Skip to content
1981
Disability and Popular Culture
  • ISSN: 2045-5852
  • E-ISSN: 2045-5860

Abstract

This article performs a critical disability analysis of disability memes that emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic, examining how they functioned as significant counternarratives to dominant cultural representations. The pandemic disrupted the perceived stability of able-bodiedness, forcing many non-disabled people to experience forms of social isolation, bodily vulnerability and environmental limitations that are routine for people with disability. As digital media became central to communication, disability communities used memes – a popular and participatory form of communication – to expose the myth of stable embodiment and offer valuable insights. Drawing on Rosemarie Garland-Thomson’s framework of disability as a relationship between bodies and environments, we identify three categories of disability memes from the pandemic era: experiential, environmental and expectation subversion. These memes, created and shared widely, leveraged disability humour to challenge ableist stereotypes by positioning people with disability as ‘oracles’ and experts in navigating bodily instability and inaccessibility. The experiential memes foregrounded insider knowledge, performing a pedagogical function for a new audience. Environmental memes used humour to critique socially constructed barriers and institutional failures that were suddenly exposed as arbitrary. Finally, expectation-subversion memes challenged the pressures of productivity culture, validating rest and fluctuating capacity while embodying ‘crip time’ as a form of resistance. By analysing these new meme genres, this article argues that the shared experiences of the pandemic fostered a unique cultural moment where disability memes could effectively challenge long-standing, problematic representations – such as those centred on charity, inspiration or faking disability – and offer authentic counternarratives that legitimized the voices and experiences of people with disability.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Australian Research Council Mid-Career Industry fellowship (Award IM240100147)
© 2025 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc_00115_1
2026-01-31
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albrecht, G. L. (1999), ‘Disability humor: What’s in a joke?’, Body & Society, 5:4, pp. 67–74, https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X99005004007.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkaraki, S. M. S., Alias, N. B. and Maros, M. (2024), ‘Exploring the impact of social media humor related to the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review on themes, coping mechanisms, critiques and linguistic devices’, Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11:1, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2322227.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Anesi, J. (2018), ‘Laughing matters: Humour as advocacy in education for the disabled’, Disability & Society, 33:5, pp. 723–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1453782.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Aslan, E. (2021a), ‘Days of our “quarantined” lives’, Internet Pragmatics, 5:2, pp. 227–56, https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00075.asl.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Aslan, E. (2021b), ‘When the internet gets “coronified”: Pandemic creativity and humor in internet memes’, Viral Discourse, https://healthdiscoursecom.wordpress.com/author/easlan19/. Accessed 6 September 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2024), ‘People with disability in Australia’, 23 April, https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/disability/people-with-disability-in-australia/contents/social-support/social-inclusion. Accessed 5 September 2025.
  7. Barnes, C. (1992), ‘Disabling imagery and the media: An exploration of the principles for media representations of disabled people’, Ryburn Publishing, https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/library/Barnes-disabling-imagery.pdf. Accessed 2 November 2025.
  8. Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S. and Guitton, M. J. (2020), ‘COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies’, Computers in Human Behaviour, 111, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bertazzoli, A. (2019), Internet Memes and Society: Social, Cultural, and Political Contexts, Milton: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brooks, E. and Haller, B. (2025), ‘Centering disabled Americans’ writings about the Covid-19 pandemic: A critical disability studies analysis’, in K. Ellis, M. Kent and K. Cousins (eds), The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Disability Studies, New York: Routledge, pp. 154–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell, F. K. (2009), Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Clapton, J. (2003), ‘Tragedy and catastrophe: Contentious discourses of ethics and disability’, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47:7, pp. 540–47, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00533.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Davis, L. (1995), Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body, London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dourado, M. K. D. S. (2025), ‘Social voices of the Deaf community in memes’, Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso, 20, https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573p66838.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dynel, M. (2022), ‘The life of COVID-19 mask memes: A diachronic study of the pandemic memescape’, Comunicar, 30:72, pp. 73–85, https://doi.org/10.3916/c72-2022-06.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, K. (2015), Disability and Popular Culture: Focusing Passion, Creating Community, Expressing Defiance, Surrey: Ashgate.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Ellis, K. (2016), Disability Media Work: Opportunities and Obstacles, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ellis, K. and Goggin, G. (2015), Disability and the Media, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ellis, K., Kent, M., Locke, K., McRae, L., Dau, D. and Peaty, G. (2021), ‘Smartphones, disability and the Australian experience of the COVID-19 pandemic for people who are blind and with low vision’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 41:3, https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v41i3.8318.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. El-Wakil, R. (2022), ‘Women representation in crisis memes: Humour and beyond: A critical discourse analysis’, Textual Turnings: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal in English Studies, 4:1, pp. 98–122, https://doi.org/10.21608/ttaip.2022.277156.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Fricker, M. (2007), Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Garland-Thomson, R. (1997), Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in AmericanCulture and Literature, New York: Columbia University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Garland-Thomson, R. (2002), ‘Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory’, NWSA Journal, 14:3, pp. 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1353/nwsa.2003.0005.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Goodley, D. (2017), Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction, London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hadley, B. (2016), ‘Cheats, charity cases and inspirations: Disrupting the circulation of disability-based memes online’, Disability & Society, 31:5, pp. 676–92, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1199378.