Skip to content
1981
Volume 12, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 2049-3010
  • E-ISSN: 2049-3029

Abstract

The increased reliance on online platforms such as Zoom and Teams for skills training for allied health specialists has presented new challenges for the actor and the actor trainer. The research reported in this article grew out of a project set up to investigate these challenges. Since 2021, members of the Deakin University Theatre Department have been collaborating with the charity Anglicare Victoria to deliver online training for Rapid Response social workers who work with families in danger of having their children removed. This has involved recruiting and training actors to act as family members in relevant scenarios in ‘real play’ online simulations so the Anglicare Rapid Response trainee can develop essential skills. Within a practice-led research approach, we ask what might be required when this live embodied skillset is moved online. The article utilizes observations of the video recordings of the training sessions, recordings of debrief sessions and reflections from the author-actors to report on an emerging approach for preparing actors for this type of engagement. We reflect on the ways improvisation is impacted using the ‘online performance’ space, especially how status, eye gaze, body positioning and can be utilized in the online environment. We also consider the importance of actor self-care. The article offers a basis of training for a field of endeavour that is becoming more prevalent in the post-COVID world: online simulation scenarios for care workers.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/atr_00087_1
2024-07-31
2026-04-20

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anglicare Victoria (2019), Longitudinal Impact Evaluation of Rapid Response, Monash University, https://www.anglicarevic.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2021_Rapid_Response_Report.pdf. Accessed 2 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anglicare Victoria (2024), ‘Rapid Response website’, https://www.anglicarevic.org.au/our-services/family-and-parenting-support/rapid-response. Accessed 2 April 2024.
  3. Arrighi, G., Irvine, C., Joyce, B. and Haracz, K. (2018), ‘Reimagining “role” and “character”: An approach to acting training for role-play simulation in the tertiary education setting’, Applied Theatre Research, 6:2, pp. 89106.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Boal, A. (1995), The Rainbow of Desire: The Boal Method of Theatre and Therapy (trans. A. Jackson), New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brook, P. (1989), The Shifting Point: 1946–1987, New York: Harper & Row.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Churchouse, C. and Rudd, C. (2008), ‘Bridging the theory to practice gap using performance based simulation’, EDU-COM 2008 International Conference: ‘Sustainability in Higher Education: Directions for Change’, Perth, 19–21 November.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Frost, R. and Yarrow, A. (2007), Improvisation in Drama, London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Haseman, B. (2010), ‘Rupture and recognition: Identifying the performative research paradigm’, in E. Barrett and B. Bolt (eds), Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry, London: I. B. Tauris, pp. 14758.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnstone, K. (1981), Impro: Improvisation and the Theatre, London: Methuen.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Karaosmanoğlu, G. and Metinnam, I. (2022), ‘Improvisation strategies in online drama lessons’, Education Quarterly Reviews, 5:4, pp. 60216.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Loth, J., Andersen, P. and Mitchell, P. (2015), ‘Acting for health: Effective actor preparation for health-care simulations’, Applied Theatre Research 3:3, pp. 28596.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Loth, J., Penton, J. and Andersen, P. (2016), ‘Acting 4 health: A complementary curricular approach for drama and healthcare studies’, Applied Theatre Research, 4:3, pp. 25568.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Neideck, J., Pike, S., Kelly, K. and Henry, K. (2021), ‘The iconography of digital windows: Perspectives on the pervasive impact of the Zoom digital window on embodied creative practice in 2020’, Body, Space & Technology, 20:1, pp. 5160.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/atr_00087_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/atr_00087_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test