Skip to content
1981
Decolonizing Animation
  • ISSN: 2042-7875
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7883

Abstract

This article explores how an artificially intelligent (AI) animation praxis, encompassing traditional Carib practices and AI technologies, serves as a bridge between Indigenous knowledge and contemporary experiences. It delves into AI animation’s ability to alter consciousness and perception utilizing virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and game engines (GE), drawing from scholarship such as Sri Lankan-born Dr Laleen Jayamanne’s decolonial avatar theory to reconsider the uncanny valley phenomenon. The sense of revulsion that a computer-generated figure can evoke in a viewer is often influenced by cultural and ethnic factors. What appears eerie or unsettling to one cultural group may be perceived as typical or dominant by another. By hijacking bodily processing, interactive animation apps create immersive narratives, challenging traditional philosophical debates and contrasting Carib and western world-views. Emphasizing the integration of diverse perspectives, the article highlights the potential for animation to reshape epistemologies arising from the decolonial Caribbean and Latin American ontological turn. As AI-driven animation evolves, it could lead to more holistic ways of understanding the world, transcending Eurocentric biases. The Indigenous nature-centric ontology of Carib people fosters an interconnectedness with the environment, viewing all elements – including stones, rivers, plants and animals – as imbued with informational significance. Abiogenesis, or the origin of life, is understood as the interplay of information and energy. All life emerges from non-living components, akin to a cosmic play where information serves as both script and energy driving the scenes. Landauer’s principle, which posits that creating things demands more energy than erasing them, serves as a rulebook for the universe, outlining the relationship between information and the energy required to set things in motion. This radical theory contrasts with historical binaries that compartmentalize the metaphysical and material worlds.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/ap3_00041_1
2024-09-04
2026-04-16

