Representational risks associated with interview-based animated documentaries

References

1. Animatedminds.com (n.d.), ‘Watch Our Series’, Animatedminds.com, https://www.animatedminds.com/watch-the-series. Accessed 14 March 2023.
2. asiam.ie (n.d.), ‘Autism & language: What’s the best word?’, https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5c52ed424611a0dfb0370362/t/5d65196b24d57900014c12bc/1566906732015/Autism-And-Language.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2023.
3. autisticadvocacy.org (n.d.), ‘Autism Self Advocacy Network’, https://autisticadvocacy.org//. Accessed 14 March 2023.
4. Baudry, J. L. and Williams, A. (1974), ‘Ideological effects of the basic cinematographic apparatus’, Film Quarterly, 28:2, pp. 39–47.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Brown, L. (2011), ‘The significance of semantics: Person-first language: Why it matters’, Autistic Hoya, 4 August, https://www.autistichoya.com/2011/08/significance-of-semantics-person-first.html. Accessed 14 March 2023.
6. Bruzzi, S. (2006), New Documentary, London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Butler, J. (1990), Gender Trouble, Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chapman, R. (2019), ‘Neurodiversity theory and its discontents: Autism, schizophrenia, and the social model of disability’, in S. Tekin and R. Bluhm (eds), The Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophy of Psychiatry, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 371–90.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cowie, E. (1999), ‘The spectacle of actuality’, in J. M. Gaines and M. Renov (eds), Collecting Visible Evidence, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 19–45.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Cowie, E. (2011), Recording Reality, Desiring the Real, London and Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Crosby, S. J. (2019), Unconscious Bias: A Psychodynamic Exploration, Dublin: Dublin Business School.
    [Google Scholar]
12. DelGaudio, S. (1997), ‘If truth be told, can ‘toons tell it? Documentary and animation’, Film History, 9:2, pp. 189–99.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dervin, F. (2012), ‘Cultural identity, representation and othering’, in J. Jackson (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication, Oxfordshire: Routledge, pp. 195–208.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Firth-Bernard, K. (2021), Cloud Boy: An Autistic Journey, UK: University of the Creative Arts Farnham.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Formenti, C. (2022), The Classical Animated Documentary and Its Contemporary Evolution, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Foucault, M. (1990), The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Glynne, A. (2009), An Alien in the Playground, UK: Channel 4.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Glynne, A. (2012), ‘Interview with Andy Glynne’, Doc On-Line, 13 December, pp. 293–304.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Goletski, G. (2018), HOLE, Canada: Emily Carr University of Art and Design.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Grandin, T. and Panek, R. (2013), The Autistic Brain: Thinking Across the Spectrum, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Honess Roe, A. (2013), Animated Documentary, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Krumer-Nevo, M. and Sidi, M. (2012), ‘Writing against othering’, Qualitative Inquiry, 18:4, pp. 299–309.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Lacan, J. (2010), ‘The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience’, in D. Birksted-Breen, S. Flanders, A. Gibeault (eds), Reading French Psychoanalysis, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 97–104.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Leyda, J. and Eisenstein, S. (1988), Eisenstein on Disney, London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
25. MacKinnon, C. (2022), ‘Contexts of short animated documentary production in the United Kingdom’, Ph.D. thesis, Bournemouth: Arts University Bournemouth.
    [Google Scholar]
26. McGowan, T. (2007), The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Metz, C. (1982), Psychoanalysis and Cinema: The Imaginary Signifier, London: Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Miller, G. (2021), ‘Asperger’s vs. autism: What exactly is the difference?’, PsychCentral, 31 March, https://psychcentral.com/autism/aspergers-vs-autism-whats-the-difference. Accessed 14 March 2023.
29. Milton, D. (2012), ‘On the ontological status of autism: The “double empathy problem”’, Disability & Society, 27:6, pp. 883–87.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Minchin, A. (2022), My Thoughts on Autism… and Orangutans, UK: University of Hertfordshire.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Minh-Ha, T. T. (1990), ‘Documentary is/not a name’, October, 52, Spring, pp. 76–98.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Moore, S. (2015), ‘Out of sight: Using animation to document perceptual brain states’, Ph.D. thesis, Loughborough: Loughborough University.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Muggleton, J. (n.d.), ‘A little about Josh’, mugsy.org, http://mugsy.org/joshua/. Accessed 14 March 2023.
34. Mulvey, L. (1975), ‘Visual pleasure and narrative cinema’, Screen, 16:3, pp. 6–18.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Mulvey, L. and Wollen, P. (1977), Riddles of the Sphinx, UK: British Film Institute.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Murray, S. (2008), Representing Autism: Culture, Narrative, Fascination, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Nichols, B. (1991), Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Nichols, B. (2017), Introduction to Documentary, 3rd ed., Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Piotrowska, A. (2012), ‘Psychoanalysis and ethics in documentary film’, Ph.D. thesis, London: Birkbeck University of London.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Pryluck, C. ([1976] 2005), ‘Ultimately we are all outsiders: The ethics of documentary filming’, in A. Rosenthal and J. Corner (eds), New Challenges for Documentary, 2nd ed., Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 194–208.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Renov, M. (2004), The Subject of Documentary, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Robison, J. E. (2008), Look Me in the Eye: My Life with Asperger’s, New York: Random House.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Rothwell, J. (2021), The Reason I Jump, UK and USA: Picture House Entertainment.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Ruby, J. ([1979] 2005), ‘The ethics of image making’, in A. Rosenthal and J. Corner (eds), New Challenges for Documentary, 2nd ed., Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 209–19.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Rughani, P. (2013), ‘The dance of documentary ethics’, in B. Winston (ed.), The Documentary Film Book, London: BFI and Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 98–109.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Silberman, S. (2015), NeuroTribes: The Legacy of Autism and How to Think Smarter About People Who Think Differently, London: Atlantic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Singer, J. (1998), ‘Odd people in: The birth of community amongst people on the autistic spectrum: A personal exploration of a new social movement based on neurological diversity’, B.Sc. thesis, Sydney: University of Technology Sydney.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Southern Ladies Animation Group (2003), It’s Like That, Australia: Southern Ladies Animation Group.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Thurschwell, P. (2000), Sigmund Freud, Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Walker, N. (2021), Neuroqueer Heresies: Notes on the Neurodiversity Paradigm, Autistic Empowerment, and Postnormal Possibilities, Fort Worth, TX: Autonomous Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Webb, T. (1992), A Is for Autism, UK: Channel 4.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Webb, T. (2021), ‘Life, Animated (PG*) & A is for Autism (short) + ScreenTalk with Director Tim Webb & Artist Carla MacKinnon’, Autism and Cinema: An Exploration of Neurodiversity, Barbican Centre, 25 September.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Widdowson, A. (2021), Drawing on Autism, UK: Queen Mary University of London.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Weber, B. N. and Heinen, H. (1980) Bertolt Brecht: Political Theory and Literary Practice, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]