A bid for memorialization: Negotiating public memory | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Art & the Public Sphere
  4. Volume 10, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2042-793X
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7948

Abstract

In March 2018, following the defeat of the Left Front by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) led alliance in the Assembly elections in Tripura, India, one witnessed the demolition of Lenin’s statue in South Tripura amidst cries of, ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai!’. The Tripura governor, as a response, tweeted – ‘[w]‌hat one democratically elected government can do another democratically elected government can undo, and vice versa’ (Karmakar 2018: n.pag.). In May 2019, newspaper reports stated that workers from the right-wing political organization, BJP had defaced a statue of Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar in Vidyasagar College, Kolkata, India. Of the many criticisms levelled against this incident, one in particular took a nativist and elitist tone and posited that the rally consisted of ‘outsiders’, i.e., people from the neighbouring states of Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Jharkhand. As these ‘outsiders’ were not cognizant of Vidyasagar’s contributions to the sociocultural and political fabric of West Bengal, it made them more prone to committing said acts of vandalism. To that end, this article will closely examine the contemporary debates concerning the vandalism and restoration of statues in South Asia, which brings up pertinent questions regarding state power and the narratives propagated in the daily lives of its citizens and the iconographic function of statues which allows for communities, both real and imagined to rally around it. As structures of cultural, religious and political significance rise to the fore with increasing frequency, debates on their utility, significance, allegiance and symbolism are burgeoning with multiple meanings. To that end, in an attempt to historicize said events it is imperative to unpack the categories of culture, religious and political representation and what goes into their production in order to better address the questions: ‘Who is represented?’ and ‘[w]ho gets to represent?’. This article will locate the discussion around how statues are related at once to the mundane, the local and the national and when they are vandalized, how are discourses around communities affected as a result within the contours of cultural and religio-political representation.

