Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Australian Journalism Review
  4. Volume 46, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 46, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0810-2686
  • E-ISSN: 2517-620X

Abstract

In the present study, we compare coverage in mainstream English and minority ethnic media in Australia of the Uluru Statement proposal for a Voice and later referendum announcements, over the period from 1 January 2018 to 31 March 2023, to compare any changes over time within and between these two sets of media. With the election of the Labor government in 2022 and subsequent referendum announcements in early 2023, we are provided an opportunity to study the influence of key actors, in this case an incoming government with a signature policy, on discourse in the multi-ethnic public sphere. Our overarching aim is to compare the extent to which an issue of national, political and civic importance is addressed across both the mainstream English and the minority ethnic public sphere in contemporary, multicultural Australia. The results of keyword searches show that, while there were significant increases in mainstream English media coverage of the Voice referendum proposal, corresponding to the election of the Labor government in 2022 and then subsequent announcements of an upcoming referendum in early 2023, there was inconsistent coverage across the minority ethnic media we studied: while significant increases in coverage in the Chinese media mirrored those in the mainstream English media, there was only a small increase in one of the Vietnamese media over the same period, and no increase in the other Vietnamese media. The findings presented here have implications for scholars and others interested in the development of a truly multicultural public sphere in Australia and elsewhere.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • 2022 JERAA (Journalism Education and Research Association of Australia)
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ajr_00151_1
2024-06-13
2024-09-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albanese, A. (2021), ‘Indigenous voice must be heard to make nation whole’, The Australian, 27 April, https://www.theaustralian.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=TAWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theaustralian.com.au%2Fcommentary%2Findigenous-voice-must-be-heard-for-nation-to-be-whole%2Fnews-story%2F57fde8fe3afbec66ce3ef7e3105c579c&memtype=anon. Accessed 19 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allam, L. (2022), ‘Voice, treaty, truth: What does Labor’s commitment to Uluru Statement from the Heart mean?’, The Guardian, 22 May, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/may/22/voice-treaty-truth-what-does-labors-commitment-to-uluru-statement-from-the-heart-mean. Accessed 19 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. ALP National Platform (2021), ‘Australian Labor Party’, https://alp.org.au/media/2594/2021-alp-national-platform-final-endorsed-platform.pdf. Accessed 14 December 2023.
  4. Anderson, P. and Wild, R. (2007), ‘Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle (Little Children Are Sacred): Report of the Board of Inquiry into the Protection of Aboriginal Children from Sexual Abuse 2007’, Department of the Chief Minister, Northern Territory Government, https://humanrights.gov.au/sites/default/files/57.4%20%E2%80%9CLittle%20Children%20are%20Sacred%E2%80%9D%20report.pdf. Accessed 14 December 2023.
  5. Appleby, G. and Davis, M. (2018), ‘The Uluru Statement and the promises of truth’, Australian Historical Studies, 49:4, pp. 501–09.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Australian Government (2023a), ‘History of constitutional recognition and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice’, https://voice.gov.au/about-voice/history-constitutional-recognition-and-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-voice. Accessed 14 December 2023.
  7. Australian Government (2023b), ‘Prime minister announces referendum date’, https://voice.gov.au/news/prime-minister-announces-referendum-date. Accessed 14 December 2023.
  8. Bailey, O. G. (2015), ‘Diasporic media in multicultural societies’, in C. Atton (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 414–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Biddle, N., Gray, M., McAllister, I. and Qvortrup, M. (2023), ‘Detailed analysis of the 2023 Voice to Parliament Referendum and related social and political attitudes’, ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, https://csrm.cass.anu.edu.au/sites/default/files/docs/2023/11/Detailed_analysis_of_the_2023_Voice_to_Parliament_Referendum_and_related_social_and_political_attitudes.pdf. Accessed 14 December 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bruns, A. (2023), ‘From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: Towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spaces’, Communication Theory, 33:2–3, pp. 70–81, https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad007.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ch’ng, H. Y., Aslam, K., Nguyen, H. and Smith, B. (2022), ‘Asian Australian media representation of First Nations sovereignty and constitutional change’, Australian Journalism Review, 44:2, pp. 191–209.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Clun, R. (2022), ‘Referendum on Indigenous voice will be “a priority”’, The Age, 23 May, https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/no-shame-in-voting-no-to-an-ill-judged-referendum-20231016-p5ecie.html. Accessed 24 May 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cover, R. (2013), ‘Community print media: Perceiving minority community in multicultural South Australia’, Continuum, 27:1, pp. 110–23.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cunningham, S. (2001), ‘Popular media as public “sphericules” for diasporic communities’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4:2, pp. 131–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunning, T. (2012), Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://jonnyphillips.github.io/FLS6415/Class_5/Dunning%20Natural%20Experiments.