Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Artifact
  4. Volume 8, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 8, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 1749-3463
  • E-ISSN: 1749-3471
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

In this article, we discuss and argue for the value of working with strategic design in organizational settings through inventive research practices rooted in co-design and design anthropology. More specifically, we propose a process of collaborative experimentation staged as a series of events that establish relations between everyday organizational perspectives and practices and organizational strategic documents. We base our analytical discussions and reflections on a research project carried out in the organizational setting of a labour union. We describe how a programme–experiment informed design research approach, driven by and reliant on collaborative explorations, provides a scaffold for unlocking organizational strategic management visions and goals in interaction with transformational perspectives on organizational practices. We frame our approach as a research strategy of working the organizational setting, which focuses on staging dialogues between the experimental and the managerial. Such a disposition, we argue, offers important alternatives to management literatures’ current approaches to strategic design research.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Royal Danish Academy
© 2021 The Authors Published by Intellect Ltd.
This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-ND), which allows users to copy, distribute and transmit the article as long as the author is attributed, the article is not used for commercial purposes, and the work is not modified or adapted in any way. To view a copy of the licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/art_00018_1
2021-12-01
2024-09-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ajdp/8/1-2/art.8.1-2.18.1.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1386/art_00018_1&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Armstrong, L.,, Bailey, J.,, Julier, G., and Kimbell, L.. ( 2014), Social Design Futures: HEI Research and the AHRC, University of Brighton;, http://mappingsocialdesign.org. Accessed 14 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Binder, T.. ( 2016;), ‘ The things we do: Encountering the possible. ’, in R. C. Smith,, K. T. Vangkilde,, M. G. Kjaersgaard,, T. Otto,, J. Halse, and T. Binder. (eds), Design Anthropological Futures, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;, pp. 267–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Binder, T.,, Michelis, G. De,, Ehn, P.,, Jacucci, G.,, Linde, P., and Wagner, I.. ( 2011), Design Things, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Binder, T., and Redström, J.. ( 2006;), ‘ Exemplary design research. ’, in K. Friedman,, T. Love,, E. Côrte Real, and C. Rust. (eds), Wonderground: DRS International Conference, Lisbon, Portugal, 1–4 November, https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2006/researchpapers/51. Accessed 10 August 2021.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bjerknes, G.,, Ehn, P., and Kyng, M.. ( 1987), Computers and Democracy, Aldershot:: Avebury;.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Blomberg, J., and Karasti, H.. ( 2013;), ‘ Ethnography: Positioning ethnography within participatory design. ’, in J. Simonsen, and T. Robertson. (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 106–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Borja de Mozota, B.. ( 2006;), ‘ The four powers of design: A value model in design management. ’, Design Management Review, 17:2, pp. 44–53.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brandt, E.,, Redström, J.,, Eriksen, M. A., and Binder, T.. ( 2011), XLAB, Copenhagen:: The Danish Design School Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Calabretta, G., and Gemser, G.. ( 2017;), ‘ Building blocks for effective strategic design. ’, Journal of Design, Business & Society, 3:2, pp. 109–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Clark, B., and Caldwell, M. L.. ( 2016;), ‘ Design anthropology on the fly: Performative spontaneity in commercial ethnographic research. ’, in R. C. Smith,, K. T. Vangkilde,, M. G. Kjaersgaard,, T. Otto,, J. Halse, and T. Binder. (eds), Design Anthropological Futures, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;, pp. 169–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Clegg, S. R.,, Kornberger, M., and Pitsis, T. S.. ( 2016), Managing & Organizations: An Introduction to Theory and Practice, London:: Sage;.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. DiSalvo, C.,, Clement, A., and Pipek, V. ( 2012;), ‘ Communities: Participatory design for, with and by communities. ’, in J. Simonsen, and T. Robertson. (eds), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, New York:: Routledge;, pp. 202–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dorst, K.. ( 2015;), ‘ Frame creation and design in the expanded field. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 1:1, pp. 22–33.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Ehn, P.. ( 1988;), ‘ Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. ’, doctoral dissertation, Umeå:: Umeå University & Arbetslivscentrum;.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Ehn, P.,, Nilsson, E. M., and Topgaard, R.. ( 2014), Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Farías, I., and Wilkie, A.. (eds) ( 2016), Studio Studies: Operations, Topologies & Displacements, London:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Foverskov, M.. ( 2020;), ‘ Design as everyday theatre. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Copenhagen:: Royal Danish Academy;.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Gunn, W.,, Otto, T., and Smith, R. C.. (eds) ( 2013), Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Halse, J.. ( 2008;), ‘ Design anthropology: Borderland experiments with participation. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Copenhagen:: IT University of Copenhagen;.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Halse, J.. ( 2013;), ‘ Ethnographies of the possible. ’, in W. Gunn,, T. Otto, and R. C. Smith. (eds), Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;, pp. 180–96.