Skip to content
1981
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2042-793X
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7948

Abstract

This article applies a multimodal analysis to explore the potential meanings attached to the re-inscriptions of public monuments and spaces produced during the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. Specific attention is given to several contentious examples: the George Floyd Memorial in Minneapolis, Winston Churchill’s statue in London, and the Queen Victoria statue in Leeds. We reflect on the ephemerality of protest re-inscriptions and how they receive a multimodal ‘second-life’ through their (re)presentations in mainstream/social media. Although institutions of power are quick to remove subversive re-inscriptions from the public sphere, we note that the portrait mural of George Floyd continues to function as a universal shrine to the injustices experienced by the wider Black community. A memorial space which is allowed to linger until its promised transubstantiation into George Perry Floyd Jr Place. In contrast, the other BLM re-inscriptions analysed in this article have now been removed from the physical public sphere, in which their transient messages of protest and public pedagogy will have in some cases been privately and publicly archived digitally on the internet; where evidence is much harder to remove than the public sphere.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00047_1
2021-07-01
2025-03-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adkins, M.. ( 2020;), @MarkMyWordsNews. , https://twitter.com/markmywordsnews?lang=en. Accessed 18 August 2021.
  2. Althusser, Louis. ( 1970;), ‘ Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). ’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (trans. B. Brewster.), New York:: Monthly Review Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bal, Mieke, and Bryson, Norman. ( 1991;), ‘ Semiotics and art history. ’, Art Bulletin, Vol. 73, pp. 174208.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brogden, Jim. ( 2019), Photography and the Non-Place: The Cultural Erasure of the City, London:: Palgrave;.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elsner, Jas. ( 2003;), ‘ Iconoclasm and the preservation of memory. ’, in R. S. Nelson, and M. Olin. (eds), Monuments and Memory, Made and Unmade, Chicago, IL and London:: The University of Chicago Press;, pp. 20931.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Figlio, Karl. ( 2003;), ‘ Getting to the beginning: Identification and concrete thinking in historical consciousness. ’, in S. Radstone, and K. Hodgkin. (eds), Regimes of Memory, London and New York:: Routledge;, p. 155.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Halliday, Michael. ( 1985), An Introduction to Functional Grammar, London:: Hodder Arnold;.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Halliday, Michael. ( 1989), Spoken and Written Language, Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hodge, Robert, and Kress, Gunther. ( 1988), Social Semiotics, Cambridge:: Polity Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ishmael, Hannah,, Sowinski, Ego,, Foster, Kelly,, Joseph, Etienne, and Richards, Nathan. ( 2020;), ‘ Locating the Black archive. ’, in S. Popple,, A. Prescot, and D. H. Mutibwa. (eds), Communities, Archives and New Collaborative Practices, Bristol:: Policy Press;, pp. 20718.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jewitt, Carey. (ed.) ( 2009), The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kress, Gunther. ( 2010), Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kress, Gunther, and Van Leeuwen, Theo. ( 1996), Reading Images – The Grammar of Visual Design, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Lammy, David. ( 2021;), ‘ We must learn from the war graves scandal. ’, The Guardian, 24 April.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lemke, Jay. ( 2002;), ‘ Opening up closure: Semiotics across scales. ’, in J. L. R. Chandler, and G. van de Viguer. (eds), Closure: Emergent Organisations and Their Dynamics, vol. 901, New York:: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences;, p. 100.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Maruyama, Magorah. ( 1980;), ‘ Information and communication in poly-epistemological systems. ’, in K. Woodward. (ed.), The Myths of Information: Technology and Postindustrial Culture, Milwaukee:: University of Wisconsin Press;, pp. 2840.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Metz, Christian. ( [1975] 1982), The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, Indiana:: Indiana University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Pollock, Griselda. ( 1988), Vision and Difference: Femininity, Feminism and the Histories of Art, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rose, Gillian. ( 2007), Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials, , 2nd ed.., London:: Sage Publications;.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sert, Josep,, Léger, Fernand, and Giedion, Sigfried. ( [1943] 1984;), ‘ Nine points on monumentality. ’, Monumentality and the City, Harvard Architecture Review, 4, pp. 6263.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Terdiman, Richard. ( 2003;), ‘ Given memory: On mnemonic coercion, reproduction, and invention. ’, in S. Radstone, and K. Hodgkin. (eds), Regimes of Memory, London and New York:: Routledge;, p. 193.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Till, Karen. ( 2005), The New Berlin: Memory, Politics, Place, Minnesota:: University of Minnesota Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Leeuwen, Theo. ( 2005), Introducing Social Semiotics, London:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Young, James. ( 2016), The Stages of Memory: Reflections on Memorial Art, Loss, and the Spaces Between, Amerst, MA and Preston:: University of Massachusetts Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Brogden, Jim, and Harper, Douglas. ( 2021;), ‘ R WE LOUD ENOUGH?: Re-inscribing monuments in the public sphere by the Black Lives Matter movement. ’, Art & the Public Sphere, 10:1, pp. 3753, https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00047_1
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00047_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00047_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test