Invisible journalists and dominant algorithms: AI-generated news and its implications for Australian media pluralism

References

1. Abu Jamie, N. H., Abu-Jamie, T. N. and Al-Absy, M. S. M. (2024), ‘Advances in AI and their effects on finance and economic analysis’, in B. Awwad (ed.), The AI Revolution: Driving Business Innovation and Research: Volume 1, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 507–23.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Ahmed, S., Wang, Y. and Bee, A. W. T. (2023), ‘Adjusting news accuracy perceptions after deepfakes exposure: Evidence from a non-Western context’, Telematics and Informatics, 84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2023.102047.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Aleessawi, N. A. K. and Alzubi, S. F. (2024), ‘The implications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on the quality of media content’, Studies in Media and Communication, 12:4, pp. 41–51, https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v12i4.7058.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Attard, M., Dickson, G., Jehangir, A., Newling, N. and Park, J. (2024), Regional News Media, Sydney: UTS Centre for Media Transition.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Australian Government (2024), News Media Assistance Program: Government’s Role in News and Journalism, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bachmann, P., Eisenegger, M. and Ingenhoff, D. (2022), ‘Defining and measuring news media quality: Comparing the content perspective and the audience perspective’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27:1, pp. 9–37, https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161221999666.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blakston, A. and Waller, L. (2022), ‘“It’s always there”: A study of the sources and motivations for Australian teens’ news consumption’, Australian Journalism Review, 44:1, pp. 101–16, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00090_7.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bleyer-Simon, K., Brogi, E., Carlini, R., Nenadic, I., Palmer, M., Parcu, P. L., Verza, S., Cunha, M. V. D. A. and Žuffová, M. (2021), Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era, Italy: Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom, San Domenico di Fiesole.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Breazu, P. and Katsos, N. (2024), ‘ChatGPT-4 as a journalist: Whose perspectives is it reproducing?’, Discourse & Society, 35:6, pp. 687–707, https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265241251479.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Canavilhas, J., Ioscote, F. and Gonçalves, A. (2024), ‘Artificial intelligence as an opportunity for journalism: Insights from the Brazilian and Portuguese media’, Social Sciences, 13:11, https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110590.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Coade, M. (2024), ‘Industry report examines AI productivity and jobs promise’, The Mandarin, 2 July, https://www.themandarin.com.au/249697-industry-report-examines-ai-productivity-and-jobs-promise/. Accessed 12 December 2024.
12. del Rio-Chanona, M., Laurentsyeva, N. and Wachs, J. (2024), ‘Large language models reduce public knowledge sharing on online Q&A platforms’, PNAS Nexus, 3:9, https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae400.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dervanović, D. (2018), ‘I, inhuman lawyer: Developing artificial intelligence in the legal profession’, in M. Corrales, M. Fenwick and N. Forgó (eds), Robotics, AI and the Future of Law, Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 209–34.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dorton, S. and Harper, S. (2022), ‘Self-repairing and/or buoyant trust in artificial intelligence’, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Atlanta, GA, 10–14 October, vol. 66, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 162–66.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dwyer, T., Wilding, D. and Koskie, T. (2021), Australia: Media Concentration and Deteriorating Conditions for Investigative Journalism, Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Flew, T. and Iosifidis, P. (2020), ‘Populism, globalisation and social media’, International Communication Gazette, 82:1, pp. 7–25, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519880721.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Foster, R. and Bunting, M. (2019), Public Funding of High-Quality Journalism: A Report for the ACCC, Canberra: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gefen, D., Jabbari, S., Rezapour, R. S., Pessianzadeh, A., Kayastha, K. and Van Den Bulck, H. (2024), ‘The evolving meaning of trust and risk in Reddit discourse about ChatGPT’, Proceedings of the 39th EGOS Colloquium, Cagliari, Italy, 6–8 July.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gherheș, V., Fărcașiu, M. A. and Cernicova-Buca, M. (2024), ‘Are ChatGPT-generated headlines better attention grabbers than human-authored ones? An assessment of salient features driving engagement with online media’, Journalism and Media, 5:4, pp. 1817–35, https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040110.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Greste, P. (2023), ‘Defining journalism: How a new approach to a definition could revolutionize media freedom’, Australian Journalism Review, 45:1, pp. 27–36, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00116_7.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Groutsis, D., Martin, L., Lattouf, A., Soutphommasane, T., Lumby, C., Young, N., Crawford, J. and Robertson, A. (2022), Who Gets to Tell Australian Stories? 2.0, Camperdown, NSW: Media Diversity Australia, https://www.mediadiversityaustralia.org/who-gets-to-tell-australian-stories-2-0/. Accessed 4 December 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hanusch, F. and Tandoc, E. (2019), ‘Comments, analytics, and social media: The impact of audience feedback on journalists’ market orientation’, Journalism, 20:6, pp. 695–713, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917720305.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Heylen, K. (2023), ‘Enforcing platform sovereignty: A case study of platform responses to Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code’, New Media & Society, 26:12, pp. 7277–94, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231166057.