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, S. (2017), Living a Feminist Life, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen-Agostini, L. (1999), ‘Revising the arena affair’, Trinidad Guardian, 30 November, p. 21.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Balaguer, C. (n.d.), ‘Publishing as bloodletting’, https://www.kabk.nl/storage/documents/CB-SG-lecture_PUBLISHING-AS-BLOODLETTING.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2024.
  4. Brathwaite-Shirley, D. (2021a), BlackTransSea, London and Berlin: Braithwaite-Shirley and Helen Starr.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brathwaite-Shirley, D. (2021b), interviewed by J. L. E. Taylor, ‘Worldbuilding and the Black Trans experience: An interview’, Billedkunst, 5 January, https://www.norskebilledkunstnere.no/billedkunst/aktuelt/keeping-them-damn-alive-how-danielle-brathwaite-shirley-is-building-new-worlds/. Accessed 30 July 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Broadmeadow, M., Sam-Sumana, B. C., Delap, N., Hall, B., Hussain, A., Kim, N., Noor, S. and Saraiya, K. (2021), It Was a Roadside Picnic/Beyond Black Orientalism, n.p.: New Art City, https://newart.city/show/daadfuturism. Accessed 13 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bunting-Branch, A. (2019), META, Liverpool: FACT.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bunting-Branch, A. (2022), Practicing the Difference: Reading Luce Irigaray with Feminist Science Fiction, Practice-Related Research Degree, London: Slade School of Fine Art, UCL.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chalmers, D. J. (2022), Reality+: Virtual Worlds and the Problems of Philosophy, London: Penguin and W. W. Norton & Company.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Chernela, J. M. (1991), ‘Symbolic inaction in rituals of gender and procreation among the Garifuna (Black Caribs) of Honduras’, Ethos, 19:1, pp. 5267.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Davies, P. (2019), ‘Life’s secret ingredient: A radical theory of what makes things alive’, New Scientist, 30 January, pp. 2831.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Deleuze, G. (1988), The Fold: Leibniz and the Baroque, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Edwards, S. (2014), ‘The history of abortifacients’, Jezebel, 18 November, https://www.jezebel.com/the-history-of-abortifacients-1658993381. Accessed 27 February 2024.
  14. Evanson, N. (2024), ‘A new physics paper suggests that we may all be living in the ultimate 4X strategy game after all’, PC Gamer, 22 April, https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/a-new-physics-paper-suggests-that-we-may-all-be-living-in-the-ultimate-4x-strategy-game-after-all/. Accessed 17 June 2024.
  15. Finchett-Maddock, L. and Tan, J. K. (2022), ‘Practice and/or process? (In)disciplining law and art’, Law and Humanities, 16:2, pp. 15664.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Firth, N. (2013), ‘Virtual reality: Meet founding father Jaron Lanier’, New Scientist, 218:2922, pp. 2141.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Fox, D. (2004), ‘Do fruit flies dream of electric bananas?’, New Scientist Magazine, 14 February, pp. 3639.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gómez-Barris, M. (2017), The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gómez-Moriana, A. (ed.) (1999), National Identity and Sociopolitical Change: Latin America between Marginizalization and Integration, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Graeber, D. and Wengrow, D. (2021), The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity, London: Allen Lane.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Herzog, Werner (1999), ‘The Minnesota declaration’, designmanifestos.org, 30 April, https://designmanifestos.org/werner-herzog-the-minnesota-declaration. Accessed 13 August 2024.
  22. Holbraad, M. and Pedersen, M. A. (2017), The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hussain, A. (2021), Meander, n.p.: New Art City.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Jayamanne, L. (2015), ‘Modulating simulated avatars’, in L. Jayamanne (ed.), The Epic Cinema of Kumar Shahani, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 18182.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kern, M. (2022), ‘Dream state: Hugs, dreams and British psychopolitics’, Journal of Visual Culture & HaFI, 18, pp. 4557.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lettvin, J. Y., Maturana, H. R., McCulloch, W. S. and Pitts, W. H. (1959), ‘What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain’, Proceedings of the IRE, 47:11, pp. 194051.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lugones, M. (1987), ‘Playfulness, “world”-travelling, and loving perception’, Hypatia, 2:2, pp. 319.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Lugones, M. (2003), Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing Coalition Against Multiple Oppressions, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mingers, J. (1991), ‘The cognitive theories of Maturana and Varela’, Systems Practice, 4:4, pp. 31938, https://cepa.info/fulltexts/2253.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mohamed, S., Png, M.-T. and Isaac, W. (2020), ‘Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence’, Philosophy and Technology, 33:4, pp. 65984, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00405-8.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Murphy, M. W. and Schroering, C. (2020), ‘Refiguring the Plantationocene: Racial capitalism, world-systems analysis, and global socioecological transformation’, Journal of World-Systems Research, 26:2, pp. 40015.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Nature Godded Worlds (2022), QUAD, Derby, 23 July–30 October, https://www.derbycathedralquarter.co.uk/events/game-jam-showcase-nature-godded-worlds-at-quad/. Accessed 16 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Oliver, J. (1998), El Centro Ceremonial de Caguana, Puerto Rico: Simbolismo Iconográfico, Cosmovisión y el Poderío Caciquil Taíno de Boriquen, Oxford: British Archaeological Reports.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Oliver, J. (2009), Caciques and Cemi Idols, Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rieder, J. (2008), Colonialism and the Emergence of Science Fiction, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Rieder, J. (2010), ‘On defining SF, or not: Genre theory, SF, and history’, Science Fiction Studies, 37:2, pp. 191209.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Rieder, J. (2013), Colonialism and the Emergence of Science Fiction, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J. and Pratt, S. L. (2020), ‘The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement’, Qualitative Inquiry, 26:3–4, pp. 33146, https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sandoval, C. (1994), ‘New sciences: Cyborg feminism and the methodology of the oppressed’, in J. Wolmark (ed.), Cybersexualities: A Reader on Feminist Theory, Cyborgs, and Cyberspace, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 24763, https://monoskop.org/images/e/eb/Wolmark_Jenny_ed_Cybersexualities_A_Reader_in_Feminist_Theory_Cyborgs_and_Cyberspace_1999.pdf. Accessed 17 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Saraiya, K. (2022–present), TARANG/तरंग, https://www.kinnarisaraiya.com/tarang. Accessed 13 August 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Spearman, D. (2023), ‘Howard Thurman and the promise of interspecies communion’, Caribbean Philosophical Association, 27 December, https://caribbeanphilosophy.org/blog/interspecies-communion. Accessed 17 June 2024.
  42. St Cyr, T. (2024), Woven, n.p.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Starr, H. (2019), ‘Building a better world for the future with Helen Starr’, FACT, 4 October, https://www.fact.co.uk/resources/2019/10/curator-blog-helen-starr. Accessed 17 June 2024.
  44. Starr, H. (2020), ‘Ontologies of the Caribbean Sea’, in A. Bunting-Branch (ed.), Warm Worlds and Otherwise: Exhibition Catalog, Derby: UAD Press, pp. 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Starr, H. (2022), Bush Tea, London: Institute of International Visual Arts.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Starr, H. (2023), ‘To dance in the dark: On the worldbuilding artworks of Kinnari Saraiya’, Archivo Papers Journal, 3:1, pp. 6982.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Starr, H. and Allen, R. (2018–19), Sync(Emerge(Consciousness)), exhibition catalogue, QUAD, Derby, 10 November–4 February.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Uexküll, Jakob von (1926), Theoretical Biology, New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Viveiros de Castro, E. (1998), ‘Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4:3, pp. 46988.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams, E. ([1962] 2010), History of the People of Trinidad and Tobago, Buffalo, NY: Eworld Inc.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Wynter, S. (1999), ‘Towards the sociogenic principle: Fanon, the puzzle of conscious experience, of “identity” and what it’s like to be “black”’, in M. Durán-Cogan and A. Gómez-Moriana (eds), National Identity and Sociopolitical Change: Latin America Between Marginizalization and Integration, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Wynter, S. (2022), We Must Learn to Sit Down Together and Talk about a Little Culture: Decolonizing Essays 1967–1984, Leeds: Peepal Tree Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. You Feel Me_ (2019–20), FACT, Liverpool, 1 November–23 February, https://www.fact.co.uk/event/you-feel-me. Accessed 16 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/ap3_00041_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/ap3_00041_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test