Skip to content
1981
image of ‘Did this really happen or not?’: Exploring news doubt and its antecedents

Abstract

In recent decades, scholars have made great efforts to analyse and monitor audiences’ levels of trust in news and information. To capture these levels, research has primarily relied on concepts such as news (dis)trust, media scepticism or cynicism. While these concepts provide valuable insights, they also tend to oversimplify news consumers as either trusting or distrusting of the news, thereby ignoring the presence of uncertainty and variability in news evaluations. To fill this gap, this article explores variable experiences of news doubt, moments when people feel uncertain about the accuracy of a news story. Based on 31 semi-structured interviews with news consumers, this article first empirically explores how and when news doubt is experienced. Second, at a more theoretical level, it considers whether news doubt can truly be seen as a concept distinct from other related concepts such as news distrust or media scepticism. The results show that all participants experience moments of news doubt, but that it is interpreted in different ways and caused by a variety of triggers (e.g. sensationalism, partisanship). Conceptually, the findings suggest that news doubt may have explanatory value as a theoretical concept on its own.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Flemish Government’s Department of Culture, Youth and Media
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00167_1
2025-03-13
2026-04-11

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Allcott, H. and Gentzkow, M. (2017), ‘Social media and fake news in the 2016 election’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31:2, pp. 211–36, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Rawi, A. (2020), ‘Networked emotional news on social media’, Journalism Practice, 14:9, pp. 1125–41, https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1685902.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bentivegna, S. and Marchetti, R. (2018), ‘Journalists at a crossroads: Are traditional norms and practices challenged by Twitter?’, Journalism, 19:2, pp. 270–90, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917716594.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Blumer, H. (1969), Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Boczkowski, P. J. (2021), Abundance: On the Experience of Living in a World of Information Plenty, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Boesman, J., Van Damme, K. and De Vooght, E. (2023), Nieuwsbarometer 2023, 2nd ed., Ghent: Arteveldehogeschool, https://www.mediawijs.be/nl/onderzoek/nieuwsbarometer. Accessed 11 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Carlson, M. (2017), Journalistic Authority: Legitimating News in the Digital Era, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Conrad, L. Y. and Tucker, V. M. (2019), ‘Making it tangible: Hybrid card sorting within qualitative interviews’, Journal of Documentation, 75:2, pp. 397–416, https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2018-0091.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. De Marez, L., Sevenhant, R., Denecker, F., Georges, A., Wuyts, G. and Schuurman, D. (2022), Imec.digimeter 2022, 15th ed., Ghent: Imec, https://www.imec.be/nl/kennisuitwisseling/techmeters/digimeter/digimeter-2022. Accessed 27 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Edelman (2023), Edelman Trust Barometer, 23rd ed., Edelman Trust Institute, https://www.edelman.com/trust/trust-barometer. Accessed 3 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Eldridge, S. A. and Bødker, H. (2019), ‘Confronting uncertainty: The contours of an inferential community’, Journalism & Communication Monographs, 21:4, pp. 280–349, https://doi.org/10.1177/1522637919878729.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Engelke, K. M., Hase, V. and Wintterlin, F. (2019), ‘On measuring trust and distrust in journalism: Reflection of the status quo and suggestions for the road ahead’, Journal of Trust Research, 9:1, pp. 66–86, https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2019.1588741.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Eveland Jr, W. P. and Shah, D. V. (2003), ‘The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias’, Political Psychology, 24:1, pp. 101–17, https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00318.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanitzsch, T., Van Dalen, A. and Steindl, N. (2018), ‘Caught in the nexus: A comparative and longitudinal analysis of public trust in the press’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23:1, pp. 3–23, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161217740695.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Hase, V., Boczek, K. and Scharkow, M. (2023), ‘Adapting to affordances and audiences? A cross-platform, multi-modal analysis of the platformization of news on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter’, Digital Journalism, 11:8, pp. 1499–520, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2128389.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Hermida, A. and Mellado, C. (2020), ‘Dimensions of social media logics: Mapping forms of journalistic norms and practices on Twitter and Instagram’, Digital Journalism, 8:7, pp. 864–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1805779.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hopp, T. (2022), ‘Fake news self-efficacy, fake news identification, and content sharing on Facebook’, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 19:2, pp. 229–52, https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1962778.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. de León, E. and Trilling, D. (2021), ‘A sadness bias in political news sharing? The role of discrete emotions in the engagement and dissemination of political news on Facebook’, Social Media + Society, 7:4, https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211059710.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lucassen, T. and Schraagen, J. M. (2013), ‘The influence of source cues and topic familiarity on credibility evaluation’, Computers in Human Behavior, 29:4, pp. 1387–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.036.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Metzger, M. J. and Flanagin, A. J. (2013), ‘Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics’, Journal of Pragmatics, 59, pp. 210–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.07.012.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J. and Medders, R. B. (2010), ‘Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online’, Journal of Communication, 60:3, pp. 413–39, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R. and Mccann, R. M. (2003), ‘Credibility for the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment’, Annals of the International Communication Association, 27:1, pp. 293–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Mont’Alverne, C., Badrinathan, S., Arguedas, A. R., Toff, B., Fletcher, R. and Nielsen, R. (2022), The Trust Gap: How and Why News on Digital Platforms is Viewed More Sceptically versus News in General, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:42cc0bd8-f737-4a79-947fe528e8116926. Accessed 28 November 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Newman, N. and Fletcher, R. (2017), Bias, Bullshit and Lies: Audience Perspectives on Low Trust in the Media, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the study of Journalism, https://www.digitalnewsreport.org/publications/2017/bias-bullshit-and-lies-audienceperspectives-on-low-trust-in-the-media/. Accessed 23 January 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C. T., Eddy, K. and Nielsen, R. K. (2022), Digital News Report 2022, 11th ed., Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Eddy, K., Robertson, C. T. and Nielsen, R. K. (2023), Digital News Report 2O23, 12th ed., Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/digital-news-report/2023. Accessed 29 August 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Nielsen, R. K. (2017), ‘The one thing journalism just might do for democracy’, Journalism Studies, 18:10, pp. 1251–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1338152.