Skip to content
1981
Disability and Popular Culture
  • ISSN: 2045-5852
  • E-ISSN: 2045-5860

Abstract

Disabled creators are systematically excluded from shaping the cultural narratives that circulate globally. This exclusion is embedded in the digital infrastructure that enables contemporary cultural production. We situate accessibility within the broader terrain of popular culture studies by examining FilmFreeway, the dominant online submission portal for the global film festival circuit. Festivals are key elements of global screen culture, and FilmFreeway is a ubiquitous and influential element of festival processes. However, the accessibility of FilmFreeway’s submission portal has received little critical attention. This case study follows the submission journey of (2023), a documentary short film produced through an accessible filmmaking process by Australian university students. The film was submitted to 24 international festivals via FilmFreeway and accepted by five. Using thematic analysis, we examine the submission portal and accessibility policies of these five festivals. Our findings reveal that while disability-focused film festivals integrate accessibility into their submission processes, more general film festivals and FilmFreeway itself largely exclude disabled filmmakers, offering only incidental or symbolic access. Drawing on Elizabeth Ellcessor’s concept of cultural accessibility, we argue that meaningful participation in popular culture depends not only on representation and audience reception but also on equitable access to the infrastructures through which culture circulates, including film festivals. Inclusion in festival submission processes requires more than technical access; it requires a systemic rethinking of digital platforms and festival spaces to centre disabled people as valued cultural participants.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • iSchools research
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc_00112_1
2026-01-31
2026-04-14

