Revealing the unseen: Altering modes of viewing practice to explore the aesthetics of seeing more than one frame at a time | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Animation Practice, Process & Production
  4. Volume 10, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2042-7875
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7883

Abstract

Contemporary animation is typically viewed in a digital format which is subject to the mechanics of cinema: a frame-by-frame presentation of a sequence of images (at a constant rate) so that the illusion of continuous motion is experienced by the viewer. In this article I argue that by altering the way we view animation, we could influence the viewer’s experience and understanding of an animated work. The research is a culmination of my Ph.D. by creative practice, which unpacks modes of viewing practice through the creation of an experimental short film and the presentation of an art exhibition that reveal movement for the viewer in a deliberately playful manner. The short film expands on the experimental animation technique known as strata-stencil that uses a multiple layered approach, revealing the consecutive frames of a movement on every frame. Drawing on techniques of nineteenth-century chronophotography, my work focuses on the representation of movement in classic cartoon-style animation and reveals the construction of animation for the viewer through static and animated sequences. My interest lies in the imperceptible moments that are lost in standard viewing practice, forcing the viewer to question their understanding of a movement and the aesthetics involved in seeing more than one frame at a time. I propose that we look at the individual animation frames not in isolation but simultaneously as sequences, so that the notion of seriality informs the viewer’s understanding of animated movement as a distinct aesthetic experience. In doing this, I challenge the viewer to look at animation in a different way and create an innovative viewing experience.

© 2022 (2021) Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ap3_000027_1
2022-12-26
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ballestrasse, D. (2016), ‘Artist blog’, Der Greif, 4 December, https://dergreif-online.de/artist-blog/douglas-gordons-temporary-alterations-on-24-hour-psycho/. Accessed 1 July 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Braun, M. (1995), Picturing Time: The Work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830–1904), Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Bukatman, S. (2006), ‘Comics and the critique of chronophotography, or “he never knew when it was coming!”’, Animation: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 1:1, pp. 83–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Duchamp, M. (1912), Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2., Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia Museum of Art.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fleuriet, I (2013), The Grand Old Lady of Modern Art: Marcel Duchamp’s Nude Descending a Staircase, New York: Readymade Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Frank, H. (2019), Frame by Frame: A Materialist Aesthetics of Animated Cartoons, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Gordon, D. (1993), 24 Hour Psycho, installation, Tramway Gallery, Glasgow.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Gunning, T. (2014), ‘Animating the instant: The secret symmetry between animation and photography’, in K. Beckman (ed.), Animating Film Theory, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 37–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Gunning, T. (2019), ‘Foreword: Hannah Frank’s Pause’, in H. Frank (ed.), Frame by Frame: A Materialist Aesthetics of Animated Cartoons, Oakland, CA: University of California Press, pp. xi–xviii.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ivey, J. (dir.) (2007), My Paper Mind, experimental animation, unpublished.
  11. Kentridge, W. ([1993] 2017), ‘Fortuna: Neither program nor chance in the making of images’, in R. Krauss (ed.), William Kentridge: October Files, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 25–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Krauss, R. (ed.) (2017), ‘“The rock”: William Kentridge’s Drawings for Projection’, in William Kentridge: October Files, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 33–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Maltz-Leca, L. (2013), ‘Process/procession: William Kentridge and the process of change’, The Art Bulletin, 95:1, pp. 139–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Manning, E. (2014), ‘Interlude: Animation’s dance’, in Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Technology, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, https://academic.oup.com/mit-press-scholarship-online/book/14961/chapter-abstract/169315668?redirectedFrom=fulltext. Accessed 4 June 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. McCloud, S. (1994), Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art, New York: Harper Perennial.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. McLaren, N. (1968), Pas de deux, Canada: National Film Board of Canada.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Moss, C. (2021), ‘The rise and fall of Saturday morning cartoons’, Saturday Evening Post, 20 May, https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2021/05/the-rise-and-fall-of-saturday-morning-cartoons/. Accessed 20 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Muybridge, E. (1887), Animal Locomotion: An Electro-Photographic Investigation of Connective Phases of Animal Movements, 1872–1885, Digital Commonwealth, https://www.digitalcommonwealth.org/collections/commonwealth:70795t73j. Accessed 4 March 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Røssaak, E. (2014), ‘The delay in the system: Why Douglas Gordon needed Alfred Hitchcock’, Millennium Film Journal, 59, Spring, pp. 86–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. St George, P. (ed.) (2009), Sequences: Contemporary Chronophotography and Experimental Digital Art, New York: Wallflower Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Thain, A. (2016), ‘In the blink of an eye: Norman McLaren between dance and animation’, in D. Rosenberg (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Screendance Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomas, F. and Johnson, O. (1981), The Illusion of Life: Disney Animation, New York: Hyperion.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams, R. (2001), The Animator’s Survival Kit, 2nd ed., London: Faber & Faber.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Worthington, A. M. (1895), The Splash of a Drop, London and Salt Lake City, UT: E. & J. B. Young & Co. and the Project Gutenberg, https://www.gutenberg.org/files/27125/27125-h/27125-h.htm. Accessed 29 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Horne, Bronwyn (2022 [2021]), ‘Revealing the unseen: Altering modes of viewing practice to explore the aesthetics of seeing more than one frame at a time’, Animation Practice, Process & Production, 10, pp. 73–94, https://doi.org/10.1386/ap3_000027_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/ap3_000027_1
Loading
Revealing the unseen: Altering modes of viewing practice to explore the aesthetics of seeing more than one frame at a time
Animation Practice, Process & Production 10, 73 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/ap3_000027_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ap3_000027_1
/content/journals/10.1386/ap3_000027_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): artistic practice; cartoon animation; chronophotography; experimental animation; sequences; strata-stencil

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error