Skip to content
1981
image of Fake news sharing and correction driven by COVID-19 prosociality

Abstract

The pandemic provides a unique research context for examining prosocial responses manifested through information behaviours towards false information. The present study aims to investigate the influencing mechanisms of prosociality towards fake news correction under the COVID-19 settings. We investigated the mediating links between individual’s personal participation with sharing fake news, the emerged awareness of fake news prevalence and the subsequent protective intent to counteract fake news as illustrated in an experience–awareness–coping model. The proposed sequential mediation model is tested with survey data ( = 1219) of Hong Kong residents collected during a major wave of COVID-19 Omicron variant. Results show that the paths from prosociality to correcting fake news are mediated by sharing and awareness of fake news. The act of correction may be seen as a coping strategy prompted by a heightened awareness of a worsening news environment that threatens the public’s well-being. These results have significant theoretical and practical implications and can inform solutions for incorporating prosocial values in effectively engaging the public to debunk fake news.

© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00175_1
2025-04-05
2026-04-11

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Rawi, Ahmed (2018), ‘Gatekeeping fake news discourses on mainstream media versus social media’, Social Science Computer Review, 37:6, pp. 687–704, https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318795849.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Apuke, Oberiri D. and Omar, Bahiyah (2021), ‘Fake news and COVID-19: Modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users’, Telematics and Informatics, 56, 101475, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baines, Darrin and Elliott, Robert J. (2020), ‘Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation: An urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic’, working paper, Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Balakrishnan, Vimala, Han, Kang R. and Ong, Boon Y. (2021), ‘Sharing behaviour of COVID-19 fake news among Malaysians: The role of social influence and gratification factors’, Behaviour & Information Technology, 41:13, pp. 2826–44, https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1946163.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Balakrishnan, Vimala, Ng, Wei Z., Soo, Mun C., Han, Gan J. and Lee, Choon J. (2022), ‘Infodemic and fake news: A comprehensive overview of its global magnitude during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021: A scoping review’, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 78, 103144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103144.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bentler, Peter M. (1990), ‘Comparative fit indexes in structural models’, Psychological Bulletin, 107:2, pp. 238–46, https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bode, Leticia and Vraga, Emily (2021), ‘Value for correction: Documenting perceptions about peer correction of misinformation on social media in the context of COVID-19’, Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 1, pp. 1–20, https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.016.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chadwick, Andrew and Vaccari, Cristian (2019), News Sharing on UK Social Media: Misinformation, Disinformation, and Correction, Loughborough: Online Civic Culture Centre, Loughborough University.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chang, Chingching (2021), ‘Fake news: Audience perceptions and concerted coping strategies’, Digital Journalism, 9:5, pp. 636–59, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1923403.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Xinran, Sin, Sei-Ching Joanna, Theng, Yin-Leng and Lee, Chei Sian (2015), ‘Why students share misinformation on social media: Motivation, gender, and study-level differences’, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41:5, pp. 583–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.003.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cook, John, Lewandowsky, Stephan and Ecker, Ullrich K. (2017), ‘Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence’, PLoS One, 12:5, e0175799, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175799.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cornwell, James F., Franks, Becca and Higgins, E. Tory (2017), ‘How the “truth” self relates to altruism: When your problem is mine’, Social Cognition, 35:2, pp. 204–26, https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2017.35.2.204.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ecker, Ullrich K., Lewandowsky, Stephen and Chadwick, Matthew (2020), ‘Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect’, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5:1, pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00241-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Grant, Adam M. and Shandell, Marissa S. (2022), ‘Social motivation at work: The organizational psychology of effort for, against, and with others’, Annual Review of Psychology, 73:1, pp. 301–26, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060321-033406.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Grimalda, Gianluca, Buchan, Nancy R., Ozturk, Ozturk D., Pinate, Adriana C., Urso, Giulia and Brewer, Marilynn B. (2021), ‘Exposure to COVID-19 is associated with increased altruism, particularly at the local level’, Scientific Reports, 11:1, 18950, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97234-2.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Guess, Andrew M., Lerner, Michael, Lyons, Benjamin, Montgomery, Jacob M., Nyhan, Brendan, Reifler, Jason and Sircar, Neelanjan (2020), ‘A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117:27, pp. 15536–45, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hameleers, Michael (2022), ‘Separating truth from lies: Comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands’, Information, Communication & Society, 25:1, pp. 110–26, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2020.1764603.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Harring, Niklas, Jagers, Sverker C. and Löfgren, Åsa (2021), ‘COVID-19: Large-scale collective action, government intervention, and the importance of trust’, World Development, 138, 105236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105236.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hartley, Kris and Vu, Minh Khuong (2020), ‘Fighting fake news in the COVID-19 era: Policy insights from an equilibrium model’, Policy Sciences, 53:4, pp. 735–58, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09405-z.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hu, Li-Tze and Bentler, Peter M. (1999), ‘Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives’, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6:1, pp. 1–55, https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jensen, Keith (2016), ‘Prosociality’, Current Biology, 26:16, pp. 48–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.025.