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alexiou, Gus (2024), ‘How inaccessible film festivals silence disabled voices in cinema – New research’, Forbes, 30 June, https://www.forbes.com/sites/gusalexiou/2024/06/30/how-inaccessible-film-festivals-silence-disabled-voices-in-cinema--new-research/. Accessed 19 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowen, Liz (2021), ‘Disability access and digital platforms’, Hastings Center Report, 51:5, p. 5, https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1278.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Brunow, Dagmar (2020), ‘Come together? Curating communal viewing experiences for hybrid and online film festivals’, NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies, 9:2, pp. 339–47, https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/15326.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Courage Film Festival FilmFreeway (2025), ‘About’, https://filmfreeway.com/CourageFilmFestival. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  5. De Valck, Marijke (2016), ‘What is a film festival? How to study festivals and why you should’, in M. de Valck, B. Kredell and S. Loist (eds), Fim Festivals: History, Theory, Method, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Debinski, Anna (2023), ‘Accessing film culture and community at the 2023 Melbourne International Film Festival’, NECSUS: European Journal of Media Studies, 12:2, pp. 292–300, https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/21711.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Effer, Niklas, Zimmerman, Gottfried and Strobbe, Christophe (2022), ‘Overlay tools as a support for accessible websites – possibilities and limitations’, in K. Miesenberger, G. Kouroupetroglou, K. Mavrou, R. Manduchi, M. Rodriguez and P. Penáz (eds), Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 6–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellcessor, Elizabeth (2016), Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Film Festival Alliance (2024), ‘Best practices for professional film festivals’, https://filmfestivalalliance.org/advocacy/best-practices?utm_source=ff&utm_medium=article&utm_campaign=best_practices. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  10. FilmFreeway (2025a), ‘Help center’, https://filmfreeway.com/help. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  11. FilmFreeway (2025b), ‘How do I add subtitles or captions to my video?’, https://filmfreeway.com/help/article/16059/how-do-add-subtitles-or-captions-to-my-video. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  12. FilmFreeway (2025c), ‘Our commitment to ensuring a safe and trusted platform’, https://filmfreeway.com/help/article/16095/our-commitment-to-ensuring-a-safe-and-trusted-platform. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  13. Fischer, Alex (2018), ‘The fully clickable situation: From tyranny to monopoly to a Filmfreeway’, in T. Jenkins (ed.), International Film Festivals: Contemporary Cultures and History Beyond Venice and Cannes, London and New York: I.B. Tauris, pp. 49–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fletcher-Watson, Ben and May, Shaun (2018), ‘Enhancing relaxed performance: Evaluating the Autism Arts Festival’, Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 23:3, pp. 406–20, https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2018.1468243.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. FWD-Doc (2021), ‘A toolkit for inclusion & accessibility’, https://www.fwd-doc.org/toolkit. Accessed 17 July 2025.
  16. FWD-Doc (2023), ‘Executive summary of film event accessibility scorecard impact report 2023’, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5dd1c2b5a0f7a568485cbedd/t/6668727efe7391021f25a9bc/1718121090182/Executive+Summary+Scorecard+Impact+Report+2023.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2025.
  17. Inside Out and Creative Users Project (2023), ‘The film festival guide to access’, https://www.creativeconnector.art/the-film-festival-guide-to-access/. Accessed 19 July 2025.
  18. Magladry, Mad and Ellis, Katie (2022), Accidental Allies: A Content Analysis Study of National and International Fringe Festivals, Perth: Curtin University.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Martins, Cláudia and Ferreira, Cláudia (2022), ‘Accessibility as far as the eye can see: An accessible film festival’, in P. C. Bernal and M. E. Grossi (eds), Translation, Mediation and Accessibility for Linguistic Minorities, Berlin: Frank & Timme, pp. 69–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. McNeely, Michael (2020) ‘Film critic Michael McNeely recaps his Sundance Film Festival experience’, Accessible Media Inc., https://www.ami.ca/sundance-wrap-up. Accessed 19 July 2025.
  21. Morris, Amanda (2022), ‘For blind internet users, the fix can be worse than the flaws’, New York Times, 13 July, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/13/technology/ai-web-accessibility.html. Accessed 17 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Norcross, Eric (2014), ‘Festivals & filmmakers: Here is FilmFreeway.com’, Renegade Cinema, 10 February, https://renegadecinema.com/23415/filmfreeway-com-festivals-filmmakers/. Accessed 17 July 2025.
  23. Novella Film Festival FilmFreeway (2025), ‘About’, https://filmfreeway.com/NovellaFilmFestival. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  24. OTR Film Fest (2025a), ‘About’, https://otrfilmfest.org/about/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  25. OTR Film Fest (2025b), ‘Homepage’, https://otrfilmfest.org/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  26. OTR Film Fest (2025c), ‘Contact us’, https://otrfilmfest.org/contact/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  27. OTR Film Fest AccessiBe Widget (2025a), ‘Accessibility statement’, https://otrfilmfest.org/about/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  28. OTR Film Fest AccessiBe Widget (2025b), ‘Accessibility adjustments’, https://otrfilmfest.org/about/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  29. Over-the-Rhine International Film Festival FilmFreeway (2025), ‘About’, https://filmfreeway.com/otrfilmfest. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  30. Pedersen, Isabel and Aspevig, Kristen (2014), ‘“Swept to the sidelines and forgotten”: Cultural exclusion, blind persons’ participation, and International film festivals’, Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 3:3, p. 29, https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v3i3.172.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Riley, Olivia Johnston (2024), ‘Podfic: Cultural accessibility through digital community’, Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 20:1, pp. 94–116, https://www.participations.org/20-01-06-riley.pdf.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Roselli, Adrian (2020), ‘#accessiBe will get you sued’, https://adrianroselli.com/2020/06/accessibe-will-get-you-sued.html. Accessed 17 July 2025.
  33. Snyder, Sharon L. and Mitchell, David T. (2008), ‘“How do we get all these disabilities in here?”: Disability film festivals and the politics of atypicality’, Canadian Journal of Film Studies, 17:1, pp. 11–29, https://doi.org/10.3138/cjfs.17.1.11.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Snyder, Sharon L. and Mitchell, David T. (2020), ‘Disability cinema: Charting alternative ethical maps of living on film’, in K. Ojrzyńska and M. Wieczorek (eds), Disability and Dissensus: Strategies of Disability Representation and Inclusion in Contemporary Culture, Leiden: Brill, pp. 69–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Together (2012a), ‘Filming disability: A guide for filmmakers and editors’, https://www.together2012.org.uk/resources/disability-a-guide-for-filmmakers-and-editors/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  36. Together (2012b), ‘The D system’, https://www.together2012.org.uk/resources/the-d-system/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  37. Together (2012c), ‘Contact’, https://www.together2012.org.uk/contact/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  38. Together (2012d), ‘Access’, https://www.together2012.org.uk/about/access/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  39. Together (2012e), ‘Our vision’, https://www.together2012.org.uk/about/home-is-where-the-art-is-our-vision/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  40. Together! Disability Film Festival FilmFreeway (2025), ‘About’, https://filmfreeway.com/TogetherDisabilityFilmFestival. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  41. United Nations (2006), Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, New York: United Nations, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Ch_IV_15.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Uzzo, Gabriele (2020), ‘Accessible film festivals: A pilot study’, Bridge: Trends and Traditions in Translation and Interpreting Studies, 1:2, pp. 68–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. W3C (2024), ‘Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.2’, 12 December, https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed 15 July 2025.
  44. WA Screen Culture Awards FilmFreeway (2025), ‘About’, https://filmfreeway.com/WAScreenCultureAwards. Accessed 10 July 2025.
  45. White, Abbey (2023), ‘ReelAbilities New York director on the state of disability inclusion and changes over the fest’s 15 years’, The Hollywood Reporter, 27 April, https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/reelabilities-new-york-festival-director-state-of-accessibility-interview-1235403161/. Accessed 17 July 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Wong, Cindy Hing-Yuk (2011), Film Festivals: Culture, People and Power on the Global Screen, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc_00112_1
Loading
Inclusivity from the start? Evaluating the accessibility of FilmFreeway festival submission processes
Australasian Journal of Popular Culture 14, 239 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1386/ajpc_00112_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc_00112_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc_00112_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): cinema; digital access; disability; film festivals; inclusion; media

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test