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Halse, J.,, Brandt, E.,, Clark, B., and Binder, T.. ( 2010), Rehearsing the Future, Copenhagen:: The Danish Design School Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson, G.,, Langley, A.,, Melin, L., and Whittington, R.. ( 2007), Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources, Cambridge:: Cambridge University Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kimbell, L.. ( 2011;), ‘ Rethinking design thinking: Part I. ’, Design and Culture, 3:3, pp. 285–306.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Koskinen, I.,, Zimmerman, J.,, Binder, T.,, Redström, J., and Wensveen, S.. ( 2011), Design Research through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom, Waltham, MA:: Morgan Kaufmann/Elsevier;.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kotler, P., and Rath, G. A.. ( 1984;), ‘ Design: A powerful but neglected strategic tool. ’, Journal of Business Strategy, 5:2, pp. 16–21, https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039054. Accessed 20 May 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Kyng, M., and Greenbaum, J.. ( 1991;), ‘ Cooperative design: Bringing together the practices of users and designers. ’, in H.-E. Nissen,, H.-K. Klein, and R. A. Hirschheim. (eds), Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches & Emergent Traditions, Amsterdam:: North-Holland;, pp. 405–16.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Lury, C., and Wakeford, N.. (eds) ( 2012), Inventive Methods: The Happening of the Social, London and New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Manzini, E.. ( 2015), Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Manzini, E., and Rizzo, F.. ( 2011;), ‘ Small projects/large changes: Participatory design as an open participated process. ’, CoDesign, 7:3&4, pp. 199–215.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Marres, N.,, Guggenheim, M., and Wilkie, A.. ( 2018;), ‘ Introduction: From performance to inventing the social. ’, in N. Marres,, M. Guggenheim, and A. Wilkie. (eds), Inventing the Social, Manchester:: Mattering Press;, pp. 17–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Martin, R.. ( 2009), The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking Is the Next Competitive Advantage, Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Business Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Meyer, M. W., and Norman, D.. ( 2020;), ‘ Changing design education for the 21st century. ’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6:1, pp. 13–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Nedergaard, N., and Gyrd-Jones, R.. ( 2013;), ‘ Sustainable brand-based innovation: The role of corporate brands in driving sustainable innovation. ’, Journal of Brand Management, 20:9, pp. 762–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Olander, S.. ( 2014;), ‘ The Network Lab: A proposal for design-anthropological experimental set-ups in cultural work and social research. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Copenhagen:: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts;.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Olander, S.. ( 2016;), ‘ Texts as events: Or how to account for descriptions as intervention. ’, STS Encounters, 8:1, pp. 1–26.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Olander, S.. ( 2018;), ‘ Critique and post-critique in social innovation projects: Between speculation and realism. ’, in C. Storni,, K. Leahy,, M. McMahon,, P. Lloyd,, and E. Bohemia. (eds), Proceedings of the Design Research Society International Conference: Design as a Catalyst for Change, Limerick, Ireland, 25–28 June.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Olander, S.,, Ulv Lenskjold, T.,, Yndigegn, S. L., and Foverskov, M.. ( 2011;), ‘ Mobilizing for community building and everyday innovation. ’, Interactions, 18:4, pp. 28–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Olins, W.. ( 1989), Corporate Identity: Making Business Strategy Visible through Design, London:: Thames & Hudson;.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Redström, J.. ( 2017), Making Design Theory, Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press;.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Simonsen, J., and Robertson, T.. (eds) ( 2012), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, New York:: Routledge;.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith, R. C.,, Vangkilde, K. T.,, Otto, T.,, Kjaersgaard, M. G.,, Halse, J., and Binder, T.. (eds) ( 2016), Design Anthropological Futures, London:: Bloomsbury Academic;.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Stevens, J., and Moultrie, J.. ( 2011;), ‘ Aligning strategy and design perspectives: A framework of design’s strategic contributions. ’, The Design Journal, 14:4, pp. 475–500.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Vangkilde, K. T., and Rod, M. H.. ( 2016;), ‘ Para-ethnography 2.0: An experiment in design anthropological collaboration. ’, in R. C. Smith,, K. T. Vangkilde,, T. Otto,, M. G. Kjaersgaard,, J. Halse, and T. Binder. (eds), Design Anthropological Futures, London: Bloomsbury Academic;, pp. 155–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Wilkie, A.,, Savransky, M., and Rosengarten, M.. (eds) ( 2017), Speculative Research: The Lure of Possible Futures, London:: Taylor & Francis;.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Yndigegn, S. L.. ( 2015;), ‘ Managing resistance and negotiating co-design. ’, Ph.D. thesis, Copenhagen:: IT University of Copenhagen;.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Olander, Sissel, and Nedergaard, Nicky. ( 2021;), ‘ Strategic design research: Co-designing organizational transformation from within. ’, Artifact: Journal of Design Practice, 8:1&2, pp. 18.1–18.19, https://doi.org/10.1386/art_00018_1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/art_00018_1
Loading
Strategic design research: Co-designing organizational transformation from within
Artifact 8, 18.1 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1386/art_00018_1
/content/journals/10.1386/art_00018_1
/content/journals/10.1386/art_00018_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): co-design; design anthropology; experimental design research; practice-based design research; programmatic design research; strategic design

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error