Charting the media innovations landscape for regional and rural newspapers | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Australian Journalism Review
  4. Volume 42, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 42, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0810-2686
  • E-ISSN: 2517-620X

Abstract

This article charts a scholarly framework for understanding media innovation in Australia’s non-metropolitan news environments. We adopt a geo-social methodology to explore strategies for the betterment of small country newspapers and the societies they serve in the digital era. In doing so, we do not discount the importance of digitization, but contend that a narrow ‘digital first’ focus is eclipsing other important aspects of local news and generating blind spots around existing and evolving power relationships that might impede or foster innovation. We advocate for a six-dimensional approach to shaping innovation for rural news organizations – one that is relational because it foregrounds the connections between digital, social, cultural, political, economic and environmental concerns. Here, the central question is not how country newsrooms can innovate in the interests of their own viability but rather how they can build resilience and relevance in the interests of the populations and environments that sustain them.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Australian Research Council Linkage (Award LP180100813)
  • Country Press Australia
© 2020 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajr_00019_1
2020-06-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ACCC (Australian Competition and Consumer Commission) ( 2019), Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final report, Canberra:: Australia Competition and Consumer Commission;, pp. 1–623.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Australian Government ( 2018a;), ‘ Innovation fund a boost for regional and small publishers. ’, 21 December, https://www.minister.communications.gov.au/minister/mitch-fifield/news/innovation-fund-boost-regional-and-small-publishers. Accessed 20 February 2020.
  3. Australian Government ( 2018b;), ‘ Senate Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism final report: Parliament of Australia. ’, 5 February, https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Future_of_Public_Interest_Journalism/PublicInterestJournalism/Report/b01. Accessed 20 February 2020.
  4. Blum-Ross, A.,, Mills, J.,, Egglestone, P., and Frohlich, D.. ( 2013;), ‘ Community media and design: Insight journalism as a method for innovation. ’, Journal of Media Practice, 14:3, pp. 171–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bourdieu, P.. ( 1986;), ‘ The forms of capital. ’, in J. G. Richardson. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, New York:: Greenwood Press;, pp. 241–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bowd, K.. ( 2011;), ‘ Reflecting regional life: Localness and social capital in Australian country newspapers. ’, Australian Journalism Review, 17:2, pp. 72–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Boyles, L.. ( 2016;), ‘ The isolation of innovation: Restructuring the digital newsroom through intrapreneurship. ’, Digital Journalism, 4:2, pp. 229–46.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bruns, A.. ( 2014;), ‘ Media innovations, user innovations, societal innovations. ’, The Journal of Media Innovations, 1:1, pp. 13–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Carey, J.. ( 1989), Communication as Culture, New York and London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Carlson, M., and Usher, N.. ( 2016;), ‘ News startups as agents of innovation. ’, Digital Journalism, 4:5, pp. 563–81.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Costera Meijer, I.. ( 2013;), ‘ Valuable journalism: The search for quality from the vantage point of the user. ’, Journalism, 14:6, pp. 754–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Creech, B., and Nadler, A. M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Post-industrial fog: Reconsidering innovation in visions of journalism’s future. ’, Journalism, 19:2, pp. 182–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cunningham, S.. ( 2013), Hidden Innovation: Policy, Industry and the Creative Sector, St Lucia:: University of Queensland Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cunningham, S.. ( 2015;), ‘ Repositioning the innovation rationale for public service media. ’, International Journal of Digital Television, 6:2, pp. 203–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dahlgren, P.. ( 2003;), ‘ Reconfiguring civic culture in a new media milieu. ’, in J. Corner, and D. Pels. (eds), Media and Restyling of Politics: Consumerism, Celebrity and Cynicism, London:: Sage;, pp. 151–70.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dowd, C.. ( 2016;), ‘ The new order of news and social media enterprises: Visualizations, linked data, and new methods and practices in journalism. ’, Communication Research and Practice, 2:1, pp. 97–110.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Duffy, A., and Ang, P. H.. ( 2019;), ‘ Digital journalism: Defined, refined, or re-defined. ’, Digital Journalism, 7:3, pp. 378–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Foster, R., and Bunting, M.. ( 2019), Public Funding of High-quality Journalism: A Report for the ACCC, Canberra, Australia:: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission;, https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/ACCC%20commissioned%20report%20-%20Public%20funding%20of%20high-quality%20journalism%20-%20phase%201%2C%20Communications%20Chambers.PDF. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Garcia-Aviles, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ How journalists innovate in the newsroom: Proposing a model of the diffusion of innovations in media outlets. ’, The Journal of Media Innovations, 5:1, pp. 1–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Graves, L.,, Nyhan, B., and Reifler, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ Understanding innovations in journalistic practice: A field experiment examining motivations for fact-checking. ’, Journal of Communication, 66:1, pp. 102–38.