© 2021 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00052_1
2021-07-01
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anon. ( 2018;), ‘ Mayawati seeks apology from those flaying BSP for its statues. ’, Times of India, 31 October, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/mayawati-seeks-apology-from-those-flaying-bsp-for-its-statues/articleshow/66445967.cms. Accessed 18 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Avid Learning ( 2021;), ‘ LIVE | Statues in Colonial Bombay & Bengal Presidencies. ’, YouTube, 11 July, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sr_lZV8bW1s&t=12s. Accessed 5 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Belli, M.. ( 2014;), ‘ Monumental pride: Mayawati’s memorials in Lucknow on JSTOR. ’, JSTOR, https://www.jstor.org/stable/43489799. Accessed 21 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhatia, S.. ( 2021;), ‘ Podcast: Monumental statues are an assertion of identity. ’, The Wire, 23 March, https://thewire.in/politics/podcast-monumental-statues-are-an-assertion-of-identity. Accessed 10 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bhattacharya, T.. ( 2005), The Sentinels of Culture: Class, Education and the Colonial Intellectual in Bengal (1848–85), Oxford:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Chakrabarty, D.. ( 2008;), ‘ The public life of history: An argument out of India. ’, Public Culture, 20:1, pp. 143–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chakraborty, S.. ( 2019;), ‘ Vandalisation of Vidyasagar’s bust a “black spot” in Bengal’s history. ’, Newsclick, 15 May, https://www.newsclick.in/Elections-2019-West-Bengal-Ishwarchand-Vidyasagar-BJP-TMC-Violence. Accessed 19 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chandrashekhar, V.. ( 2021;), ‘ How colonial statues vanished from India’s cities. ’, MSN, 30 June, https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/how-colonial-statues-vanished-from-india-s-cities/ar-AAKieBq. Accessed 19 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Chatterjee, P.,, Guha-Thakurta, T., and Kar, B.. ( 2014), New Cultural Histories of India, New Delhi:: Oxford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Choudhary, A.. ( 2019;), ‘ SC: Mayawati must refund money spent on elephant statues from her pocket. ’, Times of India, 9 February, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/sc-mayawati-must-refund-money-spent-on-elephant-statues-from-her-pocket/articleshow/67908187.cms. Accessed 19 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Coombes, A.. ( 2003), History after Apartheid: Visual Culture and Public Memory in a Democratic South Africa, Durham, NC:: Durham University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Frichot, H.. ( 2011;), ‘ Conexa, conjuncta, disjuncta: What can a monument do?. ’, Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism, 8:2, pp. 74–86, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/futuante.8.2.0074. Accessed 15 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Halbwachs, M.. ( 1980), The Collective Memory, New York:: Harper Colophon Books and Harper & Row Publishers;.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Jain, K.. ( 2014;), ‘ The handbag that exploded: Mayawati’s monuments and the aesthetics of democracy in Post-Reform India. ’, Academia, https://www.academia.edu/7007275/The_Handbag_that_Exploded_Mayawati_s_Monuments_and_the_Aesthetics_of_Democracy_in_Post_Reform_India. Accessed 18 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Jain, K.. ( 2018;), ‘ Reconfiguring India’s nationalism, one grand statue at a time. ’, The Wire, 31 October, https://thewire.in/politics/narendra-modi-statue-of-unity-sardar-patel. Accessed 19 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Karmakar, R.. ( 2018;), ‘ Lenin statue demolition: Tripura Governor tweets of precedent. ’, The Hindu, 6 March, https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/lenin-statue-controversy-tripura-governor-tweets-of-precedent/article22940286.ece. Accessed 15 January 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Koselleck, R.. ( 2002), The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts, Stanford University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Koselleck, R.,, Sebastián, J., and Fuentes, J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Conceptual history, memory, and identity: An interview with Reinhart Koselleck. ’, Contributions to the History of Concepts, 2:1, pp. 99–127, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23731013. Accessed 10 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Musil, R.. ( 1936), Nachlass zu Lebzeiten (Posthumous Papers of a Living Author) (trans. P. Worstman), New York:: Archipelago Books;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Narayan, B.. ( 2006), Women Heroes and Dalit Assertion in North India: Culture, Identity and Politics: Cultural Subordination and the Dalit Challenge, vol. 5, New Delhi:: Sage Publications;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Nora, P.. ( 1989;), ‘ Between memory and history: Les Lieux de Mémoire. ’, Représentations, 26:1, pp. 7–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Olsen, N.. ( 2012), History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck, New York:: Berghahn Books;, pp. 280–85.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Pal, S.. ( 2020;), ‘ Statue of Unity: Tribal activists arrested ahead of PM Modi’s visit, mobile services suspended in parts. ’, NewsClick, 31 October, https://www.newsclick.in/statue-unity-tribal-activists-arrested-PM-modi-visit-mobile-services-suspended-parts. Accessed 15 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Parr, A.. ( 2011;), ‘ Conexa, conjuncta, disjuncta: What can a monument do?. ’, Future Anterior: Journal of Historic Preservation, History, Theory, and Criticism, 8:2, pp. 74–86, https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/futuante.8.2.0074. Accessed 15 May 2020.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Pati, S.. ( 2012;), ‘ “A nation set in stone”: Insight into the politics of statuary in Delhi (1950–65). ’, Economic and Political Weekly, 47:30, pp. 232–38, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23251775. Accessed 3 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. PTI ( 2018;), ‘ Mayawati seeks apology from those flaying BSP for its statues. ’, Indian Express, 31 October, https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/lucknow/mayawati-statue-of-unity-sardar-vallabhbhai-patel-5427965/. Accessed 8 July 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Sebastián, J., and Fuentes, J.. ( 2021;), ‘ Conceptual history, memory, and identity: An interview with Reinhart Koselleck. ’, Contributions to the History of Concepts, 2:1, pp. 99–127, https://www.jstor.org/stable/23731013. Accessed 30 April 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Sircar, J.. ( 2019;), ‘ Why the BJP feels it has to appropriate Sardar Patel. ’, The Wire, 31 October, https://thewire.in/history/bjp-sardar-vallabhbhai-patel. Accessed 15 May 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Thakurta-Guha, T.. ( 1997;), ‘ Archaeology as evidence: Looking back from the Ayodhya debate. ’, Occasional Paper No. 159, Calcutta:: Centre for Studies in Social Sciences;.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Kujur, Rini Pratik, and Majumdar, Puja Sen. ( 2021;), ‘ A bid for memorialisation: Negotiating public memory. ’, Art & the Public Sphere, 10:1, pp. 111–25, https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00052_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00052_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): caste; community; memorialization; public memory; public sphere; statues

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error