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. First Nations National Constitutional Convention (2017), ‘Uluru Statement from the heart’, in P. Anderson and M. Leibler (eds), Final Report of the Referendum Council, Commonwealth of Australia, https://www.referendumcouncil.org.au/sites/default/files/report_attachments/Referendum_Council_Final_Report.pdf. Accessed 14 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gitlin, T. (1998), ‘Public sphere or public sphericules?’, in T. Liebes and J. Curran (eds), Media, Ritual and Identity, London: Routledge, pp. 168–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Graham, T. (2023), ‘Understanding misinformation and media manipulation on Twitter during the Voice to Parliament referendum’, OSF Preprints, pp. 1–35, https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/qu2fb.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hevesi, B. (2023), ‘When the Voice to Parliament referendum will be held: PM gives update on timeframe as he responds to lack of detail criticism’, Skynews, 27 January, https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/voice-to-parliament/when-the-voice-to-parliament-referendum-will-be-held-pm-gives-update-on-timeframe-as-he-responds-to-lack-of-detail-criticism/news-story/e18b613306723a6bedc245e9fbdcbdc4. Accessed 19 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Hunter, F. (2017), ‘Coalition rejects Indigenous “voice” to parliament’, The Age, 27 October, https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.lib.rmit.edu.au/docview/1955464282/116D9F368134439CPQ/17?accountid=13552. Accessed 19 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Husband, C. (1996), ‘The right to be understood: Conceiving the multi-ethnic public sphere’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 9:2, pp. 205–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Kildea, P. (2011), ‘Achieving citizen engagement in the referendum on Indigenous recognition’, Indigenous Law Bulletin, 7:25, pp. 27–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kildea, P. (2014), ‘Expert panels, public engagement and constitutional reform’, 25 Public Law Review 33, UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2016-70, 13 September, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2837458. Accessed 15 May 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Marks, A., Itaoui, R., Nance, T. and Balogh, S. (2023), ‘Western Sydney votes: The Voice referendum’, Centre for Western Sydney, https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/content/dam/digital/images/WesternSydneyVotesTheVoiceReferendum.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Markus, A., Jupp, J. and McDonald, P. (2009), Australia’s Immigration Revolution, Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Mastrorocco, N. and Minale, L. (2018), ‘News media and crime perceptions: Evidence from a natural experiment’, Journal of Public Economics, 165, pp. 230–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. McCallum, K. and Reid, H. (2012), ‘Little children and big men: Campaigning journalism and Indigenous policy’, Australian Journalism Review, 34:2, pp. 71–84.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. McCombs, M. (2005), ‘A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future’, Journalism Studies, 6:4, pp. 543–57.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L. and Weaver, D. H. (2014), ‘New directions in agenda-setting theory and research’, Mass Communication and Society, 17:6, pp. 781–802, https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.964871.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. McKnight, D. (2015), ‘Shaping the news: Media advisers under the Howard and Rudd governments’, Australian Journalism Review, 37:1, pp. 21–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Murphy, K. and Butler, J. (2023), ‘Inside the voice campaigns: How muddled messages and voter confusion led to a crushing defeat’, The Guardian, 19 October, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/18/inside-the-voice-campaigns-how-muddled-messages-and-voter-confusion-led-to-a-crushing-defeat. Accessed 14 December 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Prime Minister of Australia (2023), ‘Press conference’, Parliament of Australia, transcript, 23 March, https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22media%2Fpressrel%2F9079995%22;src1=sm1. Accessed 14 December 2023.
  33. Sun, W. and Yu, H. (2016), ‘Digital/social media and the Chinese community in Australia’, Media Asia, 43:3–4, pp. 165–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Sun, W. and Yu, H. (2023), Digital Transnationalism: Chinese-Language Media in Australia, Leiden: Brill.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Taylor, P. (2020), ‘Delays on “voice” to sink hope for poll’, The Australian, 16 June, https://www.proquest.com/docview/2413226003/8CF2E7D838574405PQ/29?sourcetype=Newspapers. Accessed 19 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Turnbull, M., Brandis, G. and Scullion, N. (2017), ‘Joint press release: Response to Referendum Council’s report on constitutional reform’, Parliament of Australia, 26 October, https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/media/pressrel/5596294/upload_binary/5596294.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22media/pressrel/5596294%22. Accessed 14 February 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Watts, T. (2019), The Golden Country: Australia’s Changing Identity, Melbourne: Text Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Williams, C. (2022), ‘Push for Indigenous voice to parliament is about justice and unity, not identity politics, Noel Pearson says’, ABC News, 28 October, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-10-28/noel-pearson-first-nations-voice-to-parliament/101584974. Accessed 19 April 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wolfsfeld, G. (2022), Making Sense of Media and Politics: Five Principles in Political Communication, New York: Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Yu, S. (2018), ‘Multi-ethnic public sphere and accessible ethnic media: Mapping online English-language ethnic media’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44:11, pp. 1976–93.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Yu, S. and Ahadi, D. (2010), ‘Promoting civic engagement through ethnic media’, PLATFORM: Journal of Media and Communication, 2:2, pp. 54–71.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ajr_00151_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): Australian government; Australian politics; mainstream media; media coverage; minority ethnic media; public sphere; referendum; The Voice

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error