in T. Storsul, and A. H. Krumsvik. (eds), Media Innovations: A Multidisciplinary Study of Change, Goteborg:: Nordicom;, pp. 13–26.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tuchman, G.. ( 1978;), ‘ Professionalism as an agent of legitimation. ’, Journal of Communication, 28:2, pp. 106–13, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01605.x.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Volz, Y.. ( 2013;), ‘ Journalism awards as a site of contention in the field of journalism. ’, Chinese Journal of Communication, 6:4, pp. 391–96.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Williams, K.. ( 2007;), ‘ Anglo-American journalism: The historical development of practice, style and form. ’, in M. Broersma. (ed.), Form and Style in Journalism: European Newspapers and the Representation of News 1880–2005, Leuven:: Peeters;, pp. 1–26.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Jones, Haley-Georgia. ( 2023;), ‘ Innovation in a volatile field: An analysis of judges’ comments from journalism awards. ’, Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, Special Issue: ‘Communicating Chaos: New Perspectives on VUCA’, 12:2, pp. 223–44, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00115_1
    [Google Scholar]