Sexy, slimy, monstrous: Infection as collaboration in Ben Wheatley’s In the Earth and Jaco Bouwer’s Gaia | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Australasian Journal of Popular Culture
  4. Volume 11, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 11, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 2045-5852
  • E-ISSN: 2045-5860

Abstract

This article offers a discussion of two eco-horror feature films, each released in 2021: Ben Wheatley’s , and Jaco Bouwer’s . With a pandemic theme, both film fictions feature sentient woods and forests which infect humans with fungal spores. This is the non-human world enlisting human collaboration. Both films break the mould of the traditional eco-horror; invariably, the latter dramatizes how the natural world avenges itself on humankind. This storytelling mode involves the use of catastrophe narratives. Elizabeth Parker has explored the alternative genre, the ‘ecoGothic’ (2020), which stimulates ambiguous emotional responses to human–non-human hybrid forms. To date, there is little scholarship which analyses such hybrids through the lens of queer ecology. Therefore, I will bring Timothy Morton’s theory of queer ecology (2010), dark ecology (2007) and his concept of the spectral non-human world (2017) into dialogue with Simon C. Estok’s term ‘the slimic imagination’ (2022). My thesis is that both films engage an interaction between queer and slimic narratives in order to undo the catastrophe narrative. Queer slime is that which destabilizes gender binaries as a means of creating uneasy but intimate collaborations between the human and non-human world.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc_00056_1
2022-12-27
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alaimo, Stacy. ( 2010), Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self, Bloomington, IN:: Indiana University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouwer, Jaco. ( 2021), Gaia, South Africa:: Film Initiative South Africa;.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulfin, A.. ( 2017;), ‘ Popular culture and the “new human condition”: Catastrophe narrative and climate change. ’, Global and Planetary Change, 156, pp. 140–46, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.03.002. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Comstock, M., and Hocks, M. E.. ( 2016;), ‘ The sounds of climate change: Sonic rhetoric in the anthropocene, the age of human impact. ’, Rhetoric Review, 35:2, pp. 165–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2016.1142854. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Estok, Simon C.. ( 2022;), ‘ The slimic imagination and elemental horror. ’, de Gruyter, ZAA, 70:1, 28 March, pp. 59–74, https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2022-2049. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Foy, Joseph J.. ( 2010;), ‘ It came from planet earth: Eco-horror and the politics of postenvironmentalism in The Happening. ’ in T. M. Dale, and J. J. Foy. (eds), Homer Simpson Marches on Washington: Dissent through American Popular Culture, Lexington, KY:: Kentucky University Press;, pp. 167–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Haraway, Donna. ( 2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC and London:: Duke University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ingwersen, Moritz. ( 2019;), ‘ Environmental catastrophe as morphogenesis: Inhuman transformations in Ballard’s climate novels. ’, Humanities, 8:52, pp. 1–16, https://doi.org/10.3390/h8010052. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Kramer, Heinrich, and Sprenger, James. ([1490] 2008), Malleus Maleficarum: Or the Hammer of the Witches, London:: Forgotten Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Lovelock, James. ( 2007), The Revenge of Gaia: Why the Earth Is Fighting Back and Why We Can Still Save Humanity, London:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Lovelock, James. ( 2021;), ‘ Beware: Gaia may destroy humans before we destroy the earth. ’, The Guardian, 2 November, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/nov/02/beware-gaia-theory-climate-crisis-earth. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Lovelock, James E., and Margulies, Lynn. ( 1974;), ‘ Atmospheric homeostasis for and by the biosphere: The Gaia hypothesis. ’, Tellus, 26:1&2, pp. 2–10, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v26i1-2.9731. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Money, Nicholas P.. ( 2017), Mushrooms: A Natural and Cultural History, London:: Reaktion;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Morton, Timothy. ( 2007), Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics, Cambridge, MA and London:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Morton, Timothy. ( 2010), The Ecological Thought, Cambridge, MA and London:: Harvard University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Morton, Timothy. ([ 2010;] 2020), ‘ Guest column: Queer ecology. ’, PMLA, 23 October, 125:2, pp. 273–82, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/pmla/article/abs/guest-column-queer-ecology/1EF919CB20FEC2B18F7B76CFCF7DC4E1. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Morton, Timothy. ( 2017), Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People, London:: Verso;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Parker, Elizabeth. ( 2020), The Forest and the EcoGothic: The Deep Dark Woods in the Popular Imagination, London:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Quammen, David. ( 2012), Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic, London:: Penguin;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Quammen, David. ( 2020;), ‘ The pandemic from the virus’s point of view. ’, New York Times, 19 September, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/19/opinion/sunday/coronavirus-covid-evolution.html. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Rolf, R. T., and Rolfe, R. W.. ( 1974), The Romance of the Fungus World, New York:: Dover Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Tollefson, Jeff. ( 2020;), ‘ Why deforestation and extinction make pandemics more likely. ’, Nature, 584:7820, n.pag., 7 August, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02341-1. Accessed 5 September 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Tsing, Anne Lowenhaupt. ( 2015), The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins, Princeton, NJ and Oxford:: Princeton University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Wheatley, Ben. ( 2021), In the Earth, UK:: Rootk Films and US: Protagonist Pictures;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Wohlleben, Peter. ( 2017), The Hidden Life of Trees: What they Feel, How they Communicate (trans. J. Billinghurst), London:: William Collins;.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Woodward, Ben. ( 2012), Slime Dynamics: Generation, Mutation, and the Creep of Life, Washington, DC and Winchester:: Zero Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lord, Catherine. ( 2022;), ‘ Sexy, slimy, monstrous: Infection as collaboration in Ben Wheatley’s In the Earth and Jaco Bouwer’s Gaia. ’, The Australasian Journal of Popular Culture, 11:1&2, pp. 147–61, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajpc_00056_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc_00056_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): catastrophe narrative; dark ecology; eco-horror; ecoGothic; fungal networks; hybrid; queer ecology

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error