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Nielsen, R. K. and Ganter, S. A. (2017), ‘Dealing with digital intermediaries: A case study of the relations between publishers and platforms’, New Media & Society, 20:4, pp. 1600–17, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817701318.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Opgenhaffen, M. (2022), ‘Fact-checking interventions on social media using cartoon figures: Lessons learned from “the tooties”’, Digital Journalism, 10:5, pp. 888–911, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.2011758.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Otto, L., Thomas, F. and Maier, M. (2018), ‘Everyday dynamics of media skepticism and credibility: An ambulatory assessment study’, in K. Otto and A. Köhler (eds), Trust in Media and Journalism: Empirical Perspectives on Ethics, Norms, Impacts and Populism in Europe, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 111–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Picone, I., Vandenplas, R., Truyens, P. and Vis, S. (2023), ‘Wie heeft wantrouwen in het nieuws?’, Nieuwsgebruik, https://www.nieuwsgebruik.be/monitor/wie-heeft-wantrouwen-in-het-nieuws. Accessed 2 September 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Pinkleton, B. E., Austin, E. W., Zhou, Y., Willoughby, J. F. and Reiser, M. (2012), ‘Perceptions of news media, external efficacy, and public affairs apathy in political decision making and disaffection’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89:1, pp. 23–39, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699011428586.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Rossen, I., Hurlstone, M. J., Dunlop, P. D. and Lawrence, C. (2019), ‘Accepters, fence sitters, or rejecters: Moral profiles of vaccination attitudes’, Social Science & Medicine, 224, pp. 23–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.038.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Schmidt, T. R., Heyamoto, L. and Milbourn, T. (2019), ‘The social construction of media trust: An exploratory study in underserved communities’, Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies, 8:3, pp. 257–71, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00001_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Schwarzenegger, C. (2020), ‘Personal epistemologies of the media: Selective criticality, pragmatic trust, and competence–confidence in navigating media repertoires in the digital age’, New Media & Society, 22:2, pp. 361–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819856919.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Steensen, S. and Westlund, O. (2021), What is Digital Journalism Studies?, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., Boomgaarden, H., Damstra, A., Lindgren, E., Vliegenthart, R. and Lindholm, T. (2020), ‘News media trust and its impact on media use: Toward a framework for future research’, Annals of the International Communication Association, 44:2, pp. 139–56, https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1755338.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Suiter, J. and Fletcher, R. (2020), ‘Polarization and partisanship: Key drivers of distrust in media old and new?’, European Journal of Communication, 35:5, pp. 484–501, https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120903685.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Tandoc, E. C., Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D. and Zheng Wei, L. (2018), ‘Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework’, New Media & Society, 20:8, pp. 2745–63, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731756.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Toff, B., Badrinathan, S., Mont’Alverne, C., Ross Arguedas, A., Fletcher, R. and Nielsen, R. (2021a), Listening to What Trust in News Means to Users: Qualitative Evidence from Four Countries, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/listening-what-trust-news-means-usersqualitative-evidence-four-countries. Accessed 28 November 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Toff, B., Badrinathan, S., Mont’Alverne, C., Ross Arguedas, A., Fletcher, R. and Nielsen, R. (2021b), Overcoming Indifference: What Attitudes Towards News Tell Us About Building Trust, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/overcoming-indifference-what-attitudestowards-news-tell-us-about-building-trust. Accessed 5 April 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Tsfati, Y. (2003), ‘Media skepticism and climate of opinion perception’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15:1, pp. 65–82, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/15.1.65.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Tsfati, Y. and Ariely, G. (2014), ‘Individual and contextual correlates of trust in media across 44 countries’, Communication Research, 41:6, pp. 760–82, https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213485972.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Vaccari, C. and Chadwick, A. (2020), ‘Deepfakes and disinformation: Exploring the impact of synthetic political video on deception, uncertainty, and trust in news’, Social Media+ Society, 6:1, pp. 1–13, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L. and Lepper, M. R. (1985), ‘The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49:3, pp. 577–85, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Dalen, A (2019), ‘Journalism, trust, and credibility’, in K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch (eds), The Handbook of Journalism Studies, London: Routledge, pp. 356–71.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Van de Calseyde, P. P. F. M., Keren, G. and Zeelenberg, M. (2014), ‘Decision time as information in judgment and choice’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125:2, pp. 113–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.07.001.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. VRT (2022), Desinformatie 2022 Report, Brussels: VRT.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2020), ‘An emotional turn in journalism studies?’, Digital Journalism, 8:2, pp. 175–94, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2019.1697626.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Weeks, B. E. and Garrett, R. K. (2014), ‘Electoral consequences of political rumors: Motivated reasoning, candidate rumors, and vote choice during the 2008 U.S. presidential election’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26:4, pp. 401–22, https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edu005.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00167_1
Loading
‘Did this really happen or not?’: Exploring news doubt and its antecedents
Intellect ; https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00167_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00167_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00167_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keywords: media scepticism ; media cynicism ; news credibility ; news audiences ; news distrust ; sensationalism

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test