Raising the agenda of environmental issues within a hybrid media landscape: A communication framework for public engagement and impact

References

1. Albrecht, G., Sartore, G. M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., Stain, H., Tonna, A. and Pollard, G. (2007), ‘Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change’, Australasian Psychiatry: Bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 15, pp. S95–S98, https://doi.org/10.1080/10398560701701288.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andrejevic, M. (2013), Infoglut: How Too Much Information Is Changing the Way We Think and Know, New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Attwater, R. (2014), ‘Meta-methodology’, in D. Coghlan and M. Brydon-Miller (eds), The Sage Encyclopaedia of Action Research, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 532–34.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bennett, W. L. and Segerberg, A. (2012), ‘The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalisation of contentious politics’, Information, Communication & Society, 15:5, pp. 739–68, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Berger, L. and Freeman, M. (2011), ‘The issue of relevance of agenda-setting theory to the online community’, Communication Studies Undergraduate Research Journal, 1:1, pp. 1–22.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chadwick, A. (2017), The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power, New York: Oxford University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chapman, S. and Dominello, A. (2006), ‘A strategy for increasing news media coverage of tobacco and health in Australia’, Health Promotion International, 16:3, pp. 137–43.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W. and Starnini, M. (2021), ‘The echo chamber effect on social media’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118:9, pp. 1–11.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Clayton, S. (2020), ‘Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change’, Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 74, 102263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Comfort, S. E. and Park, Y. E. (2018), ‘On the field of environmental communication: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature’, Environmental Communication, 12:7, pp. 862–75, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2018.1514315.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Conley, D. and Lamble, S. (2006), The Daily Miracle: An Introduction to Journalism, South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cox, R. (2015), ‘Scale, complexity, and communicative systems’, Environmental Communication, 9:3, pp. 370–78, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1044064.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Crompton, T. (2010), Common Cause: The Case for Working with Our Cultural Values, Oxfam report, https://assets.wwf.org.uk/downloads/common_cause_report.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2025.
14. Crompton, T. (2018), Where Now for the Environment Movement? Weathercocks and Signposts Ten Years On, Commons Library report, https://commonslibrary.org/where-now-for-the-environment-movement/. Accessed 3 April 2025.
15. Crompton, T. and Weinstein, N. (2015), Common Cause Communication: A Toolkit for Charities, Commons Cause Foundation report, https://commoncausefoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/CCF_communications_toolkit.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2025.
16. Cunsolo, A. and Landman, K. E. (eds) (2017), ‘Mourning nature: Hope at the heart of ecological loss and grief’, Mourning Nature, Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 232–45.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Data Reportal (2024), ‘Digital 2024 Australia’, https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-australia/. Accessed 3 April 2025.
18. Dryzek, J. S. (2013), The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourse, 3rd ed., New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Entman, R. M. (1991), ‘Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrast in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents’, Journal of Communication, 41:4, pp. 6–27, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1991.tb02328.x.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Friedlander, J. (2019), ‘A meaty discourse: Raising the agenda of an inconvenient message’, Ph.D. thesis, Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Friedlander, J. and Riedy, C. (2018), ‘Celebrities, credibility, and complementary frames: Raising the agenda of sustainable and other “inconvenient” food issues in social media campaigning’, Communication Research and Practice, 4:3, pp. 229–45, https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1448210.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gallay, E., Furlan Brighente, M., Flanagan, C. and Lowenstein, E. (2021), ‘Place-based civic science: Collective environmental action and solidarity for eco-resilience’, Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 27:1, pp. 39–46, https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12537.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Griffin, E. (2009), A First Look at Communication Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Guneralp, B. and Seto, K. C. (2013), ‘Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation’, Environmental Research Letters, 8:1, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014025.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Huntley, R. (2020), How to Talk about Climate Change in a Way That Makes a Difference, Sydney: Murdoch Books.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Iyengar, S. and Hahn, K. S. (2009), ‘Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use’, Journal of Communication, 59:1, pp. 19–39, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kitzinger, J. (2007), ‘Framing and frame analysis’, in E. Devereux (ed.), Media Studies: Key Issues and Debates, Cardiff: Sage Publications, pp. 134–61.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Krzanowski, J. (2021), ‘The need for biodiversity champions in psychiatry: The entwined crises of climate change and ecological collapse’, BJPsych Bull, 45:4, pp. 238–43, https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2021.44.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Leimbach, T. and Palmer, J. (2022), ‘#AustraliaOnFire: Hashtag activism and collective affect in the Black Summer fires’, Journal of Australian Studies, 46:4, pp. 496–511, https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2022.2121744.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Louv, R. (2011), The Nature Principle: Human Restoration and the End of Nature-Deficit Disorder, Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Luo, Y., Burley, H., Moe, A. and Sui, M. (2018), ‘A meta-analysis of news media’s public agenda-setting effects from 1972 to 2015’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96:1, pp. 150–72.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Macnamara, J. (2012), Public Relations: Theories, Practices, Critiques, Frenchs Forest: Pearson Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Masterton, M. (1992), ‘News values and newsworthiness’, in D. Conley and S. Lamble (eds), The Daily Miracle: An Introduction to Journalism, Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