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kahneman, Daniel (2003), ‘A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality’, The American Psychologist, 58:9, pp. 697–720, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Katapodi, Maria C., Dodd, Marylin J., Facione, Noreen C., Humphreys, Janice C. and Lee, Kathryn A. (2010), ‘Why some women have an optimistic or a pessimistic bias about their breast cancer risk: Experiences, heuristics, and knowledge of risk factors’, Cancer Nursing, 33:1, pp. 64–73, https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181b430f9.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, Antino and Dennis, Alan R. (2019), ‘Says who? The effects of presentation format and source rating on fake news in social media’, Mis Quarterly, 43:3, pp. 1025–39, https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/15188.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kligler-Vilenchik, Neta (2022), ‘Collective social correction: Addressing misinformation through group practices of information verification on WhatsApp’, Digital Journalism, 10:2, pp. 300–18, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1972020.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kline, Rex B. (2011), Principles and Practice for Structural Equation Modelling, 3rd ed., New York: Guilford Publications.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Knuutila, Aleksi, Neudert, Lisa-Maria and Howard, Philip N. (2022), Who Is Afraid of Fake News? Modeling Risk Perceptions of Misinformation in 142 Countries, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Koo, Alax Zhi-Xiong, Su, Min-Hsin, Lee, Sangwon, Ahn, So-Yun and Rojas, Hernando (2021), ‘What motivates people to correct misinformation? Examining the effects of third-person perceptions and perceived norms’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 65:1, pp. 111–34, https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2021.1903896.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Laato, Samuli, Islam, A. Najmul, Islam, Muhammad N. and Whelan, Eoin (2020), ‘What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic?’, European Journal of Information Systems, 29:3, pp. 288–305, https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1770632.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Lee, Sun Y., Sasaki, Shusaku, Kurokawa, Hirofumi and Ohtake, Fumio (2022), ‘The school education, ritual customs, and reciprocity associated with self-regulating hand hygiene practices during COVID-19 in Japan’, BMC Public Health, 22:1, pp. 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14012-z.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Lewandowsky, Stephan and van der Linden, Sander (2021), ‘Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking’, European Review of Social Psychology, 32:2, pp. 348–84, https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Lim, Joon Soo (2017), ‘The third-person effect of online advertising of cosmetic surgery: A path model for predicting restrictive versus corrective actions’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94:4, pp. 972–93, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016687722.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Maksl, Adam, Craft, Stephanie, Ashley, Seth and Miller, Dean (2017), ‘The usefulness of a news media literacy measure in evaluating a news literacy curriculum’, Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 72:2, pp. 228–41, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077695816651970.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Malhotra, Anshu and Jindal, Rajni (2022), ‘Deep learning techniques for suicide and depression detection from online social media: A scoping review’, Applied Soft Computing, 130, 109713, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109713.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Margolin, Drew B., Hannak, Aniko and Weber, Ingmar (2018), ‘Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect?’, Political Communication, 35:2, pp. 196–219, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334018.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Markus, Hazel R. and Kitayama, Shinobu (1991), ‘Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation’, Psychological Review, 98:2, pp. 224–53, https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.98.2.224.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Naeem, Shamshad B., Bhatti, Rubina and Khan, Aqsa (2021), ‘An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk’, Health Information & Libraries Journal, 38:2, pp. 143–49, https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12320.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. O’Connor, Robert E., Yarnal, Brent, Dow, Kirstin, Jocoy, Christine L. and Carbone, Greg J. (2005), ‘Feeling at risk matters: Water managers and the decision to use forecasts’, Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 25:5, pp. 1265–75, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00675.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Orosz, Gábor, Faragó, Laura, Paskuj, Benedek and Kreko, Peter (2022), ‘Long-lasting effects of a prosocial counter-misinformation intervention in an informational autocracy’, Research Square, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2159993/v1.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pennycook, Gordon and Rand, David Gertler (2021), ‘The psychology of fake news’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25:5, pp. 388–402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Pennycook, Gordon, McPhetres, Jonathon, Zhang, Yunhao, Lu, Jackson G. and Rand, David G. (2020), ‘Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention’, Psychological Science, 31:7, pp. 770–80, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Pew Research Center (2021), ‘70% of U.S. social media users never or rarely post or share about political, social issues’, Pew Research Center, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/04/70-of-u-s-social-media-users-never-or-rarely-post-or-share-about-political-social-issues/. Accessed 9 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rogers, Ronald W. (1975), ‘A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change’, The Journal of Psychology, 91:1, pp. 93–114, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosenstock, Irwin M. (1974), ‘Historical origins of the health belief model’, Health Education Monographs, 2:4, pp. 328–35, https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosseel, Yves (2012), ‘lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling’, Journal of Statistical Software, 48:2, pp. 1–36, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Sheeran, Paschal, Maki, Alexander, Montanaro, Erika, Avishai-Yitshak, Aya, Bryan, Angela, Klein, William M., Miles, Eleanor and Rothman, Alexander J. (2016), ‘The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis’, Health Psychology, 35:11, pp. 1178–88, https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000387.