    [Google Scholar]
24. James-Garrod, C. (2023), ‘“No time to think”: Overloaded journalists trim practices to save time’, Australian Journalism Review, 45:2, pp. 257–76, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00135_7.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Jones, P. and Pusey, M. (2010), ‘Political communication and “media system”: The Australian canary’, Media, Culture & Society, 32:3, pp. 451–71, https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709361172.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kharvi, P. (2024), ‘Understanding the impact of AI-generated deepfakes on public opinion, political discourse, and personal security in social media’, IEEE Security & Privacy, 22:4, pp. 115–22, https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2024.3405963.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Hermida, A., Valenzuela, S. and Villi, M. (2020), ‘Studying incidental news: Antecedents, dynamics and implications’, Journalism, 21:8, pp. 1025–30, https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920915372.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Klimkiewicz, B. (2015), ‘Cultural and geographical dimensions of media pluralism’, in P. Valcke, M. Sükösd and R.G. Picard (eds), Media Pluralism and Diversity, London: Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp. 82–106.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Koskie, T. (2023a), ‘Diversity below the line: Media pluralism through comments on public affairs news stories’, doctoral thesis, Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Koskie, T. (2023b), ‘“Downright dangerous”: Citizen reactions to media diversity issues in public submissions’, Media International Australia, 196:1, pp. 140–55, https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878x231212945.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Kurzweil, R. (2024), ‘The promise and peril of AI’, Time, 25 June, https://time.com/6991651/ai-safety-ray-kurzweil/. Accessed 20 November 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kuznetsova, E., Makhortykh, M., Vziatysheva, V., Stolze, M., Baghumyan, A. and Urman, A. (2024), ‘In generative AI we trust: Can chatbots effectively verify political information?’, Journal of Computational Social Science, 8:1, p. 15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-024-00338-8.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lavrinovics, E., Biswas, R., Bjerva, J. and Hose, K. (2025), ‘Knowledge graphs, large language models, and hallucinations: An NLP perspective’, Journal of Web Semantics, 85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2024.100844.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Link, E. and Beckmann, S. (2025), ‘AI at everyone’s fingertips? Identifying the predictors of health information seeking intentions using AI’, Communication Research Reports, 42:1, pp. 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2024.2427609.
    [Google Scholar]
35. McKinnon, M., Howes, J., Leach, A. and Prokop, N. (2018), ‘Perils and positives of science journalism in Australia’, Public Understanding of Science, 27:5, pp. 562–77, https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517701589.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Meade, A. (2018), ‘Fairfax Nine takeover: Australia’s oldest media empire ends with $4bn merger’, The Guardian, 26 July, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jul/26/fairfax-nine-takeover-australias-oldest-media-empire-ends-with-4bn-merger. Accessed 18 November 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Meade, A. (2021), ‘“Dangerous monopoly”: Labor and Greens support judicial inquiry into media diversity and News Corp’, The Guardian, 9 December, https://www.theguardian.com/media/2021/dec/09/dangerous-monopoly-labor-and-greens-support-judicial-inquiry-into-media-diversity-and-news-corp. Accessed 18 November 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mehrotra, A. and Musolesi, M. (2020), ‘Intelligent notification systems’, in Synthesis Lectures on Mobile and Pervasive Computing, San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool Publishers, pp. 1–61.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Mollick, E. (2022), ‘ChatGPT is a tipping point for AI’, Harvard Business Review, 15 December, https://hbr.org/2022/12/chatgpt-is-a-tipping-point-for-ai. Accessed 11 December 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Nadal, L. and Jančárik, P. (2024), ‘Beyond the deepfake hype: AI, democracy, and “the Slovak case”’, Misinformation Review, 22 August, https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/beyond-the-deepfake-hype-ai-democracy-and-the-slovak-case/. Accessed 13 December 2024.