34. McCombs, M. and Shaw, D. L. (1972), ‘The agenda-setting function of mass media’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 36:2, pp. 176–87.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McCombs, M. and Valenzuela, S. (2007), ‘The agenda-setting theory’, Cuadernos de Informacion, 20, pp. 44–50.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Meraz, S. (2009), ‘Is there an elite hold? Traditional media to social media agenda setting influence in blog networks’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14:3, pp. 682–707, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01458.x.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Moser, S. C. (2007), ‘More bad news: The risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information’, in S. C. Moser and L. Dilling (eds), Creating a Climate for Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 64–81.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Moser, S. C. (2016), ‘Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: What more is there to say?’, WIREs Climate Change, 7:3, pp. 345–69, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.403.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Neuendorf, K. (2002), The Content Analysis Guidebook, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nikkhou, A. and Tezer, A. (2020), ‘Nature-deficit disorder in modern cities’, WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 241, pp. 407–17.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Norgaard, K. M. (2011), Living in Denial: Climate Change, Emotions, and Everyday Life, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Pezzullo, P. C. and Cox, R. (2017), Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Protess, D. and McCombs, M. E. (2016), Agenda Setting: Readings on Media, Public Opinion and Policy Making, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Rees, L., Sherwood, M. and Shields, N. (2024), ‘Caught in a cycle: Agenda-building practices of journalists and sources in spinal cord injury news media coverage’, Australian Journalism Review, 46:1, pp. 93–111, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00150_1.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E. W., Leiserowitz, A. and Zhao, X. (2014), ‘The genesis of climate change activism: From key beliefs to political action’, Climatic Change, 125:2, pp. 163–78, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1173-5.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Sánchez-Bayo, F. and Wyckhuys, K. A. G. (2019), ‘Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers’, Biological Conservation, 232, pp. 8–27.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schwartz, S. H. (2012), ‘Toward refining the theory of basic human values’, in S. Salzborn, E. Davidov and J. Reinecke (eds), Methods, Theories, and Empirical Applications in the Social Sciences, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 39–46.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Science for Environment Policy (2020), Pollinators: Importance for Nature and Human Well-Being, Drivers of Decline and the Need for Monitoring, Future Brief 23, Bristol: European Commission DG Environment, Science Communication Unit, UWE Bristol.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Stewart, A. E. (2018), ‘Mourning nature: Hope at the heart of ecological grief and loss’, Ethics and the Environment, 23:1, pp. 79–86.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Sumiala, J., Hoover, S. M. and Laughlin, C. (2023), ‘Global populism: Its roots in media and religion | religious populism? Rethinking concepts and consequences in a hybrid media age – introduction’, International Journal of Communication, 17, pp. 2795–804.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Wang, X., Chen, L., Shi, J. and Tang, H. (2021), ‘Who sets the agenda? The dynamic agenda setting of the wildlife issue on social media’, Environmental Communication, 17:3, pp. 245–62, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1901760.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Wenzel, A., Grass, I., Belavadi, V. and Tscharntke, T. (2020), ‘How urbanisation is driving pollinator diversity and pollination – a systematic review’, Biological Conservation, 241, p. 108321.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Creswell, J. W. (2009), ‘Mapping the field of mixed methods research’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3:2, pp. 95–108.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Ducarme, F., Luque, G. M. and Courchamp, F. (2012), ‘What are “charismatic species” for conservation biologists?’, BioSciences Master Reviews, 10, pp. 1–8.
    [Google Scholar]
55. van Eeden, L. M., Nimmo, D., Mahony, M., Herman, K., Ehmke, G., Driessen, J., O’Connor, J., Bino, G., Taylor, M. and Dickman, C. R. (2020), ‘Impacts of the unprecedented 2019-2020 bushfires on Australian animals’, https://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/en/publications/impacts-of-the-unprecedented-2019-2020-bushfires-on-australian-an. Accessed 3 April 2025.
56. Golan, G. (2007), ‘Inter-media agenda setting and global news coverage’, Journalism Studies, 7:2, pp. 323–33, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700500533643.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Sage Journals (2019), ‘Action Research Manifesto’, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
58. Schwartz, S. H. (1992), ‘Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25:1, pp. 1–65.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Schwartz, S. H. (2003), ‘A proposal for measuring value orientations across nations’, in Questionnaire Package of European Social Survey, pp. 259–90, https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/sites/default/files/2023-06/ESS_core_questionnaire_human_values.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2025.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Schwarze, S. (2007), ‘Environmental communication as a discipline of crisis’, Environmental Communication, 1:1, pp. 87–98, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030701334326.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Seto, K. C., Guneralp, B. and Hutyra, L. R. (2012), ‘Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 109:40, pp. 16083–88, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Shaw, D. L. and Colistra, R. (2008), ‘Agenda melding’, in L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha (eds), Encyclopedia of Political Communication, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 12–13.
    [Google Scholar]