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gutsche, R. E., and Hess, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Contesting communities. ’, Journalism Studies, 19:4, pp. 473–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Harlow, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Quality, innovation, and financial sustainability: Central American entrepreneurial journalism through the lens of its audience. ’, Journalism Practice, 12:5, pp. 543–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Heckman, M., and Wihby, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ The local-mobile paradox: Missed innovation opportunities at local newspapers. ’, Newspaper Research Journal, 40:3, pp. 317–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hess, K.. ( 2013;), ‘ Breaking boundaries: Recasting the small newspaper as geo-social news. ’, Digital Journalism, 1:1, pp. 45–60.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Hess, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Making connections: Mediated social capital and the small-town press. ’, Journalism Studies, 16:4, pp. 486–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hess, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Power to the virtuous?. ’, Journalism Studies, 17:7, pp. 925–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Hess, K.. ( 2019;), ‘ Mining the depleted rivers of gold: Public notices and the sustainability of Australian local news in a digitized democracy. ’, in A. Schapals,, A. Bruns, and B. McNair. (eds), Digitizing Democracy, London:: Routledge;, pp. 88–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hess, K., and Waller, L.. ( 2017), Local Journalism in a Digital World, London:: Palgrave;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Hess, K., and Waller, L.. ( 2018;), ‘ Local and hyperlocal journalism. ’, in M. Carlson,, H. Ornebring,, H. Chan,, S. Craft, and M. Karlsson. (eds), Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies, London:: Oxford University Press;, pp. 144–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hess, K.,, Waller, L., and Ricketson, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Are there news gaps in rural/regional Australia? Researching media plurality beyond Finkelstein. ’, Australian Journalism Review, 36:2, pp. 157–69.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Ihlebæk, K. A.,, Krumsvik, A. H., and Storsul, T.. ( 2012;), ‘ Actor-network theory and the innovation of apps in the media industry. ’, Norwegian Media Researchers’ Conference, Kristiansand, 18–19 October.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ijäs, A. J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Public regulation that promotes or inhibits change. ’, in L. Morlandstø, and A. H. Krumsvik. (eds), Innovation and Value Creation in Local Media, Oslo:: Cappelen Damm Akademisk;, pp. 143–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jenkins, J., and Graves, L.. ( 2019), Case Studies in Collaborative Local Journalism, Oxford:: Oxford Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism;, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/case-studies-collaborative-local-journalism. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Konieczna, M.,, Hatcher, J. A., and Moore, J. E.. ( 2017;), ‘ Citizen-centered journalism and contested boundaries. ’, Journalism Practice, 12:1, pp. 4–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Krumsvik, A. H., and Storsul, T.. ( 2013), Media Innovations: A Multidisciplinary Study of Change, Göteborg:: Nordicom;.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kung, L.. ( 2015), Innovators in Digital News, London:: IB Tauris;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Lehtisaari, K.,, Villi, M.,, Grönlund, M.,, Lindén, C.,, Mierzejewska, B.,, Picard, R., and Roepnack, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Comparing innovation and social media strategies in Scandinavian and US newspapers. ’, Digital Journalism, 6:8, pp. 1029–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Lewis, S., and Usher, N.. ( 2013;), ‘ Open source and journalism: Toward new frameworks for imaging innovation. ’, Media Culture & Society, 35:5, pp. 602–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Lowrey, W.,, Sherrill, L., and Broussard, R.. ( 2019;), ‘ Field and ecology approaches to journalism innovation: The role of ancillary organizations. ’, Journalism Studies, 20:15, pp. 2131–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Maeyer, J. De. ( 2016;), ‘ Adopting a material sensibility in journalism studies. ’, in T. Witschge,, C. W. Anderson, and D. Domingo. (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage;, pp. 460–76.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Meade, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ News Corp Australia plans to axe journalists who lack digital skills. ’, Guardian Australia, 4 June, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/jun/04/news-corp-australia-plans-to-axe-journalists-without-digital-skills. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Morlandstø, L.. ( 2019;), ‘ Innovation and value creation in local media. ’, The Journal of Media Innovations, 5:1, pp. 17–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Park, J.. ( 2017;), ‘ The 2017 innovation funding recipients revealed. ’, Medium, 26 July, https://medium.com/@walkleys/the-2017-innovation-funding-recipients-revealed-647873e33b02. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Poynter Institute ( 2018;), ‘ What media innovation looks like in 2018. ’, 26 June, https://www.poynter.org/business-work/2018/what-media-innovation-looks-like-in-2018/. Accessed 21 February 2020.
