Research through and through design | Intellect Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Artifact
  4. Volume 8, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 1749-3463
  • E-ISSN: 1749-3471
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

An intriguing aspect of the notion of is how much we seem to gain from its proposition and how informative it appears to be, even as we do not state precisely what is meant by the terms research or design. But, what is it that this notion of calls to the foreground? In what follows, I discuss three interpretations of what through might refer to by looking at it from different perspectives: , and . Different perspectives bring different possibilities to the foreground, and therefore they also suggest slightly different future trajectories. But this also means that some issues fade into the background, something new perspectives can help us get a glimpse of. This is perhaps especially evident in the case of judgement, the least familiar of the three. Looking across the range of research trajectories that these three perspectives open up, there are reasons to think that we can make research through design become a more extensive, inclusive and a far more radical research proposition than its name reveals.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation, Stockholm, Sweden (Award 2017.0058)
© 2021 The Authors Published by Intellect Ltd.
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows users to copy, distribute and transmit the article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/art_00016_1
2021-12-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ajdp/8/1-2/art.8.1-2.16.1.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/art_00016_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Archer, B.. ( 1979;), ‘ Design as a discipline. ’, Design Studies, 1:1, pp. 17–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer, B.. ( 1995;), ‘ The nature of research. ’, Co-design: Interdisciplinary Journal of Design, January, pp. 6–13.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arendt, H.. ( [1954] 1994;), ‘ Understanding and politics (The difficulties of understanding). ’, in J. Kohn. (ed.), Essays in Understanding: 1930–1954, New York:: Harcourt Brace;, pp. 307–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Asplund, G.,, Creagh, L.,, Kåberg, H., and Lane, B. M.. ( 2008), Modern Swedish Design: Three Founding Texts / by Uno Åhrén, Gunnar Asplund, Wolter Gahn, Ellen Key, Sven Markelius, Gregor Paulsson and Eskil Sundahl; Edited and with Introductions by Lucy Creagh, Helena Kåberg, and Barbara Miller Lane; Essays by Kenneth Frampton, New York:: Museum of Modern Art;.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Borgdorff, H.. ( 2010;), ‘ The production of knowledge in artistic research. ’, in M. Biggs, and H. Karlsson. (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, Abingdon:: Routledge;, pp. 44–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Braidotti, R.. ( 2013), The Posthuman, Cambridge, MA:: Polity;.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Fallan, K.. (ed.) ( 2012), Scandinavian Design: Alternative Histories, London:: Berg;.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Frayling, C.. ( 1993;), ‘ Research in art and design. ’, Royal College of Arts Research Papers, 1:1, 1993/4 , pp. 1–5.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Fry, T.. ( 2009), Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics, and New Practice, Oxford:: Berg;.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gaver, W.. ( 2012;), ‘ What should we expect from research through design?. ’, in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York:: Association for Computing Machinery;, pp. 937–46, https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208538. Accessed 28 June 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Giaccardi, E.. ( 2019;), ‘ Histories and futures of research through design: From prototypes to connected things. ’, International Journal of Design, 13:3, pp. 139–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Göransdotter, M., and Redström, J.. ( 2018;), ‘ Design methods and critical historiography: An example from Swedish user-centered design. ’, Design Issues, 34:2, pp. 20–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Höök, K., and Löwgren, J.. ( 2021;), ‘ Characterizing interaction design by its ideals: A discipline in transition. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 7:1, pp. 24–40.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Kant, I.. ( [1790] 1987), Critique of Judgment, Indianapolis, IN:: Hackett;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Krippendorff, K.. ( 2016;), ‘ Design, an undisciplinable profession. ’, in G. Joost,, K. Bredies,, M. Christensen,, F. Conradi, and A. Unteidig. (eds), Design as Research, Basel:: Birkhäuser;, pp. 197–206.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Redström, J.. ( 2017), Making Design Theory, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Redström, J., and Wiltse, H.. ( 2019), Changing Things: The Future of Objects in a Digital World, London:: Bloomsbury Visual Arts;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Rittel, H. W. J., and Webber, M. M.. ( 1973;), ‘ Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. ’, Policy Sciences, 4, pp. 155–69, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730. Accessed 1 June 2022.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Shaviro, S.. ( 2009), Without Criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and Aesthetics, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Simon, H. A.. ( 1996), The Sciences of the Artificial, , 3rd ed.., Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Society for Artistic Research ( 2020;), ‘ The Vienna Declaration on Artistic Research. ’, 24 June, https://societyforartisticresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Vienna-Declaration-on-Artistic-Research-Final.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2022.
  22. Stolterman, E.. ( 2008;), ‘ The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. ’, International Journal of Design, 2:1, pp. 55–65.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Stolterman, E.. ( 2021;), ‘ The challenge of improving designing. ’, International Journal of Design, 15:1, pp. 65–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Zimmerman, J., and Forlizzi, J.. ( 2008;), ‘ The role of design artifacts in design theory construction. ’, Artifact, 2:1, pp. 41–45.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Redström, Johan. ( 2021;), ‘ Research through and through design. ’, Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 8:1&2, pp. 16.1–16.19, https://doi.org/10.1386/art_00016_1
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1386/art_00016_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): design research methodology; design studies; design theory; judgement; making; practice-based research

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error