Skip to content
1981
Latin-American Performance, Activism and Public Space
  • ISSN: 2042-793X
  • E-ISSN: 2042-7948

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study of two recent Latin American cases of counter-monumental interventions initiated by feminist and dissident actors: the intervention in Santiago de Chile and the creation of in Mexico City. The analysis of the two cases is empirically based on a combination of social media publications and interviews with central actors conducted during fieldwork in both cities. The analysis demonstrates how the interventions made visible and enriched the conflicts of memory that stem from the traditional monumentalization of national histories, whilst fortifying feminist and dissident movements through an exposure of the continuity of their demands. Based on this combined analysis of the interventions’ aesthetic representations of patriarchal violence on a variety of temporal levels and their role in the reappropriation of public space, we argue that both interventions are in their own way expressions of what we have chosen to call memory activism; an affective, cathartic and aesthetically cacophonous practice through which long-lasting injustices are exposed in the public space.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The ANID postdoctoral Fondecyt (Award 3210074)
  • COES (Award ANID/FONDAP/1523A0005)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00082_1
2024-11-06
2024-12-05
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. @antimonumenta_vivasnosqueremos (2021), ‘Que Siempre No…’, Instagram, 26 November, https://www.instagram.com/p/CWwF_4TFX4q/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. @antimonumenta_vivasnosqueremos (2022), ‘El 25 de Septiembre de 2021, Tomamos…’, Instagram, 5 April, https://www.instagram.com/p/Cb-VSrkuzRD/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Badilla, M. and Aguilera, C. (2021), ‘The 2019–2020 Chilean anti-neoliberal uprising: A catalyst for decolonial de-monumentalization’, Memory Studies, 14:6, pp. 122640, https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980211054305.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger, S., Scalmer, S. and Wicke, C. (eds) (2021), Remembering Social Movements: Activism and Memory, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, B. (2022), ‘Tiempo Al Tiempo: Nonlinear time in Chilean sexually dissident/diverse activism’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 28:3, pp. 32551, https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-9738470.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Desinformémonos (2022), ‘Nace el Jardín Somos Memoria para las mujeres que luchan’, 5 March, https://desinformemonos.org/nace-el-jardin-somos-memoria-para-las-mujeres-que-luchan/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
  7. @foreverveintidos (2021a), ‘Este Sábado Nos Reunimos En La Caballa Manuel Rodriguez…’, Instagram, 15 December, https://www.instagram.com/p/CXgen6GOZPE/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. @foreverveintidos (2021b), ‘Expo Pública e Intervención Callejera “Amor y Furia” Acto I…’, Instagram, 28 December, https://www.instagram.com/p/CYBt8Ebu2X6/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gutman, Y. and Wüstenberg, J. (2022), ‘Challenging the meaning of the past from below: A typology for comparative research on memory activists’, Memory Studies, 15:5, pp. 107086.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gutman, Y. and Wüstenberg, J. (eds) (2023), The Routledge Handbook of Memory Activism, London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003127550.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Instituto Nacional de Derechos Humanos (2019), ‘Informe Anual 2019: Situación de los Derechos Humanos en Chile en el contexto de la crisis social’, December, https://bibliotecadigital.indh.cl/handle/123456789/1701. Accessed 8 April 2023.
  12. Jelin, E. (2002), Los Trabajos de La Memoria, Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jelin, E. and Langland, V. (eds) (2003), Monumentos, Memoriales y Marcas Territoriales, Madrid: Siglo XXI.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. et al. (2021), ‘DIFUNDIR/COMPARTIR POR FAVOR…’, Instagram, 7 December, https://www.instagram.com/p/CXL2lp8Oq9o/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. et al. (2021), Quemar El Miedo: Un Manifiesto, Santiago de Chile: Editorial Planeta.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lugones, M. (2010), ‘Toward a decolonial feminism’, Hypatia, 25:4, pp. 74259, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01137.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Mellado, M. (2022), ‘“O te matas o te matan”: La cruda realidad que viven hoy las personas trans en Chile’, La Red, 26 February, https://www.lared.cl/2022/reportajes/o-te-matas-o-te-matan-la-cruda-realidad-que-viven-hoy-las-personas-trans-en-chile. Accessed 8 April 2023.
  18. Mignolo, W. (2007), La Idea de América Latina: La Herida Colonial y La Opción Decolonial, Barcelona: Gedisa.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Quezada Vásquez, I. and Alvarado Lincopi, C. (2020), ‘Repertorios anticoloniales en Plaza Dignidad: Desmonumentalización y resignificación del espacio urbano en la Revuelta: Santiago de Chile, 2019’, Aletheia, 10:20, pp. 116, https://doi.org/10.24215/18533701e049.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Quijano, A. (2000), ‘Colonialidad del Poder y Clasificacion Social’, Journal of World-Systems Research, XI:2, pp. 34286.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. @resistencia.libertad (2022), ‘Conmemoración a Un Año de La Muerte de Emilia Bau…’, Instagram, 16 February, https://www.instagram.com/p/CaDpfebOWZE/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Rigney, A. (2018), ‘Remembering hope: Transnational activism beyond the traumatic’, Memory Studies, 11:3, pp. 36880, https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698018771869.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rigney, A. (2022), ‘Toxic monuments and mnemonic regime change’, Studies on National Movements (SNM), 9, pp. 741.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2012), ‘Ch’ixinakax utxiwa: A reflection on the practices and discourses of decolonization’, South Atlantic Quarterly, 111:1, pp. 95109, https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1472612.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2015), Sociología de La Imagen: Miradas Ch’ixi Desde La Historia Andina, Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rivera Cusicanqui, S. (2018), Un Mundo Ch’ixi Es Posible: Ensayos Desde Un Presente En Crisis, Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Segato, R. (2020), Las Estructuras Elementales de La Violencia: Ensayos Sobre Género Entre La Antropología, El Psicoanálisis y Los Derechos Humanos, Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. @trinchera.lgbtiqa (2022), ‘ENERO TRANS MASCULINE…’, Instagram, 3 January, https://www.instagram.com/p/CYRi_8qu_Dy/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. @yodenunciepero (2021), ‘Queremos Que En México…’, Instagram, 12 November, https://www.instagram.com/p/CWMG1k3JwzU/. Accessed 8 April 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Young, J. E. (1992), ‘The counter-monument: Memory against itself in Germany today’, Critical Inquiry, 18:2, pp. 26796, https://doi.org/10.1086/448632.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00082_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/aps_00082_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error