Skip to content
1981
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1749-3463
  • E-ISSN: 1749-3471

Abstract

Abstract

A welcome topic of the new journal Artifact is to promote as a distinct academic field the transdisciplinary approaches centered on design research. One of the conditions for such a transdisciplinary approach is that the different actors recognize the specificity of the contributions of other actors and the complementary nature of their respective productions. In this essay, I will argue that the different contributions of experts in design must be completed by users’ constructive activity. More particularly, my focus is to search for a unit of analysis that helps to build shared references between users and designers. I will proceed in two steps. In the first, I will suggest that an instrument cannot be confused with an artifact, and that it is the user or the worker who gives to an artifact the status of an instrument. In a second step I will describe the design process as a dialogical process in the Bakhtinien sense. I will conclude with comments on “what is an artifact?”

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/art.1.1.11_1
2007-03-01
2026-04-12

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/art.1.1.11_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): dialogism; Instrument; Instrumental Genesis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test