Teaching beyond control? On situating a fence and the agonizing effect of graffiti-based cultural practices as challenge and chance for museum education

References

1. Anon. ( 2020a;), ‘ Reaktionen auf eine Ausstellung: Face It!. ’, Wien Museum Magazin, 16 November, https://magazin.wienmuseum.at/reaktionen-auf-eine-ausstellung. Accessed 12 August 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anon. ( 2020b;), ‘ Rund 1.500 Corona-Verharmloser demonstrierten in Wien ohne Abstand und ohne Maske. ’, Der Standard, 26 October, https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000121201027/rund-1-500-corona-verharmloser-demonstrieren-in-wien-ohne-abstand. Accessed 29 January 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Auer, Konstantin, and Reibenwein, Michaela. ( 2020;), ‘ Warum die Corona-Demo in Wien nicht aufgelöst wurde. ’, Kurier, 27 October, https://kurier.at/chronik/wien/warum-die-corona-demo-in-wien-nicht-aufgeloest-wurde/401078283. Accessed 29 January 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bengtsen, Peter, and Arvidsson, Matilda. ( 2014;), ‘ Spatial justice and street art. ’, NAVEIÑ REET: Nordic Journal of Law and Social Research, Special Issue: ‘Law and Art’, 1:5, pp. 117–30.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bishop, Claire. ( 2012), Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship, London and New York:: Verso Books;.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bourdieu, Pierre. ( 1993), The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, New York:: Columbia University Press;.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Cameron-Chileshe, Jasmine. ( 2019;), ‘ Inspiration or gentrification? The Netflix flamingo mural dividing opinion in the Baltic. ’, Liverpool Echo, 30 March, https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/inspirational-gentrification-worst-netflix-david-16050875. Accessed 27 September 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Caramanica, Jon. ( 2018;), ‘ “Beyond the Streets” embraces the sprawling world of Graffiti. ’, New York Times, 22 August, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/22/arts/design/beyond-the-streets-graffiti.html. Accessed 27 September 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Clarke, Adele E.. ( 2005), Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn, Thousand Oaks, CA:: Sage Publications;.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Clarke, Adele E.. ( 2012), Situationsanalyse: Grounded Theory nach dem Postmodern Turn (ed. R. Keller., trans. J., Sarnes.), Wiesbaden:: Springer VS;.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Clifford, James. ( 1997), Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard University Press;.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Ebenführer, Astrid. ( 2020;), ‘ 5G, Chip bei Impfung, Überwachungsstaat, Lügenpresse: ORF-“Schauplatz” über Corona und Verschwörungstheoretiker. ’, Der Standard, 15 October, https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000120914278/5g-chip-bei-impfung-ueberwachungsstaat-luegenpresse-orf-schauplatz-ueber-corona. Accessed 29 January 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Frederick, Ursula K.. ( 2009;), ‘ Revolution is the new Black: Graffiti/Art and Mark-making practices. ’, Archeologies, 5:2, pp. 210–37.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Freire, Paulo. ( 2018), Pedagogy of the Oppressed, , rev. ed.., New York:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Güleç, Ayşe,, Herring, Carina,, Kolb, Gila,, Sternfeld, Nora, and Stolba, Julia. ( 2020), vermittlung vermitteln: Fragen, Forderungen und Versuchsanordnungen von Kunstvermittler*innen im 21: Jahrhundert, Berlin:: Verlag der neuen Gesellschaft für bildende Kunst – nGbK;.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Haraway, Donna. ( 1988;), ‘ Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. ’, Feminist Studies, 14:3, pp. 575–99.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Harris, Keely B.. ( 2006;), ‘ Graffiti as public pedagogy: The educative potential of street art. ’, in J. Kincheloe, and K. Hayes. (eds), Metropedagogy: Power, Justice, and the Urban Classroom, Rotterdam:: Sense Publishers;, pp. 97–112.