41. Naing, S. Z. S. and Udomwong, P. (2024), ‘Public opinions on ChatGPT: An analysis of Reddit discussions by using sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and SWOT analysis’, Data Intelligence, 6:2, pp. 344–74, https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00250.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Naveed, H., Khan, A. U., Qiu, S., Saqib, M., Anwar, S., Usman, M., Akhtar, N., Barnes, N. and Mian, A. (2025), ‘A comprehensive overview of large language models’, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 16:5, pp. 1–72, https://doi.org/10.1145/3744746.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Robertson, C., Ross Arguedas, A. and Nielsen, R. K. (2024), Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024, Oxford: University of Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Papandrea, F. and Tiffen, R. (2016), ‘Media ownership and concentration in Australia’, in E. M. Noam (ed.), Who Owns the World’s Media? Media Concentration and Ownership around the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 703–39.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Park, S., Fisher, C., Flew, T. and Dulleck, U. (2020), ‘Global mistrust in news: The impact of social media on trust’, International Journal on Media Management, 22:2, pp. 83–96, https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2020.1799794.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Park, S., Fisher, C., McGuinness, K., Lee, J. Y., McCallum, K., Cai, X., Chatskin, M., Mardjianto, L. D. and Yao, S. (2024), Digital News Report: Australia 2024, Canberra: News and Media Research Centre, University of Canberra.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Peebles, A. and Snyder, M. (2024), ‘Are you smarter than ChatGPT? Challenging our understanding of media literacy through generative AI’, Communication Teacher, 39:3, pp. 204–09, https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2024.2414032.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pickard, V. (2020), ‘Restructuring democratic infrastructures: A policy approach to the journalism crisis’, Digital Journalism, 8:6, pp. 704–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1733433.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Ray, P. P. (2023), ‘ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope’, Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, pp. 121–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Roe, J. and Perkins, M. (2023), ‘“What they’re not telling you about ChatGPT”: Exploring the discourse of AI in UK news media headlines’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10:1, p. 753, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02282-w.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Rossettini, G., Rodeghiero, L., Corradi, F., Cook, C., Pillastrini, P., Turolla, A., Castellini, G., Chiappinotto, S., Gianola, S. and Palese, A. (2024), ‘Comparative accuracy of ChatGPT-4, Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini in the Italian entrance test for healthcare sciences degrees: A cross-sectional study’, BMC Medical Education, 24:1, p. 694, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05630-9.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Senate Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism (2018), The Senate Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism: Report, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Spataro, J. (2023), ‘Introducing Microsoft 365 Copilot – your copilot for work’, Microsoft, 16 March, https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/03/16/introducing-microsoft-365-copilot-your-copilot-for-work/. Accessed 20 October 2024.
54. The Senate Environment and Communications References Committee (2021), Media Diversity in Australia, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications/Mediadiversity/Report. Accessed 15 October 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Toosi, A., Bottino, A., Saboury, B., Siegel, E. and Rahmim, A. (2021), ‘A brief history of AI: How to prevent another winter (a critical review)’, PET Clinics, 16:4, pp. 449–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2021.07.001.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Tracy, S. (2010), ‘Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research’, Qualitative Inquiry, 16:10, pp. 837–51, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Trielli, D. and Diakopoulos, N. (2019), ‘Search as news curator: The role of Google in shaping attention to news information’, in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland, 4–9 May, New York: ACM, p. 453.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Valcke, P., Picard, R., Sükösd, M., Klimkiewicz, B., Petkovic, B., Zotto, C. D. and Kerremans, R. (2010), ‘The European media pluralism monitor: Bridging law, economics and media studies as a first step towards risk-based regulation in media markets’, Journal of Media Law, 2:1, pp. 85–113, https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2010.11427355.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Valcke, P., Sukosd, M. and Picard, R. (eds) (2015), Media Pluralism and Diversity: Concepts, Risks and Global Trends, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Waisbord, S. (2019), ‘The progressive promises and the reality of news beyond industrial journalism’, Australian Journalism Review, 41:1, pp. 9–16, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr.41.1.9_1.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Wake, A. and Ward, M. (2020), ‘Latest $84 million cuts rip the heart out of the ABC, and our democracy’, The Conversation, 24 June, https://theconversation.com/latest-84-million-cuts-rip-the-heart-out-of-the-abc-and-our-democracy-141355. Accessed 1 February 2025.
62. Wilding, D. and Molitorisz, S. (2022), ‘Improving news media oversight: Why Australia needs a cross-platform standards scheme’, Australian Journalism Review, 44:1, pp. 19–38, https://doi.org/10.1386/ajr_00086_1.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Wilding, D., Fray, P., Molitorisz, S. and McKewon, E. (2018), The Impact of Digital Platforms on News and Journalistic Content, Sydney: UTS.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Yanardağoğlu, E. (2021), ‘“Just the way my generation reads the news”: News consumption habits of youth in Turkey and the UK’, Global Media and Communication, 17:2, pp. 149–66, https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766520979729.
    [Google Scholar]