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Haller, B. (2010), Representing Disability in an Ableist World: Essays on Mass Media, Louisville, KY: Advocado Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Haller, B. A. (2024), Disabled People Transforming Media Culture for a More Inclusive World, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Haller, B. and Becker, A. B. (2014), ‘Stepping backwards with disability humor? The case of NY Gov. David Paterson’s representation on Saturday Night Live’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 34:1, https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v34i1.3459.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hevey, D. (1992), The Creatures Time Forgot: Photography and Disability Imagery, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hughes, B. (2019), ‘Fear, pity and disgust: Emotions and the non-disabled imaginary’, in N. Watson, A. Roulstone and C. Thomas (eds), Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Laor, T. (2023), ‘Are memes selfish? How internet memes reflect crisis – Covid-19 pandemic in Israel’, Online Information Review, 47:7, pp. 1377–95, https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-07-2022-0381.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Literat, I. (2021), ‘Memes in the time of corona: An autoethnographic visual essay on memes as relational resources during the COVID-19 pandemic’, Visual Studies, 36:2, pp. 116–23, https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586x.2021.1911678.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Longmore, P. (1987), ‘Screening stereotypes: Images of disabled people in television and motion pictures’, in A. Gartner and T. Joe (eds), Images of the Disabled, Disabling Images, New York: Praeger, pp. 65–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Longmore, P. K. (2005), ‘The cultural framing of disability: Telethons as a case study’, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 120:2, pp. 502–08, https://doi.org/10.1632/s0030812900167793.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Mamo, Y. and Haegele, J. (2023), ‘“I’m not your inspiration, thank you very much”: Social media users’ engagement with Stella Young’s TED Talk’, The Journal of Social Media in Society, 12:2, pp. 264–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Massanari, A. L. and Chess, S. (2018), ‘Attack of the 50-foot social justice warrior: The discursive construction of SJW memes as the monstrous feminine’, Feminist Media Studies, 18:4, pp. 525–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447333.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. McRuer, R. (2006), Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Medina, J. (2003), ‘Identity trouble: Disidentification and the problem of difference’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 29:6, pp. 655–80, https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453703296002.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Meekosha, H. and Shuttleworth, R. (2009), ‘What’s so “critical” about critical disability studies?’, Australian Journal of Human Rights, 15:1, pp. 47–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238x.2009.11910861.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Mielczarek, N. (2018), ‘The “Pepper-Spraying Cop” icon and its internet memes: Social justice and public shaming through rhetorical transformation in digital culture’, Visual Communication Quarterly, 25:2, pp. 67–81, https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2018.1456929.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Mills, M., Kornstein, H., Ginsburg, F., Rapp, R., Heumann, J. and Yong, E. (2025), How to Be Disabled in a Pandemic, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Milner, R. (2013), ‘Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the Occupy Wall Street movement’, International Journal of Communication, 7, pp. 2357–90, https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1949. Accessed 13 November 2025.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Mould, T. (2022), ‘Counter memes and anti-legends in online welfare discourse’, Journal of American Folklore, 135:538, pp. 441–65, https://doi.org/10.5406/15351882.135.538.03.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Moussa, M., Benmessaoud, S. and Douai, A. (2020), ‘Internet memes as “tactical” social action: A multimodal critical discourse analysis approach’, International Journal of Communication, 14, pp. 5920–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Norden, M. (199), The Cinema of Isolation: A History of Physical Disability in the Movies, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Oliver, M. (1996), Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Peaty, G., Alice, J. and Ellis, K. (2022), ‘Clickbait in the commodification of sympathy: Disability, inspiration porn and the possibilities for new narratives’, in W. Housley, A. Edwards, R. Beneito-Montagut and R. Fitzgerald (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Digital Society, London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529783193.n23.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Preston, J. (2021), ‘They see me rollin’, they hatin’: Discourses on disability, race and masculinity in the wheelchair Drake meme’, Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 10:3, pp. 1–43, https://doi.org/10.15353/cjds.v10i3.813.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Preston, J. (2023), ‘Never go full potato: Discourses of ableism and sexism in “I can count to potato” memes’, in M. S. Jeffress, J. M. Cypher, J. Ferris and J. A. Scott-Pollock (eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Disability and Communication, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Rintal, S. (2013), ‘Crisis memes: The importance of templatability to internet culture and freedom of expression’, Australasian Journal of Popular Culture, 2:2, pp. 253–71, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajpc.2.2.253_1.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Samuels, E. (2017), ‘Six ways of looking at crip time’, Disability Studies Quarterly, 37:3, https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.5824.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Siebers, T. (2008), Disability Theory, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ungureanu, D. (2024), ‘Memescape narratives of Romanian social movements (2013-2021): A framing theory perspective’, Media and Jornalismo, 24:44, n.pag., https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-5462_44_10.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Vie, S. (2014), ‘In defense of “slacktivism”: The Human Rights Campaign Facebook logo as digital activism’, First Monday, 19:4, https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i4.4961.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. White, M. (2021), ‘Greta Thunberg is “giving a face” to climate activism: Confronting anti-feminist, anti-environmentalist, and ableist memes’, Australian Feminist Studies, 36:110, pp. 396–413, https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2022.2062667.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Wong, A. (2020a), ‘Disabled oracles and the coronavirus’, Disability Visibility Project, 18 March, https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/2020/03/18/coronavirus/. Accessed 6 September 2025.
  57. Wong, A. (2020b), ‘DVP coronavirus stories’, Disability Visibility Project, 29 April, https://disabilityvisibilityproject.com/2020/04/29/dvp-covid-19-stories/. Accessed 18 February 2021.
  58. Young, S. (2014), ‘I’m not your inspiration, thank you very much’, TED, April, https://www.ted.com/talks/stella_young_i_m_not_your_inspiration_thank_you_very_much. Accessed 6 September 2025.
/content/journals/10.1386/ajpc_00115_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): compulsory able-bodiedness; crip time; critical disability studies; dis/ability; disability humour; memes; social justice

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test