Skip to content
1981
image of Digital dynamics: British tabloids’ adaptation strategies online and in print

Abstract

Tabloids are still thriving in the United Kingdom, but few studies have specifically explored the issue of how British tabloids have been affected by the digital turn. To the best of authors’ knowledge, no study has addressed what changes have taken place in the characteristics of tabloids in this emergent environment. This research therefore compares the digital manifestation of British tabloid newspapers with their analogue counterparts in order to ascertain whether online tabloids are adapting technology to amplify their print siblings’ traditional character, creating new features or becoming a digital tabloid hybrid. We selected two highly successful and representative online tabloids, online and , and their paper counterparts. The sample period for this study spans from 20 December 2021 to 20 February 2022, encompassing two months. The analysis aims to demonstrate how tabloids are adapting to the logic of the internet in order to maintain and even increase their commercial success. Conceptually, therefore, this research applies a discussion of tabloidization and includes more contemporary discussions of the place of tabloid newspapers and websites within the broader tabloid culture. It explores the changes in online tabloids compared with print tabloid newspapers through quantitative content analysis and qualitative interviews.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00163_1
2025-02-28
2026-04-10

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adams, W. C. (2015), ‘Conducting semi‐structured interviews’, in K. E. Newcomer, H. P. Hatry and J. S. W. Hoboken (eds), Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 492505.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Berelson, B. R. (1952), Content Analysis in Communication Research, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown, D. K., Harlow, S., García-Perdomo, V. and Salaverría, R. (2016), ‘A new sensation? An international exploration of sensationalism and social media recommendations in online news publications’, Journalism, 19:11, pp. 1497516, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916683549.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Carlson, M. (2017), Journalistic Authority: Legitimating News in the Digital Era, New York: Columbia University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C. and O’Loughlin, B. (2018), ‘Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing’, New Media & Society, 20:11, pp. 425574.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chakraborty, A., Sarkar, R., Mrigen, A. and Ganguly, N. (2017), ‘Tabloids in the era of social media? Understanding the production and consumption of clickbaits in Twitter’, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1:CSCW, pp. 121, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3034591.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Conboy, M. (2006), Tabloid Britain: Constructing a Community through Language, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Conboy, M. (2015), ‘Tabloid culture: The political economy of a newspaper style’, in M. Conboy and J. Steel (eds), Routledge Companion to British Media History, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 21527.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Conboy, M. (2020), ‘Aligning the newspaper and the people: Defining the popular in the British press’, Journal of European Periodical Studies, 5:1, pp. 723.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Conboy, M. (2021), ‘Tabloid culture: Parameters and debates’, in M. Conboy and S. A. Eldridge ll (eds), Global Tabloid: Culture and Technology, London: Routledge, pp. 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Conboy, M. and Eldridge II, S. (eds) (2021), Global Tabloid: Culture and Technology, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Croteau, D. and Hoynes, W. (2013), Media/Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences, London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Debrix, F. (2007), Tabloid Terror: War, Culture, and Geopolitics, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dick, M. (2011), ‘Search engine optimization in UK news production’, Journalism Practice, 5:4, pp. 46277, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2010.551020.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Eldridge ll, S. A. (2021), ‘Digital impacts on the tabloid sphere: Blurring and diffusion of a popular form and its power’, in M. Conboy and S. A. Eldridge ll (eds), Global Tabloid: Culture and Technology, London: Routledge, pp. 2440.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C. and McDonald, D. (2011), ‘Conducting an in-depth interview’, EDIS, 2011:8, pp. 13, https://doi.org/10.32473/edis-fy393-2011.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Johansson, S. (2007), Reading Tabloids: Tabloid Newspapers and Their Readers, Stockholm: Södertörns högskola.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Johansson, S. (2020), ‘Tabloid journalism and tabloidization’, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, 28 February, https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-877. Accessed 14 December 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Klinger, U. (2013), ‘Mastering the art of social media: Swiss parties, the 2011 national election and digital challenges’, Information, Communication & Society, 16:5, pp. 71736.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Klinger, U. and Svensson, J. (2015), ‘The emergence of network media logic in political communication: A theoretical approach’, New Media and Society, 17:8, pp. 124157.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Krippendorff, K. (2004), Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Magin, M., Steiner, M., Häuptli, A., Stark, B. and Udris, L. (2021), ‘Is Facebook driving tabloidization? A cross-channel comparison of two German newspapers’, in M. Conboy and S. Eldridge II (eds), Global Tabloid: Culture and Technology, London: Routledge, pp. 5674.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. McLachlan, S. and Golding, P. (2000), ‘Tabloidization in the British press: A quantitative investigation into changes in British newspapers, 1952–1997’, in C. Sparks and J. Tulloch (eds), Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 7690.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Neuman, W. (1997), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, K. and Nielsen, K. N. (2019), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nilsson, M. and Wadbring, I. (2015), ‘Not good enough? Amateur images in print and online mainstream news media’, Journalism Practice, 9:4, pp. 484501.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Örnebring, H. (2008), ‘The consumer as producer – of what?’, Journalism Studies, 9:5, pp. 77185.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Palau-Sampio, D. (2016), ‘Reference press metamorphosis in the digital context: Clickbait and tabloid strategies in Elpais.com’, Communication & Society, 29:2, pp. 6379, https://doi.org/10.15581/003.29.2.63-79.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Peña-Fernández, S., Lazkano-Arrillaga, I. and García-González, D. (2016), ‘European newspapers’ digital transition: New products and new audiences’, Comunicar, 24:46, pp. 2736.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Ponce de Leon, C. L. (2002), Self-Exposure: Human Interest Journalism and the Emergence of Celebrity in America 1890–1940, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Press Gazette (2024), ‘Top 50 UK news websites in June: Mirror overtakes MailOnline to narrowly take third place’, 10 December, https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/media-audience-and-business-data/media_metrics/most-popular-websites-news-uk-monthly-2/. Accessed 27 July 2024.
  32. Rony, M. M. U., Hassan, N. and Yousuf, M. (2017), ‘Diving deep into clickbaits: Who use them to what extents in which topics with what effects?’, in Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, pp. 23239.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Skovsgaard, M. (2014), ‘A tabloid mind? Professional values and organizational pressures as explanations of tabloid journalism’, Media, Culture & Society 36:2, pp. 20018, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443713515740.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sparks, C. and Tulloch, J. (eds) (2000), Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Tong, J. (2023), Journalism, Economic Uncertainty and Political Irregularity in the Digital and Data Era, Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Trilling, D., Tolochko, P. and Burscher, B. (2016), ‘From newsworthiness to shareworthiness’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94:1, pp. 3860.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Uberti, D. (2014), ‘In a tabloidized world, tabloids struggle’, Columbia Journalism Review, 29 July, http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/in_a_tabloidized_world_tabloid.php. Accessed 9 January 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. UCLA (2021), ‘What does Cronbach’s alpha mean? UCLA: Statistical consulting group’, 22 August, https://www.stats.oarc.ucla.edu/spss/faq/what-does-cronbachs-alpha-mean/. Accessed 1 July 2024.
  39. Wadbring, I. and Ödmark, S. (2016), ‘Going viral: News sharing and shared news in social media’, OBS-Observatorio, 10:4, pp. 13249.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Zelizer, B. (2010), ‘Journalists as interpretive communities revisited’, in S. Allan (ed.), The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism, New York: Routledge, pp. 18190.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sparks, C. (2000), ‘Introduction: The panic over tabloid news’, in C. Sparks and J. Tulloch (eds), Tabloid Tales: Global Debates over Media Standards, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 140.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00163_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00163_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test