    [Google Scholar]
18. hooks, bell. ( 1994), Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom, New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Hoppe, Ilaria. ( 2020;), ‘ Graffiti is back in town: Critical approaches to visual and spatial practices in Berlin. ’, Journal of Urban Cultural Studies, 7:1, pp. 199–223.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Iveson, Kurt. ( 2018;), ‘ Graffiti, street art and the democratic city. ’, in K. Avramidis, and M. Tsilimpounidi. (eds), Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and Representing the City, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 89–99.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Laclau, Ernesto, and Mouffe, Chantal. ( 1985), Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, London:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Landau, Friederike. ( 2019), Agonistic Articulations in the ‘Creative’ City: On New Actors and Activism in Berlin’s Cultural Politics, London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Landau, Friederike. ( 2021;), ‘ (Un)Grounding agonistic public space: Approaching Mouffe’s spatial theory via museums. ’, in F. Landau,, L. Pohl, and N. Roskamm. (eds), (Un)Grounding: Post-Foundational Geographies, Sozial- und Kulturgeographie, Bielefeld:: Transcript;, pp. 153–73.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Landau, Friederike,, Pohl, Lucas, and Roskamm, Nikolai. ( 2021), (Un)Grounding: Post-Foundational Geographies, Sozial- und Kulturgeographie, Bielefeld:: Transcript;.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Marchart, Oliver. ( 2010), Die politische Differenz: Zum Denken des Politischen bei Nancy, Lefort, Badiou, Laclau und Agamben, Frankfurt am Main:: Suhrkamp;.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Marchart, Oliver. ( 2015;), ‘ Die Institution spricht: Kunstvermittlung als Herrschafts- und als Emanzipationstechnologie. ’, in schnittpunkt, B. Jaschke,, C. Martinez-Turek, and N. Sternfeld. (eds), Wer spricht? Autorität und Autorschaft in Ausstellungen, ausstellungstheorie & praxis, Vienna and Berlin:: Turia + Kant;, pp. 34–58.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Marchart, Oliver. ( 2018), Thinking Antagonism: Political Ontology after Laclau, Edinburgh:: Edinburgh University Press Ltd;.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Mießgang, Thomas. ( 2021;), ‘ Der Kampf um den Zaun. ’, Zeit Online, 15 February, https://www.zeit.de/2021/07/wien-museum-ausstellung-lockdown-corona-leugner/komplettansicht. Accessed 12 August 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mörsch, Carmen. (ed.) ( 2009), Kunstvermittlung 2: Zwischen kritischer Praxis und Dienstleistung auf der documenta 12: Ergebnisse eines Forschungsprojekts, Zürich and Berlin:: Diaphanes;.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mouffe, Chantal. ( 2005), On the Political: Thinking in Action, London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mouffe, Chantal. ( 2007;), ‘ Art and democracy: Art as an agonistic intervention in public space. ’, Open! Platform for Art, Culture & the Public Domain, 1 January, https://www.onlineopen.org/art-and-democracy. Accessed 27 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Mouffe, Chantal. ( 2010), Artforum, 48:10, https://www.artforum.com/print/201006/chantal-mouffe-25710. Accessed 24 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Mouffe, Chantal. ( 2013), Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically, London and New York:: Verso;.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Mouffe, Chantal. ( 2016;), ‘ An agonistic conception of the museum. ’, Museu: Un Proyecto de Es Baluard, http://proyectomuseu.org/an-agonistic-conception-of-the-museum/?doing_wp_cron=1645170405.4893629550933837890625. Accessed 24 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rogoff, Irit. ( 2008;), ‘ Turning. ’, e-flux Journal, 0:0, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/00/68470/turning/. Accessed 27 September 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Schacter, Rafael. ( 2014;), ‘ The ugly truth: Street art, graffiti and the creative city. ’, Art & the Public Sphere, 3:2, pp. 161–76.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Schacter, Rafael. ( 2018;), ‘ Street art is a period, period: Or, classificatory confusion and intermural art. ’, in K. Avramidis, and M. Tsilimpounidi. (eds), Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and Representing the City, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 103–18.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Schad, Anke. ( 2019), Cultural Governance in Österreich: Eine Interpretative Policy-Analyse zu kulturpolitischen Entscheidungsprozessen in Linz und Graz, Bielefeld:: Transcript Verlag;.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schnittpunkt, Jaschke, Beatrice, and Sternfeld, Nora. (eds) ( 2012), Educational Turn: Handlungsräume der Kunst- und Kulturvermittlung, ausstellungstheorie & praxis, Vienna and Berlin:: Turia + Kant;.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Skregelid, Lisbet. ( 2021;), ‘ Zoom in on Dry Joy-Dissensus, agonism and democracy in art education. ’, Education Sciences, 11:1, pp. 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Star, Susan L., and Griesemer, James R.. ( 1989;), ‘ Institutional ecology, “Translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. ’, Social Studies of Science, 19:3, pp. 387–420.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sternfeld, Nora. ( 2018), Das radikaldemokratische Museum, Berlin and Boston, MA:: De Gruyter;.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Stuiber, Petra. ( 2020;), ‘ Wie die Pandemie die Gesellschaft spaltet: ORF-“Schauplatz” über Corona und Verschwörungstheoretiker. ’, Der Standard, 24 October, https://www.derstandard.at/story/2000121169394/wie-die-pandemie-die-gesellschaft-spaltet. Accessed 29 January 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Waldner, Lisa K., and Dobratz, Betty A.. ( 2013;), ‘ Graffiti as a form of contentious political participation. ’, Sociology Compass, 7:5, pp. 377–89.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wien Museum Official Website ( 2020;), ‘ Face It! Reactions to an exhibition. ’, https://www.wienmuseum.at/en/exhibitions/exhibition-archive/detail/face-it-portraets-aus-dem-fruehjahr-2020. Accessed 12 August 2021.
46. Young, Alison. ( 2014), Street Art, Public City: Law, Crime and the Urban Imagination, London and New York:: Routledge;.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Young, Alison. ( 2018;), ‘ Art or crime or both at the same time? On the ambiguity of images in public spaces. ’, in K. Avramidis, and M. Tsilimpounidi. (eds), Graffiti and Street Art: Reading, Writing and Representing the City, London and New York:: Routledge;, pp. 39–53.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Fridrik, Stefanie. ( 2022;), ‘ Teaching beyond control? On situating a fence and the agonizing effect of graffiti-based cultural practices as challenge and chance for museum education. ’, Art & the Public Sphere, Special Issue: ‘Politicizing Artistic Pedagogies: Disciplines, Struggles, Teachings’, 11:1, pp. 69–86, https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00070_1
    [Google Scholar]