Whose body? Auteurism, feminism and horror in Hostel Part II and Jennifer’s Body | Intellect Skip to content
1981
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2045-5852
  • E-ISSN: 2045-5860

Abstract

The gender politics of horror cinema are ambiguous and ideologically complex. In 2007, film-maker Eli Roth generated considerable debate when he claimed that his film Hostel Part II (2007) was a feminist horror film. More recently, awardwinning screenwriter Diablo Cody generated a similar uproar when she likewise claimed that her film Jennifer's Body (Kusama 2009) was feminist. In both cases, the attacks directed at Roth and Cody stemmed as much from animosity towards their very public personas as from their films' content. These attacks also stemmed partly from long-standing prejudices against horror films as vehicles for violently reinforcing patriarchy, and from the fact that these film-makers, in speaking about feminism, were speaking on behalf of a generalized, unified and coherent entity that most feminists would argue does not actually exist. This article analyses the claims made by Roth and Cody and the outcry generated by these claims. Moreover, this article considers whether the contemporary horror film can legitimately serve as a vehicle for forging feminist statements, given both the nature of the horror film and the many competing and contradictory ideas of what constitutes feminism.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc.1.2.181_1
2011-09-08
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc.1.2.181_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): auteurism; feminism; film; gender; genre; horror
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error