The ‘digital death knock’: Australian journalists’ use of social media in reporting everyday tragedy | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Australian Journalism Review
  4. Volume 44, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 44, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0810-2686
  • E-ISSN: 2517-620X

Abstract

Newspapers regularly publish stories about people who have died suddenly or in unusual circumstances and the effect of these deaths on families and communities. The practice by which a journalist writes such a story is called the ‘death knock’; the journalist seeks out the deceased’s family to interview them for a story about their loss. The death knock is challenging and controversial. It has been criticized as an unethical intrusion on grief and privacy and shown to have negative effects on bereaved people and journalists. It has also been defended as an act of inclusion, giving the bereaved control over stories that may be written anyway, and a form of public service journalism that can have benefits for families, communities and journalists. Traditionally a knock on the door, the death knock is also done via phone and e-mail, and recently, in a practice termed the ‘digital death knock’, using social media. This article reports on the findings of a 2021 survey of Australian journalists and their current death knock practice and it will do this within the framework of research in the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. In these countries, journalists are doing the ‘digital death knock’ because of time and competition pressures and available technology; however, this raises ethical concerns about their reproduction of social media material without the permission or knowledge of its owners. This article will discuss the extent to which social media has impacted death knock practice in Australia.

© 2022 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajr_00106_7
2022-11-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnes, L.. ( 2016;), ‘ Journalism and everyday trauma: A grounded theory of the impact from death-knocks and court reporting. ’, doctoral thesis, Auckland:: Auckland University of Technology, https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/handle/10292/10228. Accessed 27 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes, L.,, Tupou, J., and Harrison, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Rolling with the punches: Why it is ethical to practise death knocks. ’, Asia Pacific Media Educator, 26:1, pp. 51–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Belch, L.. ( 2015;), ‘ Reporting the death knock: Ethics, social media and the Leveson inquiry. ’, master’s thesis, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh Napier University, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74028703.pdf. Accessed 20 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, A.. ( 2015), Media and Communication Research Methods: An Introduction to Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, London:: Sage Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Berrington, E., and Jemphrey, A.. ( 2003;), ‘ Pressures on the press: Reflections on reporting tragedy. ’, Journalism, 4:2, pp. 225–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyd, D., and Ellison, B.. ( 2008;), ‘ Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13:1, pp. 210–30, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x. Accessed 20 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Braun, V.,, Clarke, V.,, Boulton, E.,, Davey, L., and McEvoy, C.. ( 2021;), ‘ The online survey as a qualitative research tool. ’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24:6, pp. 641–54, https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550. Accessed 12 November 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Compton, J., and Benedetti, P.. ( 2010;), ‘ Labour, new media and the institutional restructuring of journalism. ’, Journalism Studies, 11:4, pp. 487–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cooper, G.. ( 2012;), ‘ Facing up to the ethical issues surrounding Facebook use. ’, in R. Keble, and J. Mair. (eds), The Phone Hacking Scandal: Journalism on Trial, Suffolk:: Abramis;, pp. 250–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooper, G., and Whittle, S.. ( 2009), ‘Privacy, probity and public interest’, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism;, University of Oxford, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/privacy-probity-and-public-interest. Accessed 14 April 2021.
  11. Duncan, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ Sadly missed: The death knock news story as a personal narrative of grief. ’, Journalism, 13:5, pp. 589–603, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911431542. Accessed 22 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Duncan, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ The ethics. ’, in J. Healey. (ed.), Trauma Reporting: A Journalist’s Guide to Covering Sensitive Stories, London:: Routledge;, pp. 186–98.