  45. Raetzsch, C.. ( 2015;), ‘ Innovation through practice: Journalism as a structure of public communication. ’, Journalism Practice, 9:1, pp. 65–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Redman-MacLaren, M.,, Mills, J., and Tommbe, R.. ( 2014;), ‘ Interpretive focus groups: A participatory method for interpreting and extending secondary analysis of qualitative data. ’, Global Health Action, 7:1, p. 25214.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Richards, I.. ( 2013;), ‘ Beyond city limits: Regional journalism and social capital. ’, Journalism, 14:5, pp. 627–42.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Ricketson, M.. ( 2017;), ‘ Dance of the elephants. ’, Inside Story, 18 September, https://insidestory.org.au/dance-of-the-elephants/. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Seelos, C., and Mair, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Innovation is not the Holy Grail. ’, Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall 2012 , https://pacscenter.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Seelos-Mair-2012-SSIR-Innovation.pdf. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Simons, M.. ( 2019;), ‘ What the ACCC thinks about journalism. ’, Inside Story, 30 July, https://insidestory.org.au/what-the-accc-thinks-about-journalism/. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Spyridou, L.,, Matsiola, M.,, Veglis, A.,, Kalliris, G., and Dimoulas, C.. ( 2013;), ‘ Journalism in a state of flux: Journalists as agents of technology innovation and emerging news practices. ’, The International Communication Gazette, 75:1, pp. 76–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Trappel, J.. ( 2015;), ‘ What to study when studying media and communication innovation? Research design for the digital age. ’, The Journal of Media Innovations, 2:1, pp. 7–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wagemans, A., and Witschge, T.. ( 2019;), ‘ Examining innovation as process: Action research in journalism studies. ’, Convergence, 25:2, pp. 209–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Wemple, E.. ( 2016;), ‘ Innovation gone bad: The best of the worst ideas in media experimentation. ’, Columbia Journalism Review, Fall/Winter, https://www.cjr.org/special_report/innovation_bad_ideas_listicle.php. Accessed 20 February 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Westlund, O., and Lewis, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ Agents of media innovations: Actors, actants, and audiences. ’, The Journal of Media Innovations, 1:2, pp. 10–35.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Zelizer, B.. ( 2015;), ‘ Terms of choice: Uncertainty, journalism, and crisis. ’, Journal of Communication, 65:5, pp. 888–908.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Zelizer, B.. ( 2019;), ‘ Why journalism is about more than digital technology. ’, Digital Journalism, 7:3, pp. 343–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Zhang, S., and Feng, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ A step forward? Exploring the diffusion of data journalism as journalistic innovations in China. ’, Journalism Studies, 20:9, pp. 1281–300.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hess, Kristy, and Waller, Lisa. ( 2020;), ‘ Charting the media innovations landscape for regional and rural newspapers. ’, Australian Journalism Review, 42:1, pp. 59–75, doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00019_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ajr_00019_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): business models; local journalism; local news; media innovation; news sustainability; public interest journalism

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error