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Staub, Ervin (2015), The Roots of Goodness and Resistance to Evil: Inclusive Caring, Moral Courage, Altruism Born of Suffering, Active Bystandership, and Heroism, New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Steiger, James H. (2007), ‘Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling’, Personality and Individual Differences, 42:5, pp. 893–98, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Sun, Yanqing, Oktavianus, Jeffry, Wang, Sai and Lu, Fangcao (2022), ‘The role of influence of presumed influence and anticipated guilt in evoking social correction of COVID-19 misinformation’, Health Communication, 37:11, pp. 1368–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1888452.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Talwar, Shalini, Dhir, Amandeep, Kaur, Puneet, Zafar, Nida and Alrasheedy, Melfi (2019), ‘Why do people share fake news? Associations between the dark side of social media use and fake news sharing behavior’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, pp. 72–82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.026.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Talwar, Shalini, Dhir, Amandeep, Singh, Dilraj, Virk, Gurnam Singh and Salo, Jari (2020), ‘Sharing of fake news on social media: Application of the honeycomb framework and the third-person effect hypothesis’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102197.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Tan, Wee-Kheng and Hsu, Chun Yu (2023), ‘The application of emotions, sharing motivations, and psychological distance in examining the intention to share COVID-19-related fake news’, Online Information Review, 47:1, pp. 59–80, https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-08-2021-0448.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Tandoc Jr, Edson C. (2019), ‘The facts of fake news: A research review’, Sociology Compass, 13:9, e12724, https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12724.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Tandoc Jr, Edson C., Lim, Darren and Ling, Rich (2020), ‘Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why’, Journalism, 21:3, pp. 381–98, https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849198683.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Tully, Melissa, Bode, Letica and Vraga, Emily K. (2020a), ‘Mobilizing users: Does exposure to misinformation and its correction affect users’ responses to a health misinformation post?’, Social Media + Society, 6:4, 2056305120978377, https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120978377.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Tully, Melissa, Vraga, Emily K. and Bode, Leticia (2020b), ‘Designing and testing news literacy messages for social media’, Mass Communication and Society, 23:1, pp. 22–46, https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1604970.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel (1973), ‘Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability’, Cognitive Psychology, 5:2, pp. 207–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. van der Linden, Sander, Roozenbeek, Jon and Compton, Josh (2020), ‘Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19’, Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 566790, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. van der Meer, Toni G. and Jin, Yan (2020), ‘Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: The effects of corrective information type and source’, Health Communication, 35:5, pp. 560–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573295.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. van der Meer, Toni G., Brosius, Anna and Hameleers, Michael (2023), ‘The role of media use and misinformation perceptions in optimistic bias and third-person perceptions in times of high media dependency: Evidence from four countries in the first stage of the COVID-19 pandemic’, Mass Communication and Society, 26:3, pp. 438–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2039202.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Volkmer, Ingrid (2021), Social Media and COVID-19: A Global Study of Digital Crisis Interaction among Gen Z and Millennials, Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Walter, Nathan, Cohen, Jonathan, Holbert, R. Lance and Morag, Yasmin (2020), ‘Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom’, Political Communication, 37:3, pp. 350–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Wiysonge, Charles S., Ndwandwe, Duduzile, Ryan, Jill, Jaca, Anelisa, Batouré, Oumarou, Anya, Blanche-Philomene M. and Cooper, Sara (2022), ‘Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19: Could lessons from the past help in divining the future?’, Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 18:1, pp. 1–3, https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1893062.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Wu, Liang, Morstatter, Fred, Carley, Kathleen M. and Liu, Huan (2019), ‘Misinformation in social media: Definition, manipulation, and detection’, ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 21:2, pp. 80–90, https://doi.org/10.1145/3373464.3373475.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Xiao, Xizhu (2022), ‘Not doomed: Examining the path from misinformation exposure to verification and correction in the context of COVID-19 pandemic’, Telematics and Informatics, 74, 101890, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101890.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Yang, Jeongwon and Tian, Yu (2021), ‘“Others are more vulnerable to fake news than I am”: Third-person effect of COVID-19 fake news on social media users’, Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106950, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106950.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Yang, Wenjie, Wang, Sitong, Peng, Zhenhui, Shi, Chuhan, Ma, Xiaojuan and Yang, Diyi (2022), ‘Know it to defeat it: Exploring health rumor characteristics and debunking efforts on Chinese social media during COVID-19 crisis’, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 16, pp. 1157–68, https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19366.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Yu, Wenting, Shen, Fei and Min, Chen (2022), ‘Correcting science misinformation in an authoritarian country: An experiment from China’, Telematics and Informatics, 66, 101749, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101749.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhu, Yicheng, Wei, Ran, Lo, Ven-Hwei, Zhang, Mingxin and Li, Zongya (2021), ‘Collectivism and altruistic behavior: A third-person effect study of COVID-19 news among Wuhan residents’, Global Media and China, 6:4, pp. 476–91, https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364211045568.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00175_1
Loading
Fake news sharing and correction driven by COVID-19 prosociality
Intellect ; https://doi.org/10.1386/ajms_00175_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00175_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ajms_00175_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keywords: social media ; survey ; communication ; altruism ; public health crisis ; misinformation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test