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Duncan, S., and Luce, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ Using the responsible suicide reporting model to increase adherence to global media reporting guidelines. ’, Journalism, 23:5, pp. 1132–48, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920952685. Accessed 1 December 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Duncan, S., and Newton, J.. ( 2010;), ‘ How do you feel? Preparing novice reporters for the death knock. ’, Journalism Practice, 4:4, pp. 439–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Duncan, S., and Newton, J.. ( 2012;), ‘ Hacking into tragedy: Exploring the ethics of death reporting in the social media age. ’, in R. Keeble, and J. Mair. (eds), The Phone Hacking Scandal: Journalism on Trial, Bury St Edmunds:: Abramis;, pp. 208–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Duncan, S., and Newton, J.. ( 2014;), ‘ Emotion and trauma in reporting disaster and tragedy. ’, The Future of Humanitarian Reporting, London:: City University, London;, pp. 69–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Fletcher, K.. ( 2007;), ‘ Why blogs are an open door. ’, British Journalism Review, 18:2, pp. 41–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956474807080945. Accessed 27 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Franklin, B.. ( 2014;), ‘ The future of journalism. ’, Journalism Studies, 15:5, pp. 481–99, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.930254. Accessed 27 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Friedman, A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Facebook as a reporting tool. ’, Columbia Journalism Review, 24 January, https://archives.cjr.org/realtalk/facebook_as_a_reporting_tool.php. Accessed 27 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Fullerton, R. S., and Patterson, M. J.. ( 2016;), ‘ The traditional “pickup” or “death knock” story: Its role, its value(s), and the impact of social media. ’, in C. Richardson, and R. S. Fullerton. (eds), Covering Canadian Crime: What Journalists Should Know and the Public Should Question, Toronto:: University of Toronto Press;, pp. 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Gregory, P.,, Stevenson, F.,, King, M.,, Osborn, D., and Pitman, A.. ( 2020;), ‘ The experiences of people bereaved by suicide regarding the press reporting of the death: qualitative study. ’, BMC Public Health, 20:1, pp. 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8211-1. Accessed 22 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hanusch, F.. ( 2010), Representing Death in the Media: Journalism, Media and Mortality, Basingstoke:: Palgrave Macmillan;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Harcup, T.. ( 2014), A Dictionary of Journalism, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Healey, J.. ( 2020), Trauma Reporting: A Journalist’s Guide to Covering Sensitive Stories, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Herman, L., and Vergeer, M.. ( 2009;), ‘ Internet in the daily life of journalists: Explaining the use of the internet by work-related characteristics and professional opinions. ’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, pp. 138–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Hume, J.. ( 2005;), ‘ Life and death in a small town: Cultural values and memory in community newspaper obituaries. ’, Grassroots Editor, 46:4, pp. 1–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Linklater, M.. ( 1996;), ‘ Why Dunblane was different. ’, British Journalism Review, 7:2, pp. 15–19.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Margaret Gee’s Australian Media Guide ( 2021), ConnectWeb Directories, Mediality Pty Ltd;, https://connectweb-com-au.ezproxy.newcastle.edu.au/search.aspx?pub=mg. Accessed 10 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance ( 2020;), ‘ Survey finds concerns about concentration of ownership and decline of trust in journalism. ’, MEAA, 15 May, https://www.meaa.org/news/survey-finds-concerns-about-concentration-of-ownership-and-decline-of-trust-in-journalism/. Accessed 8 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. McKay, J.. ( 2007;), ‘ Preparing Journalism Students for the Blameless Bugle and the Guilty Gazette. ’, Ethical Space, 4:4, pp. 51–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. McManus, J. H.. ( 2009;), ‘ The commercialisation of news. ’, in K. Wahl-Jorgensen, and T. Hanitzsch. (eds), The Handbook of Journalism Studies, pp. 218–33, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Moreham, N. A., and Tinsley, Y.. ( 2019;), ‘ The impact of grief journalism on its subjects: Lessons from the Pike River mining disaster. ’, Journal of Media Law, 10:2, pp. 189–218, https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1592337. Accessed 15 July 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Muller, D.. ( 2010;), ‘ Ethics and trauma: Lessons from media coverage of Black Saturday. ’, The Australian Journal of Rural Health, 18, pp. 5–10.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Newton, J., and Duncan, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ Journalists and the bereaved: Constructing a positive approach to the teaching of death reporting. ’, Journalism Education, 1:2, pp. 59–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Saleh, A., and Bista, K.. ( 2017;), ‘ Examining factors impacting online survey response rates in educational research: Perceptions of graduate students. ’, Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 13:29, pp. 63–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanders, K.. ( 2003), Ethics and Journalism, London:: Sage Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Ward, S. J.. ( 2009;), ‘ Journalism ethics. ’, in K. Wahl-Jorgensen, and T. Hanitzsh. (eds), The Handbook of Journalism Studies, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 295–309.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Watson, Alysson. ( 2022;), ‘ The “digital death knock”: Australian journalists’ use of social media in reporting everyday tragedy. ’, Australian Journalism Review, 44:2, pp. 245–62, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00106_7
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ajr_00106_7
Loading
The ‘digital death knock’: Australian journalists’ use of social media in reporting everyday tragedy
Australian Journalism Review 44, 245 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00106_7
/content/journals/10.1386/ajr_00106_7
/content/journals/10.1386/ajr_00106_7
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): death knock; digital death knock; journalism ethics; journalism practice; social media; trauma reporting

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error